he is the only human being who was staring at the history in the successive politician in

Correctly, only the Park Chung-hee administration didn't accompany.
It isn't exaggerated even if it says that he is the only human being who was staring at the history in the successive politician in Korea.
He did not tell a lie against history.

In the exaggeration even if Korean Peninsula which chose merger with Japan and achieved the part of the clan of the modern nationhood at a breath is called the reproduction of the maladministration and the history which repeated conflict inside the peninsula by Ri Seung-man's monocracy, the inner war with Kim Il-song's North Korea danced an aspect and retraced it to one of the world least less-developed countrieses.

At this time, Park Chung-hee which started a military coup d'etat and laid Ri Seung-man, Park knew thoroughly with need the help from Japan to reconstruct Korea.

Because he knew all of being true of Japan and Korean Peninsula, he never sticks to the lies such as being anti-Japanese.

It is the times when the communist had influence.
Being anti-Japanese was expedient propaganda then, too, for them.

He issued a martial law, he held down this.

For what purpose is it?

Japan which lost and passed through the occupation state felt a debt to merging Korea.

When there was getting huge financial support from the Japan only now, he knew thoroughly.

It knew thoroughly the way of rescuing Korea when only it was.

The current president of his daughter is nestling close to China which made inroads into Korea at the time of the Korean War and drove Korea on the confines of ruined nation, but being the incorrigible human being who is fighting with Japan which rescued Korea.

If saying at the time of now, her father rescued a country thoroughly but isn't exaggerated even if it says that she is the malefactor who made that the extreme unstable of the world in now is done, stopping the developing of the turntable of the civilization to be going around to Japan, in addition to making Korea worthless thoroughly.

it does not cover properly with the person in question who caused a

The following is the sequel of the preceding chapter.

The black emphasis is me.

Sakurai

Will the question and the proposal which Tahara said now have reached how much, the report this time, in addition to, in the nucleus of the management of "Asahi Shimbun "?

Tahara

It thinks that it is understood if it sees the paper of future “Asahi Shimbun". Of calling a newspaper as expected of "Asahi's ", "Yomiuri's" and "Sankei's" being the same it is a campaign that, by the matter this time, was felt.

Sakurai

The campaign? Is the newspaper the fact not to be a reporting medium actually?

Tahara

In short, it does not covers neatly and it isn't writing a fact. For example, it is "it first puts on that there is a conclusion" such as the nuclear power plant problem. In "Asahi" and "Mainichi", since before writing an article, the opposition stance are decided, on the other hand "Yomiuri" and "Sankei" to agreeing the nuclear power plant about. The problem of the right of collective self-defense, too, is the same, "Yomiuri" "Sankei" agree but "Asahi" "Mainichi" in the opposition. However, we journalist doesn't accompany. Without deciding a conclusion from the beginning, first, it covers and it pursues a fact. Then the thing to be inconvenient for itself, it writes if being a fact.

The newspaper in Japan, it tends to bring only material with the convenience which is good for itself. For example, if saying about Yoshida Seiji's false report, it thinks that the surplus redemption consciousness "to have done a bad thing to Korea during the wartime" in "Asahi Shimbun" in the first time.

The man who is called Yoshida Seiji there appeared and in 1982, he confessed, saying "he took several hundred women from Jeju Do in Korea and made it a comfort woman". It will apply perfectly to the atonement consciousness of "Asahi Shimbun".

From the 1960s to the 70s, by the influence of All-Campus Joint Struggle League student group active at universities throughout Japan between 1968 and in 1969, the word, "the generalization" and "the self-criticism", is popular. The media leaped at the remark having to do with self-criticism in a body. As for entering into Yoshida Seiji's fiction, "Mainichi" "Yomiuri" in addition to "Asahi", too, is the same. Among the Japanese in those days, the stronger the atonement consciousness to the war in the past was, the measure to be more conscientious it became. 

It thinks that the thought to be the media about which most reconsidered "Asahi Shimbun" is the most conscientious is the big reason which can have aggravated the problem of the comfort woman report.

Sakurai

It thinks that the assuming a posture pose saying "themselves are conscientious media" in "Asahi Shimbun" contains a lot of deceptions very much.

First, while “the evidence coverage" which is the most basic of basics of the journalism prints the account which isn't made, fancy themselves to be doing a conscientious report.

