以下は昨日の検索数ベスト50である。

順位	ページ名
1	辻元清美の両親の国籍は韓国なんでしょうか？ 国籍が韓国である噂は多かったので、 帰化の噂の真相を調べてみますと、
2	accusation of passing it to others, ignoring the fact of history distorting and distorting it
3	such as Ando group in Shibuya and Ginza police in Ginza, it was a symbol of that spirit.
4	states cannot invoke domestic laws of their country as a basis for justifying the breach of the
5	Furthermore, graduate first on the list was the result brought by governance by Japan.
6	civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being
7	to support South Korea that overturn national promises and treaties regardless of facts
8	grow presumptuous, finally, as before, they completely lost moderation and respect for Japan
9	Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that
10	Such as Korea continued taking the attitude of lacking diplomatic rites to Japan.
11	米カリフォルニアにあるはずの本拠も、単なる民家だった
12	Even if it is a problem of a comfort woman, even a bronze statue scattered all around the world
13	実は、辻元清美の設立した『ピースボート』は、日本赤軍が国際的に作ろうとしている支援組織の表側の組織なんです。
14	In the common opinion, it is said that 2 thousand women were mobilized, but if it is supposed
15	Non sono fatti ma solo in Giappone "Può fare qualsiasi cosa".
16	It is the responsibility of their ancestors' decision to bring facts of history as governance rule
17	Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty
18	There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
19	As a result of the Opium War, Hong Kong's 99-year lease tied between the UK and Qing Dynasty
20	However in Japan, there are many 'anti-Japanese Japanese' who wants to make Japan a bad guy
21	2019-01-30に発信した章が、今日、アメーバで公式ハッシュタグランキング：大阪大学1位に入っている。
22	that is taking root in Korea now.Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear
23	The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and
24	‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which
25	They are not done but only to Japan 'It may do whatever'.
26	who returned from the war opposing to military MP of the absolute power, they expel it.
27	is fictitious and I cannot think that girl of tender age was urged like that at that time
28	Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book
29	Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that
30	Nevertheless, for a long time, Japan has continued to hold on with our patience, but that the
31	A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife Empress Myeongseong and the
32	This time too, behind the scenes, Japanese anti-Japanese forces are doing maneuvering hard.
33	Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
34	Ignoring the background of the history that brought it up, there is nothing to gain from each
35	それでも長い間、日本は持ち前の忍耐で、つき合いを続けてきたが、それも「限界に来た」ことが、一連の事態で日本人全体が認識できたのである。
36	Sie werden nicht gemacht, sondern nur nach Japan "Es kann alles tun".
37	Tourner les promesses entre les nations et changer les conditions avec le temps.
38	Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress
39	while they were doing violence to women and girls in Japan, young people who returned from
40	As stipulated in Article 27 of the Vienna Treaty Convention adopted by the United Nations
41	While he was born in a poor farming house, he longed for academics he was able to attend
42	No están terminados, pero solo para Japón "Puede hacer lo que sea"
43	that follow Korea, accusing Japan by saying black as white, white as black as not based on facts
44	It is because Japan knows that the national promise is so heavy.
45	具眼の士は皆こんな人間がNGO代表に就任する国連の無知と愚かさとデタラメさといかがわしさに呆れるだろう
46	In other words, Japan just shows a resolute attitude like America and China to South Korea.
47	not a few in Japan that believed in without evidence 'being moved forcibly', which is not a fact
48	Compared Japan just after the defeat so-called third countries suppressed were acting as
49	whole Japanese was able to recognize that ‘it came to the limit’ also in a series of circumstances
50	Japan never said that the Meiji government had signed the treaty of inequality, ‘That is invalid’,

 

 

a doubt that the Korean Navy was directing a scene that Japanese patrol aircraft should not see

Below is from Mr. Tsutomu Nishioka's article which was published entitled, 'scoop! Kim Jong-un's assassination attempted incident, why Korean destroyers had radar irradiation', in the monthly magazine Sound Argument released the other day.
If you read this genuine article, all Japanese citizens immediately stop subscribing to the Asahi newspaper and change the subscription fee of about 5,000 yen to the four subscriptions of the monthly magazine Sound Argument, Hanada, WiLL, Voice It should strongly think that it must be. The total cost is 3,600 yen.
It is not an exaggeration to say that you cannot understand the truth simply by subscribing to the Asahi Newspaper, Mainichi Newspaper, Tokyo Newspaper, Chunichi Newspaper, and watching the news of TV stations such as NHK, which dominate radio waves at cheap prices, you should know that there is nothing.
Kim Dong-young reporter's allegation raised
"There is a doubt that the Korean Navy was directing a scene that Japanese patrol aircraft should not see"
Last December 29, a news site presided over by a journalist representing Korean conservatives, Mr. Cho Gab-je, Mr. Kim Dong-young, a former monthly Korean reporter from Korea Air Force Radar Controller, he wrote a passage of an article about the action of the Korean navy destroyer 'Gwanggaeto, The Great Conqueror'.
They urged Korean troops to release the truth.
Due to various circumstances, Mr. Kim Dong-yong argued that Destroyer of Korea irradiated the attacking radar, arguing that the ship did not reply to the radio, it was strange that he requested that the truth be disclosed to the Korean army because the truth is the national interest.
So, what was the South Korean destroyer doing? 
Mr. Kim Dong-yong pointed out the current case of Moon Jae-in administration and the suspicion of the relationship between North Korea and the following case, which was on May 3, 2018.
An SDF destroyer finds a scene where the Korean ship ‘JeyHope’ in the East China Sea approaches the North Korean ship Nanshan No. 8 and seems to be off-shore delivery, and the SDF destroyer finds it and requests the Korean government to investigate, but Korea Denied. 
Some Japanese experts have argued that the destroyer was refueling the North Korean fishing boat if so it could be a violation of UN sanctions. 
However, three North Korean residents aboard a North Korean fishing boat have been taken to South Korea after being rescued.
If it had received refueling, it should have returned to North Korea with a fishing boat as it is, so I think that there was no refueling.
If it is not refueling, what is the scene that the Korean destroyer did not want to show to the SDF patrol aircraft?
Mr. Cho Gab-je is a YouTube TV presided over by himself, ① Why did the navy and the two vessels of the marine police work together to rescue ② Why the destroyer did not answer the radio of the SDF 3) Why did I return the North Korean residents who rescued him to North Korea two days later, saying that he cannot easily tune to the explanation of the Korean government, cautiously saying that he was asserting the purpose. 
I wanted to solve these doubts and went to Seoul from January 13th to 17th. 
Mr. Cho Gab-je, a spirited journalist Kim Pilje, the best military reporter in South Korea, Lee Jin-Gyu · Dong-A Ilbo reporter, North Korean human rights activist Jin Seung-Kyu · Freedom North Representative of broadcasting, former National Intelligence Service Director, and several information officials.
This draft continues.

