文明のターンテーブルThe Turntable of Civilization

日本の時間、世界の時間。
The time of Japan, the time of the world

Top 10 real-time searches 2021/9/22, 22:00

2021年09月22日 22時01分29秒 | 全般

1

河野太郎は日本端子で小泉進次郎はこれで それぞれ中国との繋がり!

2

Top 10 real-time searches 2021/9/22, 16:05

3

岸田文雄、高市早苗、野田聖子3氏は揃って“採択すべき”と答え、河野太郎氏だけは“回答しない”と連絡。

4

Top 10 real-time searches 2021/9/22, 19:46

5

森友問題を専らに質問し出した眼鏡男が何と!日本経済新聞社の記者である小竹洋之という男であると初めて知った

6

Then Junius saw the Japanese army again. This time, they came from the sky.

7

そしてジュニウスは再び日本軍を見た。今回は空からやってきた。

8

その中で、上記の疑問を解明してくれる、米国での研究者の実態が、簡明に語られている

9

Top 10 real-time searches 2021/9/22, 17:15

10

トップページ

 


It calls into question Mr. Kono's qualifications as prime minister.

2021年09月22日 21時53分35秒 | 全般

The following is from Ms. Sakurai Yoshiko's serial column, which brings the weekly Shincho released today to a successful conclusion.
This paper also proves that she is a national treasure, a supreme national treasure defined by Saicho.
This article should be read with great attention, especially by the mass media and their local party members and friends of the LDP who say that their polls (I have no idea who they polled or what questions they asked) put Kono in the first place.
Two big questions for Mr. Kono in the LDP presidential race
The debate over the LDP presidential election is in full swing, with the vote set for September 29.
The next prime minister will be chosen from among four candidates: Taro Kono, Fumio Kishida, Sanae Takaichi, and Seiko Noda. 
The first thing I would like to point out is that Mr. Noda is not up to standard.
In the years leading up to her fourth attempt, what has she been doing?
If she had set her sights on becoming prime minister, why did she spend so many years doing nothing?
She has yet to reach the level of debate with the other three candidates on any of the topics of security, economy, diplomacy, and health care. 
On the September 17 edition of "Kotoron TV," "Sound Argument," publisher Takashi Arimoto explained that Nikai cooperated with Noda to preserve his influence. 
"It is believed that Kono will be the one to be put at a disadvantage by Noda's run. If Noda loses Kono's vote even a little, it will be a close race, and Nikai's power will become a casting vote. 
The concern is not whether Mr. Noda is qualified to be prime minister or not, but rather the desire to sell Mr. Nikai's position at a high price.
If these people stay in the center of the party, the future of the LDP is really in jeopardy.
In looking at the policies and ideas of the three remaining members, there were some memorable moments.
One of them was on Fuji TV's "Sunday Report" on the 19th.
The anchor, Toshiyuki Matsuyama, asked about the deployment of medium-range missiles that the U.S. military considers part of its strategy against China. 
"If there is a formal request from the U.S. side, please raise your hand if you will decide to accept the deployment when you become prime minister." 
On the 13th and 15th of this month, North Korea launched a series of missiles.
Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga said that the missiles landed outside Japan's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Still, eight hours later, Defense Minister Nobuo Kishi corrected the statement, saying that the rockets landed "inside the EEZ."
In other words, Japan had not been able to track the North Korean missile.
The North Korean missile was not a ballistic missile that flew on a predetermined trajectory but a new type that moved irregularly and changed course before the attack.
Opposing Arguments 
An attack by this type of missile, which North Korea and China, and Russia possess, would be the last thing that would happen. It is a dire situation. At this point, neither the U.S. nor Japan has the means to intercept it.
Therefore, we must have sufficient deterrence to dissuade them from attacking us.
In this sense, it was a very appropriate question. 
At this point, Ms. Takaichi raised her hand quickly.
"I think it is indispensable to protect Japan. The year before last, Secretary of Defense William Esper said that Japan would deploy these missiles in Asia, and I would like to see this happen. The long-range missiles that the U.S. is currently developing will be effective against air bases in almost all of China. We need to think about this as well. 
