The following is the editorial of the Sankei on June 11th.
The owner with proper brain should find that it is a complete sound argument.
Investigate question by the Diet invitation.
It flatters mutual "achievements" each other, but they are feigning ignorance in the point which allows for something to come back and bite one in the ass badly, or it is as unreasonable.
It is the conversation of the Tomiichi Murayama former prime minister and the Yohei Kono former speaker of House of Representatives which was done in Japan National Press Club.
Mr. Murayama presented the prime minister talk to convict the past in Japan in 1995 in 50 after the war.
Mr. Kono is the party of the Chief Cabinet Secretary talk in 1993 which admitted the compulsoriness of the comfort woman recruitment without the basis.
Both discourse tied nearby diplomacy in Japan after that and brought disgrace as the state, too.
But it isn't possible to find the persons in question the consciousness to have compromised a national interest, it will should say in the Diet if there is an objection in the talk reconsideration and so on.
It should answer a lot of question in the talk process of the releasing, too, being clear.
It said that the Mr. Kono who was a deputy prime minister then about the Murayama talk "was the excellent talk to have been well-balanced which was made with the leadership of Mr. Murayama".
A Murayama talk was abruptly submitted to the cabinet meeting on August 15th, 1995 of the coalition government times by Liberal Democratic Party, Social Democratic Party and New Party Sakigake and it apologized for "the invasion" and "the colonial rule" in the past one-sidedly.
It conceives a procedure, a content together big problem.
It forgot the situation of the prime minister who keeps honor in the country and it made have priority over "me" as the Socialist Party party leader.
Mr. Murayama placed with "the historic document which the starting point of Japan and the Republic of Korea reconciliation was composed of " about Kono talk.
However, in the verification of the government after that, have let it have priority over an apology and the fictionality which was created without the basis became clear.
It becomes the big factor that a comfort woman problem is rehashed and that an apology request from the Korean side is repeated, too.
The press conference in releasing was the one to have admitted "the compulsion taking" beyond Research Result but the representation of Mr. Kono about it is as it is not.
On the place where the comfort woman wipes out the misunderstanding which spread internationally as "the sexual slave in the Japanese military", the Diet invitation by Mr. Kono and the reconsideration of the talk are essential.
Liberal Democratic Party should make a distinction even if it is the president of the party stager, feeling the responsibility of being in the administration Government party then, too, still.
It is necessary to verify a Murayama talk, too, of course.
As for the verification of the talk in the past, Mr. Murayama said "why to rehash" and Mr. Kono pointed out, saying "he Japan-Korea relations became sorry status within these several years".
It will have charged with the intention of the check of Shinzo Abe administration.
However, because it didn't lead to the solution of the problem, it looks away eyes and it will not become even if it slights a fact and it presents a talk and it repeats an apology.
However, because it didn't lead to the solution of the problem even if it slighted a fact and it presented a talk and it repeated an apology, it will must not look away eyes.