scoop! Kim Jong-un assassination attempted incident, why Korean destroyers had radar

Below is from Mr. Tsutomu Nishioka's article which was published entitled, 'scoop! Kim Jong-un assassination attempted incident, why Korean destroyers had radar irradiation', in the monthly magazine Sound Argument released the other day.
If you read this genuine article, all Japanese citizens immediately stop subscribing to the Asahi newspaper and change the subscription fee of about 5,000 yen to the four subscriptions of the monthly magazine Sound Argument, Hanada, WiLL, Voice It should strongly think that it must be. The total cost is 3,600 yen.
It is not an exaggeration to say that you cannot understand the truth simply by subscribing to the Asahi Newspaper, Mainichi Newspaper, Tokyo Newspaper, Chunichi Newspaper, and watching the news of TV stations such as NHK, which dominate radio waves at cheap prices, you should know that there is nothing.
Kim Dong-young reporter's allegation raised
"There is a doubt that the Korean Navy was directing a scene that Japanese patrol aircraft should not see"
Last December 29, a news site presided over by a journalist representing Korean conservatives, Mr. Cho Gab-je, Mr. Kim Dong-young, a former monthly Korean reporter from Korea Air Force Radar Controller, he wrote a passage of an article about the action of the Korean navy destroyer 'Gwanggaeto, The Great Conqueror'.
They urged Korean troops to release the truth.
Due to various circumstances, Mr. Kim Dong-yong argued that Destroyer of Korea irradiated the attacking radar, arguing that the ship did not reply to the radio, it was strange that he requested that the truth be disclosed to the Korean army because the truth is national interest.
So, what was the South Korean destroyer doing? 
Mr. Kim Dong-yong pointed out the current case of Moon Jae-in administration and the suspicion of the relationship between North Korea and the following case, which was on May 3, 2018.
An SDF destroyer finds a scene where the Korean ship ‘JeyHope’ in the East China Sea approaches the North Korean ship Nanshan No. 8 and seems to be off-shore delivery, and the SDF destroyer finds it and requests the Korean government to investigate, but Korea Denied. 
Some Japanese experts have argued that the destroyer was refueling the North Korean fishing boat, if so it could be a violation of UN sanctions. 
However, three North Korean residents aboard a North Korean fishing boat have been taken to South Korea after being rescued.
If it had received refueling, it should have returned to North Korea with a fishing boat as it is, so I think that there was no refueling.
If it is not refueling, what is the scene that the Korean destroyer did not want to show to the SDF patrol aircraft?
Mr. Cho Gab-je is a YouTube TV presided over by himself, ① Why did the navy and the two vessels of the marine police work together to rescue ② Why the destroyer did not answer the radio of the SDF 3) Why did I return the North Korean residents who rescued him to North Korea two days later, saying that he cannot easily tune to the explanation of the Korean government, cautiously saying that he was asserting the purpose. 
I wanted to solve these doubts and went to Seoul from January 13th to 17th. 
Mr. Cho Gab-je, a spirited journalist Kim Pilje, the best military reporter in South Korea, Lee Jin-gyu · Dong-A Ilbo reporter, North Korean human rights activist Jin Seung-Kyu · Freedom North Representative of broadcasting, former National Intelligence Service Director, and several information officials.
This draft continues.

I wanted to solve these doubts and went to Seoul from January 13th to 17th.

Below is from Mr. Tsutomu Nishioka's article which was published entitled, 'scoop! Kim Jong-un assassination attempted incident, why Korean destroyers had radar irradiation', in the monthly magazine Sound Argument released the other day.
If you read this genuine article, all Japanese citizens immediately stop subscribing to the Asahi newspaper and change the subscription fee of about 5,000 yen to the four subscriptions of the monthly magazine Sound Argument, Hanada, WiLL, Voice It should strongly think that it must be. The total cost is 3,600 yen.
It is not an exaggeration to say that you cannot understand the truth simply by subscribing to the Asahi Newspaper, Mainichi Newspaper, Tokyo Newspaper, Chunichi Newspaper, and watching the news of TV stations such as NHK, which dominate radio waves at cheap prices, you should know that there is nothing.
Kim Dong-young reporter's allegation raised
"There is a doubt that the Korean Navy was directing a scene that Japanese patrol aircraft should not see"
Last December 29, a news site presided over by a journalist representing Korean conservatives, Mr. Cho Gab-je, Mr. Kim Dong-young, a former monthly Korean reporter from Korea Air Force Radar Controller, he wrote a passage of an article about the action of the Korean navy destroyer 'Gwanggaeto, The Great Conqueror'.
They urged Korean troops to release the truth.
Due to various circumstances, Mr. Kim Dong-yong argued that Destroyer of Korea irradiated the attacking radar, arguing that the ship did not reply to the radio, it was strange that he requested that the truth be disclosed to the Korean army because the truth is national interest.
So, what was the South Korean destroyer doing? 
Mr. Kim Dong-yong pointed out the current case of Moon Jae-in administration and the suspicion of the relationship between North Korea and the following case, which was on May 3, 2018.
An SDF destroyer finds a scene where the Korean ship ‘JeyHope’ in the East China Sea approaches the North Korean ship Nanshan No. 8 and seems to be off-shore delivery, and the SDF destroyer finds it and requests the Korean government to investigate, but Korea Denied. 
Some Japanese experts have argued that the destroyer was refueling the North Korean fishing boat, if so it could be a violation of UN sanctions. 
However, three North Korean residents aboard a North Korean fishing boat have been taken to South Korea after being rescued.
If it had received refueling, it should have returned to North Korea with a fishing boat as it is, so I think that there was no refueling.
If it is not refueling, what is the scene that the Korean destroyer did not want to show to the SDF patrol aircraft?
Mr. Cho Gab-je is a YouTube TV presided over by himself, ① Why did the navy and the two vessels of the marine police work together to rescue ② Why the destroyer did not answer the radio of the SDF 3) Why did I return the North Korean residents who rescued him to North Korea two days later, saying that he cannot easily tune to the explanation of the Korean government, cautiously saying that he was asserting the purpose. 
I wanted to solve these doubts and went to Seoul from January 13th to 17th. 
Mr. Cho Gab-je, a spirited journalist Kim Pilje, the best military reporter in South Korea, Lee Jin-gyu · Dong-A Ilbo reporter, North Korean human rights activist Jin Seung-Kyu · Freedom North Representative of broadcasting, former National Intelligence Service Director, and several information officials.
This draft continues.