Even if the fact becomes clearer, still, it is not admitting a mistake and not apologizing.

Tahara

There is a problem.

By the verification article of "Asahi Shimbun" on August 5th, 2014, it didn't understand me, why doing thoroughgoing coverage to Yoshida Seiji while he was living, didn't they do the special story to generalize Yoshida testimony?

In other words, it does not cover properly with the person in question who caused a comfort woman problem and it isn't verifying.

The campaign? Is the newspaper the fact not to be a reporting medium actually?

The following is the sequel of the preceding chapter.

The black emphasis is me.

Sakurai

Will the question and the proposal which Tahara said now have reached how much, the report this time, in addition to, in the nucleus of the management of "Asahi Shimbun "?

Tahara

It thinks that it is understood if it sees the paper of future “Asahi Shimbun". Of calling a newspaper as expected of "Asahi's ", "Yomiuri's" and "Sankei's" being the same it is a campaign that, by the matter this time, was felt.

Sakurai

The campaign? Is the newspaper the fact not to be a reporting medium actually?

Tahara

In short, it does not covers neatly and it isn't writing a fact. For example, it is "it first puts on that there is a conclusion" such as the nuclear power plant problem. In "Asahi" and "Mainichi", since before writing an article, the opposition stance are decided, on the other hand "Yomiuri" and "Sankei" to agreeing the nuclear power plant about. The problem of the right of collective self-defense, too, is the same, "Yomiuri" "Sankei" agree but "Asahi" "Mainichi" in the opposition. However, we journalist doesn't accompany. Without deciding a conclusion from the beginning, first, it covers and it pursues a fact. Then the thing to be inconvenient for itself, it writes if being a fact.

The newspaper in Japan, it tends to bring only material with the convenience which is good for itself. For example, if saying about Yoshida Seiji's false report, it thinks that the surplus redemption consciousness "to have done a bad thing to Korea during the wartime" in "Asahi Shimbun" in the first time.

The man who is called Yoshida Seiji there appeared and in 1982, he confessed, saying "he took several hundred women from Jeju Do in Korea and made it a comfort woman". It will apply perfectly to the atonement consciousness of "Asahi Shimbun".

From the 1960s to the 70s, by the influence of All-Campus Joint Struggle League student group active at universities throughout Japan between 1968 and in 1969, the word, "the generalization" and "the self-criticism", is popular. The media leaped at the remark having to do with self-criticism in a body. As for entering into Yoshida Seiji's fiction, "Mainichi" "Yomiuri" in addition to "Asahi", too, is the same. Among the Japanese in those days, the stronger the atonement consciousness to the war in the past was, the measure to be more conscientious it became. 

It thinks that the thought to be the media about which most reconsidered "Asahi Shimbun" is the most conscientious is the big reason which can have aggravated the problem of the comfort woman report.

Sakurai

It thinks that the assuming a posture pose saying "themselves are conscientious media" in "Asahi Shimbun" contains a lot of deceptions very much.

First, while “the evidence coverage" which is the most basic of basics of the journalism prints the account which isn't made, fancy themselves to be doing a conscientious report.

Even if the fact becomes clearer, still, it is not admitting a mistake and not apologizing.

Tahara

There is a problem.

By the verification article of "Asahi Shimbun" on August 5th, 2014, it didn't understand me, why doing thoroughgoing coverage to Yoshida Seiji while he was living, didn't they do the special story to generalize Yoshida testimony?

In other words, it does not cover properly with the person in question who caused a comfort woman problem and it isn't verifying.

it tends to bring only material with the convenience which is good for itself.

The following is the sequel of the preceding chapter.

The black emphasis is me.

Sakurai

Will the question and the proposal which Tahara said now have reached how much, the report this time, in addition to, in the nucleus of the management of "Asahi Shimbun "?

Tahara

It thinks that it is understood if it sees the paper of future “Asahi Shimbun". Of calling a newspaper as expected of "Asahi's ", "Yomiuri's" and "Sankei's" being the same it is a campaign that, by the matter this time, was felt.

Sakurai

The campaign? Is the newspaper the fact not to be a reporting medium actually?

