The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
Benefits that Park Chung-hee has received from Japan
“The development of the police system and the security of the country has improved the security of remote areas where burglars and robbers were rampant. The peace in Korea has not been clouded since the annexation. In March 1919, a disturbance occurred suddenly (Watarube Note 3.1 Movement), which was the influence of the national self-determinism advocated by President Wilson, but was immediately suppressed. It was carefully reformed, but it was decided to rush to see the plan.It should be noted that not only military personnel will also civilians will be able to be appointed governor of Korea, the governor was in charge of the emperor only but changed to obey the prime minister. The prime minister, Hara Takashi, discriminates between Japanese and Koreans on the education, industry, and civil service system, as the prime minister. Prime Minister Hara Takashi has stated that he is promoting a policy to eliminate discrimination between Japanese and Koreans in the education, industry, and civil service system, and thus peace has returned to Korea again. Even after that, the dissatisfaction molecule was sometimes noisy, but it was excellently suppressed."
It is not limited to the era of Japanese rule that Koreans cause riots.
Even after independence, there were many revolts, such as the Jeju Island Incident (1948) and the Gwangju Incident (1980).
It is much more than Japan era.
Anyway, the word "Annexation" is also used in the description of this 1922 edition Britannica.
Four years later, in the 13th edition issued in 1926, the item "Annexation of Korea" is added, “First Sino-Japanese War and the Russo-Japanese War, it was a battle to prevent Korea from becoming a dagger directed at the Japanese heart," and wrote "There was no better way than Japan's merger to put off the whimsical and suicidal diplomacy of Korean courtiers, which means that it culminated with the assassination of Ito Hirobumi", Japan it is written very sympathetic to Japan.
It is also frequently described how the economy has developed and stabilized in the Korean peninsula after the union with Japan.
What is described as "The Tokyo government thinks that it is Japan's responsibility to reign Korea, and the King of Korea has received high honor and economic economic support" is a polite way of treating Japan against Korea's Lee royal family. It is.
Treated according to the royal family of Japan, the Queen of Masako of the Nashimoto no Miya family is married to the prince of Yi Un.
If it is a "colonial" royal family conquered by aggression, it is impossible to marry a royal family in your home country.
There is never been a case in which the King of Korea had a wife of a royal daughter of China.
In other words, annexation has created three upper classes in Japan: Imperial families, other royal families (Lee royal family), and Kazoku.
By the way, the Yangbang family in Korea, which became Kazoku, was Marquess 6 people, Graf 7 people, Viscount 22 people, Baron 45 people.
Until then, the Korean peninsula was ruled by Qing.
Korea is a country that was built in Ming, so when Ming was destroyed in Qing, it was in-law and resisted, so it was completely done in Qing.
If you don't listen to the stories of people who remembered in the era of Qing's country, the pain is not easy.
I happened to have left a former North Korean deserter for a year or so.
He was a well educated man who left Pyongyang Junior High School, but according to his story, the reason why Korea in Qing end was so dirty is that if it is kept clean, Qing soldiers will come, so they even It is as dirty as can not come close.
As there is delicious food, everything is taken away, so the cuisine doesn't develop either, and it is something like scorched rice to eat.
They are afraid of Wokou and they haven't been able to go out to the sea since ancient times, so they haven't developed sea fish dishes either.
So, even during the Sino-Japanese Russo-Japanese War, Korean people were supportive of Japan. With regard to Annexation, as it was stated in the fair in Britannica, there were certainly opposition and terrorists, but most of the people were delighted.
This manuscript continues.
The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
Benefits that Park Chung-hee has received from Japan
“The development of the police system and the security of the country has improved the security of remote areas where burglars and robbers were rampant. The peace in Korea has not been clouded since the annexation. In March 1919, a disturbance occurred suddenly (Watarube Note 3.1 Movement), which was the influence of the national self-determinism advocated by President Wilson, but was immediately suppressed. It was carefully reformed, but it was decided to rush to see the plan.It should be noted that not only military personnel will also civilians will be able to be appointed governor of Korea, the governor was in charge of the emperor only but changed to obey the prime minister. The prime minister, Hara Takashi, discriminates between Japanese and Koreans on the education, industry, and civil service system, as the prime minister. Prime Minister Hara Takashi has stated that he is promoting a policy to eliminate discrimination between Japanese and Koreans in the education, industry, and civil service system, and thus peace has returned to Korea again. Even after that, the dissatisfaction molecule was sometimes noisy, but it was excellently suppressed."
