public officials and citizens are thoroughly committed to racial discrimination against the Japanese

3-3. Examples of anti-Japanese actions by citizens
3-3-1. Anti-Japanese civil organization VANK14
In Korea, there is a civil group that openly proclaims that “they will ‘exclude’ Japan from Asia.”
That is Voluntary Agency Network of Korea (a.k.a. VANK).
VANK was established in 1999 and has about two hundred thousand members. 
Based on the concept that Koreans are superior, they disseminate a biased history that puts Korea in the most favorable light.
Above all, they are most passionate about their “Discount Japan [defile Japan] Campaign,” which has now become a national campaign. 
In this campaign to degrade Japan, every possible means and measures are taken, day and night, including irresponsible dissemination of fabricated “facts” on the Net, slandering Japan and making wild claims such as, “The issue of comfort women and Dokdo (Takeshima Island) are threats against world peace.”
They are stoking the flames of a global diplomatic war between Japan and Korea.
VANK’s activities are heartily supported by the Korean Government and major Korean companies.
The Korean Government financially supported VANK for four years, beginning in 2005, using the 14 Voluntary Agency Network of Korea taxpayers’ money.
http://vankstory.prkorea.com/
In February 2013, VANK President Pak Gi Tae was awarded the Korean Presidential Prize. (Above paragraphs based on the Yomiuri Newspaper, morning edition dated November 14, 2013.)
Presently, VANK engages in anti-Japanese activities in cooperation with the Korean Government.
For example, regarding the appellation “the Sea of Japan,” which has been an internationally recognized appellation among Europeans and Americans since the beginning of the 19th century, VANK supports the Korean Government’s scheme to forcibly change the appellation to the “East Sea”.
VANK has worked with maps and atlas publishers worldwide. (The Sankei Newspaper dated June 29, 2017.)15
Also, VANK has been conspicuously working to promote vile racism against Japanese people. 
This is in violation of Article 2-1 of ICERD, which stipulates that “Each State party shall not sponsor, support nor vindicate racial discrimination committed by any individual or group.” 
In Korea, the fact is that through anti-Japanese education conducted in Korea, both public officials and citizens are thoroughly committed to racial discrimination against the Japanese.

In Korea, the fact is that through anti-Japanese education conducted in Korea,

3-3. Examples of anti-Japanese actions by citizens
3-3-1. Anti-Japanese civil organization VANK14
In Korea, there is a civil group that openly proclaims that “they will ‘exclude’ Japan from Asia.”
That is Voluntary Agency Network of Korea (a.k.a. VANK).
VANK was established in 1999 and has about two hundred thousand members. 
Based on the concept that Koreans are superior, they disseminate a biased history that puts Korea in the most favorable light.
Above all, they are most passionate about their “Discount Japan [defile Japan] Campaign,” which has now become a national campaign. 
In this campaign to degrade Japan, every possible means and measures are taken, day and night, including irresponsible dissemination of fabricated “facts” on the Net, slandering Japan and making wild claims such as, “The issue of comfort women and Dokdo (Takeshima Island) are threats against world peace.”
They are stoking the flames of a global diplomatic war between Japan and Korea.
VANK’s activities are heartily supported by the Korean Government and major Korean companies.
The Korean Government financially supported VANK for four years, beginning in 2005, using the 14 Voluntary Agency Network of Korea taxpayers’ money.
http://vankstory.prkorea.com/
In February 2013, VANK President Pak Gi Tae was awarded the Korean Presidential Prize. (Above paragraphs based on the Yomiuri Newspaper, morning edition dated November 14, 2013.)
Presently, VANK engages in anti-Japanese activities in cooperation with the Korean Government.
For example, regarding the appellation “the Sea of Japan,” which has been an internationally recognized appellation among Europeans and Americans since the beginning of the 19th century, VANK supports the Korean Government’s scheme to forcibly change the appellation to the “East Sea”.
VANK has worked with maps and atlas publishers worldwide. (The Sankei Newspaper dated June 29, 2017.)15
Also, VANK has been conspicuously working to promote vile racism against Japanese people. 
This is in violation of Article 2-1 of ICERD, which stipulates that “Each State party shall not sponsor, support nor vindicate racial discrimination committed by any individual or group.” 
In Korea, the fact is that through anti-Japanese education conducted in Korea, both public officials and citizens are thoroughly committed to racial discrimination against the Japanese.

violation of Article 2-1 of ICERD, which stipulates that “Each State party shall not sponsor,

