International common sense is that it is not permissible to break treaties and conventions exchanged

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Meaning of promises among nations
International common sense is that it is not permissible to break treaties and conventions exchanged between states.
As stipulated in Article 27 of the Vienna Treaty Convention adopted by the United Nations that states cannot invoke domestic laws of their country as a basis for justifying the breach of the treaty (Article 27) It is strictly forbidden to tread over the obligation to comply with treaties, etc., by the law, that is, in the circumstances of their own country.
As a result of the Opium War, Hong Kong's 99-year lease tied between the UK and Qing Dynasty also claimed that ‘It is ineffective because it was connected by losing the war’, afterwards both the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China Never, never did.
Japan never said that the Meiji government had signed the treaty of inequality, ‘That is invalid’, etc., raised national strength, negotiated repeatedly, and finally brought it to the revision at the end of sweat blood.
Also, the Japanese archipelago was taken as a scorched land, the Japanese never said not whatever happens, which the Potsdam Declaration accepted at the end of dropping two atomic bombs 'That is invalid because it was accepted in a disastrous state'.
It is because Japan knows that the national promise is so heavy.
That international common sense does not exist in Korea.
However, of all things, it is a political party in Japan ...,
Japan Communist Party's Chairman Kazuo Shii in December last year as a member of the Korea-Japan Federation, visited the president of Moon Jae-in, ‘The Japanese government has also officially announced that it will not extinguish individual claim rights of victims. Both governments agree on this point. In order to obtain a positive solution toward the recovery of the honor and dignity of the victims, cool discussion is important', he said. (By the report of ‘Shimbun Akahata’).
It is unbelievable that Japanese political parties will support Korea, which is trying to reverse the conventions between nations, a Japan-Korea Claim Agreement that was the basis of Japan-Korea Basic Treaty.
This will be a thing that Japanese citizens must keep in mind as strict.
It is not a few in Japan that believed in without evidence 'being moved forcibly', which is not a fact at all and had supported the issue of comfort women still seeking apologies.
In addition, young people who dreamed of the Japan Dream and responded to the company's ‘free recruitment’ pretending to be 'drafting worker', which have only six months since September 1944 prevailed in court,
Some political parties support it as mentioned above.
It is strange for me that there are Japanese politicians and person in the speech community that follow Korea, accusing Japan by saying black as white, white as black as not based on facts.
While being a Japanese, to support South Korea that overturn national promises and treaties regardless of facts ...,
What on earth are people with background?
And why are the opposition parties developing criticism of the regime so never speaking up to Korean tyranny?
The Japanese should carefully think about that.
This draft continues.

Tourner les promesses entre les nations et changer les conditions avec le temps.