It is not limited to the era of Japanese rule that Koreans cause riots.
Even after independence, there were many revolts, such as the Jeju Island Incident (1948) and the Gwangju Incident (1980).
It is much more than Japan era.
Anyway, the word "Annexation" is also used in the description of this 1922 edition Britannica.
Four years later, in the 13th edition issued in 1926, the item "Annexation of Korea" is added, “First Sino-Japanese War and the Russo-Japanese War, it was a battle to prevent Korea from becoming a dagger directed at the Japanese heart," and wrote "There was no better way than Japan's merger to put off the whimsical and suicidal diplomacy of Korean courtiers, which means that it culminated with the assassination of Ito Hirobumi", Japan it is written very sympathetic to Japan.
It is also frequently described how the economy has developed and stabilized in the Korean peninsula after the union with Japan.
What is described as "The Tokyo government thinks that it is Japan's responsibility to reign Korea, and the King of Korea has received high honor and economic economic support" is a polite way of treating Japan against Korea's Lee royal family. It is.
Treated according to the royal family of Japan, the Queen of Masako of the Nashimoto no Miya family is married to the prince of Yi Un.
If it is a "colonial" royal family conquered by aggression, it is impossible to marry a royal family in your home country.
There is never been a case in which the King of Korea had a wife of a royal daughter of China.
In other words, annexation has created three upper classes in Japan: Imperial families, other royal families (Lee royal family), and Kazoku.
By the way, the Yangbang family in Korea, which became Kazoku, was Marquess 6 people, Graf 7 people, Viscount 22 people, Baron 45 people.
Until then, the Korean peninsula was ruled by Qing.
Korea is a country that was built in Ming, so when Ming was destroyed in Qing, it was in-law and resisted, so it was completely done in Qing.
If you don't listen to the stories of people who remembered in the era of Qing's country, the pain is not easy.
I happened to have left a former North Korean deserter for a year or so.
He was a well educated man who left Pyongyang Junior High School, but according to his story, the reason why Korea in Qing end was so dirty is that if it is kept clean, Qing soldiers will come, so they even It is as dirty as can not come close.
As there is delicious food, everything is taken away, so the cuisine doesn't develop either, and it is something like scorched rice to eat.
They are afraid of Wokou and they haven't been able to go out to the sea since ancient times, so they haven't developed sea fish dishes either.
So, even during the Sino-Japanese Russo-Japanese War, Korean people were supportive of Japan. With regard to Annexation, as it was stated in the fair in Britannica, there were certainly opposition and terrorists, but most of the people were delighted.
This manuscript continues.
The following is a continuation of the great heritage that Japan's great treasure, Shoichi Watanabe, left for us.
There is no meaning to plunder and conquest
Furthermore, the word "annexatinoist" is the meaning of the Texas annexation advocate in the United States.
The word "Texan annexation" realized in 1845 does not mean "deprivation" or "conquest".
With this in mind, take a look at the 12 edition of Encyclopedia Britannica 1922.
The 11th edition of 1911, which is the next year of the Japan-Korean Union, is not yet described, and the 12th edition in the item of "Korea", published 12 years later, will be released for the first time.
Britannica, the first edition of Great Britain's Edinburgh in 1771, was published in the United Kingdom alone, and was recognized worldwide for its fairness of information along with the London Times, and knowledgeable people from all over the world It is a highly reliable encyclopedia read by
It is written there: "On August 22, 1910, Korea became an integral part of the Japanese Empire."
The phrase “integral part” here also indicates that they do not consider it as “colonial”. (Omitted) since 1906 when Japan had diplomatic rights, in Korea, orderly and systematic progress has been initiated by Japan, this (annexation) made the progress even more solid."