3-3. Examples of anti-Japanese actions by citizens
3-3-1. Anti-Japanese civil organization VANK14
In Korea, there is a civil group that openly proclaims that “they will ‘exclude’ Japan from Asia.”
That is Voluntary Agency Network of Korea (a.k.a. VANK).
VANK was established in 1999 and has about two hundred thousand members. 
Based on the concept that Koreans are superior, they disseminate a biased history that puts Korea in the most favorable light.
Above all, they are most passionate about their “Discount Japan [defile Japan] Campaign,” which has now become a national campaign. 
In this campaign to degrade Japan, every possible means and measures are taken, day and night, including irresponsible dissemination of fabricated “facts” on the Net, slandering Japan and making wild claims such as, “The issue of comfort women and Dokdo (Takeshima Island) are threats against world peace.”
They are stoking the flames of a global diplomatic war between Japan and Korea.
VANK’s activities are heartily supported by the Korean Government and major Korean companies.
The Korean Government financially supported VANK for four years, beginning in 2005, using the 14 Voluntary Agency Network of Korea taxpayers’ money.
http://vankstory.prkorea.com/
In February 2013, VANK President Pak Gi Tae was awarded the Korean Presidential Prize. (Above paragraphs based on the Yomiuri Newspaper, morning edition dated November 14, 2013.)
Presently, VANK engages in anti-Japanese activities in cooperation with the Korean Government.
For example, regarding the appellation “the Sea of Japan,” which has been an internationally recognized appellation among Europeans and Americans since the beginning of the 19th century, VANK supports the Korean Government’s scheme to forcibly change the appellation to the “East Sea”.
VANK has worked with maps and atlas publishers worldwide. (The Sankei Newspaper dated June 29, 2017.)15
Also, VANK has been conspicuously working to promote vile racism against Japanese people. 
This is in violation of Article 2-1 of ICERD, which stipulates that “Each State party shall not sponsor, support nor vindicate racial discrimination committed by any individual or group.” 
In Korea, the fact is that through anti-Japanese education conducted in Korea, both public officials and citizens are thoroughly committed to racial discrimination against the Japanese.

campaign to degrade Japan, every possible means and measures are taken, day and night

3-3. Examples of anti-Japanese actions by citizens
3-3-1. Anti-Japanese civil organization VANK14
In Korea, there is a civil group that openly proclaims that “they will ‘exclude’ Japan from Asia.”
That is Voluntary Agency Network of Korea (a.k.a. VANK).
VANK was established in 1999 and has about two hundred thousand members. 
Based on the concept that Koreans are superior, they disseminate a biased history that puts Korea in the most favorable light.
Above all, they are most passionate about their “Discount Japan [defile Japan] Campaign,” which has now become a national campaign. 
In this campaign to degrade Japan, every possible means and measures are taken, day and night, including irresponsible dissemination of fabricated “facts” on the Net, slandering Japan and making wild claims such as, “The issue of comfort women and Dokdo (Takeshima Island) are threats against world peace.”
They are stoking the flames of a global diplomatic war between Japan and Korea.
VANK’s activities are heartily supported by the Korean Government and major Korean companies.
The Korean Government financially supported VANK for four years, beginning in 2005, using the 14 Voluntary Agency Network of Korea taxpayers’ money.
http://vankstory.prkorea.com/
In February 2013, VANK President Pak Gi Tae was awarded the Korean Presidential Prize. (Above paragraphs based on the Yomiuri Newspaper, morning edition dated November 14, 2013.)
Presently, VANK engages in anti-Japanese activities in cooperation with the Korean Government.
For example, regarding the appellation “the Sea of Japan,” which has been an internationally recognized appellation among Europeans and Americans since the beginning of the 19th century, VANK supports the Korean Government’s scheme to forcibly change the appellation to the “East Sea”.
VANK has worked with maps and atlas publishers worldwide. (The Sankei Newspaper dated June 29, 2017.)15
Also, VANK has been conspicuously working to promote vile racism against Japanese people. 
This is in violation of Article 2-1 of ICERD, which stipulates that “Each State party shall not sponsor, support nor vindicate racial discrimination committed by any individual or group.” 
In Korea, the fact is that through anti-Japanese education conducted in Korea, both public officials and citizens are thoroughly committed to racial discrimination against the Japanese.

In Korea, there is a civil group that openly proclaims that “they will ‘exclude’ Japan from Asia

3-3. Examples of anti-Japanese actions by citizens
3-3-1. Anti-Japanese civil organization VANK14
In Korea, there is a civil group that openly proclaims that “they will ‘exclude’ Japan from Asia.”
That is Voluntary Agency Network of Korea (a.k.a. VANK).
VANK was established in 1999 and has about two hundred thousand members.
Based on the concept that Koreans are superior, they disseminate a biased history that puts Korea in the most favorable light.
Above all, they are most passionate about their “Discount Japan [defile Japan] Campaign,” which has now become a national campaign.
In this campaign to degrade Japan, every possible means and
measures are taken, day and night, including irresponsible dissemination of fabricated “facts” on the Net, slandering Japan and making wild claims such as, “The issue of comfort women and Dokdo (Takeshima Island) are threats against world peace.”
They are stoking the flames of a global diplomatic war between Japan and Korea.
VANK’s activities are heartily supported by the Korean Government and major Korean companies.
The Korean Government financially supported VANK for four years, beginning in 2005, using the 14 Voluntary Agency Network of Korea taxpayers’ money.
http://vankstory.prkorea.com/
In February 2013, VANK President Pak Gi Tae was awarded the Korean Presidential Prize. (Above paragraphs based on the Yomiuri Newspaper, morning edition dated November 14, 2013.)
Presently, VANK engages in anti-Japanese activities in cooperation with the Korean Government.
For example, regarding the appellation “the Sea of Japan,” which has been an internationally recognized appellation among Europeans and Americans since the beginning of the 19th century, VANK supports the Korean Government’s scheme to forcibly change the appellation to the “East Sea”.
VANK has worked with maps and atlas publishers worldwide. (The Sankei Newspaper dated June 29, 2017.)15
Also, VANK has been conspicuously working to promote vile racism against Japanese people.
This is in violation of Article 2-1 of ICERD, which stipulates that “Each State party shall not sponsor, support nor vindicate racial discrimination committed by any individual or group.”
In Korea, the fact is that through anti-Japanese education conducted in Korea, both public officials and citizens are thoroughly committed to racial discrimination against the Japanese.