She said it would be best if it could produce the missiles domestically.
But Mr. Kono argued the exact opposite. 
He said, "When we think about deterrence, what we need is for Japan to be able to pull the trigger with its own finger. Putting a missile in Japan that only the U.S. has its finger on the trigger will not increase Japan's deterrence. 
Concerning deterrence against China, he said that "the division of roles between Japan and the U.S. should be decided after more careful discussions" and "how to enhance deterrence within the Japan-U.S. alliance as a whole" should be discussed first.
It will only please those who are brave enough to say, "Do it! I don't think this is a discussion that will lead to stability in Japan-China relations or between Japan, the U.S., and China at all. 
At this point, Ms. Takaichi responded. 
"I'm not talking about a brave, go-go-go!  I think this is absolutely necessary to protect the lives and territory of the Japanese people. Of course, Japan is a civilian-controlled country, so we don't want the U.S. to pull the trigger, but we should have a thorough discussion about this rule when we decide to introduce it." 
The U.S. military is now hurriedly preparing medium-range missiles, and their deployment in Japan would be a solid deterrent to North Korea and China.
It is in our national interest to accept the deployment of medium-range missiles for the defense of our country. At the Japan-U.S. summit on April 16, Prime Minister Suga clearly stated that he would "work with the U.S. to strengthen our deterrence and response capabilities" and "raise the Japan-U.S. alliance to new heights."
What Prime Minister Suga has pledged to do should be done precisely for the sake of Japan.
One concrete measure would be the deployment of medium-range missiles to curb the threats from North Korea and China.
Ms. Takaichi's argument that the deployment of medium-range missiles is necessary to protect Japan is much more convincing than Mr. Kono's abstract argument that the entire Japan-U.S. alliance will enhance deterrence.
Prejudice and falsehoods stand out. 
Another highlight was the debate held at the Japan Press Club on Saturday, August 18.
On the energy issue, Mr. Kono said, "It has become clear that renewable energy is cheaper than nuclear power.
It is a cost comparison as of 2030 announced by the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry on July 12.
However, this figure did not include the cost of securing the thermal power needed as backup for solar and other renewable energy sources.
It also did not include the cost of large-capacity storage batteries and other equipment to absorb solar and wind power fluctuations or the cost of developing a large power grid to prepare for the fluctuating peak output of renewable energy.
The Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry later formally corrected this figure. 
There is no way Mr. Kono does not know this.
He must know that he is making a mistake and is asserting it.
If so, his words are "false." 
Mr. Kono also repeated his argument for abolishing the nuclear fuel cycle, which he has been saying for a long time.
Mr. Kishida refuted this.
If we stop the nuclear fuel cycle, the reprocessing plant in Rokkasho Village, Aomori Prefecture, will also stop. We will not be able to reprocess the spent fuel produced by nuclear power generation.
It would fill up the pools used to store spent fuel at nuclear power plants, forcing them to shut down.
It will take 100,000 years to detoxify the high-level waste produced in the final stage of reprocessing, but technology has been developed to shorten this time to 300 years." 
Mr. Kishida attempted to point out this point, but Mr. Kono quickly denied it, saying, "We don't have such technology at this time."
However, GE-HITACHI Nuclear Energy has already developed the PRISM (Power Reactor Innovative Small Module), reducing the toxicity of high-level waste.
In other words, the technology to render the waste harmless in 300 years has been proven.
Mr. Kono is wrong on this point as well. 
Kono's claims are riddled with prejudice and falsehoods on the fundamental national issues of national defense and energy.
It calls into question Mr. Kono's qualifications as prime minister.

