The following is from the serial column of Mr. Hasegawa Yukihiro posted at the beginning of the monthly issue of the monthly magazine WiLL released this month.
Today, Japanese citizens who can read printed letters, including the monthly magazine HANADA released, must immediately head to the nearest bookstore.
Because it pays subscription fee of 5000 yen or more per month and subscribes to the Asahi newspaper, etc., news report of their broadcasting station,
Not only is it in sync with the Asahi Shimbun but also a childish and poor masochistic view of history,
Obviously under the influence such as Chongryon,
But it does not know the truth of things just by watching NHK etc. which is biased coverage is bad,
It is full of real papers that convey the truth of aspects of Japan and the world with payment of only 840 yen each month.
Mr. Yukihiro Hasegawa's article is that it is without the minimum difference with my Trump review,
The reader will also notice the hitting the mark of things.
I am emphasizing the sentence except the headline.
Trump regime fighting against China and North Korea
The North Korean nuclear negotiations on North Korea's missile development have been run aground.
In the talks with Secretary of State Pompeo of the United States of America held in Pyongyang on July 6th and 7th and Kim Seung-hee, Deputy Chairperson of the Workers' Party of Korea, concrete timing and method of denuclearization was not decided.
Speaking of achievements, both sides agreed to set up a working group. Director Pompeo boasted ‘The progress has been made with almost all major problems’.
However, the North Korean Central News Agency has brought demands to denuclearize aside from burglary that ‘(the United States) CVID (complete and verifiable, irreversible denuclearization)’ is a declaration but verification. We are facing a dangerous phase where our denuclearization intention could be shaken,’ it told a Foreign Ministry spokesperson.
As usual ‘rocking operation’, time earning is clear.
Why did North Korea become bullish?
Background has relations with China.
Mr. Trump approved a sanction duty of 50 billion dollars against China on June 15, three days after the US-North Korean summit.
Prior to the talks, he decided to shelve the sanctioning tariff so as not to let China go to the enemy, but as Trump had Kim Jong-Il, Chairman of the Korean Workers Party's promise of denuclearization, President Trump immediately resurrected decided.
That is not all.
On the 18th in succession, he also announced 200 billion dollars of additional sanctions against China.
Reuters reports on additional sanctions, ‘President thinks Since the United States secured means of negotiating with North Korea, the influence of China will not be a reason for refraining tariffs against China.’
From the point of view, there is no doubt that the sanctions against China were linked with the progress of the US-North Korea negotiations.
However, nearly at the same time as China announced the sanctions of 200 billion dollars, it held the third China-North Korea summit meeting.
Xi Jinping President of the People 's Republic of China is' Mr. Kim Jong - un is to be taken in my hand' he was showing off to Trump.
Mr. Kim Jong-un turned confident again with the confidence of China's support and turned again bullish.
Based on the above, let us consider future developments.
The composition that China and North Korea are collaborating against the United States is clear.
Mr. Kim Jong-un had a bullish turmoil shortly after opening the summit between China and North Korea the second time before the US-North Korean summit.
The same pattern was repeated this time.
North Korea's bullish attitude is backed by the support of China.
If so, it is first necessary to determine how the Trump administration will deal with China.
To put it concluding earlier, Mr. Trump will seriously intend to fight the trade war with China.
Even though the importance of free trade is known, the basic recognition of the administration is that ‘the other party is a thief ignoring rules’.
It is clearly stated in the report of the White House.
According to the report, the intellectual property stolen by China by industrial espionage and cyber-attacks ranges from $ 180 billion to $ 530 billion annually (about 20 trillion yen to 60 trillion yen).
To deal with the unprecedented ‘thief of the country's nation’, it is judgment that it cannot deal very much with the detection of individual cases, and only must resort to a large-scale sanction tariff.
In addition, there must be a strategic decision that ‘There is only now to fight China.’
The more late the response of the United States, the more China will catch up with the United States with high-tech technology and eventually threaten not only the economic hegemony but also the security of the United States.
To support such judgment, the Chinese renminbi has declined.
If the RMB drops in addition to the US sanction tariffs, it will be a double blow to China.
As the price of imported goods rises, domestic inflation pressures increase, debt repayment pressures are also heavy.
On the contrary, since the US can partly offset the retaliatory tariffs of China by the dollar's rise, from now on, macroscopically, the trade war is advantageous to the United States.
Congressional support is also on the hard line to China.
The comment ‘Supporting aims in the November midterm election’ is out of essence.
If China is not breaking, is not the Trump regime determined to fight a long-term battle?
North Korea should be looking at the intensification of the trade war between the United States and China at a glance and smiling with 'We are bullish, okay for the time being'.
Even if I know that it is time earning by North Korea, does Mr. Trump go out for a while or turn to a firm stance again?
Depending on public opinion trends, I think that there is a possibility that it will be inclined to a firm stance theory including military options again.
Japan need not panic.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe will explain to Mr. Trump a point 'America conflicts with Japan, the European Union, Canada etc. due to trade issues, but we are different from China ignoring rule stealing intellectual property'.
Besides, we should maintain cooperation in the strategy against North Korea.