Besides, it is clearly against laws that ban illegal export/import of cultural assets (UNESCO Treaty

South Korea that is the country of abysmal evil and plausible lie makes the United Nations and Europe and America a stage, and it is the anti-Japanese propaganda that came, unrolling persistently.
On the contrary, those who lived as Japan's treasures in various fields of Japan, finally rise up against the lies, on the official website of the UN Human Rights Committee in November last year, Posted the truth of things ... It is a paper as a result of real intelligence and academics.
You truly received their anti-Japanese propaganda, and stopped progress the Turntable of Civilization, which is turning to Japan as a country that years to 1900 years later, along with the United States,
People all over the world who are making the unstable and extremely dangerous world now, know how ignorant and stupid you are and you never again commit the crime of stopping the progress of the Turntable of Civilization.
3-2-3. Infringement on free learning
Professor Park Yu-ha of Sejong University was found guilty in Seoul High Court on October 27,2017. 
This is a familiar example. 
Based on research, Professor Pak pointed out that “professional prostitutes” were among the former Japanese military comfort women. 
But she was found guilty of “defamation of character” and charged a fine of 10 million won. 
In this case, again, hate against a specific people (the Japanese people) comes before law—this is the true state of Korea, wherein even free academic inquiry is suppressed.
3-2-4. The Yasukuni Shrine arsonist is a political criminal
A suspect named Liu Qiang (an ethnic Chinese), who was serving prison time on a charge of throwing Molotov cocktails into the Japanese Embassy in Seoul in January 2012, confessed during interrogation that he set fire to Yasukuni Shrine in Japan in December 2011. 
Yasukuni Shrine is a sacred site, where those killed in service of the State are enshrined. 
Yasukini Shrine would be the equivalent to Arlington National Cemetery in the US. 
Naturally, the Japanese Government asked for the transfer of the suspect from Korea to Japan, based on an extradition treaty between Japan and Korea. 
However, the Korean High Court viewed suspect Liu as a “political criminal” and sent him back to China. 
Their reason was that “the arson was committed for the political purpose of having Japan change its policy and, therefore,
it is classified as a political crime, in which Korea can refuse transfer.” 
It is not logical at all to regard an arsonist as a “political criminal”, and, here again, it is plain that so long as Japan is concerned, there is no need to observe international treaties,
3-2-5. No need to return the Buddhist statue stolen from a Japanese temple
In October 2012, a Korean burglary gang stole “Sitting Statue of Kanzeon,” a prefectural-designated cultural asset, from Kannon-ji Temple in Tsushima City, Nagasaki Prefecture and took it home to Korea. 
The gang was arrested in Korea and the Buddhist statue was retrieved. 
Despite a request from Japan for the return of the statue, the Taejon District Court temporarily ruled that until Japan proved that it obtained the statue through legal means, the statue would not be returned. 
To this day, the statue has yet to be returned to Japan. 
However, it is almost impossible to find out how the statue was obtained in the fourteenth century. 
To be consistent with the Korean court’s temporary decision, if Egyptians and others stole their former national treasures from The British Museum or The Louvre and brought them home, they would not have to return the treasures until it was proven that Great Britain and France obtained them legally. 
To steal a Buddhist statue, however, is clearly theft and the statue should be returned to Japan. 
Besides, it is clearly against laws that ban illegal export/import of cultural assets (UNESCO Treaty), and duties to return stolen cultural assets. (Even if the Buddhist statue had been plundered by Japan in the 14th century, the UNESCO Treaty does not apply to acts which had taken place before the Treaty took effect.)
Clearly, not complying with Japan’s proper requests to return the Buddhist statue is against common sense and laws and plain discrimination against Japan.

it is plain that so long as Japan is concerned, there is no need to observe international treaties

