そのために日本は、たった数年で15兆円もの国富（税金）を石油、石炭、LPGの化石燃料に費やす羽目になった

私の家からは大阪市内が一望できる。

だから大気が清浄かどうかが一瞬で分かる。

昨日、今日と、アレッと思っていた。

市内も大阪市を取り巻く山並も霞んで見えていたからである。

今日、これは光化学スモッグが発生しているに違いないと確信し、ｐｍ2.5の分布図をチェックして見た。

https://pm25.jp/

読者は今すぐにチェックして下さい。

北海道と東北北部を除く日本全域が真っ赤になっている。

私が朝日新聞などのメディアやNHK等に対して、怒りを覚えたのは言うまでもない。

件の3悪人が2011年に始めた原発即時全面停止以来、朝日新聞がこれに同調して開始した反原発運動、これに同調してきた連中全てに怒りを覚えたのである。

朝日や、NHKが、今日もこの酷い大気汚染状況について、一言も報道しないのは言うまでもない。

彼らこそ本当の悪人であり、悪辣な輩とは彼らのような態様をいうのである。

自分たちにとって不都合な真実は一切報道しない。

昨日、NHKのニュースを見ていて、アナウンサーが今、日本を襲っている高温状態について、しきりに「命の危険がありますから注意して下さい」、と連呼していたのが気になった。

勿論、それほどの高温状態が続いている。

だが、この高温に光化学スモッグが加わったら、スモッグの危険は倍増するのではないか。

私は、どちらかと言えば、暑いのは平気で寒いのが苦手、というタイプの人間なのだが、今年の夏だけは、何故か、本能的に外に出たいと思わなかった…気温が高いだけではなく、空気が汚れていたからである。

先日、2011年に原発を即時全面停止した時、当時の原発による発電量と、日本全体の発電量に占めていた割合について検索、その結果も紹介して、今回の西日本一帯を襲った未曾有の集中豪雨の原因、2011年以降に頻発しだした集中豪雨や竜巻の原因について誰も指摘しなかった推論を発表した。

私の推論のほぼ全部が当たっていた事は、読者はご存知のとおりである。

いつも私の論説を読んでくれている友人が「原発の発電量が3,000万kWだったことを良く調べたね…」と言って来た。

人類史上最大の図書館であるインターネットで一瞬にして分かった事は言うまでもない。

2011年、世のため人のために実業の世界で日々仕事に邁進していた私を含む大多数の日本国民が、その数字や日本の総発電量それに対する原子力発電の総量と割合について何も知らなかったのは当然の事である。

だが朝日新聞などのメディアやNHK,　彼らに同調している学者や言論人たちは違うのである。

何故なら彼らは、その様な事に対する知識で生計を立てているのだから。

政治家達も同様である。

発電量という国家の最重要分野に置いて、総発電量の半分超3,000万kWを占めていた原子力発電施設54基を即時全面停止するなどは政治でなどあり得ない。

幼稚園児以下のヒステリーと菅直人、孫正義、福島瑞穂という、もはや日本史上最低の3悪人と言って過言ではない連中の私利私欲。

そのために日本は、たった数年で15兆円もの国富（税金）を石油、石炭、LPGの化石燃料に費やす羽目になった。

だが、更なる大問題を生じさせていた事を、先ず、40年ぶりに再登場した光化学スモッグが告げていたのである。

15兆円もの超大金を費やして3,000万kW分の化石燃料を燃やし続け、温室化ガスを排出し続けた結果が、今回の未曾有の集中豪雨。

これが、のっぴきならないのは、日本人の魂である、日本の故郷、日本の里山、日本の川を破壊しだしている事なのである。

日本人の心は、東京や大阪で出来ているのでは決してない！

日本人の心は、魂は、精神は、日本の山川、湖、海、田園に在るのである。

件の3悪人が全員、真正な日本人ではないと評されているのは、彼らが行った悪が、日本の国力の低下を謀っていたと言っても過言でないだけではなく、日本の国の根幹を破壊して、日本中を、ソーラーパネルや風車などという醜悪なもので埋め尽くそうとした…している事だけでも、彼らの悪が極まっている事は明白だろう。

