More Than I Can Say
it is a popular page yesterday on ameba
it is a popular page yesterday
the top 50 searches for the past week
Professor Kennedy suggests that we first look back 500 years.
There is nothing more urgent for Japan than these questions.
she is a national treasure defined by Saicho and a supreme national treasure.
China has been actively promoting the theory of the decline of the United States.
he gave high marks to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for his idea of a framework
以下はリアルタイムのベスト10である。2021年3月20日、10時30分
以下はリアルタイムのベスト10である。2021年3月19日、23時40分
it is a popular page yesterday on ameba
it is a popular page yesterday
the top 50 searches for the past week
以下はリアルタイムのベスト10である。2021年3月19日、23時40分
Professor Kennedy suggests that we first look back 500 years.
There is nothing more urgent for Japan than these questions.
China has been actively promoting the theory of the decline of the United States.
he gave high marks to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for his idea of a framework
she is a national treasure defined by Saicho and a supreme national treasure.
以下はリアルタイムのベスト10である。2021年3月19日、22時40分
The following is from the serial column of Ms. Sakurai Yoshiko, who brings the weekly Shincho released yesterday to a successful conclusion.
This article also proves that she is a national treasure defined by Saicho and a supreme national treasure.
It is a must-read not only for the Japanese people but also for people worldwide.
Professor Kennedy: "U.S. Will Not Decline
On March 9, I had a trilogy discussion with Professor Paul Kennedy at an international seminar titled "Is the United States in Decline?
Professor Kennedy, who participated remotely from his home near Yale University in Connecticut in the eastern part of the U.S., quickly prepared and checked the audio.
We did the same, and both of us were ready well ahead of schedule.
I introduced myself and asked, "If you don't mind, shall we begin?
Then, with a very cheerful expression on his face, he said, "Let's do it! Professor Kennedy replied.
When I hear Paul Kennedy's name, I immediately think of the two volumes of The Rise and Fall of Great Powers.
The book, which describes the rise and fall of great powers from 1500 to 2000, became an international bestseller.
I have in my possession the 1988 edition translated by Suzuki Chikara (Soshisha).
At the time, I contributed articles to Bungeishunju and Shokun!, but I was not yet a writer, and Professor Kennedy was a shining light.
The man was ready and willing to get started.
Is the United States in decline?
Is it in decline, and will it continue to decline?
Is the decline relative or absolute?
There is nothing more urgent for Japan than these questions.
After all, we cannot discuss Japan's security without the United States.
Whether we can stop the Chinese Communist Party's domination of the world is an important one that will determine the fate of Japan and the entire world.
Professor Kennedy suggests that we first look back 500 years.
Five hundred years ago, China was the largest country in the world. After the 19th century, the world's major powers came to dominate the entire world. After the 19th century, the world's major powers came to dominate the entire world, and both Japan and the U.S. gained power in this new configuration.
In the 20th century, World War I weakened Europe, and the United States and Japan gained power.
In the 20th century, World War I weakened Europe, and the U.S. and Japan gained strength. In World War II, the U.S. literally became a superpower, and Japan was defeated, losing millions of its people and falling to the level of the world's poorest country.
China is disappointed.
After the war, Japan once again emerged as a world power, and the U.S. led the Soviet Union to collapse and became the only superpower. Still, now the whole world is trying to determine the reality of its power and its future.
In the midst of this, China has been actively promoting the theory of the decline of the United States.
Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, known as a pro-China politician, points out that Xi Jinping's policy toward the United States has been consistent since he became president in 2013, and his basic philosophy is that the tide of history is in China's favor (Foreign Affairs, March-April 2009).
China, which has already declared that it will surpass the United States and tower over the world in 2049, the centennial of its founding, is ahead of schedule in many ways on its path to becoming the world's most powerful nation Rudd said.
The modernization of the military, for example, will be completed in six more years, by 2015, eight years ahead of schedule, he said.
The reason for the huge acceleration is to gain an advantage over the U.S. in all aspects of its bid to take Taiwan.
Rudd writes that China is surprised that the U.S. reversal offensive is more limited than expected. China has set specific goals to break the U.S. dominance and is steadily implementing them one by one.
When I asked Professor Kennedy what he thought about China's proliferation of theories about U.S. decline, he replied that the Chinese media has an unusual interest in writing about U.S. decline because they want to witness U.S. decline without going to war.