South Korea that is the country of abysmal evil and plausible lie makes the United Nations and Europe and America a stage, and it is the anti-Japanese propaganda that came, unrolling persistently.
On the contrary, those who lived as Japan's treasures in various fields of Japan, finally rise up against the lies, on the official website of the UN Human Rights Committee in November last year, Posted the truth of things ... It is a paper as a result of real intelligence and academics.
You truly received their anti-Japanese propaganda, and stopped progress the Turntable of Civilization, which is turning to Japan as a country that years to 1900 years later, along with the United States,
People all over the world who are making the unstable and extremely dangerous world now, know how ignorant and stupid you are and you never again commit the crime of stopping the progress of the Turntable of Civilization.
3-2-3. Infringement on free learning
Professor Park Yu-ha of Sejong University was found guilty in Seoul High Court on October 27,2017. 
This is a familiar example. 
Based on research, Professor Pak pointed out that “professional prostitutes” were among the former Japanese military comfort women. 
But she was found guilty of “defamation of character” and charged a fine of 10 million won. 
In this case, again, hate against a specific people (the Japanese people) comes before law—this is the true state of Korea, wherein even free academic inquiry is suppressed.
3-2-4. The Yasukuni Shrine arsonist is a political criminal
A suspect named Liu Qiang (an ethnic Chinese), who was serving prison time on a charge of throwing Molotov cocktails into the Japanese Embassy in Seoul in January 2012, confessed during interrogation that he set fire to Yasukuni Shrine in Japan in December 2011. 
Yasukuni Shrine is a sacred site, where those killed in service of the State are enshrined. 
Yasukini Shrine would be the equivalent to Arlington National Cemetery in the US. 
Naturally, the Japanese Government asked for the transfer of the suspect from Korea to Japan, based on an extradition treaty between Japan and Korea. 
However, the Korean High Court viewed suspect Liu as a “political criminal” and sent him back to China. 
Their reason was that “the arson was committed for the political purpose of having Japan change its policy and, therefore,
it is classified as a political crime, in which Korea can refuse transfer.” 
It is not logical at all to regard an arsonist as a “political criminal”, and, here again, it is plain that so long as Japan is concerned, there is no need to observe international treaties,
3-2-5. No need to return the Buddhist statue stolen from a Japanese temple
In October 2012, a Korean burglary gang stole “Sitting Statue of Kanzeon,” a prefectural-designated cultural asset, from Kannon-ji Temple in Tsushima City, Nagasaki Prefecture and took it home to 
Korea. 
The gang was arrested in Korea and the Buddhist statue was retrieved. 
Despite a request from Japan for the return of the statue, the Taejon District Court temporarily ruled that until Japan proved that it obtained the statue through legal means, the statue would not be returned. 
To this day, the statue has yet to be returned to Japan. 
However, it is almost impossible to find out how the statue was
obtained in the fourteenth century. 
To be consistent with the Korean court’s temporary decision, if
Egyptians and others stole their former national treasures from The British Museum or The Louvre and brought them home, they would not have to return the treasures until it was proven that Great
Britain and France obtained them legally. 
To steal a Buddhist statue, however, is clearly theft and the
statue should be returned to Japan. 
Besides, it is clearly against laws that ban illegal export/import of
cultural assets (UNESCO Treaty), and duties to return stolen cultural assets. (Even if the Buddhist statue had been plundered by Japan in the 14th century, the UNESCO Treaty does not apply to acts
which had taken place before the Treaty took effect.)
Clearly, not complying with Japan’s proper requests to return the Buddhist statue is against common sense and laws and plain discrimination against Japan.

In this case, again, hate against a specific people (the Japanese people) comes before law

South Korea that is the country of abysmal evil and plausible lie makes the United Nations and Europe and America a stage, and it is the anti-Japanese propaganda that came, unrolling persistently.
On the contrary, those who lived as Japan's treasures in various fields of Japan, finally rise up against the lies, on the official website of the UN Human Rights Committee in November last year, Posted the truth of things ... It is a paper as a result of real intelligence and academics.
You truly received their anti-Japanese propaganda, and stopped progress the Turntable of Civilization, which is turning to Japan as a country that years to 1900 years later, along with the United States,
People all over the world who are making the unstable and extremely dangerous world now, know how ignorant and stupid you are and you never again commit the crime of stopping the progress of the Turntable of Civilization.
3-2-3. Infringement on free learning
Professor Park Yu-ha of Sejong University was found guilty in Seoul High Court on October 27,2017.
This is a familiar example.
Based on research, Professor Pak pointed out that “professional prostitutes” were among the former Japanese military comfort women.
But she was found guilty of “defamation of character” and charged a fine of 10 million won.
In this case, again, hate against a specific people (the Japanese people) comes before law—this is the true state of Korea, wherein even free academic inquiry is suppressed.
3-2-4. The Yasukuni Shrine arsonist is a political criminal
A suspect named Liu Qiang (an ethnic Chinese), who was serving prison time on a charge of throwing Molotov cocktails into the Japanese Embassy in Seoul in January 2012, confessed during interrogation that he set fire to Yasukuni Shrine in Japan in December 2011.
Yasukuni Shrine is a sacred site, where those killed in service of the State are enshrined.
Yasukini Shrine would be the equivalent to Arlington National Cemetery in the US.
Naturally, the Japanese Government asked for the transfer of the suspect from Korea to Japan, based on an extradition treaty between Japan and Korea.
However, the Korean High Court viewed suspect Liu as a “political criminal” and sent him back to China.
Their reason was that “the arson was committed for the political purpose of having Japan change its policy and, therefore,
it is classified as a political crime, in which Korea can refuse transfer.”
It is not logical at all to regard an arsonist as a “political criminal”, and, here again, it is plain that so long as Japan is concerned, there
is no need to observe international treaties,
3-2-5. No need to return the Buddhist statue stolen from a Japanese temple
In October 2012, a Korean burglary gang stole “Sitting Statue of Kanzeon,” a prefectural-designated cultural asset, from Kannon-ji Temple in Tsushima City, Nagasaki Prefecture and took it home to
Korea.
The gang was arrested in Korea and the Buddhist statue was retrieved.
Despite a request from Japan for the return of the statue, the Taejon District Court temporarily ruled that until Japan proved that it obtained the statue through legal means, the statue would not be returned.
To this day, the statue has yet to be returned to Japan.
However, it is almost impossible to find out how the statue was
obtained in the fourteenth century.
To be consistent with the Korean court’s temporary decision, if
Egyptians and others stole their former national treasures from The British Museum or The Louvre and brought them home, they would not have to return the treasures until it was proven that Great
Britain and France obtained them legally.
To steal a Buddhist statue, however, is clearly theft and the
statue should be returned to Japan.
Besides, it is clearly against laws that ban illegal export/import of
cultural assets (UNESCO Treaty), and duties to return stolen cultural assets. (Even if the Buddhist statue had been plundered by Japan in the 14th century, the UNESCO Treaty does not apply to acts
which had taken place before the Treaty took effect.)
Clearly, not complying with Japan’s proper requests to return the Buddhist statue is against common sense and laws and plain discrimination against Japan.

