in this new era in which the country itself is forced to make a strict choice each time it happens

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It was good with Trump

It will learn the lesson from history, I am afraid that it is a meaning in it, is hard to make a decision that gives priority to domestic interest over anything without being dragged by false history recognition, it will turn a blind eye to future big trouble.

The new era to welcome soon will be like an era of unpredictable times like when we were replaced by Heisei from Meiji to Taisho, Taisho to Showa and Showa era.

What should we do in such a severe change period?

Autumn three years ago when Mr. Trump won the US presidential election, I wrote an article titled ‘Is not it nice for Trump?’

The thought was changed to conviction that ‘It was good with Trump’.

There have been no presidents so far as to quit major ministers one after another and tweeting passion that rises every day and giving priority to money accounts rather than faith with allies.

That is why we can learn about US naked real intention.

Those who still think that Japan can successfully jockey for the space between the United States and China is an overwhelming sucker.

Mr. Trump should press sooner or later 'Or take me or take the Xi Jinping' to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

At that time, the prime minister himself knows well that ambiguous reply cannot be done.

The era of giving up thinking that it is all right to have US-Japan security tells the end soon.

I would like to believe that the Japanese will be unleashed from the postwar spellings in this new era in which the country itself is forced to make a strict choice each time it happens.

I would like to believe that the Japanese will be unleashed from the postwar spellings

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It was good with Trump

It will learn the lesson from history, I am afraid that it is a meaning in it, is hard to make a decision that gives priority to domestic interest over anything without being dragged by false history recognition, it will turn a blind eye to future big trouble.

The new era to welcome soon will be like an era of unpredictable times like when we were replaced by Heisei from Meiji to Taisho, Taisho to Showa and Showa era.

What should we do in such a severe change period?

Autumn three years ago when Mr. Trump won the US presidential election, I wrote an article titled ‘Is not it nice for Trump?’

The thought was changed to conviction that ‘It was good with Trump’.

There have been no presidents so far as to quit major ministers one after another and tweeting passion that rises every day and giving priority to money accounts rather than faith with allies.

That is why we can learn about US naked real intention.

Those who still think that Japan can successfully jockey for the space between the United States and China is an overwhelming sucker.

Mr. Trump should press sooner or later 'Or take me or take the Xi Jinping' to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

At that time, the prime minister himself knows well that ambiguous reply cannot be done.

The era of giving up thinking that it is all right to have US-Japan security tells the end soon.

I would like to believe that the Japanese will be unleashed from the postwar spellings in this new era in which the country itself is forced to make a strict choice each time it happens.

The era of giving up thinking that it is all right to have US-Japan security tells the end soon

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It was good with Trump

It will learn the lesson from history, I am afraid that it is a meaning in it, is hard to make a decision that gives priority to domestic interest over anything without being dragged by false history recognition, it will turn a blind eye to future big trouble.

The new era to welcome soon will be like an era of unpredictable times like when we were replaced by Heisei from Meiji to Taisho, Taisho to Showa and Showa era.

What should we do in such a severe change period?

Autumn three years ago when Mr. Trump won the US presidential election, I wrote an article titled ‘Is not it nice for Trump?’

The thought was changed to conviction that ‘It was good with Trump’.

There have been no presidents so far as to quit major ministers one after another and tweeting passion that rises every day and giving priority to money accounts rather than faith with allies.

That is why we can learn about US naked real intention.

Those who still think that Japan can successfully jockey for the space between the United States and China is an overwhelming sucker.

Mr. Trump should press sooner or later 'Or take me or take the Xi Jinping' to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

At that time, the prime minister himself knows well that ambiguous reply cannot be done.

The era of giving up thinking that it is all right to have US-Japan security tells the end soon.

I would like to believe that the Japanese will be unleashed from the postwar spellings in this new era in which the country itself is forced to make a strict choice each time it happens.

At that time, the prime minister himself knows well that ambiguous reply cannot be done.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It was good with Trump

It will learn the lesson from history, I am afraid that it is a meaning in it, is hard to make a decision that gives priority to domestic interest over anything without being dragged by false history recognition, it will turn a blind eye to future big trouble.

The new era to welcome soon will be like an era of unpredictable times like when we were replaced by Heisei from Meiji to Taisho, Taisho to Showa and Showa era.

What should we do in such a severe change period?

Autumn three years ago when Mr. Trump won the US presidential election, I wrote an article titled ‘Is not it nice for Trump?’

The thought was changed to conviction that ‘It was good with Trump’.

There have been no presidents so far as to quit major ministers one after another and tweeting passion that rises every day and giving priority to money accounts rather than faith with allies.

That is why we can learn about US naked real intention.

Those who still think that Japan can successfully jockey for the space between the United States and China is an overwhelming sucker.