 


Two big questions for Mr. Kono in the LDP presidential race

2021年09月22日 21時51分59秒 | 全般

The following is from Ms. Sakurai Yoshiko's serial column, which brings the weekly Shincho released today to a successful conclusion.
This paper also proves that she is a national treasure, a supreme national treasure defined by Saicho.
This article should be read with great attention, especially by the mass media and their local party members and friends of the LDP who say that their polls (I have no idea who they polled or what questions they asked) put Kono in the first place.
Two big questions for Mr. Kono in the LDP presidential race
The debate over the LDP presidential election is in full swing, with the vote set for September 29.
The next prime minister will be chosen from among four candidates: Taro Kono, Fumio Kishida, Sanae Takaichi, and Seiko Noda. 
The first thing I would like to point out is that Mr. Noda is not up to standard.
In the years leading up to her fourth attempt, what has she been doing?
If she had set her sights on becoming prime minister, why did she spend so many years doing nothing?
She has yet to reach the level of debate with the other three candidates on any of the topics of security, economy, diplomacy, and health care. 
On the September 17 edition of "Kotoron TV," "Sound Argument," publisher Takashi Arimoto explained that Nikai cooperated with Noda to preserve his influence. 
"It is believed that Kono will be the one to be put at a disadvantage by Noda's run. If Noda loses Kono's vote even a little, it will be a close race, and Nikai's power will become a casting vote. 
The concern is not whether Mr. Noda is qualified to be prime minister or not, but rather the desire to sell Mr. Nikai's position at a high price.
If these people stay in the center of the party, the future of the LDP is really in jeopardy.
In looking at the policies and ideas of the three remaining members, there were some memorable moments.
One of them was on Fuji TV's "Sunday Report" on the 19th.
The anchor, Toshiyuki Matsuyama, asked about the deployment of medium-range missiles that the U.S. military considers part of its strategy against China. 
"If there is a formal request from the U.S. side, please raise your hand if you will decide to accept the deployment when you become prime minister." 
On the 13th and 15th of this month, North Korea launched a series of missiles.
Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga said that the missiles landed outside Japan's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Still, eight hours later, Defense Minister Nobuo Kishi corrected the statement, saying that the rockets landed "inside the EEZ."
In other words, Japan had not been able to track the North Korean missile.
The North Korean missile was not a ballistic missile that flew on a predetermined trajectory but a new type that moved irregularly and changed course before the attack.
Opposing Arguments 
An attack by this type of missile, which North Korea and China, and Russia possess, would be the last thing that would happen. It is a dire situation. At this point, neither the U.S. nor Japan has the means to intercept it.
Therefore, we must have sufficient deterrence to dissuade them from attacking us.
In this sense, it was a very appropriate question. 
At this point, Ms. Takaichi raised her hand quickly.
"I think it is indispensable to protect Japan. The year before last, Secretary of Defense William Esper said that Japan would deploy these missiles in Asia, and I would like to see this happen. The long-range missiles that the U.S. is currently developing will be effective against air bases in almost all of China. We need to think about this as well. 
She said it would be best if it could produce the missiles domestically.
But Mr. Kono argued the exact opposite. 
He said, "When we think about deterrence, what we need is for Japan to be able to pull the trigger with its own finger. Putting a missile in Japan that only the U.S. has its finger on the trigger will not increase Japan's deterrence. 
Concerning deterrence against China, he said that "the division of roles between Japan and the U.S. should be decided after more careful discussions" and "how to enhance deterrence within the Japan-U.S. alliance as a whole" should be discussed first.
It will only please those who are brave enough to say, "Do it! I don't think this is a discussion that will lead to stability in Japan-China relations or between Japan, the U.S., and China at all. 
At this point, Ms. Takaichi responded. 
"I'm not talking about a brave, go-go-go!  I think this is absolutely necessary to protect the lives and territory of the Japanese people. Of course, Japan is a civilian-controlled country, so we don't want the U.S. to pull the trigger, but we should have a thorough discussion about this rule when we decide to introduce it." 
The U.S. military is now hurriedly preparing medium-range missiles, and their deployment in Japan would be a solid deterrent to North Korea and China.
It is in our national interest to accept the deployment of medium-range missiles for the defense of our country. At the Japan-U.S. summit on April 16, Prime Minister Suga clearly stated that he would "work with the U.S. to strengthen our deterrence and response capabilities" and "raise the Japan-U.S. alliance to new heights."
What Prime Minister Suga has pledged to do should be done precisely for the sake of Japan.
One concrete measure would be the deployment of medium-range missiles to curb the threats from North Korea and China.
Ms. Takaichi's argument that the deployment of medium-range missiles is necessary to protect Japan is much more convincing than Mr. Kono's abstract argument that the entire Japan-U.S. alliance will enhance deterrence.
Prejudice and falsehoods stand out. 
Another highlight was the debate held at the Japan Press Club on Saturday, August 18.
On the energy issue, Mr. Kono said, "It has become clear that renewable energy is cheaper than nuclear power.
It is a cost comparison as of 2030 announced by the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry on July 12.
However, this figure did not include the cost of securing the thermal power needed as backup for solar and other renewable energy sources.
It also did not include the cost of large-capacity storage batteries and other equipment to absorb solar and wind power fluctuations or the cost of developing a large power grid to prepare for the fluctuating peak output of renewable energy.
The Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry later formally corrected this figure. 
There is no way Mr. Kono does not know this.
He must know that he is making a mistake and is asserting it.
If so, his words are "false." 
Mr. Kono also repeated his argument for abolishing the nuclear fuel cycle, which he has been saying for a long time.
Mr. Kishida refuted this.
If we stop the nuclear fuel cycle, the reprocessing plant in Rokkasho Village, Aomori Prefecture, will also stop. We will not be able to reprocess the spent fuel produced by nuclear power generation.
It would fill up the pools used to store spent fuel at nuclear power plants, forcing them to shut down.
It will take 100,000 years to detoxify the high-level waste produced in the final stage of reprocessing, but technology has been developed to shorten this time to 300 years." 
Mr. Kishida attempted to point out this point, but Mr. Kono quickly denied it, saying, "We don't have such technology at this time."
However, GE-HITACHI Nuclear Energy has already developed the PRISM (Power Reactor Innovative Small Module), reducing the toxicity of high-level waste.
In other words, the technology to render the waste harmless in 300 years has been proven.
Mr. Kono is wrong on this point as well. 
Kono's claims are riddled with prejudice and falsehoods on the fundamental national issues of national defense and energy.
It calls into question Mr. Kono's qualifications as prime minister.


Top 10 real-time searches 2021/9/22, 19:46

2021年09月22日 19時46分41秒 | 全般

1

Top 10 real-time searches 2021/9/22, 13:57

2

その原因は、人権問題に対する無関心にあるのか。それとも中国に対する忖度にあるのか。

3

河野太郎は日本端子で小泉進次郎はこれで それぞれ中国との繋がり!