北朝鮮核問題や拉致問題を取り上げて北朝鮮を批判する日本の世論を変えねばならない。在日同胞たちが過去に日本に連れて来られたことに対しては何も言わず

北の将軍様のためにこのような発言を垂れ流す御仁をいまだ使い続けているのが、関口氏のサンモニなのである。と題して2018-06-04に発信した章を再発信する。
以下は月刊誌正論今月号、シリーズ第18回、日本虚人列伝「関口宏」北朝鮮との“友好”を愛するサンデーモーニング名司会者「関口宏」と題して掲載された特集からである。
見出し以外の文中強調は私。
中韓両国の肩を持つ報道が多いとして、ネット民から「反日番組」と揶揄されているＴＢＳの「サンデーモーニング」（サンモニ）が、４月29日の放送でまたやらかした。
関口宏氏が司会を務めるこの番組で、常連コメンテーターの姜尚中氏が次のような驚くべきコメントを残したのである。
「拉致が見つかってから30年間解決されなかった。安倍政権はそれをかなり政治的な資源として利用してきたが、結局めどが立たなかったが、やっと今ここに来ている」　
＊こんな発言を平然と公共の電波であるテレビで行うような男を…、
東大野球部出身であることと新潟県人である事を表面上の売りにしている…有数の読書家である私の友人は、彼の笑いを悪い笑い…腹の一物をごまかしている笑いであると喝破していたが…
NHKのwatch9でこの男、姜尚中を尊敬している等と堂々と発言するは、日本国民が朝鮮半島人を強制連行したなどという姜尚中の嘘を100％真に受けている愚か者として…
私たちが朝鮮人を強制連行したなどとwatch9で平然と言い放ったのである。
大越が単なる受験優等生の愚かな頭脳しか持っていないのだとしても…、こんな嘘を大学で教わり、信じているような馬鹿が…、
東大の中には一定数いるらしいことは…、
国立大学としては、これ以上ない嘆かわしさなのである。＊
北朝鮮が拉致を認めるずっと前から、この問題に向き合っていた政治家が、安倍首相以外に果たしてどれほどいたと言うのか。
『政治的資源』とは失礼が過ぎる。
私は開いた口がふさがらなかった。　
左派色が濃いＴＢＳの中でもサンモニの親北朝鮮ぶりは突出している。
特に関口氏が重用するこの姜尚中氏は…、
「ミサイルや『拉致疑惑』で正常化交渉は遅々として進まない」（『東北アジア共同の家をめざして』平凡社）との認識を見てもわかるように…、
拉致問題の存在にすら疑義を呈し、日本が北朝鮮にインネンをつけているという主張を続けてきた人物だ。
他にも「日本が拉致問題を理由に北朝鮮を支援しない態度でいれば、国際社会から孤立してしまうので経済支援をするべきである」（2007年10月１日、ソウル大学での統一政策フォーラムにて）
「北朝鮮核問題や拉致問題を取り上げて北朝鮮を批判する日本の世論を変えねばならない。在日同胞たちが過去に日本に連れて来られたことに対しては何も言わず、冷戦時代の拉致ばかり話すというのは矛盾したことだ。私は横に横田夫妻（横田滋、横田早紀江）がいても、これを言うことができる」（2006年3月25日の世界海外韓人貿易協会での講演にて）など、トンデモ発言には事欠かない。
北朝鮮を一貫して擁護　
北の将軍様のためにこのような発言を垂れ流す御仁をいまだ使い続けているのが、関口氏のサンモニなのである。
それもそのはず、この番組自体、今に至るまで一貫して拉致の存在を無視、もしくは軽視してきたからだ。
この稿続く。