Je voulais résoudre ces doutes et je suis allé à Séoul du 13 au 17 janvier.

Ci-dessous est tiré de l'article de M. Tsutomu Nishioka intitulé «Scoop! Tentative d'assassinat de Kim Jong-un, pourquoi les destroyers coréens ont été irradiés par un radar », dans le magazine mensuel Sound Argument paru l'autre jour.
Si vous lisez ce véritable article, tous les citoyens japonais cessent immédiatement de s’abonner au journal Asahi et modifient les frais d’abonnement d’environ 5 000 yens contre les quatre abonnements du magazine mensuel Sound Argument, Hanada, WiLL, Voice. . Le coût total est de 3 600 yens.
Il n’est pas exagéré de dire que vous ne pouvez pas comprendre la vérité simplement en vous abonnant au journal Asahi, au journal Mainichi, au journal Tokyo, au journal Chunichi et en regardant les nouvelles de chaînes de télévision telles que NHK, qui dominent les ondes radio à des prix abordables. devrait savoir qu'il n'y a rien.
L'allégation de Kim Dong-jeune journaliste a été soulevée
"Il y a un doute sur le fait que la marine coréenne dirigeait une scène que les avions de patrouille japonais ne devraient pas voir"
Le 29 décembre dernier, un site d'information présidé par un journaliste représentant les conservateurs coréens, M. Cho Gab-je, M. Kim Dong-young, ancien journaliste coréen mensuel du contrôleur de radar de l'armée de l'air coréenne, a écrit un passage d'un article sur l'action du destroyer de la marine coréenne 'Gwanggaeto, le grand conquérant'.
Ils ont exhorté les troupes coréennes à révéler la vérité.
En raison de diverses circonstances, M. Kim Dong-yong a fait valoir que le destroyer coréen irradiait le radar de l'attaque, arguant que le navire ne répondait pas à la radio. Il était donc étrange qu'il ait demandé que la vérité soit révélée à l'armée coréenne. est l'intérêt national.
Alors, que faisait le destroyer sud-coréen?
M. Kim Dong-yong a souligné le cas actuel de l'administration Moon Jae-in et la suspicion des relations entre la Corée du Nord et le cas suivant, survenu le 3 mai 2018.
Un destroyer SDF trouve une scène où le navire coréen 'JeyHope' dans la mer de Chine orientale s'approche du navire nord-coréen Nanshan n ° 8 et semble être une livraison offshore, et le destroyer SDF le détecte et demande au gouvernement coréen de mener une enquête, mais la Corée a nié.
Certains experts japonais ont fait valoir que le destroyer faisait le plein du bateau de pêche nord-coréen, si cela pouvait constituer une violation des sanctions de l'ONU.
Toutefois, trois résidents nord-coréens à bord d'un bateau de pêche nord-coréen ont été emmenés en Corée du Sud après avoir été secourus.
S'il avait reçu du carburant, il aurait dû retourner en Corée du Nord avec un bateau de pêche en l'état, alors je pense qu'il n'y avait pas de carburant.
Si ce n'est pas le plein, quelle est la scène que le destroyer coréen n'a pas voulu montrer à l'avion de patrouille SDF?
 M. Cho Gab-je est une télévision YouTube présidée par lui-même. ① Pourquoi la marine et les deux navires de la police de la marine ont-ils collaboré pour porter secours Pourquoi le destroyer n'a pas répondu à la radio du SDF 3) Pourquoi suis-je revenu les résidents nord-coréens qui l'ont sauvé en Corée du Nord deux jours plus tard, affirmant qu'il ne pouvait pas facilement se conformer aux explications du gouvernement coréen, affirmant avec prudence qu'il affirmait le but recherché.
Je voulais résoudre ces doutes et je suis allé à Séoul du 13 au 17 janvier.
M. Cho Gab-je, journaliste enthousiaste Kim Pilje, meilleur journaliste militaire de la Corée du Sud, Lee Jin-gyu, reporter de Dong-A Ilbo, activiste des droits de l'homme nord-coréen, Kim Jong-il · Représentant de la radiodiffusion pour le Nord, ex-National Directeur du service de renseignement et plusieurs responsables de l'information.
Ce projet continue.

Ich wollte diese Zweifel lösen und ging vom 13. bis 17. Januar nach Seoul.