Mr. Trump should press sooner or later 'Or take me or take the Xi Jinping' to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

At that time, the prime minister himself knows well that ambiguous reply cannot be done.

The era of giving up thinking that it is all right to have US-Japan security tells the end soon.

I would like to believe that the Japanese will be unleashed from the postwar spellings in this new era in which the country itself is forced to make a strict choice each time it happens.

Mr. Trump should press sooner or later 'Or take me or take the Xi Jinping' to Prime Minister

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It was good with Trump

It will learn the lesson from history, I am afraid that it is a meaning in it, is hard to make a decision that gives priority to domestic interest over anything without being dragged by false history recognition, it will turn a blind eye to future big trouble.

The new era to welcome soon will be like an era of unpredictable times like when we were replaced by Heisei from Meiji to Taisho, Taisho to Showa and Showa era.

What should we do in such a severe change period?

Autumn three years ago when Mr. Trump won the US presidential election, I wrote an article titled ‘Is not it nice for Trump?’

The thought was changed to conviction that ‘It was good with Trump’.

There have been no presidents so far as to quit major ministers one after another and tweeting passion that rises every day and giving priority to money accounts rather than faith with allies.

That is why we can learn about US naked real intention.

Those who still think that Japan can successfully jockey for the space between the United States and China is an overwhelming sucker.

Mr. Trump should press sooner or later 'Or take me or take the Xi Jinping' to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

At that time, the prime minister himself knows well that ambiguous reply cannot be done.

The era of giving up thinking that it is all right to have US-Japan security tells the end soon.

I would like to believe that the Japanese will be unleashed from the postwar spellings in this new era in which the country itself is forced to make a strict choice each time it happens.

still think that Japan can successfully jockey for the space between the United States and China is

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It was good with Trump

It will learn the lesson from history, I am afraid that it is a meaning in it, is hard to make a decision that gives priority to domestic interest over anything without being dragged by false history recognition, it will turn a blind eye to future big trouble.

The new era to welcome soon will be like an era of unpredictable times like when we were replaced by Heisei from Meiji to Taisho, Taisho to Showa and Showa era.

What should we do in such a severe change period?

Autumn three years ago when Mr. Trump won the US presidential election, I wrote an article titled ‘Is not it nice for Trump?’

The thought was changed to conviction that ‘It was good with Trump’.

There have been no presidents so far as to quit major ministers one after another and tweeting passion that rises every day and giving priority to money accounts rather than faith with allies.

That is why we can learn about US naked real intention.

Those who still think that Japan can successfully jockey for the space between the United States and China is an overwhelming sucker.

Mr. Trump should press sooner or later 'Or take me or take the Xi Jinping' to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

At that time, the prime minister himself knows well that ambiguous reply cannot be done.

The era of giving up thinking that it is all right to have US-Japan security tells the end soon.

I would like to believe that the Japanese will be unleashed from the postwar spellings in this new era in which the country itself is forced to make a strict choice each time it happens.

There have been no presidents so far as to quit major ministers one after another and tweeting

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It was good with Trump

It will learn the lesson from history, I am afraid that it is a meaning in it, is hard to make a decision that gives priority to domestic interest over anything without being dragged by false history recognition, it will turn a blind eye to future big trouble.

The new era to welcome soon will be like an era of unpredictable times like when we were replaced by Heisei from Meiji to Taisho, Taisho to Showa and Showa era.

What should we do in such a severe change period?

Autumn three years ago when Mr. Trump won the US presidential election, I wrote an article titled ‘Is not it nice for Trump?’

The thought was changed to conviction that ‘It was good with Trump’.

There have been no presidents so far as to quit major ministers one after another and tweeting passion that rises every day and giving priority to money accounts rather than faith with allies.

That is why we can learn about US naked real intention.

Those who still think that Japan can successfully jockey for the space between the United States and China is an overwhelming sucker.

Mr. Trump should press sooner or later 'Or take me or take the Xi Jinping' to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

At that time, the prime minister himself knows well that ambiguous reply cannot be done.

The era of giving up thinking that it is all right to have US-Japan security tells the end soon.

I would like to believe that the Japanese will be unleashed from the postwar spellings in this new era in which the country itself is forced to make a strict choice each time it happens.

Mr. Trump won the US presidential election, I wrote an article titled ‘Is not it nice for Trump?’

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It was good with Trump

It will learn the lesson from history, I am afraid that it is a meaning in it, is hard to make a decision that gives priority to domestic interest over anything without being dragged by false history recognition, it will turn a blind eye to future big trouble.

The new era to welcome soon will be like an era of unpredictable times like when we were replaced by Heisei from Meiji to Taisho, Taisho to Showa and Showa era.

What should we do in such a severe change period?

Autumn three years ago when Mr. Trump won the US presidential election, I wrote an article titled ‘Is not it nice for Trump?’