この姜尚中氏は…拉致問題の存在にすら疑義を呈し、日本が北朝鮮にインネンをつけているという主張を続けてきた人物だ。

北の将軍様のためにこのような発言を垂れ流す御仁をいまだ使い続けているのが、関口氏のサンモニなのである。と題して2018-06-04に発信した章を再発信する。
以下は月刊誌正論今月号、シリーズ第18回、日本虚人列伝「関口宏」北朝鮮との“友好”を愛するサンデーモーニング名司会者「関口宏」と題して掲載された特集からである。
見出し以外の文中強調は私。
中韓両国の肩を持つ報道が多いとして、ネット民から「反日番組」と揶揄されているＴＢＳの「サンデーモーニング」（サンモニ）が、４月29日の放送でまたやらかした。
関口宏氏が司会を務めるこの番組で、常連コメンテーターの姜尚中氏が次のような驚くべきコメントを残したのである。
「拉致が見つかってから30年間解決されなかった。安倍政権はそれをかなり政治的な資源として利用してきたが、結局めどが立たなかったが、やっと今ここに来ている」　
＊こんな発言を平然と公共の電波であるテレビで行うような男を…、
東大野球部出身であることと新潟県人である事を表面上の売りにしている…有数の読書家である私の友人は、彼の笑いを悪い笑い…腹の一物をごまかしている笑いであると喝破していたが…
NHKのwatch9でこの男、姜尚中を尊敬している等と堂々と発言するは、日本国民が朝鮮半島人を強制連行したなどという姜尚中の嘘を100％真に受けている愚か者として…
私たちが朝鮮人を強制連行したなどとwatch9で平然と言い放ったのである。
大越が単なる受験優等生の愚かな頭脳しか持っていないのだとしても…、こんな嘘を大学で教わり、信じているような馬鹿が…、
東大の中には一定数いるらしいことは…、
国立大学としては、これ以上ない嘆かわしさなのである。＊
北朝鮮が拉致を認めるずっと前から、この問題に向き合っていた政治家が、安倍首相以外に果たしてどれほどいたと言うのか。
『政治的資源』とは失礼が過ぎる。
私は開いた口がふさがらなかった。　
左派色が濃いＴＢＳの中でもサンモニの親北朝鮮ぶりは突出している。
特に関口氏が重用するこの姜尚中氏は…、
「ミサイルや『拉致疑惑』で正常化交渉は遅々として進まない」（『東北アジア共同の家をめざして』平凡社）との認識を見てもわかるように…、
拉致問題の存在にすら疑義を呈し、日本が北朝鮮にインネンをつけているという主張を続けてきた人物だ。
他にも「日本が拉致問題を理由に北朝鮮を支援しない態度でいれば、国際社会から孤立してしまうので経済支援をするべきである」（2007年10月１日、ソウル大学での統一政策フォーラムにて）
「北朝鮮核問題や拉致問題を取り上げて北朝鮮を批判する日本の世論を変えねばならない。在日同胞たちが過去に日本に連れて来られたことに対しては何も言わず、冷戦時代の拉致ばかり話すというのは矛盾したことだ。私は横に横田夫妻（横田滋、横田早紀江）がいても、これを言うことができる」（2006年113月25日の世界海外韓人貿易協会での講演にて）など、トンデモ発言には事欠かない。
北朝鮮を一貫して擁護　
北の将軍様のためにこのような発言を垂れ流す御仁をいまだ使い続けているのが、関口氏のサンモニなのである。
それもそのはず、この番組自体、今に至るまで一貫して拉致の存在を無視、もしくは軽視してきたからだ。
この稿続く。

こんな嘘を大学で教わり、信じているような馬鹿が、 東大の中には一定数いるらしいことは、 国立大学としては、これ以上ない嘆かわしさなのである。

北の将軍様のためにこのような発言を垂れ流す御仁をいまだ使い続けているのが、関口氏のサンモニなのである。と題して2018-06-04に発信した章を再発信する。
以下は月刊誌正論今月号、シリーズ第18回、日本虚人列伝「関口宏」北朝鮮との“友好”を愛するサンデーモーニング名司会者「関口宏」と題して掲載された特集からである。
見出し以外の文中強調は私。
中韓両国の肩を持つ報道が多いとして、ネット民から「反日番組」と揶揄されているＴＢＳの「サンデーモーニング」（サンモニ）が、４月29日の放送でまたやらかした。
関口宏氏が司会を務めるこの番組で、常連コメンテーターの姜尚中氏が次のような驚くべきコメントを残したのである。
「拉致が見つかってから30年間解決されなかった。安倍政権はそれをかなり政治的な資源として利用してきたが、結局めどが立たなかったが、やっと今ここに来ている」　
＊こんな発言を平然と公共の電波であるテレビで行うような男を…、
東大野球部出身であることと新潟県人である事を表面上の売りにしている…有数の読書家である私の友人は、彼の笑いを悪い笑い…腹の一物をごまかしている笑いであると喝破していたが…
NHKのwatch9でこの男、姜尚中を尊敬している等と堂々と発言するは、日本国民が朝鮮半島人を強制連行したなどという姜尚中の嘘を100％真に受けている愚か者として…
私たちが朝鮮人を強制連行したなどとwatch9で平然と言い放ったのである。
大越が単なる受験優等生の愚かな頭脳しか持っていないのだとしても…、こんな嘘を大学で教わり、信じているような馬鹿が…、
東大の中には一定数いるらしいことは…、
国立大学としては、これ以上ない嘆かわしさなのである。＊
北朝鮮が拉致を認めるずっと前から、この問題に向き合っていた政治家が、安倍首相以外に果たしてどれほどいたと言うのか。
『政治的資源』とは失礼が過ぎる。
私は開いた口がふさがらなかった。　
左派色が濃いＴＢＳの中でも、サンモニの親北朝鮮ぶりは突出している。
特に関口氏が重用するこの姜尚中氏は…、
「ミサイルや『拉致疑惑』で正常化交渉は遅々として進まない」（『東北アジア共同の家をめざして』平凡社）との認識を見てもわかるように…、
拉致問題の存在にすら疑義を呈し、日本が北朝鮮にインネンをつけているという主張を続けてきた人物だ。
他にも「日本が拉致問題を理由に北朝鮮を支援しない態度でいれば、国際社会から孤立してしまうので経済支援をするべきである」（2007年10月１日、ソウル大学での統一政策フォーラムにて）
「北朝鮮核問題や拉致問題を取り上げて北朝鮮を批判する日本の世論を変えねばならない。在日同胞たちが過去に日本に連れて来られたことに対しては何も言わず、冷戦時代の拉致ばかり話すというのは矛盾したことだ。私は横に横田夫妻（横田滋、横田早紀江）がいても、これを言うことができる」（2006年113月25日の世界海外韓人貿易協会での講演にて）など、トンデモ発言には事欠かない。
北朝鮮を一貫して擁護　
北の将軍様のためにこのような発言を垂れ流す御仁をいまだ使い続けているのが、関口氏のサンモニなのである。
それもそのはず、この番組自体、今に至るまで一貫して拉致の存在を無視、もしくは軽視してきたからだ。
この稿続く。