However, it is also written that "some people criticize the repression of Korean nationalism", and the following statement about the following purpose is continued. “The development of the police system and the security of the country has improved the security of remote areas where burglars and robbers were rampant. The peace in Korea has not been clouded since the annexation. In March 1919, a disturbance occurred suddenly (Watarube Note 3.1 Movement), which was the influence of the national self-determinism advocated by President Wilson, but was immediately suppressed. It was carefully reformed, but it was decided to rush to see the plan.It should be noted that not only military personnel will also civilians will be able to be appointed governor of Korea, the governor was in charge of the emperor only but changed to obey the prime minister.
This manuscript continues.
It was a slogan to advance the war led by the Asahi Shimbun, "
One hundred million total suicidal, without being shamed of prisoner alive "
The chapter that originated on 2018-08-30 is now in the top 10 best searches for goo.
Ryukyu Shinpo and Okinawa Times, two of the monopolized newspapers in Okinawa, should have existed before the war, and the contents should have been in accordance with the Asahi Shimbun etc. as in the present. saw.
The result was more than my guess.
Above all, with Wikipedia below, my goal was achieved 100% ....
Launched in June 1931 as the "Okinawa Nippon Daily Newspaper". The title was changed to "Okinawa Nippo" in 1932 one year later, and along with the Okinawa Asahi Shimbun and Ryukyu Shinpo, they gained great support as a prefectural area newspaper representing Okinawa Prefecture in the early Showa era.
Masayuki Takayama brilliantly elucidates the severity of the as usual aspect of the Asahi Shimbun and the nature that they rely on, which were also revealed in the cervical cancer preventive vaccination coverage, and Muranaka Riko is a real scholar and human being. ,
When the world's good sense gave the John Maddox award to Muranaka Riko who did not succumb to the vicious pressure of Asahi etc., and Asahi's fabrication coverage became clear to the world, an insignificant article on a page that readers do not read after three weeks For the mode reported in ...
He has been criticized, saying he is a newspaper company, which has been a temporizing measure in every point.
Also in the search results just now, the constitution that is the ultimate feature of Asahi Shimbun's life was exposed.
Along with the Okinawa Asahi Shimbun and Ryukyu Shimpo, we have gained tremendous support as a prefectural area newspaper representing Okinawa Prefecture in the early Showa period
If you click this "Okinawa Asahi Shimbun", nothing will come out.
It is exactly the same way as deleting the comfort woman related articles in English and making it impossible to search for the corrected articles ... indeed, it is a newspaper with in every point temporizing measures.
Why did Asahi Shimbun delete the search for Okinawa Asahi Shimbun, which was the newspaper that represented Okinawa Prefecture before the war?
Asahi Shimbun used "Okinawa notebook" which is a random anti-Japanese propaganda work of Oe Kenzaburo, etc.
Okinawan people who committed suicide or jumped off the cliff in the war against Okinawa (I remember that there were a lot of women) ... It is no exaggeration to say that it is now a symbol of anti-Japanese propaganda "Himeyuri Memorial" ... this case they Forged the work of the Japanese army.
They are being removed from the search to conceal that they were the ones who had been forced to commit suicide to the reports of the Asahi Shimbun of that time.
There was a slogan for the war led by the Asahi Shimbun, "One hundred million total suicidal, without being shamed of prisoner alive", and other than this, there was no one who made Okinawa women go for suicide. .
The sins of the Asahi and Oe Kenzaburo, who in fact rubbed it against the highly disciplined Japanese soldiers, are deeper than the sea and are not forgiven at all.
If you look at the editorials and papers of the Asahi Shimbun at the time, it is obvious that ... So Asahi Shimbun is trying not to come out in the search.