China's efforts to spread the theory of U.S. decline is probably part of their signature "three wars" (public opinion, psychological warfare, and legal warfare).
By creating the impression that the U.S. power is weakening, it may weaken confidence in the U.S., attract more countries to China, or even drive a wedge into the U.S. alliance.
It may be one way to make people think that China is more dependable than the US.
After making the right point, Professor Kennedy asserted.
The decline of the United States is relative, not absolute. The U.S. may have to share its position with other rising powers, but it will remain strong. In that sense, China will be disappointed.
China will not defeat the U.S., and its strength will come from its strong economy, Kennedy said.
He stresses that the United States can achieve remarkable economic growth and bring prosperity to the American people, which will restore confidence in the U.S. government, respect and deference to democracy, and contribute to the nation's stability as a whole.
The Path of Japan
However, he predicted that the U.S. would have to cooperate with its allies to confront China and gave high marks to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for his idea of a framework for cooperation among Japan, the U.S., Australia, and India.
Looking back at history, there are similar cases. Before World War I, Germany built a lot of ships and had a large navy. The French, British, Russians, and others were very wary, which eventually led to World War I. The results are shown in history. History has shown us the result. Another similar example is the Soviet Union during the Cold War. They, too, built up their navy and expanded into the Mediterranean. In response, the U.S., Britain, France, Italy, and other countries cooperated closely to prevent the Soviet Union from engaging in aggressive activities.
The Japan-U.S.-Australia-India Quad, Britain's expressed willingness to join it, and even France and Germany's positive reaction to the Quad were all caused by China's aggressive offensive.
To paraphrase the historical example set by Professor Kennedy, it is the side that initiates the reckless friction that loses.
In other words, in the case of the ongoing crisis, the loser is China.
At the time of writing this article, on the 15th, the US Secretaries of State and Defense visited Japan for the Japan-US Security Consultative Committee (2+2).
The document released by the U.S. government on April 14, "Reaffirming the Solid Japan-U.S. Alliance," clearly states that "U.S. involvement in defense of Japan is absolute," "Article 5 of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty applies to the Senkakus," and "Japan and the United States will cooperate in responding to China's challenges.
There were fears that the Biden administration was a second Obama administration of appeasers against China.
However, the document's contents on the right, the realization of the "2+2" agreement, and Prime Minister Yoshihide Kan's arrival in Washington on the first day of the summit all refute such suspicions.
Professor Kennedy said that if Japan's economic relationship with China deteriorates, there will be an alternative, but if Japan's security relationship with the US deteriorates, there will be no alternative.
I think he is right.
The trilogy made me think that Japan must realize major reforms, including the Constitution's revision, to survive as a decent nation in the great flow of history.
The following is from the serial column of Ms. Sakurai Yoshiko, who brings the weekly Shincho released yesterday to a successful conclusion.
This article also proves that she is a national treasure defined by Saicho and a supreme national treasure.
It is a must-read not only for the Japanese people but also for people worldwide.
Professor Kennedy: "U.S. Will Not Decline
On March 9, I had a trilogy discussion with Professor Paul Kennedy at an international seminar titled "Is the United States in Decline?
Professor Kennedy, who participated remotely from his home near Yale University in Connecticut in the eastern part of the U.S., quickly prepared and checked the audio.
We did the same, and both of us were ready well ahead of schedule.
I introduced myself and asked, "If you don't mind, shall we begin?
Then, with a very cheerful expression on his face, he said, "Let's do it! Professor Kennedy replied.
When I hear Paul Kennedy's name, I immediately think of the two volumes of The Rise and Fall of Great Powers.
The book, which describes the rise and fall of great powers from 1500 to 2000, became an international bestseller.
I have in my possession the 1988 edition translated by Suzuki Chikara (Soshisha).
At the time, I contributed articles to Bungeishunju and Shokun!, but I was not yet a writer, and Professor Kennedy was a shining light.
The man was ready and willing to get started.
Is the United States in decline?
Is it in decline, and will it continue to decline?
Is the decline relative or absolute?
There is nothing more urgent for Japan than these questions.
After all, we cannot discuss Japan's security without the United States.
Whether we can stop the Chinese Communist Party's domination of the world is an important one that will determine the fate of Japan and the entire world.