Unten ist ein Artikel von Herrn Tsutomu Nishioka, der unter dem Titel "Scoop!" Veröffentlicht wurde. Kim Jong-un-Attentat versuchte einen Vorfall, weshalb koreanische Zerstörer Radar bestrahlt hatten “, veröffentlichte das Monatsmagazin Sound Argument neulich.
Wenn Sie diesen authentischen Artikel lesen, hören alle japanischen Bürger sofort auf, die Asahi-Zeitung zu abonnieren, und ändern die Abonnementgebühr von etwa 5.000 Yen in die vier Abonnements der monatlichen Zeitschrift Sound Argument, Hanada, WiLL, Voice . Die Gesamtkosten betragen 3.600 Yen.
Es ist keine Übertreibung zu sagen, dass Sie die Wahrheit nicht verstehen können, indem Sie einfach die Zeitung Asahi Newspaper, Mainichi Newspaper, Tokyo Newspaper, Chunichi Newspaper abonnieren und die Nachrichten von Fernsehsendern wie NHK, die Radiowellen zu günstigen Preisen dominieren, sehen sollte wissen, dass es nichts gibt.
Kim Dong-junger Reporter erhob Anschuldigung
"Es besteht ein Zweifel, dass die koreanische Marine eine Szene dirigierte, die japanische Patrouillenflugzeuge nicht sehen sollten"
Am 29. Dezember berichtete eine Nachrichten-Site, die von einem Journalisten, der koreanische Konservative vertritt, Herr Kim Dong-young, ehemaliger koreanischer Reporter des koreanischen Luftwaffen-Radar-Controllers, vertreten wird, den Vorsitz. Er schrieb eine Passage über einen Artikel die Aktion des koreanischen Marinezerstörers "Gwanggaeto, der große Eroberer".
Sie forderten die koreanischen Truppen auf, die Wahrheit zu veröffentlichen.
Aufgrund verschiedener Umstände argumentierte Kim Dong-yong, dass der Zerstörer von Korea das angreifende Radar bestrahlt habe, mit dem Argument, dass das Schiff nicht auf das Funkgerät antwortete. Es sei seltsam, dass er die Wahrheit der koreanischen Armee preisgegeben habe ist nationales Interesse.
Also, was machte der südkoreanische Zerstörer?
Herr Kim Dong-yong wies auf den aktuellen Fall der Verwaltung von Moon Jae-in und den Verdacht auf die Beziehung zwischen Nordkorea und den folgenden Fall hin, der am 3. Mai 2018 stattfand.
Ein SDF-Zerstörer findet eine Szene, in der sich das koreanische Schiff 'JeyHope' im Ostchinesischen Meer dem nordkoreanischen Schiff Nanshan Nr. 8 nähert und anscheinend Offshore-Lieferung ist, und der SDF-Zerstörer findet es und fordert die koreanische Regierung zur Untersuchung auf. aber Korea verweigert.
Einige japanische Experten argumentierten, der Zerstörer habe das nordkoreanische Fischerboot aufgetankt, falls dies eine Verletzung der UN-Sanktionen sein könnte.
Drei nordkoreanische Einwohner an Bord eines nordkoreanischen Fischerbootes wurden jedoch nach ihrer Rettung nach Südkorea gebracht.
Wenn es betankt worden wäre, hätte es mit einem Fischerboot so wie es ist nach Nordkorea zurückkehren müssen, daher glaube ich, dass es kein Betanken gab.
Wenn es kein Auftanken ist, welche Szene wollte der koreanische Zerstörer dem Patrouillenflugzeug SDF nicht zeigen?
 Herr Cho Gab-je ist ein YouTube-TV mit eigenem Vorsitz. ① Warum haben die Marine und die beiden Schiffe der Marinepolizei zusammengearbeitet, um zu retten? Warum der Zerstörer das Radio der SDF nicht beantwortet hat 3) Warum bin ich zurückgekehrt? Die nordkoreanischen Bewohner, die ihn zwei Tage später nach Nordkorea gerettet hatten, sagten, dass er sich nicht leicht an die Erklärungen der koreanischen Regierung anpassen könne, wobei er vorsichtig sagte, dass er den Zweck geltend mache.
Ich wollte diese Zweifel lösen und ging vom 13. bis 17. Januar nach Seoul.
Herr Cho Gab-je, ein begeisterter Journalist Kim Pilje, der beste Militärreporter in Südkorea, Lee Jin-gyu · Dong-A-Ilbo-Reporter, nordkoreanischer Menschenrechtsaktivist Kim Jong-il · Freedom North Vertreter des Rundfunks, ehemals National Intelligence Service Director und mehrere Informationsbeamte.
Dieser Entwurf geht weiter.

Volevo risolvere questi dubbi e sono andato a Seoul dal 13 al 17 gennaio.

Di seguito è tratto dall'articolo di Mr. Tsutomu Nishioka che è stato pubblicato dal titolo, 'scoop! L'assassinio di Kim Jong-un tentativo di incidente, perché i cacciatorpediniere coreani hanno avuto irradiazione radar ', nella rivista mensile Sound Argument rilasciata l'altro giorno.
Se leggi questo articolo originale, tutti i cittadini giapponesi smettono immediatamente di iscriversi al giornale Asahi e cambiano la quota di iscrizione di circa 5.000 yen ai quattro abbonamenti della rivista mensile Sound Argument, Hanada, WiLL, Voice Dovrebbe essere fortemente convinto che deve essere . Il costo totale è di 3.600 yen.
Non è un'esagerazione dire che non puoi capire la verità semplicemente iscrivendoti al giornale Asahi, al giornale Mainichi, al giornale di Tokyo, al giornale Chunichi e guardando le notizie di stazioni televisive come la NHK, che dominano le onde radio a prezzi economici, dovrebbe sapere che non c'è niente
Le accuse di Kim Dong-giovane giornalista sollevate
"C'è il dubbio che la Marina coreana stia dirigendo una scena che l'aereo di pattuglia giapponese non dovrebbe vedere"
Lo scorso 29 dicembre, un sito di notizie presieduto da un giornalista che rappresentava i conservatori coreani, il signor Cho Gab-je, il signor Kim Dong-young, un ex giornalista coreano coreano della Korea Air Force Radar Controller, ha scritto un passaggio di un articolo su l'azione del cacciatorpediniere della marina coreana "Gwanggaeto, il grande conquistatore".
Hanno esortato le truppe coreane a rilasciare la verità.
A causa di varie circostanze, il signor Kim Dong-yong ha sostenuto che il distruttore di Corea ha irradiato il radar d'attacco, sostenendo che la nave non ha risposto alla radio, è strano che abbia chiesto che la verità venga rivelata all'esercito coreano perché la verità è interesse nazionale.
Quindi, cosa stava facendo il cacciatorpediniere della Corea del Sud?
Il signor Kim Dong-yong ha sottolineato l'attuale caso di Moon Jae-in amministrazione e il sospetto del rapporto tra la Corea del Nord e il caso seguente, che è stato il 3 maggio 2018.
Un cacciatorpediniere SDF trova una scena in cui la nave coreana "JeyHope" nel Mar Cinese orientale si avvicina alla nave nordcoreana Nanshan No. 8 e sembra essere in consegna off-shore, e il cacciatorpediniere SDF lo trova e chiede al governo coreano di indagare, ma la Corea è stata negata.
Alcuni esperti giapponesi hanno sostenuto che il cacciatorpediniere stava rifornendo di carburante il peschereccio della Corea del Nord, in tal caso potrebbe essere una violazione delle sanzioni ONU.
Tuttavia, tre residenti nordcoreani a bordo di un peschereccio della Corea del Nord sono stati portati in Corea del Sud dopo essere stati soccorsi.
Se avesse ricevuto il rifornimento di carburante, avrebbe dovuto tornare in Corea del Nord con una barca da pesca così com'è, quindi penso che non ci sia stato alcun rifornimento di carburante.
Se non sta effettuando il rifornimento, qual è la scena che il cacciatorpediniere coreano non ha voluto mostrare agli aeromobili della pattuglia SDF?
 Il signor Cho Gab-je è una TV di YouTube presieduta da solo, ① Perché la marina e le due navi della polizia marittima lavorano insieme per salvare ② Perché il cacciatorpediniere non ha risposto alla radio dell'SDF 3) Perché sono tornato i residenti della Corea del Nord che lo hanno salvato in Corea del Nord due giorni dopo, dicendo che non si può facilmente sintonizzare con la spiegazione del governo coreano, dicendo cautamente che stava affermando lo scopo.
Volevo risolvere questi dubbi e sono andato a Seoul dal 13 al 17 gennaio.
Il signor Cho Gab-je, un vivace giornalista Kim Pilje, il miglior reporter militare della Corea del Sud, Lee Jin-gyu · Dong-Un Ilbo reporter, attivista per i diritti umani nordcoreano Kim Jong-il · Freedom North Rappresentante delle trasmissioni, ex National Direttore dei servizi di intelligence e diversi funzionari di informazione.
Questo progetto continua.