朝日新聞が主導した戦争に向かわせるためのスローガンだった、「一億総玉砕、生きて虜囚の辱めを受けず」と題して2018-08-30に発信した章が、今、gooの検索数ベスト１０に入っている。
現在、沖縄の新聞紙発行を独占している二紙である琉球新報と沖縄タイムスは戦前からあったはずで、その内容は現在と同様に朝日新聞等に準じていたはずであると思い検索してみた。その結果は私の推測以上のものだった。
何よりも、以下のウィキペディアで、私の目的は１００％達成されていたのだが…。
1931年6月に「沖縄日日新聞」として創刊。1年後の1932年に「沖縄日報」に題字を変更し、沖縄朝日新聞、琉球新報と並んで、昭和初期の沖縄県を代表する県域新聞として絶大なる支持を集めた。
高山正之は子宮頸がん予防ワクチン接種騒動の、朝日新聞の例に依っての態様の酷さと彼らの依って来る本質を見事に解き明かし、本物の学者であり人間であり、朝日等のふざけた圧力にも屈しなかった村中璃子さんに世界の良識がジョンマドックス賞を与え、朝日の捏造報道が世界に明らかになった時、３週間後に、読者が読まないページにベタ記事で報道した態様に対して…、
どこまでも姑息な新聞会社である、と、手厳しく批判していたが…。
今しがたの検索結果においても、朝日新聞社の姑息の極みである体質が露呈されていたのである。
沖縄朝日新聞、琉球新報と並んで、昭和初期の沖縄県を代表する県域新聞として絶大なる支持を集めた
この、「沖縄朝日新聞」、をクリックしても何も出てこないのである。
英文での慰安婦関連記事の削除、訂正記事を、検索できないようにしていたと全く同じ態様…正に、どこまでも姑息な新聞なのである。
何故、朝日新聞社が戦前沖縄県を代表する新聞だった沖縄朝日新聞の検索を削除しているのか？
朝日新聞が大江健三郎のでたらめな反日プロパガンダ作品である「沖縄ノート」などを利用して、沖縄戦において自決したり断崖から飛び降りた沖縄の人たち（私は婦人が多かったように記憶する）…
今や反日プロパガンダの象徴であるといっても過言ではない「ひめゆりの塔」…。
彼女たちを自決に追い込んだのが当時の朝日新聞の報道であることを隠蔽するために検索から削除しているのである。
朝日新聞が主導した戦争に向かわせるためのスローガンだった、「一億総玉砕、生きて虜囚の辱めを受けず」これ以外に沖縄の婦人達を自決に向かわせたものなどありはしないのである。
それを、実は規律の厳しかった日本の軍人たちに擦り付けた朝日新聞と大江健三郎の罪は海よりも深いもので、到底、許されるものではないのである。
当時の朝日新聞の社説や紙面を見れば、それは一目瞭然…だから朝日新聞社は検索に出てこないようにしているのである。
朝日新聞が主導した戦争に向かわせるためのスローガンだった、「一億総玉砕、生きて虜囚の辱めを受けず」と題して2018-08-30に発信した章が、今、gooの検索数ベスト１０に入っている。
現在、沖縄の新聞紙発行を独占している二紙である琉球新報と沖縄タイムスは戦前からあったはずで、その内容は現在と同様に朝日新聞等に準じていたはずであると思い検索してみた。その結果は私の推測以上のものだった。
何よりも、以下のウィキペディアで、私の目的は１００％達成されていたのだが…。
1931年6月に「沖縄日日新聞」として創刊。1年後の1932年に「沖縄日報」に題字を変更し、沖縄朝日新聞、琉球新報と並んで、昭和初期の沖縄県を代表する県域新聞として絶大なる支持を集めた。
高山正之は子宮頸がん予防ワクチン接種騒動の、朝日新聞の例に依っての態様の酷さと彼らの依って来る本質を見事に解き明かし、本物の学者であり人間であり、朝日等のふざけた圧力にも屈しなかった村中璃子さんに世界の良識がジョンマドックス賞を与え、朝日の捏造報道が世界に明らかになった時、３週間後に、読者が読まないページにベタ記事で報道した態様に対して…、
どこまでも姑息な新聞会社である、と、手厳しく批判していたが…。
今しがたの検索結果においても、朝日新聞社の姑息の極みである体質が露呈されていたのである。
沖縄朝日新聞、琉球新報と並んで、昭和初期の沖縄県を代表する県域新聞として絶大なる支持を集めた
この、「沖縄朝日新聞」、をクリックしても何も出てこないのである。
英文での慰安婦関連記事の削除、訂正記事を、検索できないようにしていたと全く同じ態様…正に、どこまでも姑息な新聞なのである。
何故、朝日新聞社が戦前沖縄県を代表する新聞だった沖縄朝日新聞の検索を削除しているのか？