The thought was changed to conviction that ‘It was good with Trump’.

There have been no presidents so far as to quit major ministers one after another and tweeting passion that rises every day and giving priority to money accounts rather than faith with allies.

That is why we can learn about US naked real intention.

Those who still think that Japan can successfully jockey for the space between the United States and China is an overwhelming sucker.

Mr. Trump should press sooner or later 'Or take me or take the Xi Jinping' to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

At that time, the prime minister himself knows well that ambiguous reply cannot be done.

The era of giving up thinking that it is all right to have US-Japan security tells the end soon.

I would like to believe that the Japanese will be unleashed from the postwar spellings in this new era in which the country itself is forced to make a strict choice each time it happens.

The new era to welcome soon will be like an era of unpredictable times like when we were replaced

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It was good with Trump

It will learn the lesson from history, I am afraid that it is a meaning in it, is hard to make a decision that gives priority to domestic interest over anything without being dragged by false history recognition, it will turn a blind eye to future big trouble.

The new era to welcome soon will be like an era of unpredictable times like when we were replaced by Heisei from Meiji to Taisho, Taisho to Showa and Showa era.

What should we do in such a severe change period?

Autumn three years ago when Mr. Trump won the US presidential election, I wrote an article titled ‘Is not it nice for Trump?’

The thought was changed to conviction that ‘It was good with Trump’.

There have been no presidents so far as to quit major ministers one after another and tweeting passion that rises every day and giving priority to money accounts rather than faith with allies.

That is why we can learn about US naked real intention.

Those who still think that Japan can successfully jockey for the space between the United States and China is an overwhelming sucker.

Mr. Trump should press sooner or later 'Or take me or take the Xi Jinping' to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

At that time, the prime minister himself knows well that ambiguous reply cannot be done.

The era of giving up thinking that it is all right to have US-Japan security tells the end soon.

I would like to believe that the Japanese will be unleashed from the postwar spellings in this new era in which the country itself is forced to make a strict choice each time it happens.

make a decision that gives priority to domestic interest over anything without being dragged by

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It was good with Trump

It will learn the lesson from history, I am afraid that it is a meaning in it, is hard to make a decision that gives priority to domestic interest over anything without being dragged by false history recognition, it will turn a blind eye to future big trouble.

The new era to welcome soon will be like an era of unpredictable times like when we were replaced by Heisei from Meiji to Taisho, Taisho to Showa and Showa era.

What should we do in such a severe change period?

Autumn three years ago when Mr. Trump won the US presidential election, I wrote an article titled ‘Is not it nice for Trump?’

The thought was changed to conviction that ‘It was good with Trump’.

There have been no presidents so far as to quit major ministers one after another and tweeting passion that rises every day and giving priority to money accounts rather than faith with allies.

That is why we can learn about US naked real intention.

Those who still think that Japan can successfully jockey for the space between the United States and China is an overwhelming sucker.

Mr. Trump should press sooner or later 'Or take me or take the Xi Jinping' to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

At that time, the prime minister himself knows well that ambiguous reply cannot be done.

The era of giving up thinking that it is all right to have US-Japan security tells the end soon.

I would like to believe that the Japanese will be unleashed from the postwar spellings in this new era in which the country itself is forced to make a strict choice each time it happens.

There is no ‘if’ in history. At that time, if you do, it does not mean anything.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is the maximum cause of defeat? Why had Heisei Japan been defeated?

Supported the Chinese Communist dictatorship system

There are several reasons.

Although the aforementioned business people took a crush, ‘It is a lack of sense of crisis’, personally, ①self-conceited the economic recovery of the miracle from the ashes of a devastating war ②Politics got so confused that the number of politicians who came to prime minister in 30 years counted 18 people ③Supported the Chinese Communist dictatorship system - I want to give three pieces of the cause of defeat.

In particular, the third is an irreparable failure.

In 1989, the Tiananmen Incident that the People's Liberation Army massacred citizens and students who had gathered to seek freedom in Beijing · Tiananmen Square shocked the world. It was Japan that helped the Chinese Communist Party regime, which was isolated internationally and was in trouble.

The Kaifu administration quickly resumed ODA loans, and the following Miyazawa administration realized His Majesty the Emperor visited China.

Sankei Shimbun had been cautious from that time, but we were outnumbered, China has returned to the international community without difficulty.

The starting point that China has grown into the world's second-largest economy with maintaining a one-party dictatorship is exactly here.

There is no ‘if’ in history. At that time, if you do, it does not mean anything.

This draft continues.

The starting point that China has grown into the world's second-largest economy with maintaining a

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is the maximum cause of defeat? Why had Heisei Japan been defeated?

Supported the Chinese Communist dictatorship system

There are several reasons.