ＧＨＱ、旧陸軍、大蔵、外務両省の資料から割り出された。協定を破棄するなら、日本は8兆円の請求書を突き付ければよい。

日本人の堪忍袋の緒は切れかけている。韓国よ、いつまでも日本に甘えるな。と題して2019-01-13に発信した章が、今、アメーバで公式ハッシュタグランキング：大邱32位に入っている。
経済制裁やビザ復活などの入国規制を検討すべきである。と題して2018-11-06 に発信した章がアメーバで公式ハッシュタグランキング：大邱45位に入っている。
以下は今日の産経新聞12ページに「韓国よ、甘えるな」と題して掲載された記事からである。
３年前、福岡県田川市に住む元飲食店経営の李大一さん＝当時（64）＝に話を聞いた。
李さんの伯父は戦前、筑豊地方の方城炭鉱で働いていた。
「伯父は出身地・大邱（現在の韓国）の朝鮮人村長の命令で日本に来た。でも、自らの意思で職を求めて来た半島出身者がずいぶんいたと言っていた」
日本政府が国民徴用令を制定したのは昭和14年7月。
徴用を猶予された半島出身者が対象になったのは終戦1年前の19年9月だ。
それまでは民間業者の斡旋による自由募集だった。
危険な分、炭鉱労働の給与はケタ違いで高かった。
方城町の元文化財専門委員、植田辰生さん＝当時（91）＝によると、大正９年、炭鉱労働者の賃金は米一俵（60ｋｇ）が12円の時、平均月給は37円77銭だった。
米一俵は成人男性が1年間に消費する量だ。3年分の米をひと月でもらっていた計算だ。
取材メモを見直したのは、予想通りとはいえ、韓国最高裁が愚挙に出たためだ。
韓国人４人が新日鉄住金を相手取った訴訟だ。
いずれも徴用ではなく、募集に応じて高収入目当てに自分の意思で本土に来た。
賃金の未払い分ではなく、慰謝料を支払えと言う４人の言い分を丸のみした。
完全かつ最終的に解決されたと明記した昭和40年の日韓請求権協定を否定したものだ。
日本企業の資産差し押さえもしかねない。
日本の対応だが、紛争相手国の同意が必要な国際司法裁判所への提訴や「遺憾」の連発だけなら、何もやらぬに等しい。
経済制裁やビザ復活などの入国規制を検討すべきである。
日本は韓国に対し、有償無償で計５億＄支払った。朝鮮半島に残した道路、港湾、鉄道、水力発電所といったインフラもすべて放棄した。
総資産は約17兆円で、韓国部分は現在に換算して8兆円という試算がある。
ＧＨＱ、旧陸軍、大蔵、外務両省の資料から割り出された。
協定を破棄するなら、日本は8兆円の請求書を突き付ければよい。　
日本人の堪忍袋の緒は切れかけている。
韓国よ、いつまでも日本に甘えるな。
論説副委員長　佐々木類

Korea is so busily involved in instigating hate towards Japan through anti-Japanese education