Tahara

In short, it does not covers neatly and it isn't writing a fact. For example, it is "it first puts on that there is a conclusion" such as the nuclear power plant problem. In "Asahi" and "Mainichi", since before writing an article, the opposition stance are decided, on the other hand "Yomiuri" and "Sankei" to agreeing the nuclear power plant about. The problem of the right of collective self-defense, too, is the same, "Yomiuri" "Sankei" agree but "Asahi" "Mainichi" in the opposition. However, we journalist doesn't accompany. Without deciding a conclusion from the beginning, first, it covers and it pursues a fact. Then the thing to be inconvenient for itself, it writes if being a fact.

The newspaper in Japan, it tends to bring only material with the convenience which is good for itself. For example, if saying about Yoshida Seiji's false report, it thinks that the surplus redemption consciousness "to have done a bad thing to Korea during the wartime" in "Asahi Shimbun" in the first time.

The man who is called Yoshida Seiji there appeared and in 1982, he confessed, saying "he took several hundred women from Jeju Do in Korea and made it a comfort woman". It will apply perfectly to the atonement consciousness of "Asahi Shimbun".

From the 1960s to the 70s, by the influence of All-Campus Joint Struggle League student group active at universities throughout Japan between 1968 and in 1969, the word, "the generalization" and "the self-criticism", is popular. The media leaped at the remark having to do with self-criticism in a body. As for entering into Yoshida Seiji's fiction, "Mainichi" "Yomiuri" in addition to "Asahi", too, is the same. Among the Japanese in those days, the stronger the atonement consciousness to the war in the past was, the measure to be more conscientious it became. 

It thinks that the thought to be the media about which most reconsidered "Asahi Shimbun" is the most conscientious is the big reason which can have aggravated the problem of the comfort woman report.

Sakurai

It thinks that the assuming a posture pose saying "themselves are conscientious media" in "Asahi Shimbun" contains a lot of deceptions very much.

First, while “the evidence coverage" which is the most basic of basics of the journalism prints the account which isn't made, fancy themselves to be doing a conscientious report.

Even if the fact becomes clearer, still, it is not admitting a mistake and not apologizing.

Tahara

There is a problem.

By the verification article of "Asahi Shimbun" on August 5th, 2014, it didn't understand me, why doing thoroughgoing coverage to Yoshida Seiji while he was living, didn't they do the special story to generalize Yoshida testimony?

In other words, it does not cover properly with the person in question who caused a comfort woman problem and it isn't verifying.

In short, it does not covers neatly and it isn't writing a fact.

The following is the sequel of the preceding chapter.

The black emphasis is me.

Sakurai

Will the question and the proposal which Tahara said now have reached how much, the report this time, in addition to, in the nucleus of the management of "Asahi Shimbun "?

Tahara

It thinks that it is understood if it sees the paper of future “Asahi Shimbun". Of calling a newspaper as expected of "Asahi's ", "Yomiuri's" and "Sankei's" being the same it is a campaign that, by the matter this time, was felt.

Sakurai

The campaign? Is the newspaper the fact not to be a reporting medium actually?

Tahara

In short, it does not covers neatly and it isn't writing a fact. For example, it is "it first puts on that there is a conclusion" such as the nuclear power plant problem. In "Asahi" and "Mainichi", since before writing an article, the opposition stance are decided, on the other hand "Yomiuri" and "Sankei" to agreeing the nuclear power plant about. The problem of the right of collective self-defense, too, is the same, "Yomiuri" "Sankei" agree but "Asahi" "Mainichi" in the opposition. However, we journalist doesn't accompany. Without deciding a conclusion from the beginning, first, it covers and it pursues a fact. Then the thing to be inconvenient for itself, it writes if being a fact.

The newspaper in Japan, it tends to bring only material with the convenience which is good for itself. For example, if saying about Yoshida Seiji's false report, it thinks that the surplus redemption consciousness "to have done a bad thing to Korea during the wartime" in "Asahi Shimbun" in the first time.

The man who is called Yoshida Seiji there appeared and in 1982, he confessed, saying "he took several hundred women from Jeju Do in Korea and made it a comfort woman". It will apply perfectly to the atonement consciousness of "Asahi Shimbun".

From the 1960s to the 70s, by the influence of All-Campus Joint Struggle League student group active at universities throughout Japan between 1968 and in 1969, the word, "the generalization" and "the self-criticism", is popular. The media leaped at the remark having to do with self-criticism in a body. As for entering into Yoshida Seiji's fiction, "Mainichi" "Yomiuri" in addition to "Asahi", too, is the same. Among the Japanese in those days, the stronger the atonement consciousness to the war in the past was, the measure to be more conscientious it became. 