私はこれらの疑問を解きたいと思い、１月13日から17日までソウルに取材に行った。

以下は先日発売された月刊誌正論に、スクープ！金正恩暗殺未遂事件、なぜ韓国駆逐艦はレーダー照射したのか、と題して掲載された日本にとっては大恩人の一人でもある西岡力氏の論文からである。
この論文を読めば日本国民全員は即刻、朝日新聞などの購読を止めて購読料約5,000円を月刊誌正論Hanada,WiLL,Voiceの4誌の定期購読（合計約3,600円）に換えなければならないと痛感するはずである。
朝日、毎日、東京、中日新聞を購読して電波を安い料金で寡占しているNHK等のテレビ局のニュースを視聴しているだけでは真実は何一つ分からないと言っても過言ではない事に愕然とするはずだ。
キム・ドンヨン記者の疑惑提起　
「あたかも韓国海軍が日本の哨戒機が見てはならない場面を演出していたのではないかという疑いが持たれる」　
昨年12月29日、韓国の保守派を代表するジャーナリスト、趙甲済氏が主宰するニュースサイトで、空軍レーダー管制官出身で元月刊朝鮮記者のキム・ドンヨン氏が、韓国海軍駆逐艦「広開土大王」の行動について書いた記事の一節だ。　
キム・ドンヨン氏は、諸状況からして韓国駆逐艦が攻撃用レーダーを照射したことは問違いなく、同艦が無線に回答しなかったこともおかしいと主張し、真実が国益だとして韓国軍に真実を公開せよと求めた。　
それでは、韓国駆逐艦は一体、何をしていたのか。　
キム・ドンヨン氏は、2018年５月３日にあった次の事例を挙げて、現在の文在寅政権と北朝鮮の関係の怪しさを指摘した。　
東シナ海で韓国船舶「ＪｅｙＨｏｐｅ」号が北朝鮮船南山８号に接近し、瀬取りをしているように見える場面を自衛隊護衛艦が発見し、韓国政府に調査を依頼するが、韓国は事実を否定した。　
日本の一部専門家の間でも、駆逐艦が北朝鮮漁船に給油していたのではないか、もしそうなら国連制裁違反になりかねないという議論が出ている。　
しかし、北朝鮮漁船に乗っていた北朝鮮住民３人は、救助されて韓国に連れて行かれている。
もし、給油を受けていたならそのまま漁船で北朝鮮に戻ったはずだから、給油はなかったと思われる。
給油でないとすると、韓国駆逐艦が自衛隊哨戒機に見せたくなかった場面とは何なのか。　
趙甲済氏は自身が主宰しているユーチューブテレビで、①なぜ、海軍と海洋警察の２隻の船が一緒に救助作業をしたのか、②なぜ駆逐艦が自衛隊の無線に答えなかったのか、③なぜ、救助した北朝鮮住民を２日後に北朝鮮に返したのか、という三つの疑問を挙げて、慎重な物言いながら、韓国政府の説明には簡単には同調できないという趣旨の主張をしていた。　
私はこれらの疑問を解きたいと思い、１月13日から17日までソウルに取材に行った。　
面談できたのは趙甲済氏、気鋭のジャーナリストである金泌材氏、韓国一の軍事記者である李政勲・東亜日報社記者、脱北者人権活動家の金聖攻・自由北韓放送代表、元国家情報院長、複数の情報関係者などだ。
この稿続く。

朝日、毎日、東京、中日新聞を購読して電波を安い料金で寡占しているNHK等のテレビ局のニュースを視聴しているだけでは真実は何一つ分からない

以下は先日発売された月刊誌正論に、スクープ！金正恩暗殺未遂事件、なぜ韓国駆逐艦はレーダー照射したのか、と題して掲載された日本にとっては大恩人の一人でもある西岡力氏の論文からである。
この論文を読めば日本国民全員は即刻、朝日新聞などの購読を止めて購読料約5,000円を月刊誌正論Hanada,WiLL,Voiceの4誌の定期購読（合計約3,600円）に換えなければならないと痛感するはずである。
朝日新聞、毎日新聞、東京新聞、中日新聞を購読して、電波を安い料金で寡占しているNHK等のテレビ局のニュースを視聴しているだけでは真実は何一つ分からないと言っても過言ではない事に愕然とするはずだ。
キム・ドンヨン記者の疑惑提起　
「あたかも韓国海軍が日本の哨戒機が見てはならない場面を演出していたのではないかという疑いが持たれる」　
昨年12月29日、韓国の保守派を代表するジャーナリスト、趙甲済氏が主宰するニュースサイトで、空軍レーダー管制官出身で元月刊朝鮮記者のキム・ドンヨン氏が、韓国海軍駆逐艦「広開土大王」の行動について書いた記事の一節だ。　
キム・ドンヨン氏は、諸状況からして韓国駆逐艦が攻撃用レーダーを照射したことは問違いなく、同艦が無線に回答しなかったこともおかしいと主張し、真実が国益だとして韓国軍に真実を公開せよと求めた。　
それでは、韓国駆逐艦は一体、何をしていたのか。　
キム・ドンヨン氏は、2018年５月３日にあった次の事例を挙げて、現在の文在寅政権と北朝鮮の関係の怪しさを指摘した。　
東シナ海で韓国船舶「ＪｅｙＨｏｐｅ」号が北朝鮮船南山８号に接近し、瀬取りをしているように見える場面を自衛隊護衛艦が発見し、韓国政府に調査を依頼するが、韓国は事実を否定した。　
日本の一部専門家の間でも、駆逐艦が北朝鮮漁船に給油していたのではないか、もしそうなら国連制裁違反になりかねないという議論が出ている。　
しかし、北朝鮮漁船に乗っていた北朝鮮住民３人は、救助されて韓国に連れて行かれている。
もし、給油を受けていたならそのまま漁船で北朝鮮に戻ったはずだから、給油はなかったと思われる。
給油でないとすると、韓国駆逐艦が自衛隊哨戒機に見せたくなかった場面とは何なのか。　
趙甲済氏は自身が主宰しているユーチューブテレビで、①なぜ、海軍と海洋警察の２隻の船が一緒に救助作業をしたのか、②なぜ駆逐艦が自衛隊の無線に答えなかったのか、③なぜ、救助した北朝鮮住民を２日後に北朝鮮に返したのか、という三つの疑問を挙げて、慎重な物言いながら、韓国政府の説明には簡単には同調できないという趣旨の主張をしていた。　
私はこれらの疑問を解きたいと思い、１月13日から17日までソウルに取材に行った。　
面談できたのは趙甲済氏、気鋭のジャーナリストである金泌材氏、韓国一の軍事記者である李政勲・東亜日報社記者、脱北者人権活動家の金聖玟・自由北韓放送代表、元国家情報院長、複数の情報関係者などだ。
この稿続く。