3-2-2. Verdict ordering Japanese companies to pay compensation
All matters concerning demands to compensation were resolved “completely and finally” by “agreements on the rights of demanding and economic cooperation” with the conclusion of the Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and Korea in 1965. 
And until this particular case arouse, Korea adhered to the agreements. 
However, in a trial against Japanese companies Shin-Nittetsu (currently Shin Nittetsu Jukin) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries held in May 2012, the Korean Supreme Court ruled that an individual’s demand for compensation is “valid” and dismissed the original verdict, which ruled against the plaintiff, and returned the case to the High Court. 
The following is the view of the Korean Supreme Court:
“The Japanese court verdicts were based on the assumption that application of the National Mobilization Act to the plaintiff was effective on the understanding that colonial rule was legal, but this recognition is clearly against the basic values held by the Korean Constitution that deemed Japanese rule to have been an illegal occupation and that the National Mobilization Act itself was illegal.”
As pointed out at the beginning, Japan's Annexation of Korea was perfectly legal. 
In the first place, the Korean Constitution is an after-the-fact legal document and cannot be used to judge events that occurred during Japanese rule. 
They say that the initial Korean court verdict was against the basic values held by the Korean Constitution, but the Korean Constitution was enacted in 1948 and has been amended as many as nine times since its initial enactment.
If the Korean Supreme Court’s view is right, and Korea wishes to abandon the treaty and demand compensation from foreign countries, it should enact a new Constitution or amend the current Constitution and then judge matters that are “against the basic values of the Constitution.”
The Korean Supreme Court issued such an extraordinary verdict because even the highest judiciary organ in Korea puts anti-Japanese sentiment before the Constitution, international laws and treaties.
Such a state is hardly capable of winning trust from other states.Korea is so busily involved in instigating hate towards Japan through anti-Japanese education that we cannot help but point out that in Korea, even the judiciary deviates from common sense notions such as a government based on laws and that discrimination against Japan has permeated all over Korea.

In the first place, the Korean Constitution is an after-the-fact legal document and cannot be

3-2-2. Verdict ordering Japanese companies to pay compensation
All matters concerning demands to compensation were resolved “completely and finally” by “agreements on the rights of demanding and economic cooperation” with the conclusion of the Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and Korea in 1965. 
And until this particular case arouse, Korea adhered to the agreements. 
However, in a trial against Japanese companies Shin-Nittetsu (currently Shin Nittetsu Jukin) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries held in May 2012, the Korean Supreme Court ruled that an individual’s demand for compensation is “valid” and dismissed the original verdict, which ruled against the plaintiff, and returned the case to the High Court. 
The following is the view of the Korean Supreme Court:
“The Japanese court verdicts were based on the assumption that application of the National Mobilization Act to the plaintiff was effective on the understanding that colonial rule was legal, but this recognition is clearly against the basic values held by the Korean Constitution that deemed Japanese rule to have been an illegal occupation and that the National Mobilization Act itself was illegal.”
As pointed out at the beginning, Japan's Annexation of Korea was perfectly legal. 
In the first place, the Korean Constitution is an after-the-fact legal document and cannot be used to judge events that occurred during Japanese rule. 
They say that the initial Korean court verdict was against the basic values held by the Korean Constitution, but the Korean Constitution was enacted in 1948 and has been amended as many as nine times since its initial enactment.
If the Korean Supreme Court’s view is right, and Korea wishes to abandon the treaty and demand compensation from foreign countries, it should enact a new Constitution or amend the current Constitution and then judge matters that are “against the basic values of the Constitution.”
The Korean Supreme Court issued such an extraordinary verdict because even the highest judiciary organ in Korea puts anti-Japanese sentiment before the Constitution, international laws and treaties.
Such a state is hardly capable of winning trust from other states.Korea is so busily involved in instigating hate towards Japan through anti-Japanese education that we cannot help but point out that in Korea, even the judiciary deviates from common sense notions such as a government based on laws and that discrimination against Japan has permeated all over Korea.

As pointed out at the beginning, “Japan’s Annexation of Korea” was perfectly legal.

3-2-2. Verdict ordering Japanese companies to pay compensation
All matters concerning demands to compensation were resolved “completely and finally” by “agreements on the rights of demanding and economic cooperation” with the conclusion of the Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and Korea in 1965. 
And until this particular case arouse, Korea adhered to the agreements. 
However, in a trial against Japanese companies Shin-Nittetsu (currently Shin Nittetsu Jukin) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries held in May 2012, the Korean Supreme Court ruled that an individual’s demand for compensation is “valid” and dismissed the original verdict, which ruled against the plaintiff, and returned the case to the High Court. 
The following is the view of the Korean Supreme Court:
“The Japanese court verdicts were based on the assumption that application of the National Mobilization Act to the plaintiff was effective on the understanding that colonial rule was legal, but this recognition is clearly against the basic values held by the Korean Constitution that deemed Japanese rule to have been an illegal occupation and that the National Mobilization Act itself was illegal.”
As pointed out at the beginning, “Japan’s Annexation of Korea” was perfectly legal. 
In the first place, the Korean Constitution is an after-the-fact legal document and cannot be used to judge events that occurred during Japanese rule. 
They say that the initial Korean court verdict was against the basic values held by the Korean Constitution, but the Korean Constitution was enacted in 1948 and has been amended as many as nine times since its initial enactment.
If the Korean Supreme Court’s view is right, and Korea wishes to abandon the treaty and demand compensation from foreign countries, it should enact a new Constitution or amend the current Constitution and then judge matters that are “against the basic values of the Constitution.”
The Korean Supreme Court issued such an extraordinary verdict because even the highest judiciary organ in Korea puts anti-Japanese sentiment before the Constitution, international laws and treaties.
Such a state is hardly capable of winning trust from other states.Korea is so busily involved in instigating hate towards Japan through anti-Japanese education that we cannot help but point out that in Korea, even the judiciary deviates from common sense notions such as a government based on laws and that discrimination against Japan has permeated all over Korea.