4

自民総裁選、河野氏への二つの大疑問…正反対の論陣…思い込みや虚偽が目立つ 

5

だからこそ、十分な抑止力を持つことで彼らに攻撃を思いとどまらせることが欠かせない。

6

Top 10 real-time searches 2021/9/22, 16:05

7

日本国民全員と米国の各界・各層の無数の大谷ファンが待ちに待ったホームラン。それも快音どおりの見事な特大ホームラン。

8

河野氏がこのことを知らないはずはない。氏は間違いを承知で断言しているのではないか。だとすれば氏の言葉は「虚偽」である。

9

そうした中、恣意的に悪い方向への印象づけや特定の候補者に質問しないなどの酷い行為が

10

岸田文雄、高市早苗、野田聖子3氏は揃って“採択すべき”と答え、河野太郎氏だけは“回答しない”と連絡。

 


Isn't it too much to pretend that they don't see history when they preach that we should face it?

2021年09月22日 18時06分18秒 | 全般

The following is from Masayuki Takayama's serial column, which brings the weekly Shincho released today to a successful conclusion.
This article also proves that he is the one and only journalist in the postwar world.
It is a must-read not only for the Japanese people but for people all over the world.
Japan was great!
Junius, a 15-year-old Sinhalese boy, never forgot the majesty of the battleship "Katori" he saw at the wharf in Colombo and the impression it made on him. 
Although he could not see it, the 16,000-ton battleship was manned by the Japanese Prince Hirohito.
On his way to Britain, he had stopped in the British colony of Ceylon. 
Even so, the boy could see an officer with a similar complexion to his own busily coming and going on the ship. 
The Japanese Navy was amazing.
In the year before the boy was born, they had fought the Russian fleet off Tsushima and sunk every one of them. 
In World War I, they used airplanes for the first time to capture the German fortress of Qingdao and won. 
They also went to the Mediterranean to protect Allied ships from the threat of U-boats. 
The Japanese are not only strong in war.
At the Paris Conference last year, they represented the Third World in proposing racial equality. 
However, the world, including Ceylon, where the boy lived, was ruled by whites.
The white countries forcibly scrapped the Japanese proposal. 
Nevertheless, "the people of Asia who wanted independence felt a strong sympathy for the aspirations of the Japanese," the boy said much later. 
The boy changed from then on.
He abandoned Christianity, which was the form of upper-class Sinhalese children, and turned to Buddhism, the same as his people.
He also abandoned the world of law, which his father, a Supreme Court judge, had followed, to become a politician. 
Then Junius saw the Japanese army again. This time, they came from the sky. 
Japan was the only nation to challenge the white countries that had divided the world with their colonial imperialism. 
First, it buried the U.S. Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor.
Two days later, he sank the British battleship Prince of Wales off the coast of French Indo-China.
In the Indian Ocean, there was the British Oriental Fleet.
The Australian and Dutch fleets were a large fleet of three aircraft carriers, five battleships, and six cruisers. 
The war began with an air raid on the British port of Trincomalee in Ceylon by Japanese aircraft. 
Hearing the sound of bombing, Junius knew that the Japanese had finally entered the Indian Ocean. 
The British fleet, which had fled outside the port, was captured, and the carrier Hermes and two heavy cruisers were sunk.
The Royal Navy's sphere of influence retreated to Madagascar. 
For three years, until they returned, the Japanese gave the countries of Southeast Asia a unified language and an army of their own. 
The Japanese also embarked on a war to liberate British India and were annihilated by a counterattack when they reached Kohima. 
However, "the aspirations of the Japanese people" bore fruit beautifully after the war. 
On September 6, 1951, at the San Francisco Opera House, Indonesia, Vietnam, Ceylon, Cambodia, and other countries that had been colonies of white nations before the war were among the participants in the peace conference against Japan. 
Each country's representative gave a short speech on the stage and signed the peace treaty, but before that, U.S. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles gave a model keynote speech. 
He said, "Japan was defeated by crushing the hopes of other peoples with violence." 
However, the eighth speaker, Junius Jayawardena from Ceylon, rejected Dulles' speech.
He said, "When the peoples of Asia were colonies, only Japan was powerful and free, and we looked up to her as our liberating guardian. We looked up to Japan as the guardian of our liberation. Japan's slogan of mutual prosperity in Asia appealed strongly to us. When the war broke out, the leaders of many countries cooperated with Japan, hoping to liberate their homeland." 
He continued, "So," he said, "I am grateful to Japan for not betraying the impression I had as a boy.
"Our country renounces its right to claim reparations from Japan." 
In defiance of Dulles' speech, the Egyptian delegation raised some objections, including the inexcusable stationing of U.S. troops in Japan. 
On the 70th anniversary of the signing of the peace treaty, a memorial service for President Jayewardene was held at the Sri Lankan Embassy, according to the Sankei Shimbun. 
However, both Asahi and Mainichi rejected the article, perhaps because they did not like the deceased's assertion that the last war was right. 
Isn't it too much to pretend that they don't see history when they preach that we should face it?

 


Then Junius saw the Japanese army again. This time, they came from the sky.