Professor Kennedy suggests that we first look back 500 years.
Five hundred years ago, China was the largest country in the world. After the 19th century, the world's major powers came to dominate the entire world. After the 19th century, the world's major powers came to dominate the entire world, and both Japan and the U.S. gained power in this new configuration.
In the 20th century, World War I weakened Europe, and the United States and Japan gained power.
In the 20th century, World War I weakened Europe, and the U.S. and Japan gained strength. In World War II, the U.S. literally became a superpower, and Japan was defeated, losing millions of its people and falling to the level of the world's poorest country.
China is disappointed.
After the war, Japan once again emerged as a world power, and the U.S. led the Soviet Union to collapse and became the only superpower. Still, now the whole world is trying to determine the reality of its power and its future.
In the midst of this, China has been actively promoting the theory of the decline of the United States.
Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, known as a pro-China politician, points out that Xi Jinping's policy toward the United States has been consistent since he became president in 2013, and his basic philosophy is that the tide of history is in China's favor (Foreign Affairs, March-April 2009).
China, which has already declared that it will surpass the United States and tower over the world in 2049, the centennial of its founding, is ahead of schedule in many ways on its path to becoming the world's most powerful nation Rudd said.
The modernization of the military, for example, will be completed in six more years, by 2015, eight years ahead of schedule, he said.
The reason for the huge acceleration is to gain an advantage over the U.S. in all aspects of its bid to take Taiwan.
Rudd writes that China is surprised that the U.S. reversal offensive is more limited than expected. China has set specific goals to break the U.S. dominance and is steadily implementing them one by one.
When I asked Professor Kennedy what he thought about China's proliferation of theories about U.S. decline, he replied that the Chinese media has an unusual interest in writing about U.S. decline because they want to witness U.S. decline without going to war.
China's efforts to spread the theory of U.S. decline is probably part of their signature "three wars" (public opinion, psychological warfare, and legal warfare).
By creating the impression that the U.S. power is weakening, it may weaken confidence in the U.S., attract more countries to China, or even drive a wedge into the U.S. alliance.
It may be one way to make people think that China is more dependable than the US.
After making the right point, Professor Kennedy asserted.
The decline of the United States is relative, not absolute. The U.S. may have to share its position with other rising powers, but it will remain strong. In that sense, China will be disappointed.
China will not defeat the U.S., and its strength will come from its strong economy, Kennedy said.
He stresses that the United States can achieve remarkable economic growth and bring prosperity to the American people, which will restore confidence in the U.S. government, respect and deference to democracy, and contribute to the nation's stability as a whole.
The Path of Japan
However, he predicted that the U.S. would have to cooperate with its allies to confront China and gave high marks to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for his idea of a framework for cooperation among Japan, the U.S., Australia, and India.
Looking back at history, there are similar cases. Before World War I, Germany built a lot of ships and had a large navy. The French, British, Russians, and others were very wary, which eventually led to World War I. The results are shown in history. History has shown us the result. Another similar example is the Soviet Union during the Cold War. They, too, built up their navy and expanded into the Mediterranean. In response, the U.S., Britain, France, Italy, and other countries cooperated closely to prevent the Soviet Union from engaging in aggressive activities.
The Japan-U.S.-Australia-India Quad, Britain's expressed willingness to join it, and even France and Germany's positive reaction to the Quad were all caused by China's aggressive offensive.
To paraphrase the historical example set by Professor Kennedy, it is the side that initiates the reckless friction that loses.
In other words, in the case of the ongoing crisis, the loser is China.
At the time of writing this article, on the 15th, the US Secretaries of State and Defense visited Japan for the Japan-US Security Consultative Committee (2+2).
The document released by the U.S. government on April 14, "Reaffirming the Solid Japan-U.S. Alliance," clearly states that "U.S. involvement in defense of Japan is absolute," "Article 5 of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty applies to the Senkakus," and "Japan and the United States will cooperate in responding to China's challenges.
There were fears that the Biden administration was a second Obama administration of appeasers against China.
However, the document's contents on the right, the realization of the "2+2" agreement, and Prime Minister Yoshihide Kan's arrival in Washington on the first day of the summit all refute such suspicions.
Professor Kennedy said that if Japan's economic relationship with China deteriorates, there will be an alternative, but if Japan's security relationship with the US deteriorates, there will be no alternative.