It thinks that the thought to be the media about which most reconsidered "Asahi Shimbun" is the most conscientious is the big reason which can have aggravated the problem of the comfort woman report.

Sakurai

It thinks that the assuming a posture pose saying "themselves are conscientious media" in "Asahi Shimbun" contains a lot of deceptions very much.

First, while “the evidence coverage" which is the most basic of basics of the journalism prints the account which isn't made, fancy themselves to be doing a conscientious report.

Even if the fact becomes clearer, still, it is not admitting a mistake and not apologizing.

Tahara

There is a problem.

By the verification article of "Asahi Shimbun" on August 5th, 2014, it didn't understand me, why doing thoroughgoing coverage to Yoshida Seiji while he was living, didn't they do the special story to generalize Yoshida testimony?

In other words, it does not cover properly with the person in question who caused a comfort woman problem and it isn't verifying.

which can have aggravated the problem of the comfort woman report.

The following is the sequel of the preceding chapter.

The black emphasis is me.

Sakurai

Will the question and the proposal which Tahara said now have reached how much, the report this time, in addition to, in the nucleus of the management of "Asahi Shimbun "?

Tahara

It thinks that it is understood if it sees the paper of future “Asahi Shimbun". Of calling a newspaper as expected of "Asahi's ", "Yomiuri's" and "Sankei's" being the same it is a campaign that, by the matter this time, was felt.

Sakurai

The campaign? Is the newspaper the fact not to be a reporting medium actually?

Tahara

In short, it does not covers neatly and it isn't writing a fact. For example, it is "it first puts on that there is a conclusion" such as the nuclear power plant problem. In "Asahi" and "Mainichi", since before writing an article, the opposition stance are decided, on the other hand "Yomiuri" and "Sankei" to agreeing the nuclear power plant about. The problem of the right of collective self-defense, too, is the same, "Yomiuri" "Sankei" agree but "Asahi" "Mainichi" in the opposition. However, we journalist doesn't accompany. Without deciding a conclusion from the beginning, first, it covers and it pursues a fact. Then the thing to be inconvenient for itself, it writes if being a fact.

The newspaper in Japan, it tends to bring only material with the convenience which is good for itself. For example, if saying about Yoshida Seiji's false report, it thinks that the surplus redemption consciousness "to have done a bad thing to Korea during the wartime" in "Asahi Shimbun" in the first time.

The man who is called Yoshida Seiji there appeared and in 1982, he confessed, saying "he took several hundred women from Jeju Do in Korea and made it a comfort woman". It will apply perfectly to the atonement consciousness of "Asahi Shimbun".

From the 1960s to the 70s, by the influence of All-Campus Joint Struggle League student group active at universities throughout Japan between 1968 and in 1969, the word, "the generalization" and "the self-criticism", is popular. The media leaped at the remark having to do with self-criticism in a body. As for entering into Yoshida Seiji's fiction, "Mainichi" "Yomiuri" in addition to "Asahi", too, is the same. Among the Japanese in those days, the stronger the atonement consciousness to the war in the past was, the measure to be more conscientious it became. 

It thinks that the thought to be the media about which most reconsidered "Asahi Shimbun" is the most conscientious is the big reason which can have aggravated the problem of the comfort woman report.

Sakurai

It thinks that the assuming a posture pose saying "themselves are conscientious media" in "Asahi Shimbun" contains a lot of deceptions very much.

First, while “the evidence coverage" which is the most basic of basics of the journalism prints the account which isn't made, fancy themselves to be doing a conscientious report.

Even if the fact becomes clearer, still, it is not admitting a mistake and not apologizing.

Tahara

There is a problem.

By the verification article of "Asahi Shimbun" on August 5th, 2014, it didn't understand me, why doing thoroughgoing coverage to Yoshida Seiji while he was living, didn't they do the special story to generalize Yoshida testimony?

In other words, it does not cover properly with the person in question who caused a comfort woman problem and it isn't verifying.

Même la partie du début, je crains le monde que

Ce qui suit est de la revue hebdomadaire de diamant (710 yens) de l'émission de cette semaine.