2021年09月22日 18時05分38秒 | 全般

The following is from Masayuki Takayama's serial column, which brings the weekly Shincho released today to a successful conclusion.
This article also proves that he is the one and only journalist in the postwar world.
It is a must-read not only for the Japanese people but for people all over the world.
Japan was great!
Junius, a 15-year-old Sinhalese boy, never forgot the majesty of the battleship "Katori" he saw at the wharf in Colombo and the impression it made on him. 
Although he could not see it, the 16,000-ton battleship was manned by the Japanese Prince Hirohito.
On his way to Britain, he had stopped in the British colony of Ceylon. 
Even so, the boy could see an officer with a similar complexion to his own busily coming and going on the ship. 
The Japanese Navy was amazing.
In the year before the boy was born, they had fought the Russian fleet off Tsushima and sunk every one of them. 
In World War I, they used airplanes for the first time to capture the German fortress of Qingdao and won. 
They also went to the Mediterranean to protect Allied ships from the threat of U-boats. 
The Japanese are not only strong in war.
At the Paris Conference last year, they represented the Third World in proposing racial equality. 
However, the world, including Ceylon, where the boy lived, was ruled by whites.
The white countries forcibly scrapped the Japanese proposal. 
Nevertheless, "the people of Asia who wanted independence felt a strong sympathy for the aspirations of the Japanese," the boy said much later. 
The boy changed from then on.
He abandoned Christianity, which was the form of upper-class Sinhalese children, and turned to Buddhism, the same as his people.
He also abandoned the world of law, which his father, a Supreme Court judge, had followed, to become a politician. 
Then Junius saw the Japanese army again. This time, they came from the sky. 
Japan was the only nation to challenge the white countries that had divided the world with their colonial imperialism. 
First, it buried the U.S. Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor.
Two days later, he sank the British battleship Prince of Wales off the coast of French Indo-China.
In the Indian Ocean, there was the British Oriental Fleet.
The Australian and Dutch fleets were a large fleet of three aircraft carriers, five battleships, and six cruisers. 
The war began with an air raid on the British port of Trincomalee in Ceylon by Japanese aircraft. 
Hearing the sound of bombing, Junius knew that the Japanese had finally entered the Indian Ocean. 
The British fleet, which had fled outside the port, was captured, and the carrier Hermes and two heavy cruisers were sunk.
The Royal Navy's sphere of influence retreated to Madagascar. 
For three years, until they returned, the Japanese gave the countries of Southeast Asia a unified language and an army of their own. 
The Japanese also embarked on a war to liberate British India and were annihilated by a counterattack when they reached Kohima. 
However, "the aspirations of the Japanese people" bore fruit beautifully after the war. 
On September 6, 1951, at the San Francisco Opera House, Indonesia, Vietnam, Ceylon, Cambodia, and other countries that had been colonies of white nations before the war were among the participants in the peace conference against Japan. 
Each country's representative gave a short speech on the stage and signed the peace treaty, but before that, U.S. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles gave a model keynote speech. 
He said, "Japan was defeated by crushing the hopes of other peoples with violence." 
However, the eighth speaker, Junius Jayawardena from Ceylon, rejected Dulles' speech.
He said, "When the peoples of Asia were colonies, only Japan was powerful and free, and we looked up to her as our liberating guardian. We looked up to Japan as the guardian of our liberation. Japan's slogan of mutual prosperity in Asia appealed strongly to us. When the war broke out, the leaders of many countries cooperated with Japan, hoping to liberate their homeland." 
He continued, "So," he said, "I am grateful to Japan for not betraying the impression I had as a boy.
"Our country renounces its right to claim reparations from Japan." 
In defiance of Dulles' speech, the Egyptian delegation raised some objections, including the inexcusable stationing of U.S. troops in Japan. 
On the 70th anniversary of the signing of the peace treaty, a memorial service for President Jayewardene was held at the Sri Lankan Embassy, according to the Sankei Shimbun. 
However, both Asahi and Mainichi rejected the article, perhaps because they did not like the deceased's assertion that the last war was right. 
Isn't it too much to pretend that they don't see history when they preach that we should face it?

 