Although the aforementioned business people took a crush, ‘It is a lack of sense of crisis’, personally, ①self-conceited the economic recovery of the miracle from the ashes of a devastating war ②Politics got so confused that the number of politicians who came to prime minister in 30 years counted 18 people ③Supported the Chinese Communist dictatorship system - I want to give three pieces of the cause of defeat.

In particular, the third is an irreparable failure.

In 1989, the Tiananmen Incident that the People's Liberation Army massacred citizens and students who had gathered to seek freedom in Beijing · Tiananmen Square shocked the world. It was Japan that helped the Chinese Communist Party regime, which was isolated internationally and was in trouble.

The Kaifu administration quickly resumed ODA loans, and the following Miyazawa administration realized His Majesty the Emperor visited China.

Sankei Shimbun had been cautious from that time, but we were outnumbered, China has returned to the international community without difficulty.

The starting point that China has grown into the world's second-largest economy with maintaining a one-party dictatorship is exactly here.

There is no ‘if’ in history. At that time, if you do, it does not mean anything.

This draft continues.

but we were outnumbered, China has returned to the international community without difficulty

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is the maximum cause of defeat? Why had Heisei Japan been defeated?

Supported the Chinese Communist dictatorship system

There are several reasons.

Although the aforementioned business people took a crush, ‘It is a lack of sense of crisis’, personally, ①self-conceited the economic recovery of the miracle from the ashes of a devastating war ②Politics got so confused that the number of politicians who came to prime minister in 30 years counted 18 people ③Supported the Chinese Communist dictatorship system - I want to give three pieces of the cause of defeat.

In particular, the third is an irreparable failure.

In 1989, the Tiananmen Incident that the People's Liberation Army massacred citizens and students who had gathered to seek freedom in Beijing · Tiananmen Square shocked the world. It was Japan that helped the Chinese Communist Party regime, which was isolated internationally and was in trouble.

The Kaifu administration quickly resumed ODA loans, and the following Miyazawa administration realized His Majesty the Emperor visited China.

Sankei Shimbun had been cautious from that time, but we were outnumbered, China has returned to the international community without difficulty.

The starting point that China has grown into the world's second-largest economy with maintaining a one-party dictatorship is exactly here.

There is no ‘if’ in history. At that time, if you do, it does not mean anything.

This draft continues.

It was Japan that helped the Chinese Communist Party regime, which was isolated internationally

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is the maximum cause of defeat? Why had Heisei Japan been defeated?

Supported the Chinese Communist dictatorship system

There are several reasons.

Although the aforementioned business people took a crush, ‘It is a lack of sense of crisis’, personally, ①self-conceited the economic recovery of the miracle from the ashes of a devastating war ②Politics got so confused that the number of politicians who came to prime minister in 30 years counted 18 people ③Supported the Chinese Communist dictatorship system - I want to give three pieces of the cause of defeat.

In particular, the third is an irreparable failure.

In 1989, the Tiananmen Incident that the People's Liberation Army massacred citizens and students who had gathered to seek freedom in Beijing · Tiananmen Square shocked the world. It was Japan that helped the Chinese Communist Party regime, which was isolated internationally and was in trouble.

The Kaifu administration quickly resumed ODA loans, and the following Miyazawa administration realized His Majesty the Emperor visited China.

Sankei Shimbun had been cautious from that time, but we were outnumbered, China has returned to the international community without difficulty.

The starting point that China has grown into the world's second-largest economy with maintaining a one-party dictatorship is exactly here.

There is no ‘if’ in history. At that time, if you do, it does not mean anything.

This draft continues.

In particular, the third is an irreparable failure.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is the maximum cause of defeat? Why had Heisei Japan been defeated?

Supported the Chinese Communist dictatorship system

There are several reasons.

Although the aforementioned business people took a crush, ‘It is a lack of sense of crisis’, personally, ①self-conceited the economic recovery of the miracle from the ashes of a devastating war ②Politics got so confused that the number of politicians who came to prime minister in 30 years counted 18 people ③Supported the Chinese Communist dictatorship system - I want to give three pieces of the cause of defeat.

In particular, the third is an irreparable failure.

In 1989, the Tiananmen Incident that the People's Liberation Army massacred citizens and students who had gathered to seek freedom in Beijing · Tiananmen Square shocked the world. It was Japan that helped the Chinese Communist Party regime, which was isolated internationally and was in trouble.

The Kaifu administration quickly resumed ODA loans, and the following Miyazawa administration realized His Majesty the Emperor visited China.

Sankei Shimbun had been cautious from that time, but we were outnumbered, China has returned to the international community without difficulty.

The starting point that China has grown into the world's second-largest economy with maintaining a one-party dictatorship is exactly here.

There is no ‘if’ in history. At that time, if you do, it does not mean anything.

This draft continues.