Même la partie du début, je crains le monde que vous ne connaissez pas du tout.
Recevoir conséquent les mots vraiment inexactes de l'état de communisme et l'état de l'entreprise comme un morceau du mal qui est aussi horrible que ce que vraiment,

Ce est parce que je pense que vous pouvez rester crétins à condamner le Japon sans vergogne.

Ikegami
Le savant en France en visite au Japon et pense si oui ou non ce est depuis philosophe Jean-Paul Sartre que seule cette attiré des foules d'attention dans ma mémoire.

Piketty
Ce est une chose très glorieux.
Quant au Japon, le nombre de sortir du journal et le livre par rapport à la France est différent.
Quant à l'édition japonaise, cette fois encore, il est très vend dans ce un mois.
Japon alors je pense que le pays, il ya beaucoup de gens qui lisent un livre, ce est chose extrêmement chanceux.

Cet article continue

Anche la parte di inizio, temo il mondo che non conosci affatto.

Di seguito è tratto dalla rivista diamante settimanale (710 yen) del numero di questa settimana.

Anche la parte di inizio, temo il mondo che non conosci affatto.
Pertanto ricevere le parole davvero imprecisi dello Stato comunismo e lo Stato-aziendale come un grumo del male che è così orribile come quello veramente,

E 'perché penso che si può rimanere idioti condannare Giappone sfacciatamente.

Ikegami
Lo studioso francese in visita in Giappone e pensa se sia o non è dal filosofo Jean-Paul Sartre che solo questo ha attirato folle di attenzione nella mia memoria.

Piketty
E 'una cosa molto gloriosa.
Per quanto riguarda il Giappone, il numero di uscire del giornale e il libro rispetto alla Francia è differente.
Come per l'edizione giapponese anche questa volta, molto vende entro 1 mese.
Giappone quindi credo che il paese ci sono molte persone che leggono un libro, è cosa estremamente fortunati.

Questo articolo continua

ncluso la parte del principio,

El siguiente es de la revista semanal de diamante (710 yenes) de la edición de esta semana.

Incluso la parte del principio, me temo que el mundo no conoce en absoluto.
Por lo tanto la recepción de las palabras realmente inexactos del estado comunismo y el Estado corporativo como un bulto del mal que es tan horrible como que de verdad,

Es porque creo que se puede seguir siendo idiotas para condenar Japón descaradamente.

Ikegami
El erudito en Francia visita Japón y piensa si es o no es ya el filósofo Jean-Paul Sartre que sólo esta atrajo a una multitud de atención en mi memoria.

Piketty
Es una cosa muy gloriosa.
En cuanto a Japón, el número de salir del periódico y el libro en comparación con Francia es diferente.
En cuanto a la edición japonesa de este tiempo, también, es muy vende dentro de este 1 mes.
Japón entonces creo que el país hay muchas personas que leen un libro, es cosa muy afortunados.

Este artículo continúa

Auch der Teil der Anfang,

Hier finden Sie von der Wochenzeitschrift Diamant (710 Yen) von dieser Woche die Ausgabe.

Auch der Teil der Anfang, ich fürchte, die Welt Sie nicht wissen, überhaupt.
Daher erhalten die wirklich ungenau Worte des Kommunismus Staat und Corporate-Zustand wie ein Klumpen des Bösen, die so schrecklich wie das ist wirklich,

Es ist, weil ich denke, man kann Idioten bleiben nach Japan ungeniert zu verurteilen.

Ikegami
Der Gelehrte in Frankreich besucht Japan und denkt, ob es da Philosoph Jean-Paul Sartre, der nur diese zog Massen von Aufmerksamkeit in meiner Erinnerung ist.

Piketty
Es ist eine sehr herrliche Sache.
Wie für Japan, die Zahl aus der Zeitung gehen und das Buch im Vergleich zu Frankreich ist anders.
Wie für die japanische Ausgabe auch dieses Mal, es ist sehr vertreibt in diesem 1 Monat.
Japan dann denke ich, das Land gibt es viele Menschen, die ein Buch zu lesen, ist es extrem glücklich Sache.

Dieser Artikel setzt

Mesmo a parte do começo, eu temo o mundo

O que se segue é da revista semanal de diamante (¥ 710) da edição desta semana.