I think he is right.
The trilogy made me think that Japan must realize major reforms, including the Constitution's revision, to survive as a decent nation in the great flow of history.
The following is from the serial column of Ms. Sakurai Yoshiko, who brings the weekly Shincho released yesterday to a successful conclusion.
This article also proves that she is a national treasure defined by Saicho and a supreme national treasure.
It is a must-read not only for the Japanese people but also for people worldwide.
Professor Kennedy: "U.S. Will Not Decline
On March 9, I had a trilogy discussion with Professor Paul Kennedy at an international seminar titled "Is the United States in Decline?
Professor Kennedy, who participated remotely from his home near Yale University in Connecticut in the eastern part of the U.S., quickly prepared and checked the audio.
We did the same, and both of us were ready well ahead of schedule.
I introduced myself and asked, "If you don't mind, shall we begin?
Then, with a very cheerful expression on his face, he said, "Let's do it! Professor Kennedy replied.
When I hear Paul Kennedy's name, I immediately think of the two volumes of The Rise and Fall of Great Powers.
The book, which describes the rise and fall of great powers from 1500 to 2000, became an international bestseller.
I have in my possession the 1988 edition translated by Suzuki Chikara (Soshisha).
At the time, I contributed articles to Bungeishunju and Shokun!, but I was not yet a writer, and Professor Kennedy was a shining light.
The man was ready and willing to get started.
Is the United States in decline?
Is it in decline, and will it continue to decline?
Is the decline relative or absolute?
There is nothing more urgent for Japan than these questions.
After all, we cannot discuss Japan's security without the United States.
Whether we can stop the Chinese Communist Party's domination of the world is an important one that will determine the fate of Japan and the entire world.
Professor Kennedy suggests that we first look back 500 years.
Five hundred years ago, China was the largest country in the world. After the 19th century, the world's major powers came to dominate the entire world. After the 19th century, the world's major powers came to dominate the entire world, and both Japan and the U.S. gained power in this new configuration.
In the 20th century, World War I weakened Europe, and the United States and Japan gained power.
In the 20th century, World War I weakened Europe, and the U.S. and Japan gained strength. In World War II, the U.S. literally became a superpower, and Japan was defeated, losing millions of its people and falling to the level of the world's poorest country.
China is disappointed.
After the war, Japan once again emerged as a world power, and the U.S. led the Soviet Union to collapse and became the only superpower. Still, now the whole world is trying to determine the reality of its power and its future.
In the midst of this, China has been actively promoting the theory of the decline of the United States.
Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, known as a pro-China politician, points out that Xi Jinping's policy toward the United States has been consistent since he became president in 2013, and his basic philosophy is that the tide of history is in China's favor (Foreign Affairs, March-April 2009).
China, which has already declared that it will surpass the United States and tower over the world in 2049, the centennial of its founding, is ahead of schedule in many ways on its path to becoming the world's most powerful nation Rudd said.
The modernization of the military, for example, will be completed in six more years, by 2015, eight years ahead of schedule, he said.
The reason for the huge acceleration is to gain an advantage over the U.S. in all aspects of its bid to take Taiwan.
Rudd writes that China is surprised that the U.S. reversal offensive is more limited than expected. China has set specific goals to break the U.S. dominance and is steadily implementing them one by one.
When I asked Professor Kennedy what he thought about China's proliferation of theories about U.S. decline, he replied that the Chinese media has an unusual interest in writing about U.S. decline because they want to witness U.S. decline without going to war.
China's efforts to spread the theory of U.S. decline is probably part of their signature "three wars" (public opinion, psychological warfare, and legal warfare).
By creating the impression that the U.S. power is weakening, it may weaken confidence in the U.S., attract more countries to China, or even drive a wedge into the U.S. alliance.
It may be one way to make people think that China is more dependable than the US.
After making the right point, Professor Kennedy asserted.
The decline of the United States is relative, not absolute. The U.S. may have to share its position with other rising powers, but it will remain strong. In that sense, China will be disappointed.
China will not defeat the U.S., and its strength will come from its strong economy, Kennedy said.
He stresses that the United States can achieve remarkable economic growth and bring prosperity to the American people, which will restore confidence in the U.S. government, respect and deference to democracy, and contribute to the nation's stability as a whole.