朝日新聞が大江健三郎のでたらめな反日プロパガンダ作品である「沖縄ノート」などを利用して、沖縄戦において自決したり断崖から飛び降りた沖縄の人たち（私は婦人が多かったように記憶する）…
今や反日プロパガンダの象徴であるといっても過言ではない「ひめゆりの塔」…。
彼女たちを自決に追い込んだのが当時の朝日新聞の報道であることを隠蔽するために検索から削除しているのである。
朝日新聞が主導した戦争に向かわせるためのスローガンだった、「一億総玉砕、生きて虜囚の辱めを受けず」これ以外に沖縄の婦人達を自決に向かわせたものなどありはしないのである。
それを、実は規律の厳しかった日本の軍人たちに、擦り付けた、朝日新聞と大江健三郎の罪は海よりも深いもので、到底、許されるものではないのである。
当時の朝日新聞の社説や紙面を見れば、それは一目瞭然…だから朝日新聞社は検索に出てこないようにしているのである。
朝日新聞が主導した戦争に向かわせるためのスローガンだった、「一億総玉砕、生きて虜囚の辱めを受けず」と題して2018-08-30に発信した章が、今、gooの検索数ベスト１０に入っている。
現在、沖縄の新聞紙発行を独占している二紙である琉球新報と沖縄タイムスは戦前からあったはずで、その内容は現在と同様に朝日新聞等に準じていたはずであると思い検索してみた。その結果は私の推測以上のものだった。
何よりも、以下のウィキペディアで、私の目的は１００％達成されていたのだが…。
1931年6月に「沖縄日日新聞」として創刊。1年後の1932年に「沖縄日報」に題字を変更し、沖縄朝日新聞、琉球新報と並んで、昭和初期の沖縄県を代表する県域新聞として絶大なる支持を集めた。
高山正之は子宮頸がん予防ワクチン接種騒動の、朝日新聞の例に依っての態様の酷さと彼らの依って来る本質を見事に解き明かし、本物の学者であり人間であり、朝日等のふざけた圧力にも屈しなかった村中璃子さんに世界の良識がジョンマドックス賞を与え、朝日の捏造報道が世界に明らかになった時、３週間後に、読者が読まないページにベタ記事で報道した態様に対して…、
どこまでも姑息な新聞会社である、と、手厳しく批判していたが…。
今しがたの検索結果においても、朝日新聞社の姑息の極みである体質が露呈されていたのである。
沖縄朝日新聞、琉球新報と並んで、昭和初期の沖縄県を代表する県域新聞として絶大なる支持を集めた
この、「沖縄朝日新聞」、をクリックしても何も出てこないのである。
英文での慰安婦関連記事の削除、訂正記事を、検索できないようにしていたと全く同じ態様…正に、どこまでも姑息な新聞なのである。
何故、朝日新聞社が戦前沖縄県を代表する新聞だった沖縄朝日新聞の検索を削除しているのか？
朝日新聞が大江健三郎のでたらめな反日プロパガンダ作品である「沖縄ノート」などを利用して、沖縄戦において自決したり断崖から飛び降りた沖縄の人たち（私は婦人が多かったように記憶する）…
今や反日プロパガンダの象徴であるといっても過言ではない「ひめゆりの塔」…。
彼女たちを自決に追い込んだのが当時の朝日新聞の報道であることを隠蔽するために検索から削除しているのである。
朝日新聞が主導した戦争に向かわせるためのスローガンだった、「一億総玉砕、生きて虜囚の辱めを受けず」、これ以外に、沖縄の婦人たちを自決に向かわせたものなどありはしないのである。
それを、実は規律の厳しかった日本の軍人たちに、擦り付けた、朝日新聞と大江健三郎の罪は海よりも深いもので、到底、許されるものではないのである。
当時の朝日新聞の社説や紙面を見れば、それは一目瞭然…だから朝日新聞社は検索に出てこないようにしているのである。
The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
Britain sent criminals to the colony
The word “colony” in the contemporary language, or “coloniality,” was introduced into English during the voyage as a word that reminded of Pizarro's outrageous aggression / deprivation that brought Peruvian indigenous peoples to extinction.