Mesmo a parte do começo, eu temo o mundo que você não conhece.
Portanto receber as palavras realmente imprecisas do estado do comunismo e do Estado-corporativa como um pedaço do mal que é tão horrível quanto que realmente,

É porque eu acho que você pode permanecer idiotas para condenar Japão descaradamente.

Ikegami
O estudioso da França visita o Japão e pensa se é ou não é, desde o filósofo Jean-Paul Sartre que só esta atraiu multidões de atenção na minha memória.

Piketty
É uma coisa muito glorioso.
Quanto ao Japão, o número de sair do jornal e do livro em comparação com a França é diferente.
Como para a edição japonesa este tempo, também, muito vende dentro deste de 1 mês.
Japão, então eu acho que o país existem muitas pessoas que lêem um livro, é uma coisa extremamente afortunados.

Este artigo continua

一開始甚至部分，我擔心世界你不知道的。

以下是本週的問題，每週鑽石雜誌（710日元）。

一開始甚至部分，我擔心世界你不知道的。
因此接受共產主義國家和企業狀態的真不準確的話就像邪惡的腫塊是因為可怕的是，真正，

那是因為我覺得你可以保持白痴到不加掩飾地譴責日本。

池上
法國學者訪問日本，並認為它是否是因為哲學家讓·保羅·薩特說只有這吸引了人們關注的人群在我的記憶中。

Piketty
這是一個非常光榮的事情。
至於日本，數量走出去的報紙和書與法國相比是不同的。
至於日本版的這個時候，也是如此，它極本1個月內銷售。
日本那麼我認為有許多人誰讀一本書的國家，這是非常幸運的事情。

本文繼續

一开始甚至部分，我担心世界你不知道的。

以下是本周的问题，每周钻石杂志（710日元）。

一开始甚至部分，我担心世界你不知道的。
因此接受共产主义国家和企业状态的真不准确的话就像邪恶的肿块是因为可怕的是，真正，

那是因为我觉得你可以保持白痴到不加掩饰地谴责日本。

池上
法国学者访问日本，并认为它是否是因为哲学家让·保罗·萨特说只有这吸引了人们关注的人群在我的记忆中。

Piketty
这是一个非常光荣的事情。
至于日本，数量走出去的报纸和书与法国相比是不同的。
至于日本版的这个时候，也是如此，它极本1个月内销售。
日本那么我认为有许多人谁读一本书的国家，这是非常幸运的事情。

本文继续

시작 심지어 일부는

다음은 이번 주 문제의 주간 다이아몬드 잡지 (7백10엔)에서이다.

시작 심지어 일부는, 당신이 전혀 모르는 세계를 두려워한다.
따라서 진정으로 그만큼 끔찍한 악의 덩어리 같은 공산주의 국가와 기업 국가의 정말 부정확 한 단어를 수신,

난 당신이 당당하게 일본을 비난 바보를 유지 할 수 있다고 생각하기 때문이다.

이케 가미
프랑스 학자는 일본을 방문하고 만이 내 기억에 관심의 군중을 끌었다 철학자 장 폴 사르트르 이후인지 여부를 생각한다.

피케 티
그것은 매우 영광스러운 일이다.
일본에 관해서는, 수는 신문에서 이동과 프랑스에 비해이 책은 다르다.
일본 판에 관해서는이 시간이, 너무, 아주이 한 달 이내 판매하고있다.
일본은 그때 책을 읽고 많은 사람들이이 나라, 그것은 매우 운이 좋은 일이라고 생각합니다.

이 문서는 계속

Даже часть самого

Ниже от еженедельной алмазной журнала (710 иен) выпуска на этой неделе.

Даже часть самого начала, я боюсь, мир вы не знаете вообще.
Поэтому получения действительно неточные слова состояния коммунизма и корпоративной государства, как кусок зла, которое так ужасно, как, что действительно,

Это потому, что я думаю, что вы можете оставаться идиотов, чтобы осудить Япония беззастенчиво.

Икегами
Ученый во Франции посещает Японию и думает ли она или нет, так как философ Жан-Поль Сартр, что только это привлекало толпы внимания в моей памяти.

Piketty
Это очень славные вещи.
Что касается Японии, число выходить из газеты и книги сравнению с Францией отличается.
Что касается японского издания и на этот раз, он очень продает в пределах этой 1 месяц.
Япония тогда, я думаю стране есть много людей, которые прочитали книгу, очень повезло вещь.

Эта статья продолжает