The Path of Japan
However, he predicted that the U.S. would have to cooperate with its allies to confront China and gave high marks to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for his idea of a framework for cooperation among Japan, the U.S., Australia, and India.
Looking back at history, there are similar cases. Before World War I, Germany built a lot of ships and had a large navy. The French, British, Russians, and others were very wary, which eventually led to World War I. The results are shown in history. History has shown us the result. Another similar example is the Soviet Union during the Cold War. They, too, built up their navy and expanded into the Mediterranean. In response, the U.S., Britain, France, Italy, and other countries cooperated closely to prevent the Soviet Union from engaging in aggressive activities.
The Japan-U.S.-Australia-India Quad, Britain's expressed willingness to join it, and even France and Germany's positive reaction to the Quad were all caused by China's aggressive offensive.
To paraphrase the historical example set by Professor Kennedy, it is the side that initiates the reckless friction that loses.
In other words, in the case of the ongoing crisis, the loser is China.
At the time of writing this article, on the 15th, the US Secretaries of State and Defense visited Japan for the Japan-US Security Consultative Committee (2+2).
The document released by the U.S. government on April 14, "Reaffirming the Solid Japan-U.S. Alliance," clearly states that "U.S. involvement in defense of Japan is absolute," "Article 5 of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty applies to the Senkakus," and "Japan and the United States will cooperate in responding to China's challenges.
There were fears that the Biden administration was a second Obama administration of appeasers against China.
However, the document's contents on the right, the realization of the "2+2" agreement, and Prime Minister Yoshihide Kan's arrival in Washington on the first day of the summit all refute such suspicions.
Professor Kennedy said that if Japan's economic relationship with China deteriorates, there will be an alternative, but if Japan's security relationship with the US deteriorates, there will be no alternative.
I think he is right.
The trilogy made me think that Japan must realize major reforms, including the Constitution's revision, to survive as a decent nation in the great flow of history.
The following is from the serial column of Ms. Sakurai Yoshiko, who brings the weekly Shincho released yesterday to a successful conclusion.
This article also proves that she is a national treasure defined by Saicho and a supreme national treasure.
It is a must-read not only for the Japanese people but also for people worldwide.
Professor Kennedy: "U.S. Will Not Decline
On March 9, I had a trilogy discussion with Professor Paul Kennedy at an international seminar titled "Is the United States in Decline?
Professor Kennedy, who participated remotely from his home near Yale University in Connecticut in the eastern part of the U.S., quickly prepared and checked the audio.
We did the same, and both of us were ready well ahead of schedule.
I introduced myself and asked, "If you don't mind, shall we begin?
Then, with a very cheerful expression on his face, he said, "Let's do it! Professor Kennedy replied.
When I hear Paul Kennedy's name, I immediately think of the two volumes of The Rise and Fall of Great Powers.
The book, which describes the rise and fall of great powers from 1500 to 2000, became an international bestseller.
I have in my possession the 1988 edition translated by Suzuki Chikara (Soshisha).
At the time, I contributed articles to Bungeishunju and Shokun!, but I was not yet a writer, and Professor Kennedy was a shining light.
The man was ready and willing to get started.
Is the United States in decline?
Is it in decline, and will it continue to decline?
Is the decline relative or absolute?
There is nothing more urgent for Japan than these questions.
After all, we cannot discuss Japan's security without the United States.
Whether we can stop the Chinese Communist Party's domination of the world is an important one that will determine the fate of Japan and the entire world.
Professor Kennedy suggests that we first look back 500 years.
Five hundred years ago, China was the largest country in the world. After the 19th century, the world's major powers came to dominate the entire world. After the 19th century, the world's major powers came to dominate the entire world, and both Japan and the U.S. gained power in this new configuration.
In the 20th century, World War I weakened Europe, and the United States and Japan gained power.
In the 20th century, World War I weakened Europe, and the U.S. and Japan gained strength. In World War II, the U.S. literally became a superpower, and Japan was defeated, losing millions of its people and falling to the level of the world's poorest country.
China is disappointed.
After the war, Japan once again emerged as a world power, and the U.S. led the Soviet Union to collapse and became the only superpower. Still, now the whole world is trying to determine the reality of its power and its future.
In the midst of this, China has been actively promoting the theory of the decline of the United States.
Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, known as a pro-China politician, points out that Xi Jinping's policy toward the United States has been consistent since he became president in 2013, and his basic philosophy is that the tide of history is in China's favor (Foreign Affairs, March-April 2009).
China, which has already declared that it will surpass the United States and tower over the world in 2049, the centennial of its founding, is ahead of schedule in many ways on its path to becoming the world's most powerful nation Rudd said.
The modernization of the military, for example, will be completed in six more years, by 2015, eight years ahead of schedule, he said.
The reason for the huge acceleration is to gain an advantage over the U.S. in all aspects of its bid to take Taiwan.
Rudd writes that China is surprised that the U.S. reversal offensive is more limited than expected. China has set specific goals to break the U.S. dominance and is steadily implementing them one by one.
When I asked Professor Kennedy what he thought about China's proliferation of theories about U.S. decline, he replied that the Chinese media has an unusual interest in writing about U.S. decline because they want to witness U.S. decline without going to war.
China's efforts to spread the theory of U.S. decline is probably part of their signature "three wars" (public opinion, psychological warfare, and legal warfare).
By creating the impression that the U.S. power is weakening, it may weaken confidence in the U.S., attract more countries to China, or even drive a wedge into the U.S. alliance.
It may be one way to make people think that China is more dependable than the US.
After making the right point, Professor Kennedy asserted.
The decline of the United States is relative, not absolute. The U.S. may have to share its position with other rising powers, but it will remain strong. In that sense, China will be disappointed.
China will not defeat the U.S., and its strength will come from its strong economy, Kennedy said.
He stresses that the United States can achieve remarkable economic growth and bring prosperity to the American people, which will restore confidence in the U.S. government, respect and deference to democracy, and contribute to the nation's stability as a whole.
The Path of Japan
However, he predicted that the U.S. would have to cooperate with its allies to confront China and gave high marks to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for his idea of a framework for cooperation among Japan, the U.S., Australia, and India.
Looking back at history, there are similar cases. Before World War I, Germany built a lot of ships and had a large navy. The French, British, Russians, and others were very wary, which eventually led to World War I. The results are shown in history. History has shown us the result. Another similar example is the Soviet Union during the Cold War. They, too, built up their navy and expanded into the Mediterranean. In response, the U.S., Britain, France, Italy, and other countries cooperated closely to prevent the Soviet Union from engaging in aggressive activities.
The Japan-U.S.-Australia-India Quad, Britain's expressed willingness to join it, and even France and Germany's positive reaction to the Quad were all caused by China's aggressive offensive.
To paraphrase the historical example set by Professor Kennedy, it is the side that initiates the reckless friction that loses.
In other words, in the case of the ongoing crisis, the loser is China.
At the time of writing this article, on the 15th, the US Secretaries of State and Defense visited Japan for the Japan-US Security Consultative Committee (2+2).
The document released by the U.S. government on April 14, "Reaffirming the Solid Japan-U.S. Alliance," clearly states that "U.S. involvement in defense of Japan is absolute," "Article 5 of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty applies to the Senkakus," and "Japan and the United States will cooperate in responding to China's challenges.
There were fears that the Biden administration was a second Obama administration of appeasers against China.
However, the document's contents on the right, the realization of the "2+2" agreement, and Prime Minister Yoshihide Kan's arrival in Washington on the first day of the summit all refute such suspicions.
Professor Kennedy said that if Japan's economic relationship with China deteriorates, there will be an alternative, but if Japan's security relationship with the US deteriorates, there will be no alternative.
I think he is right.
The trilogy made me think that Japan must realize major reforms, including the Constitution's revision, to survive as a decent nation in the great flow of history.
The following is from the serial column of Ms. Sakurai Yoshiko, who brings the weekly Shincho released yesterday to a successful conclusion.
This article also proves that she is a national treasure defined by Saicho and a supreme national treasure.
It is a must-read not only for the Japanese people but also for people worldwide.
Professor Kennedy: "U.S. Will Not Decline
On March 9, I had a trilogy discussion with Professor Paul Kennedy at an international seminar titled "Is the United States in Decline?
Professor Kennedy, who participated remotely from his home near Yale University in Connecticut in the eastern part of the U.S., quickly prepared and checked the audio.
We did the same, and both of us were ready well ahead of schedule.
I introduced myself and asked, "If you don't mind, shall we begin?