いつも私の論説を読んでくれている友人が「原発の発電量が3,000万kWだったことを良く調べたね…」と言って来た。

私の家からは大阪市内が一望できる。

だから大気が清浄かどうかが一瞬で分かる。

昨日、今日と、アレッと思っていた。

市内も大阪市を取り巻く山並も霞んで見えていたからである。

今日、これは光化学スモッグが発生しているに違いないと確信し、ｐｍ2.5の分布図をチェックして見た。

https://pm25.jp/

読者は今すぐにチェックして下さい。

北海道と東北北部を除く日本全域が真っ赤になっている。

私が朝日新聞などのメディアやNHK等に対して、怒りを覚えたのは言うまでもない。

件の3悪人が2011年に始めた原発即時全面停止以来、朝日新聞がこれに同調して開始した反原発運動、これに同調してきた連中全てに怒りを覚えたのである。

朝日や、NHKが、今日もこの酷い大気汚染状況について、一言も報道しないのは言うまでもない。

彼らこそ本当の悪人であり、悪辣な輩とは彼らのような態様をいうのである。

自分たちにとって不都合な真実は一切報道しない。

昨日、NHKのニュースを見ていて、アナウンサーが今、日本を襲っている高温状態について、しきりに「命の危険がありますから注意して下さい」、と連呼していたのが気になった。

勿論、それほどの高温状態が続いている。

だが、この高温に光化学スモッグが加わったら、スモッグの危険は倍増するのではないか。

私は、どちらかと言えば、暑いのは平気で寒いのが苦手、というタイプの人間なのだが、今年の夏だけは、何故か、本能的に外に出たいと思わなかった…気温が高いだけではなく、空気が汚れていたからである。

先日、2011年に原発を即時全面停止した時、当時の原発による発電量と、日本全体の発電量に占めていた割合について検索、その結果も紹介して、今回の西日本一帯を襲った未曾有の集中豪雨の原因、2011年以降に頻発しだした集中豪雨や竜巻の原因について誰も指摘しなかった推論を発表した。

私の推論のほぼ全部が当たっていた事は、読者はご存知のとおりである。

いつも私の論説を読んでくれている友人が「原発の発電量が3,000万kWだったことを良く調べたね…」と言って来た。

人類史上最大の図書館であるインターネットで一瞬にして分かった事は言うまでもない。

2011年、世のため人のために実業の世界で日々仕事に邁進していた私を含む大多数の日本国民が、その数字や日本の総発電量、それに対する原子力発電の総量と割合について、何も知らなかったのは当然の事である。

だが朝日新聞などのメディアやNHK,　彼らに同調している学者や言論人たちは違うのである。

何故なら彼らは、その様な事に対する知識で生計を立てているのだから。

政治家達も同様である。

発電量という国家の最重要分野に置いて、総発電量の半分超、3,000万kWを占めていた原子力発電施設、54基を即時、全面停止するなどは、政治でなどあり得ない。

幼稚園児以下のヒステリーと、菅直人、孫正義、福島瑞穂、という、もはや日本史上最低の3悪人と言って過言ではない連中の私利私欲。

そのために、日本は、たった数年で15兆円もの国富（税金）を石油、石炭、LPGの化石燃料のために費やす羽目になった。

だが、更なる大問題を生じさせていた事を、先ず、40年ぶりに再登場した光化学スモッグが告げていたのである。

15兆円もの超大金を費やして3,000万kW分の化石燃料を燃やし続け、温室化ガスを排出し続けた結果が、今回の未曾有の集中豪雨。

これが、のっぴきならないのは、日本人の魂である、日本の故郷、日本の里山、日本の川を破壊しだしている事なのである。

日本人の心は、東京や大阪で出来ているのでは決してない！

日本人の心は、魂は、精神は、日本の山川、湖、海、田園に在るのである。

件の3悪人が全員、真正な日本人ではないと評されているのは、彼らが行った悪が、日本の国力の低下を謀っていたと言っても過言でないだけではなく、日本の国の根幹を破壊して、日本中を、ソーラーパネルや風車などという醜悪なもので埋め尽くそうとした…している事だけでも、彼らの悪が極まっている事は明白だろう。

it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by their Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cool‐headed seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by their Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cool‐headed seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