そしてジュニウスは再び日本軍を見た。今回は空からやってきた。

2021年09月22日 17時30分29秒 | 全般

以下は、本日発売された週刊新潮の掉尾を飾る、高山正之の連載コラムからである。
本論文も彼が戦後の世界で唯一無二のジャーナリストである事を証明している。
日本国民のみならず世界中の人たちが必読。
日本は偉かった
15歳のシンハラ人少年ジュニウスはコロンボの埠頭で見た戦艦「香取」の威容と、そのときの感動を生涯忘れることはなかった。 
少年は目撃できなかったが、1万6000㌧の戦艦には日本のプリンス裕仁が座乗されていた。
訪英される途次、英領植民地セイロンに立ち寄られたのだ。 
それでも少年は艦上を忙しく行き来する自分と似た肌色の士官の姿を見ることはできた。 
日本海軍は凄かった。
少年が生まれる前の年、彼らは対馬沖で倍する露西亜艦隊と戦い、それを悉く沈めてしまった。 
第一次大戦でも青島の独軍要塞攻略に飛行機を初めて使い、勝利した。 
彼らは地中海にも出てUボートの脅威から連合軍艦船を守ってもいる。 
日本人は戦争に強いだけではない。
先年のパリ会議では第三世界を代表して人種平等案を提起した。 
しかし少年の住むセイロンを含めて世界は白人が仕切っていた。
日本案は白人国が強引に廃案とした。 
それでも「日本人が掲げた思いに独立を望むアジアの人々は強烈な共感を覚えた」と少年はずっと後に語っている。 
少年はこのときから変わった。
シンハラの上流子弟の形だったキリスト教を捨てて民と同じ仏教に転向した。
最高裁判事の父の歩んだ法曹の世界も捨てて政治家を志した。 
そしてジュニウスは再び日本軍を見た。今回は空からやってきた。 
日本は植民地帝国主義によって世界を壟断してきた白人国家にただ一国で挑戦したのだ。 
まず太平洋を仕切る米太平洋艦隊を真珠湾に葬った。
その二日後には英戦艦プリンス・オブ・ウェールズを仏印沖に沈めた。 
インド洋には英東洋艦隊がいた。
豪蘭艦隊を合わせて空母3、戦艦5、巡洋艦6の大艦隊だ。 
戦端は日本機によるセイロンの英軍港トリンコマリー空襲で開かれた。 
爆撃音を聞いてジュニウスは日本がついにインド洋に入ったことを知った。 
港外に逃れた英艦隊は捕捉され、空母ハーミーズと2隻の重巡が沈められた。
英海軍の勢力圏はマダガスカルまで後退した。 
彼らが再び戻ってくるまでの3年間、日本は東南アジアの国々に統一言語と彼ら自身の軍隊を持たせた。 
日本軍は英領インドの解放戦争にも乗り出し、コヒマに取り付いたところで反攻を受け、全滅した。 
しかし「日本人が掲げた思い」は戦後、見事に実を結んでいった。 
1951年9月6日、サンフランシスコのオペラハウスで開かれた対日講和会議に参加した国々の中には戦前まで白人国家の植民地だったインドネシア、べトナム、セイロン、カンボジアなどがあった。 
各国代表は壇上で短いスピーチをし、講和条約に署名したが、その前に米国務長官J・ダレスがお手本となる基調演説を行った。 
そこには「日本は他国民の希望を暴力でおし潰して敗れ去った」とあった。 
しかし8番目に登壇したセイロン代表ジュニウス・ジャヤワルダナはダレス演説を否定した。
「アジア諸国民が植民地だった時代、日本だけが強力かつ自由で、我々は我々を解放する守護者として仰ぎ見ていた。日本が掲げたアジア共栄のスローガンは我々に強く訴えるものがあった。戦争が始まると各国の指導者は祖国の解放を望んで日本に協力した」 
「だから」と少年時代の感動を裏切らなかった日本に感謝しながら続けた。
「我が国は対日賠償請求権を放棄する」 
エジプト代表もダレス演説に逆らい、日本に米軍が駐留する理不尽を衝くなど数多の異論が飛び出した。 
講和条約調印から70年目となる日、スリランカ大使館で「ジャヤワルダナ大統領を偲ぶ会が開かれた」と産経新聞にあった。 
しかし先の戦争は正しかったという故人の主張が気に食わなかったか、朝日も毎日もボツだった。 
日ごろ、歴史を直視しろと説教する割に、見ないふりが酷すぎないか。

 


Top 10 real-time searches 2021/9/22, 17:15

2021年09月22日 17時15分08秒 | 全般

1

Top 10 real-time searches 2021/9/22, 13:57

2

一民問企業のものすごい工事。太平洋沿岸にある重要エネルギー施設の要塞化だった。

3

中国共産党と関係が深い親族企業 日本端子から河野太郎氏に約3000万円…他の親族企業の献金を加えると6700万円以上

4

その原因は、人権問題に対する無関心にあるのか。それとも中国に対する忖度にあるのか。

5

日本原燃の遠心分離機を複数連結したカスケード同位体濃縮技術は世界一の性能である

6

自民総裁選、河野氏への二つの大疑問…正反対の論陣…思い込みや虚偽が目立つ 

7

だからこそ、十分な抑止力を持つことで彼らに攻撃を思いとどまらせることが欠かせない。

8

河野氏がこのことを知らないはずはない。氏は間違いを承知で断言しているのではないか。だとすれば氏の言葉は「虚偽」である。

9

河野太郎は日本端子で小泉進次郎はこれで それぞれ中国との繋がり!

