The following is from the article of the Mr. Yasuaki Oonuma who crosses page 187 from page 180 in the number of November of BUNGEI SHUNJU.
It is the sequel of the preceding chapter.
It is as it that it says that reporting so-called “Yoshida testimony " as if to be a fact is a problem.
Confusing a volunteer corps and a comfort woman is the mistake where it is clear that it does.
However, as for the problem, don't do out the running completely.
The omission
But journalists of Asahi, in sticking to their claims that state compensation, it was mislead public opinion.
I, too, received the coverage of Asahi Shimbun many times but had the claim which a lot of reporters in the city news department did so.
The article of the politics part and the editorialist was still good, but heading entire paper was seditious and one-sided.
The big flow of the public opinion has been composed of the impact of such index and the city news department article.
Discussions with Asahi reporter
I made a discussion, too, the people of the reporter in Asahi Shimbun plainly.
1 year from 2004 which I was teaching in the University of Tokyo, it has opened the seminar to have the people who concerned a comfort woman problem do a story.
This article continues