この論文を読めば日本国民全員は即刻、朝日新聞などの購読を止めて購読料約5,000円を月刊誌正論Hanada,WiLL,Voiceの4誌の定期購読（合計約3,600円）に換えな

以下は先日発売された月刊誌正論に、スクープ！金正恩暗殺未遂事件、なぜ韓国駆逐艦はレーダー照射したのか、と題して掲載された日本にとっては大恩人の一人でもある西岡力氏の論文からである。
この論文を読めば日本国民全員は即刻、朝日新聞などの購読を止めて購読料約5,000円を月刊誌正論Hanada,WiLL,Voiceの4誌の定期購読（合計約3,600円）に換えなければならないと痛感するはずである。
朝日新聞、毎日新聞、東京新聞、中日新聞を購読して、電波を安い料金で寡占しているNHK等のテレビ局のニュースを視聴しているだけでは真実は何一つ分からないと言っても過言ではない事に愕然とするはずだ。
キム・ドンヨン記者の疑惑提起　
「あたかも韓国海軍が日本の哨戒機が見てはならない場面を演出していたのではないかという疑いが持たれる」　
昨年12月29日、韓国の保守派を代表するジャーナリスト、趙甲済氏が主宰するニュースサイトで、空軍レーダー管制官出身で元月刊朝鮮記者のキム・ドンヨン氏が、韓国海軍駆逐艦「広開土大王」の行動について書いた記事の一節だ。　
キム・ドンヨン氏は、諸状況からして韓国駆逐艦が攻撃用レーダーを照射したことは問違いなく、同艦が無線に回答しなかったこともおかしいと主張し、真実が国益だとして韓国軍に真実を公開せよと求めた。　
それでは、韓国駆逐艦は一体、何をしていたのか。　
キム・ドンヨン氏は、2018年５月３日にあった次の事例を挙げて、現在の文在寅政権と北朝鮮の関係の怪しさを指摘した。　
東シナ海で韓国船舶「ＪｅｙＨｏｐｅ」号が北朝鮮船南山８号に接近し、瀬取りをしているように見える場面を自衛隊護衛艦が発見し、韓国政府に調査を依頼するが、韓国は事実を否定した。　
日本の一部専門家の間でも、駆逐艦が北朝鮮漁船に給油していたのではないか、もしそうなら国連制裁違反になりかねないという議論が出ている。　
しかし、北朝鮮漁船に乗っていた北朝鮮住民３人は、救助されて韓国に連れて行かれている。
もし、給油を受けていたならそのまま漁船で北朝鮮に戻ったはずだから、給油はなかったと思われる。
給油でないとすると、韓国駆逐艦が自衛隊哨戒機に見せたくなかった場面とは何なのか。　
趙甲済氏は自身が主宰しているユーチューブテレビで、①なぜ、海軍と海洋警察の２隻の船が一緒に救助作業をしたのか、②なぜ駆逐艦が自衛隊の無線に答えなかったのか、③なぜ、救助した北朝鮮住民を２日後に北朝鮮に返したのか、という三つの疑問を挙げて、慎重な物言いながら、韓国政府の説明には簡単には同調できないという趣旨の主張をしていた。　
私はこれらの疑問を解きたいと思い、１月13日から17日までソウルに取材に行った。　
面談できたのは趙甲済氏、気鋭のジャーナリストである金泌材氏、韓国一の軍事記者である李政勲・東亜日報社記者、脱北者人権活動家の金聖玟・自由北韓放送代表、元国家情報院長、複数の情報関係者などだ。
この稿続く。

この様な事にまで話が及んだのだが、その後に、

有数の読書家である友人が電話をくれた。

「国会は、あなたがいう所の霞が関で勤務条件最悪のブラック企業同然と言っても過言ではない厚労省の労働者が…役人と言えども労働者である…前近代的な調査の仕方で、おまけに全企業調査などという信じがたい…小泉進次郎よ、それこそがでたらめだよ…いい加減にマスコミ受けを狙った発言を繰り返す政治屋気取りは止めたらどうか…そんな事をしている暇に今や真実を伝える本当の媒体であると言っても過言ではないネット上で君の父親に対して確信をもって発表されている疑惑に答える方が先だろう…君の父親が何故か作った法律…個人情報保護法が無かったからと言って不利益を被る日本人は皆無と言っても過言ではないほどにいなかった…今、この法律の恩恵を受けているのは全て悪人であると言っても全く過言ではない…

悪質な犯罪を冒しながら住所不定にしてのうのうと生きている悪人たちの被害者が民事裁判で勝利しても1円のお金も取り返す事はできない…弁護士は無論、調査のしようもない…警察も検事も個人情報保護法があるからと言う、これ以上ない馬鹿馬鹿しい理由で知っていても教えられない…君の父親である、純一郎は、一体、何のために、こんな法律を作ったのか？

この様な事にまで話が及んだのだが、その後に、

それにしても、今回の韓国の問題についてこそ、それこそモリカケ騒動以上の熱を持って新聞もテレビも報道して当然じゃないか。

特にTBSのワイドショー番組は、そうすべきだし、あなたが言っていた「ちちんぷいぷい」などは一体何をしているのか…それこそが５％の朝鮮総連等の在日朝鮮人たちがTBSを支配している証明なのだろうが…