10

世界一の対策技術が開発された…さすが、天下統一の武将を生み出した中部だ。

 


岸田文雄、高市早苗、野田聖子3氏は揃って“採択すべき”と答え、河野太郎氏だけは“回答しない”と連絡。

2021年09月22日 17時11分46秒 | 全般

以下は、今しがた発見した、門田隆将氏のツイートからである。

@KadotaRyusho
日本ウイグル協会などが中国による人権侵害行為を非難する国会決議について候補者に回答を求めた。
岸田文雄、高市早苗、野田聖子3氏は揃って“採択すべき”と答え、河野太郎氏だけは“回答しない”と連絡。
中国が優遇する親族企業から巨額の献金を受ける河野氏には酷な質問、か。


https://www.sankei.com/article/20210922-RGIGUBUPLVMTRIQG4IQVENTU5Q/


森友問題を専らに質問し出した眼鏡男が何と!朝日新聞の記者である坪井ゆづるであると初めて知った

2021年09月22日 17時04分25秒 | 全般

以下は、今しがた発見した和田政宗参議院議員のツイートからである。
@wadamasamune
YouTube『和田政宗の本音でGO!』
最新回は
『自民党総裁選 メディアは特定候補外し?公平に質問を!』
総裁選各候補が、番組や記者クラブなどが設定した討論会に参加。
そうした中、恣意的に悪い方向への印象づけや特定の候補者に質問しないなどの酷い行為が。
ぜひご覧を!
和田氏の、この動画で、私は、当日、橋本五郎の左に席して、あろうことか、朝日新聞が安倍晋三氏憎しで捏造報道を開始した森友問題を、貴重な時間を割いて、専らに質問し出した眼鏡男が、朝日新聞の記者である坪井ゆづるであると初めて知った。

*この記事は当初、坪井ゆづると、日経新聞の小竹洋之記者を間違って記述していた。
先ほど、同じ記者クラブから中継されていた各党党首の質問会をながら見していて、即座に取り違えていた事を知ったので、訂正して再発信する。
自民党総裁選時の後で、日経新聞に小竹洋之記者の長文が掲載されたのを見た私は、あれ、あの愚物に、こんな立派な論文が書かけるのか?と怪訝には思っていたのだったが。
読者は御存知の犯罪者に信じがたいほどに執拗な検索妨害活動を行われているから、検索にも出てはいなかったとは思うのだが。
本章でもって、あろうことか、坪井ゆづると取り違えていた事については、深く陳謝する次第である。

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGTHRpqWuao


河野太郎は日本端子で小泉進次郎はこれで それぞれ中国との繋がり!

2021年09月22日 16時21分00秒 | 全般

以下は、今しがた発見した、フジさんがリツイート、からである。
私は、この論説を、わざわざスキャンし、発信用に改行して、下記の様に、本論文が産経新聞に掲載された翌日の2021年08月11日に、ご紹介したのだが、
このように、写真で、新聞記事のまま、掲載して頂くのも、分かりやすくて良いな、と思ったからご紹介する。
総裁選に投票権を持っている自民党の地方党員全員が必読の記事である。
大人の見識
@otonanokensiki
返信先: 
@nipponkairagi
さん, 
@takeuchikumiffy
さん
河野太郎は日本端子で小泉進次郎はこれでそれぞれ中国との繋がり!
画像

 

小泉一族を使った広告効果は大きく、地方銀行をはじめ多くの金融機関が実体のない事業へ多額の融資をしてしまい、

2021年08月11日 10時48分43秒 | 

以下は昨日の産経新聞からである。
産経新聞が、今、最も、まともな新聞である事は何度も言及して来た通り。
本論文も私の言及の正しさを証明している。
TVやネット等で、東京地検特捜部が、公明党議員の議員会館事務所を家宅捜索、の報道に接しても何のことか分からなかった日本国民は私を含めて多かったはずである。
日本国民のみならず世界中の人たちが必読。
太陽光発電の闇と小泉純一郎 論説委員長 乾正人
閉会式が終わり、「東京五輪口ス」になってしまった。 
連日連夜、アスリートたちが繰り広げた筋書きなきドラマに一喜一憂し、緊急事態宣言の禁を破って一杯やりに外へ出かけたいとは17日間、一度も思わなかったのは、五輪の効能だった(もちろん、連日のように過去最多を更新した新型コロナウイルスの感染者数増も抑制効果大だったが)。 
さて、五輪期間中、あまり大きく報道されなかったが、注目すべき出来事が、永田町であった。 
東京地検特捜部が、公明党議員の議員会館事務所を家宅捜索したのである。
国会閉会中とはいえ、国会議員の事務所が、地検特捜部に「ガサ入れ」されるのは、よくよくのことだ。 
案件は、太陽光発電関連会社の「テクノシステム」社長らが起訴された融資詐欺事件に絡んで公明党の議員秘書が、無登録で政府系金融機関の融資を仲介していた貸金業法違反容疑というのだが、秘書が勝手にやった、というわけではなかろう。
何しろ公明党は、自民党と違って党内の統制が厳しく、議員の許可無く秘書が独自の行動をとるとは考えにくい。 
地検特捜部の狙いは、別のところにありそうだが、「テクノシステム」社長の生田尚之容疑者は、政治家との交遊を自慢し、商売にも利用していたという。 
最大の広告塔として利用されたのが、小泉純一郎元首相である。 
日本経済新聞には、生田容疑者と小泉元首相の対談広告記事が、昨年2回にわたって掲載されている。
この中で、反原発論者の小泉元首相は、「すごいな、生田君の仕事は夢がある。(中略)ぜひこれからも頑張ってほしい」などと、手放しで褒めあげている。 
小泉元首相の長男、孝太郎氏もテクノシステム社のコマーシャルに起用され、小泉家に「太陽光マネー」が転がり込んでいた。 
原発を目の敵にし、何かというと太陽光発電を推奨する進次郎環境相の足もとは大丈夫だろうか。 
小泉一族を使った広告効果は大きく、地方銀行をはじめ多くの金融機関が実体のない事業へ多額の融資をしてしまい、「太陽光詐欺」に易々と引っかかってしまった。
結果的に詐欺の片棒をかついた小泉家の責任も免れまい。 
猫も杓子もSDGSだ、クリーンエネルギーなら太陽光だと騒いでいるが、読者の皆さんもおいしい話にはご用心、ご用心。