With such cool‐headed seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by their Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cool‐headed seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by their Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cold eyes seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by their Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cold eyes seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by their Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cold eyes seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by their Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cold eyes seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history,

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by their Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cold eyes seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by their Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cold eyes seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by the U UK Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cold eyes seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by the U UK Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cold eyes seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by the U UK Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cold eyes seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions,

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

There is no correct war

Nakanishi

As Professor Watanabe's research shows, even after 70 years since the end of World War II, there is a fact newly evident by carefully investigating the historical material.

That is why history is so interesting that it will not stop.

It's 'Why did the United States drop two atom bombs to Japan', if saying in relation to Japan, regarding the previous US-Japan War, questions that align with the circumstances that Japan was driven to Pearl Harbor attack.

At the time of May 1945, Grew, who served as vice-minister of state affairs, advises Truman that Japan should surrender soon if explicitly preserving the imperial preservation.

However, this proposal will be rejected due to ‘unexplored military reasons’.

What is the reason why it cannot be disclosed?

That is the atomic bomb.

It was the situation as indicated by the title of exertion 'Do not surrender Japan until the atomic bomb is dropped' (Soshisha bunko) by Mr. torii Tami of modern history historian, so it was too deep and big sin, human historical crime that the United States committed in World War II.

Watanabe

It feels sorry I wanted Mr. Torii to live a little longer.

As I wrote in the column of the July issue of this magazine, Churchill is discussing whether to use atomic bombs with military advisers in Truman at Potsdam, Germany (July 24, 1945).

At this time, Churchill said that ‘Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor without warning and killed your youth,’ he pressed Truman 's back hesitating to dumping without warning or notice of atomic bomb.

There are many experts who evaluate Churchill in Japan for some reason, it is no exaggeration to say that the war caused by Churchill in both the First and Second World War.

I think that it was a person like a sample of inconsistency between one's words and actions, it was the lowest politician in history.

Nakanishi

Personally, Churchill is an interesting person with many lovable characters, and I always evaluate it as a person's criticism.

However, Roosevelt is quite different.

However, both are cunning and viciousness as a power politician is exactly the world historical level, in that respect, I think that they were people of the same kind as Stalin and Hitler, apart from the details of what they each did specifically.

Indeed, throughout the whole war against Japan, that is from the Atlantic Charter to the Potsdam Declaration, until the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the philosophy such as 'Peace', 'Freedom', 'Civilization' or the like advocated by the U UK Leadership Division, in fact, it was nothing more than wartime propaganda that was convenient to himself as a victorious country aiming to establish world hegemony.

Most of us has it truly seriously, after defeat Japanese who have built their own view of history, it can be said that it was too naive.

As I learned about the history of international politics, I came to the thesis that ‘every war is an imperialist war’.

Even today in the twentieth century, and today in the 21st century, many countries fighting hegemony do not hesitate to take a war to protect their own exclusive national interests and expand control over others.

Even in modern times, there is no war with so-called ‘correct warfare’, i.e. 100% ‘for self-defense’.

The post-war world order after the Second World War is formed by dividing and merging ‘territory’.

The territory to be distributed there is exactly ‘booty’ for victorious countries, as Putin says.

Obviously, I do not want to say that the world is only the logic of the jungle, nothing to point out a noble ideal is meaningless.

Rather, to preserve the original ideals and values of such humans, we need the awakened historical view that ‘all wars are invasive wars’.

With such cold eyes seeing this history, for the first time in Japan, we can pursue peaceful diplomacy, we can build a penetrating national strategy.

In history recognition or to cure the serious maladjustment that Japan is falling in the real international society, it is more important than ever to have such a penetrating war view that 'There is no correct war'.