最低の連中やね…そもそも、あの放送局に、まともな日本人はいるのかいな。

日本必须代表国际社会调查真相。等待答案，日本必须庄严实施对韩国的制裁。

以下是前一章的延续。
向韩国提出十项未解决的问题
1月14日新加坡国防部门首次直接协商，保持无限无礼的韩国，完全否定了雷达照射，“如果你做的是低空威胁飞行，我们可以飞行低空威胁”他们向日本展示使用威胁语言。
而且国防部发言人说，“日本无意解决这个问题，这是非常粗鲁的，”他们甚至更需要打开。
所以，我希望日本政府向韩国政府提出以下十项未决问题。
（1）韩国海军在日本的专属经济区（专属经济区）做了什么？你为什么要营救没有发出救援信号的朝鲜渔船呢？
（2）国际社会强烈怀疑“朝鲜海军正在协助朝鲜渔船非法操作联合国的经济制裁”。你怎么回应这个？
（3）最初，'我们开始击中所有的雷达，它碰巧碰到了巡逻机'......，
为什么你改变你在路上“未受照射”的事实？
（4）虽然朝鲜船只在附近，但它正在拯救，为什么“搜索雷达”是必要的原因是什么？
（5）为什么FC天线指向巡逻机，而要求其目的的部分是用公共视频剪切的，即使收音机清晰可闻？
（6）为什么在2014年商定的“海上防撞规则”中确认未进行辐照的火控雷达照射？
（7）如果他们对巡逻机的飞行感到威胁，他们之所以没有根据“海上避撞规范”通过无线电进行通信/警告的原因是什么？
（8）该飞机的飞行符合国际民用航空公约规定的150米。
另一方面，争论“军用飞机应该在3英里（= 4.8公里）”的基础是什么？
（9）即使在韩国方面发布的视频中，也可以清楚地听到声称未能听到的自卫队的无线电通信。没有回应的原因是什么？
（10）为什么他们做出低级别的声明，我们应该看到对方的数据并努力防止再次发生，要求道歉，或者“做出低空威胁航班”？
日本必须代表国际社会调查真相。
如果我们不安，日本不仅会让国际社会失望，也会“继续照亮韩国的日本”。
等待答案，日本必须庄严实施对韩国的制裁。

일본은 국제 사회를 대신하여 진실을 조사해야합니다.

다음은 이전 장의 계속입니다.
한국에 대한 열린 질문 10 항목
그리고 14 일 싱가포르 국방부의 직접적인 협의를 통해 무한한 뻔뻔스러운 한국을 지키는 것은 레이더에 대한 방사능을 완전히 부인했다. '저공 비행 위협을하면 저공 비행을 할 수있다.' 위협적인 언어.
국방부 대변인은 "일본은이 문제를 해결할 의향이없고 매우 무례하다"고 말했다.
그래서 일본 정부가 한국 정부에 다음 10 개 항목에 대해 공개적인 질문을하도록하겠습니다.
(1) 일본의 EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone)에서 한국 해군은 무엇을 했습니까? 구조 신호를 보내지 않은 북한 어선을 구조 한 이유는 무엇입니까?
(2) 국제 사회는 "유엔 경제 제재에서 한국 해군이 북한 어선의 불법적 인 작전을 돕고있다"는 강한 의구심을 갖고있다. 이것에 어떻게 반응합니까?
(3) 처음에는 '우리는 모든 레이다를 치기 시작했다. 순찰차에 충돌 한 것 뿐이다 ...'
방해받지 않은 사실을 왜 바꾸셨습니까?
(4) 북한 선박이 근처에 있지만 구조를 구하고 있지만 '수색 레이더'가 필요한 이유는 무엇인가.
(5) FC 안테나가 순찰 항공기를 가리키는 이유는 무엇입니까? 라디오가 분명하게 들리더라도 공공 비디오로 그 목적을 물어 보는 부분이 끊깁니다.
(6) 2014 년에 합의 된 '해상 충돌 회피 코드'에서 수행되지 않는 것으로 확인 된 화재 통제 레이더가 왜 조사 되었습니까?
(7) 순찰 항공기가 위협을 느낀다면, '해상 충돌 회피 규범'에 근거하여 전파로 통신 / 경고를하지 않은 이유는 무엇입니까?
(8) 항공기는 국제 민간 항공 협약의 규정에 따라 비행했다.
다른 한편, '군용기가 3 마일 (= 4.8km)에 있어야한다고 주장하는 근거는 무엇인가?'
(9) 한국 측이 발간 한 비디오에서도 청취에 실패했다고 주장하는 자위대의 무선 통신을 분명하게들을 수있다. 이것에 응답하지 않은 이유는 무엇입니까?
(10) 그들은 서로의 자료를보고 재발 방지, 사과 요청, 저지 위협 비행을하는 등 무례한 행동을하는 저급 주장을하는 이유는 무엇입니까?
일본은 국제 사회를 대신하여 진실을 조사해야합니다.
우리가 불안한 마음으로 떠난다면 일본은 국제 사회를 실망시킬뿐만 아니라 '한국에 의한 일본의 빛을 계속 유지'할 것입니다.
답을 기다리면서 일본은 한국에 대해 엄숙하게 제재를 가해 야합니다.

जपानने आंतरराष्ट्रीय समुदायाच्या वतीने सत्याची तपासणी केली पाहिजे.