Speaking of 1555, the year when Mouri Motonari beat Sue Harukata in the Battle of Itsukushima and laid the foundation to control the Chugoku region.
It is five years before Oda Nobunaga won Imagawa Yoshimoto in the Battle of Okehazama.
The verb "colonize" "colonization" and the noun colonization "colonization" were first used by Edmund Burke in 1770.
In the book "The Thoughts on the Present Discontents," he says, "Our Growth by colonization and by conquest".
Six years after that, Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations", published in 1776, shows the example "The discovery and colonization of America".
It is a nuance that kicks Indians and forces them to take land. In Japan, it is Tanuma era.
British poet and writer Robert Southey wrote "The Life of Nelason" in the last year and has become Poet laureate by the recommendation of novelist Walter Scott, but he was forgotten when he was young. "Pantisocracy" who is a person who dreamed of "a universal society with all rights" in Japanese, and a spanish traveler named Don Manuel Alvarez Espriera is setting that he wrote In "Letters from England" ("London Correspondence" 1807), it writes as follows.
"Colonizing with offenders is one of the British systems."
In other words, they criticize Britain for sending criminals to the colony.
He also says that the lives of British people are at great risk, especially in terms of their industrial and commercial expansion.
From around this time, the English "colonize" had the image of aggression / deprivation, and all the British minded people used it in a bad sense.
Japan and Korea are "Annexation"
In the 1830s, the term "colonizationism" = colonialism or "colonizationist" = colonialists came to be used in the United States.
These etc have a completely critical meaning.
The word "colonia", which was not originally a bad word, produces the word "colonize" as whites conquer the country of colored people in Age of Discovery so that they have the image of "deprived" and "invasion" It became.
The word "coronization" does not appear at all in the British literature as far as I know about Japan and Korea.
It is all written as annexation.
The word "annexation" is "Union England and Scotland," which is said to have been written by British philosopher Francis Bacon prior to 1626, "Make a compounded annexation from the land of two countries (ethnic people). ... "and use it with the nuance of equality.
In 1875, James Bryce, a jurist and historian, wrote in The Holy Roman Empire: "France crossed the Alps by annexation of Piedmont."
There is no sense of "deprivation" here either.
The verb "annex" originally contained the meaning of "without subordination", and there was no nuance of either above.
"British History", published in 1846, originally a Latin book, which was published before that, among them is "Julius Caesar annexed Britain to the Roman Empire".
Also in this case, the nuance that Rome spreads civilization to Britain is strong, and there is no feeling that it was robbed.
This manuscript continues.
Now, the "History expert" monthly magazine WiLL April issue separate volume 202X "Korea" countdown to the disappearance (980 yen) is a must-read book for all the Japanese people.
The reason is that this magazine is packed with the true history of being unreported, for a number of people who just subscribed to the Asahi Shimbun etc. and watched NHK, and for some reason it was not informed at all. .
The following paper published is a great man born in Yamagata Prefecture, and an important heritage that he left for us, Shoichi Watabe, who lived as a treasure in Japan.
Korea was not "colonial"
"The 36-year-old colonial rule" is only the Korean side's claim.
The Japanese side also has a voice corresponding to it.
But if you look at it from a world history perspective.
There is a big difference between "annexation" and "colony".
Pissarro's invasion and "colony"
Japan and Korea were united in 1910.
There is a way of thinking that this is Korea's "colonization" by Japan, but rather, it is a general trend.
Of course, South Korea and North Korea argue so from political interests.
So, first of all, let's clearly recognize that the so-called “Japan-Korea annexation” is a union of two empires and one is not colonizing the other.
It should be remembered that Korea has become a "Korean Empire" thanks to Japan in the Sino-Japanese War.
The story starts from there.
In other words, it is a union of empires.
For example, in the English literature, Japan and Korea are described as "annexation".
This is completely different in image from "coronization" which means "colonization".
In order to see the history fairly and objectively, it is also important to know how words were used at that time.
You should not convict the past with modern common sense.