Ce qui suit est la suite du chapitre précédent.
Politique de rognage et caractère national spécial
J'aimerais que tout le monde connaisse bien la Corée avant d'entrer dans cette thèse.
Historiquement, la Corée a principalement vécu sous la dépendance de la dynastie chinoise, la suzeraine.
La Corée a un caractère caractéristique spécifique, qui est complètement subordonné aux personnes fortes, mais elles dominent les personnes faibles.
Il ne fait aucun doute que l'histoire de leur pays affecte leur caractère national.
Compte tenu de cela, il est entendu que la nature de ce pays est qu’elle est contraire au rituel diplomatique et qu’elle enfreint la promesse, et cela n’a pas commencé récemment.
L’année dernière, certaines personnes ont assisté au drame «Saigo don» de la NHK sur la taïga et l’ont vu.
Vers la fin, Saigo Takamori s’est énervé contre l’impolitesse de la Corée et a scandé «Théorie de la conquête de la Corée». Il s’est alors trouvé dans une scène où il se retirait de la vie publique.
C'est une scène importante qui mènera éventuellement à la rébellion de Satsuma.
Bien qu’il n’ait pas décrit la raison en détail dans le programme, il découle du fameux problème de «shokei (forme des lettres utilisées dans les négociations)».
En 1868, le gouvernement Meiji, qui a vaincu le shogunat Edo, a envoyé une lettre à l'ensemble du pays pour l'informer de la création d'un nouveau gouvernement et de l'établissement d'une relation internationale moderne basée sur le traité.
Tandis que les pays recevaient une réponse de conformité les uns après les autres, certains pays ont répondu étrangement. C'est la Corée.
Joseon, un pays subordonné de la dynastie Qing, a découvert que le livre national contenait des lettres "impératrice" et "imperium".
La Corée a refusé d'accepter la lettre du Japon, affirmant qu'il n'était pas autorisé à utiliser ce personnage autre que la dynastie Qing.
Même si le gouvernement Meiji tente à plusieurs reprises de prendre contact, il continue d’être un «refus d’accepter» impoli conduisant à cette théorie de la conquête.
Même si les relations diplomatiques officielles ont commencé lorsque la dynastie Qing a reçu le livre national, l'attitude de la Corée n'a pas changé.
Une lutte de pouvoir entre le Gojong de Corée du roi, son épouse · l'impératrice Myeongseong et le père du roi Heungseon Daewongun, des civils qui ne sont que de la corruption, des citoyens frappés par la pauvreté sans aucune infrastructure sociale en cours de développement et une terre déserte ...
Telles que la Corée a continué à adopter l'attitude du Japon, qui manque de rites diplomatiques.
À la suite d’actes forts, la «politique de rognage», qui adopte une attitude décroissante, est valable pour la Corée.
Et cela prend racine en Corée maintenant.
Même dans la prétendue décision de «rédacteur», cela est clair.
L’accord de réclamation nippo-coréen, qui a abandonné le droit de réclamation mutuelle et «complètement et finalement résolu», est une prémisse majeure du Traité fondamental Japon-Corée dans lequel les relations diplomatiques entre le Japon et la Corée du Sud ont été normalisées.
La magistrature coréenne a renversé la situation.
La raison en est que «la gouvernance japonaise est illégalement illégale et ce qui y est fait n’est pas inclus dans l’objet de l’accord».
En d’autres termes, le traité d’annexion entre le Japon et la Corée, qui était lié entre le Grand Empire du Japon et l’Empire de Corée en 1910, est «illicitement, illégal» et «non autorisé».
Tourner les promesses entre les nations et changer les conditions avec le temps.
Être bon au 'but en mouvement' en Corée, c'est comme ça qu'il est.
Cependant, ils ne savent pas en quoi cela est "anormal" et "déraisonnable".
Ce projet continue.

Seien Sie gut im "bewegenden Torpfosten" Korea, so ist er.