खालील मागील धडा सुरू आहे.
कोरियाला मुक्त प्रश्नांची दहा वस्तू
आणि 14 जानेवारी रोजी सिंगपुरमधील संरक्षण प्राधिकरणांनी प्रथम प्रत्यक्ष सल्लामसलत करून असीम असुरक्षित कोरियाला धरून, रडार विकिरण पूर्णपणे नाकारले, 'जर आपण कमी-हवेच्या धोक्याची उड्डाणे उडविली तर आम्ही जपानला वापरण्यास कमीतकमी हवाई वाहतूक करू शकतो' सभ्य भाषा
आणि संरक्षण मंत्रालयाच्या प्रवक्त्याने सांगितले की, 'या समस्येचे निराकरण करण्यासाठी जपानमध्ये कोणतेही हेतू नाही, ते फारच कठोर आहे', ते पुढे चालू ठेवण्यासारखे आहे.
तर, मला जपानी सरकारने कोरियन सरकारला पुढील दहा गोष्टी उघडण्यासाठी तयार करावे अशी माझी इच्छा आहे.
(1) जपानच्या ईईझेडमध्ये (विशेष आर्थिक क्षेत्र) कोरियन नेव्ही काय करत होता? आणि उत्तर कोरियातील मासेमारी बोटीची सुटका कशी केली जात होती?
(2) आंतरराष्ट्रीय समुदायाला सशक्त शंका आहे की "कोरियन नेव्ही संयुक्त राष्ट्रांच्या आर्थिक मंजुरींमध्ये उत्तर कोरियन फिशिंग जहाजांचे बेकायदेशीर ऑपरेशन करण्यास मदत करत आहे". आपण याचे उत्तर कसे देता?
(3) सुरुवातीला, 'आम्ही सर्व रडार मारणे सुरू केले, ते फक्त गस्त विमानाचा मारा झाला ...'
रस्त्यावर 'विकिरणित' नसलेले तथ्य आपण का बदललात?
(4) उत्तर कोरियन जहाज जवळ असल्याने, ते शोधत आहे, तरी 'शोधसाठी रडार' का आवश्यक आहे याचे कारण काय आहे?
(5) एफसी ऍन्टेना गश्त विमानापासून इशारा का करीत आहे आणि त्याचा उद्देश विचारात घेणारा भाग सार्वजनिक व्हिडिओसह काटायचा आहे तरीही रेडिओ स्पष्टपणे ऐकला गेला आहे का?
(6) अग्निशामक नियंत्रण रडार विकिरित केले गेले कारण 2014 मध्ये 'मॅरिटाइम कॉलिजन अॅव्हॉइडन्स कोड' मध्ये मान्य न झाल्यास पुष्टी केली गेली आहे?
(7) जर त्यांना गस्त विमानाच्या उड्डाणाला धोका असल्याचे वाटत असेल तर त्यांनी 'समुद्री टक्कर टाळण्याचा नियम' या आधारावर रेडिओद्वारे संप्रेषण / चेतावणी का दिली नाही?
(8) विमानाने आंतरराष्ट्रीय नागरी विमानचालन अधिवेशनाच्या 150 मीटरच्या तरतूदीचे पालन केले.
दुसरीकडे, 'लष्करी विमान 3 मैलांवर (= 4.8 किमी) असावे' असा युक्तिवाद करण्यासाठी काय आधार आहे?
(9) एसडीएफमधील रेडिओ संप्रेषण दक्षिण कोरियन पक्षाने प्रकाशित केलेल्या व्हिडिओमध्ये ऐकण्यास नकार देण्याचा हक्क असल्याचा दावा केला जाऊ शकतो. याचे उत्तर न देण्याचे कारण काय आहे?
(10) ते कमी पातळीचे दावे का देतात की आम्ही एकमेकांचे डेटा आणि पुनरावृत्ती टाळण्यासाठी, माफी मागण्यासाठी किंवा कमी वाहतूक करणार्या फ्लाइट करणार्या 'असभ्य' असल्याबद्दल कार्य पहावे?
जपानने आंतरराष्ट्रीय समुदायाच्या वतीने सत्याची तपासणी केली पाहिजे.
आम्ही निराश सोडल्यास, जपान केवळ आंतरराष्ट्रीय समुदायाला निराश करणार नाही, तर 'कोरियाद्वारे जपानचा प्रकाश तयार करणे' देखील असेल.
उत्तरांच्या प्रतीक्षेत, जपानने दक्षिण कोरियाविरूद्ध मंजुरी लागू करणे आवश्यक आहे.

Nhật Bản phải điều tra sự thật thay mặt cho cộng đồng quốc tế.

Sau đây là phần tiếp theo của chương trước.
Mười câu hỏi mở cho Hàn Quốc
Và giữ cho Hàn Quốc vô hạn, với sự tham vấn trực tiếp đầu tiên của các cơ quan quốc phòng tại Singapore vào ngày 14 tháng 1, đã phủ nhận hoàn toàn việc chiếu xạ radar, 'Nếu bạn bay chuyến bay đe dọa không khí thấp, chúng ta có thể bay đe dọa trên không' ngôn ngữ đe dọa.
Và người phát ngôn của Bộ Quốc phòng nói, 'Nhật Bản không có ý định giải quyết vấn đề, điều đó rất thô lỗ, họ thậm chí còn hơn thế nữa.
Vì vậy, tôi muốn Chính phủ Nhật Bản đưa ra mười câu hỏi sau đây cho chính phủ Hàn Quốc.
(1) Hải quân Hàn Quốc đã làm gì trong vùng đặc quyền kinh tế của Nhật Bản? Và tại sao bạn lại giải cứu một chiếc thuyền đánh cá của Bắc Triều Tiên mà không đưa ra tín hiệu giải cứu?
(2) Cộng đồng quốc tế nghi ngờ mạnh mẽ rằng "Hải quân Hàn Quốc đang hỗ trợ hoạt động phi pháp của các tàu cá Bắc Triều Tiên trong các lệnh trừng phạt kinh tế của Liên Hợp Quốc". Làm thế nào để bạn trả lời này?
(3) Ban đầu, 'Chúng tôi bắt đầu đánh tất cả các radar, nó chỉ tình cờ đánh vào máy bay tuần tra' ...,
Tại sao bạn thay đổi sự thật mà bạn nhân bản 'không chiếu xạ' trên đường?
(4) Lý do tại sao một radar để tìm kiếm là cần thiết mặc dù một tàu Bắc Triều Tiên đang ở gần đó và nó đang giải cứu.
(5) Tại sao ăng-ten FC chỉ từ máy bay tuần tra và phần được hỏi cho mục đích của nó bị cắt bằng video công khai mặc dù radio được nghe rõ?
(6) Tại sao radar điều khiển hỏa lực được chiếu xạ được xác nhận là không được thực hiện trong Code Mã tránh va chạm hàng hải đã được thỏa thuận vào năm 2014?
(7) Nếu họ cảm thấy mối đe dọa đối với chuyến bay của máy bay tuần tra, lý do tại sao họ không liên lạc / cảnh báo bằng đài phát thanh dựa trên chỉ tiêu tránh va chạm hàng hải?
(8) Máy bay đã bay tuân thủ quy định 150 m của Công ước Hàng không Dân dụng Quốc tế.
Mặt khác, cơ sở cho lập luận rằng ‘máy bay quân sự nên có 3 dặm (= 4,8 km)’ là gì?
(9) Liên lạc vô tuyến từ SDF tuyên bố đã không nghe thấy có thể được nghe rõ ràng ngay cả trong video do phía Hàn Quốc công bố. Lý do cho việc không đáp ứng với điều này là gì?
(10) Tại sao họ đưa ra tuyên bố cấp thấp rằng chúng ta nên xem dữ liệu của nhau và làm việc để ngăn chặn sự tái diễn, yêu cầu một lời xin lỗi hoặc ‘là thô lỗ thực hiện chuyến bay đe dọa không khí thấp?
Nhật Bản phải điều tra sự thật thay mặt cho cộng đồng quốc tế.
Nếu chúng ta rời đi một cách bất ổn, Nhật Bản sẽ không chỉ khiến cộng đồng quốc tế thất vọng, đó sẽ là ‘Hãy tiếp tục làm sáng tỏ Nhật Bản bởi Korea.
Chờ đợi câu trả lời, Nhật Bản phải long trọng thực hiện các biện pháp trừng phạt đối với Hàn Quốc.