The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Legal under international law
Professor of University of Tokyo and others have names on the signature person list.
Some people have died, but let's pick up quickly.
The title is on the roster.
Sasagu Arai (University of Tokyo professor emeritus of Biblical Studies), Takeshi Ishida (Tokyo University Professor Emeritus, Political Science), Yuzo Itagaki (The University of Tokyo professor emeritus of Islamic Studies), Kang Sang-jung (The University of Tokyo professor and political science), Yoichi Komori (Tokyo University Professor Japanese literature), Yoshikazu Sakamoto (Tokyo University professor emeritus and international politics), Masaru Tonomura (University of Tokyo Associate Professor Korean history), is a Masato Miyaji (professor emeritus at the University of Tokyo, Japan history) et al.
Including reporters of "Asahi Shimbun", other signers are also interesting.
Commentary chairperson
This is also let's pick up some staring people.
Hiroshi Imazu (former Asahi Shimbun editorial deputy chief editor), Kenzaburo Oe (writer), Odagawa Ko (former Asahi Shimbun editorial board), Sataka Makoto (magazine "Weekly Friday" the issuer), Sawachi Hisae (non-fiction writer), Kenichi Takagi ( lawyer), Takasaki Soji (Tsuda College Professor of Japanese history), Hiroshi Tanaka (Professor Emeritus, Hitotsubashi University, post-war compensation issue), Shunsuke Tsurumi (philosopher), Yuichi Tobita (Kobe student Youth Center Director), Isamu Miyazaki (economist, former Economic Planning Secretary), Tomoko Yamazaki (women's history researcher), Ymamuro Hideo (former NHK commentary chairperson), Tatsuya Yoshioka (Peace boat co-representative), Yoshiaki Yoshimi (Chuo University Professor of Japanese history), et al., exactly in the collection of intellectuals is there.
Still, the position of the Japanese government consistently showed that the Korean annexation was legally done under international law at the time and it was effective.
Mr. Nishioka stressed.
"Even Mr. Tomiichi Murayama said that the Korean annexation was legally effective and concluded in the historical circumstances such as international relations at the time.
Disparity in history awareness is natural if there are different countries. However, Mr. Wada and others will try to match the historical recognition of nature differently for each country, in a direction that Japan aligns with Korea's way of thinking and interpretation. "
There was also a campaign by a group of diverse Japanese, and Supreme Court of South Korea showed the aforementioned annexation invalid judgment.
Next, the Korean side issued "Committee Activity Results Report" (hereinafter referred to as "report") of "Investigation of forced mobilization damage in the conflict case against Japan and mandatory mobilization abroad victims etc. Support Committee".
The committee with the long name on the right was established under the Roh Moo-hyun administration in 2004, and the report was issued in June 16.
The Korean government spent more than 11 years, surveyed with tremendous obsession and compiled it into a major report.
In the preface detailed the German reflections and reparations on "Forced accommodation of Nazis for Jews, forced labor, confiscation of property, abuses and the Holocaust", so the idea of the Korean side linking Japan's wartime mobilization to the Holocaust is seen you can take it.
This draft continues.