Das Folgende ist die Fortsetzung des vorherigen Kapitels.
Beschneidungspolitik und besonderer nationaler Charakter
Ich möchte, dass jeder die richtige Kenntnis von Korea hat, bevor er an dieser These teilnimmt.
Historisch gesehen hat Korea vor allem als Abhängigkeit von der chinesischen Dynastie gelebt.
Korea hat einen spezifischen Charakter, der starken Menschen durchaus unterworfen ist, aber für schwache Menschen ist es eine überhebliche Haltung.
Es besteht kein Zweifel, dass die Geschichte ihres Landes ihren nationalen Charakter beeinflusst.
In Anbetracht dessen ist klar, dass es die Natur dieses Landes ist, dass es dem diplomatischen Ritual widerspricht und das Versprechen bricht, und es hat in letzter Zeit nicht begonnen.
Letztes Jahr genossen einige Leute das Taiga-Drama „Saigo don“ von NHK und sahen es.
Am Ende war Saigo Takamori verärgert über Koreas Unhöflichkeit und rief "Theory of Conquest of Korea". Es gab eine Szene, in der er sich aus dem öffentlichen Leben zurückzog.
Es ist eine wichtige Szene, die schließlich zur Satsuma-Rebellion führen wird.
Obwohl der Grund in dem Programm nicht detailliert beschrieben wurde, ging es um das berühmte Problem „Shokei (Form der in den Verhandlungen verwendeten Buchstaben)“.
Im Jahr 1868 sandte die Meiji-Regierung, die das Edo-Shogunat besiegte, einen landesweiten Brief, in dem sie die Errichtung einer neuen Regierung und die Einrichtung einer modernen internationalen Beziehung auf der Grundlage des Vertrags mit der ganzen Welt in Kenntnis setzte.
Während die Länder nacheinander Compliance-Antworten erhielten, gab es Länder, die auf seltsame Weise reagierten. Es ist Korea.
Joseon, ein untergeordnetes Land der Qing-Dynastie, entdeckte, dass es im Nationalbuch die Buchstaben „Kaiserin“ und „Imperium“ gab.
Korea lehnte es ab, den Brief aus Japan anzunehmen, und sagte, es sei nicht gestattet, dieses Zeichen außer der Qing-Dynastie zu verwenden.
Selbst wenn die Regierung Meiji mehrmals versucht, Kontakt aufzunehmen, ist sie nach wie vor eine unhöfliche "Ablehnung der Annahme", die zu dieser Eroberungstheorie führt.
Selbst wenn formelle diplomatische Beziehungen begannen, als die Qing-Dynastie das Nationalbuch erhielt, änderte sich die Haltung Koreas nicht.
Ein Machtkampf zwischen dem koreanischen Gojong des Königs, seiner Frau · Kaiserin Myeongseong und dem Vater des Königs Heungseon Daewongun, Zivilpersonen, die nur Korruption aufweisen, von Armut betroffene Bürger ohne jegliche soziale Infrastruktur und einem verlassenen Land ...
So nahm Korea die Haltung Japans ein, dass es an diplomatischen Riten mangelte.
Nach starken Vorstellungen gilt die „Abbaupolitik“, die eine abweichende Haltung einnimmt, für Korea, so wie es ist.
Und das hat in Korea Wurzeln geschlagen.
Das ist auch in der sogenannten "Einberufung" -Entscheidung klar.
Das Japan-Korea Claim Agreement, das die gegenseitigen Anspruchsrechte aufgegeben hat und „vollständig und endgültig gelöst“ ist, ist eine wichtige Voraussetzung des Japan-Korea-Basisvertrags, in dem die diplomatischen Beziehungen zwischen Japan und Südkorea normalisiert wurden.
Die koreanische Justiz stellte dies auf den Kopf.
Der Grund ist, dass „die japanische Regierungsführung illegal ist und das, was dort gemacht wird, nicht in den Vertragsgegenstand aufgenommen wird“.
Mit anderen Worten, der Annexionsvertrag zwischen Japan und Korea, der 1910 zwischen dem Großen Japanischen Reich und dem Koreanischen Reich geschlossen wurde, ist „illegal“ und „verboten“.
Versprechen Sie die Versprechen unter den Nationen und verschieben Sie die Bedingungen im Laufe der Zeit.
Seien Sie gut im "bewegenden Torpfosten" Korea, so ist er.
Sie wissen jedoch nicht, wie dies „abnormal“ und „unvernünftig“ ist.
Dieser Entwurf geht weiter.

Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking the attitude of lacking diplomatic rites to Japan.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.

‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking the attitude of lacking diplomatic rites to Japan.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.

The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking the attitude of lacking diplomatic rites to Japan.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.

that is taking root in Korea now.Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking the attitude of lacking diplomatic rites to Japan.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.

Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking the attitude of lacking diplomatic rites to Japan.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.

Such as Korea continued taking the attitude of lacking diplomatic rites to Japan.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking the attitude of lacking diplomatic rites to Japan.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.

civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking Japan's attitude of lacking diplomatic rites.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.

A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife Empress Myeongseong and the

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking Japan's attitude of lacking diplomatic rites.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.

Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife · Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking Japan's attitude of lacking diplomatic rites.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.

Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife · Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking Japan's attitude of lacking diplomatic rites.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.

Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife · Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking Japan's attitude of lacking diplomatic rites.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.

While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife · Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking Japan's attitude of lacking diplomatic rites.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.