Hereinafter, too, it is excerpting from the labor in Mr. Takashi Hayasaka's real thing.
It is the true paper which the person all over the world in addition to the Japanese people should read.
New York Times will should recognize that such paper is a just necessary paper in the 21st century tightly.
If thinking that they are the best intellect of the world
"The children of An Jung-geun"
The recognition concerning An Jung-geun is also the problem of the Japanese side, in turn.
In Japan after the war, by the penetration by Tokyo Tribunal of War Criminals view of history and the masochism view of history, absolute " the Japanese villain theory " reached prosperity in the relationship with Korea, too.
It was handed down in the form that a fact about An Jung-geun, too, was distorted in the such current of the times.
About Korean side's beautifying An Jung-geun as "the hero in the people", far from seeking the correction, by them and the siding form, the publication as it undertakes to assassinate accounted for many.
In other words, the forces that listed the philosophy of "pacifism" on a daily basis, it would be had supported the dirt terrorism.
Such a Japanese attitude aroused the growing impudent for which the Korean side isn't needed.
However, in recent years, a lot of Japanese got to feel the evil of such overdone "the apology and the reconsideration".
It is not in need which chants the honesty of the one's own history of a nation especially needless to say loudly and so on and the attitude to esteem an eligible self-discipline about the fair and just situation will be essential.
However, the arbitrary distortion of historical fact, it is appropriate by the objections accordingly.
The present situation, Korean side "the anti-Japanese education" become the biggest barrier which hinders the building of healthy Japan-Korea relations.
Then, it is the wrong history recognition, "the loyal retainer, An Jung-geun", that exists in the soil of the root.
In the history textbook in Korea, about the act of An Jung-geun, there is not a notation, "the assassination", it is unified by the word "judgement”.
Meanings such as "the punishment" are contained in "judgement" and it charges with the intention to sanction an assassination vividly.
Thus, the trend to veneration terrorists, in other words, it becomes the hotbed which produces a "second of An Jung-geun".
As being anti-Japanese is groundwater, in Korea which penetrates a country, "the children of An Jung-geun" is born one after another and is growing up.
In fact, South Korea people who not work the brakes on "anti-Japanese spiral" is, by likened the Prime Minister Shinzo Abe set up screaming and such as "far-right politician," "militarists", those bad customs, it does not change anything essentially in graphically that An Jung-geun called Ito as "Villain".