Even if you know it with your head, it is easy to measure the history with the current ruler.
Therefore, I would like to mention a little pedantry, but I would like to explain the difference between "Annexation" and "Coronaization" as easily as possible, based on the English dictionary and so on.
Let's first consider the word origin of coronalization.
"Colo" of "colonization" means "to cultivate" or "to live".
The past participle "cultum" of this Latin verb is "cultivated" and "sophisticated", and the English "culture" meaning "cultivation" and "cultivation" also comes from there.
(Colonia), a derivative of "cultum", means "farm" and "land".
Originally the Romans who moved to a new conquest site with the expansion of the Roman Empire, especially the land where displaced soldiers, called "veterans", lived.
They had Roman citizenship and also played a role in imperial defense as a garrison.
Is it easy to understand something like "Tondenhei"?
Looking at Britain, there were nine Roman colonia on Britain.
Well-known areas include London, Bath, Chester and Lincoln.
Both were Roman colonial back then.
By the way, "Colonia", which means "farm" and "land" in Roman times, was eventually used for the meaning of "Apoikia" in Greek.
Greece settled on the islands of Schlaquius and Italy, and built an independent and autonomous "colony".
That was "apoikia", meaning that it lived independently from Metropolis (Mother Police), but it also became Colonia in Latin.
So when did the word "colony" in modern English refer to "colony"?
The first to use the word colony in English was Richard Eden, a 16th-century English translator.
He used the word "colony" for the first time in the translation of a book written by Francis Pissarro, an example of the Spanish people who destroyed the Inca Empire in Peru and destroyed civilization.
Published in 1555. It appears in the book 'The Decade of the New Worlde, or West India'
The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
"We will follow Japan."
Korean riots and uprisings during the annexation era of Japan and Korea have ceased to exist since Mukden Incident.
That is because Koreans became equal to the former Qin ruler, who was the ruler of Korea.
Not only Manchu people, Han Chinese has always looked down on Korean people, and Koreans have been bullied.
However, Japan-Korea annexation came to say that 'I am Japanese.'
A movement to change the name from Korean to Japanese took place, and when it became Japanese, it was possible to bragging against the manchu people and Sina who have always been holding their heads for thousand of years.
From then on, there were no revolts of Koreans.
'The theory that Japan and Korea have the same ancestry' became popular, and Korean junior high school came to visit Ise Shrine on school trips.
During the war, there were many volunteer soldiers, and there were many Korean kamikazes.
I think the Meiji government was strongly prepared not to do coronazation.
Taiwan was annexed to Japan in 1895 after the Sino-Japanese War, but about ten years later, the London Times wrote the following points.
"In just 10 years, Taiwan's population has grown to hundreds of thousands. If Britain, France, and the Netherlands wanted to colonize Taiwan, they could do so, but what they did not do is to have his land It was a place of epidemic disease and epidemic spread, and the natives at the back of the mountain aside, most of them are thieves who have fled from China. Ambassador Li Hongzhang, saying, 'I've put a lot of load on Japan. Be seeing because Japan would get into trouble immediate', he laughed up his sleeve. But Japan made a great effort to overcome the endemic disease And the population has grown dramatically. The western colonial empire should imitate Japan's success."
The Japanese rule which the 'London Times' evaluated was the same in Korea.
The merger of Taiwan lasted 50 years, and the Japanese-Korean union lasted 35 years.
After the war, without the anti-Japanese movement of Syngman Rhee who returned to Korea and became the first president, and if the peninsula remained undivided from north to south, it will be another 15 years like an Taiwan and annexation with Japan for 50 years like Taiwan. If so, Japan may have been able to deal with Korea with emotions close to Taiwan .......
This is only fancy, but it feels like that.
In addition, the United States at the time performed Japanese brainwashing with 'Japan colonized Korea' through ignorance barely.
Almost all Korean researchers in Japan were left-winged and happily boarded American hoaxes.
Decent scholars and politicians who should correct it had been deported.
It is a pity that Koreans came to think that their country was a colony of Japan.
Due to American occupation policy and criminal ignorance of Japanese leftist culture people.
Now is the time to return to the origin (ad fontes).