 


Top 10 real-time searches 2021/9/22, 16:05

2021年09月22日 16時05分52秒 | 全般

1

Top 10 real-time searches 2021/9/22, 13:57

2

It is a popular page yesterday on ameba 2021/9/22

3

It is a popular page yesterday 2021/9/22

4

Top 50 searches for the past week 2021/9/22

5

一民問企業のものすごい工事。太平洋沿岸にある重要エネルギー施設の要塞化だった。

6

中国共産党と関係が深い親族企業 日本端子から河野太郎氏に約3000万円…他の親族企業の献金を加えると6700万円以上

7

今、誰が日本国の総理大臣=首相に相応しいか、については、私は、安倍晋三前首相に全く同感だからである。

8

日本原燃の遠心分離機を複数連結したカスケード同位体濃縮技術は世界一の性能である

9

その原因は、人権問題に対する無関心にあるのか。それとも中国に対する忖度にあるのか。

10

だからこそ、十分な抑止力を持つことで彼らに攻撃を思いとどまらせることが欠かせない。

 


その中で、上記の疑問を解明してくれる、米国での研究者の実態が、簡明に語られている

2021年09月22日 15時54分17秒 | 全般

以下は、私の読者の方のブログからである。
これは、色んな意味で、とても為になるブログである。
米国のファウチと、その影響下にある、教授が、当初、何故、武漢ウイルスの発生源について中国の意向通りに医学界をリードし自然発生のものであるとしたのか?

彼らの、学者としての研究生活…言わば、彼らは研究が暮らし、暮らしが研究、の人生である。
冒頭の方は、今、世界を股にかけた気鋭の言論人である河添恵子さんの武漢ウイルスの真相に迫る重要な論文に何度か登場している、毒物学の世界的な権威である、トゥー(杜祖健)博士の自伝的な貴重な論文を紹介してくれている。
その中で、上記の疑問を解明してくれる、米国での研究者の実態が、簡明に語られているからである。
日本国民必読の論文である。
毒物研究に没頭した日々を振り返る
在米68年のトゥー(杜祖健)博士

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/46141105315genkigooid/e/c6abd9b50bc15745ea052917e280417c

 


小泉大臣が公式の場で環境大臣として自民党総裁選の女性候補(高市)へ越権介入したため、元妻を守るために反論します

2021年09月22日 15時26分48秒 | 全般

以下は、今しがた発見した竹内久美子さんのツイートからである。

竹内久美子さんが返信しました
山本拓事務所
@yamamoto_taku
小泉大臣が公式の場で環境大臣として自民党総裁選の女性候補(高市)へ越権介入したため、元妻を守るために反論します
http://yamamototaku.jp/article/20210921/


竹内久美子
@takeuchikumiffy
素晴らしいです。高市先生をもっともっと応援します。

 


そうした中、恣意的に悪い方向への印象づけや特定の候補者に質問しないなどの酷い行為が

2021年09月22日 15時22分39秒 | 全般

以下は、今しがた発見した和田政宗参議院議員のツイートからである。
@wadamasamune
YouTube『和田政宗の本音でGO!』
最新回は
『自民党総裁選 メディアは特定候補外し?公平に質問を!』
総裁選各候補が、番組や記者クラブなどが設定した討論会に参加。
そうした中、恣意的に悪い方向への印象づけや特定の候補者に質問しないなどの酷い行為が。
ぜひご覧を!
和田氏の、この動画で、私は、当日、橋本五郎の左に席して、あろうことか、朝日新聞が安倍晋三氏憎しで、捏造報道を開始した森友問題を、貴重な時間を割いて、専らに質問し出した眼鏡男が、何と!日本経済新聞社の記者である小竹洋之という男であると初めて知った。
高橋洋一氏の著作のタイトルである「日経新聞と…はアホだらけ」は、正鵠を射ていたわけである。
この新聞は我が家に、毎朝、配達されてくるが、最近の私が殆ど読まないのも道理だった。

https://youtu.be/vGTHRpqWuao