Then, with a very cheerful expression on his face, he said, "Let's do it! Professor Kennedy replied.
When I hear Paul Kennedy's name, I immediately think of the two volumes of The Rise and Fall of Great Powers.
The book, which describes the rise and fall of great powers from 1500 to 2000, became an international bestseller.
I have in my possession the 1988 edition translated by Suzuki Chikara (Soshisha).
At the time, I contributed articles to Bungeishunju and Shokun!, but I was not yet a writer, and Professor Kennedy was a shining light.
The man was ready and willing to get started.
Is the United States in decline?
Is it in decline, and will it continue to decline?
Is the decline relative or absolute?
There is nothing more urgent for Japan than these questions.
After all, we cannot discuss Japan's security without the United States.
Whether we can stop the Chinese Communist Party's domination of the world is an important one that will determine the fate of Japan and the entire world.
Professor Kennedy suggests that we first look back 500 years.
Five hundred years ago, China was the largest country in the world. After the 19th century, the world's major powers came to dominate the entire world. After the 19th century, the world's major powers came to dominate the entire world, and both Japan and the U.S. gained power in this new configuration.
In the 20th century, World War I weakened Europe, and the United States and Japan gained power.
In the 20th century, World War I weakened Europe, and the U.S. and Japan gained strength. In World War II, the U.S. literally became a superpower, and Japan was defeated, losing millions of its people and falling to the level of the world's poorest country.
China is disappointed.
After the war, Japan once again emerged as a world power, and the U.S. led the Soviet Union to collapse and became the only superpower. Still, now the whole world is trying to determine the reality of its power and its future.
In the midst of this, China has been actively promoting the theory of the decline of the United States.
Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, known as a pro-China politician, points out that Xi Jinping's policy toward the United States has been consistent since he became president in 2013, and his basic philosophy is that the tide of history is in China's favor (Foreign Affairs, March-April 2009).
China, which has already declared that it will surpass the United States and tower over the world in 2049, the centennial of its founding, is ahead of schedule in many ways on its path to becoming the world's most powerful nation Rudd said.
The modernization of the military, for example, will be completed in six more years, by 2015, eight years ahead of schedule, he said.
The reason for the huge acceleration is to gain an advantage over the U.S. in all aspects of its bid to take Taiwan.
Rudd writes that China is surprised that the U.S. reversal offensive is more limited than expected. China has set specific goals to break the U.S. dominance and is steadily implementing them one by one.
When I asked Professor Kennedy what he thought about China's proliferation of theories about U.S. decline, he replied that the Chinese media has an unusual interest in writing about U.S. decline because they want to witness U.S. decline without going to war.
China's efforts to spread the theory of U.S. decline is probably part of their signature "three wars" (public opinion, psychological warfare, and legal warfare).
By creating the impression that the U.S. power is weakening, it may weaken confidence in the U.S., attract more countries to China, or even drive a wedge into the U.S. alliance.
It may be one way to make people think that China is more dependable than the US.
After making the right point, Professor Kennedy asserted.
The decline of the United States is relative, not absolute. The U.S. may have to share its position with other rising powers, but it will remain strong. In that sense, China will be disappointed.
China will not defeat the U.S., and its strength will come from its strong economy, Kennedy said.
He stresses that the United States can achieve remarkable economic growth and bring prosperity to the American people, which will restore confidence in the U.S. government, respect and deference to democracy, and contribute to the nation's stability as a whole.
The Path of Japan
However, he predicted that the U.S. would have to cooperate with its allies to confront China and gave high marks to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for his idea of a framework for cooperation among Japan, the U.S., Australia, and India.
Looking back at history, there are similar cases. Before World War I, Germany built a lot of ships and had a large navy. The French, British, Russians, and others were very wary, which eventually led to World War I. The results are shown in history. History has shown us the result. Another similar example is the Soviet Union during the Cold War. They, too, built up their navy and expanded into the Mediterranean. In response, the U.S., Britain, France, Italy, and other countries cooperated closely to prevent the Soviet Union from engaging in aggressive activities.
The Japan-U.S.-Australia-India Quad, Britain's expressed willingness to join it, and even France and Germany's positive reaction to the Quad were all caused by China's aggressive offensive.
To paraphrase the historical example set by Professor Kennedy, it is the side that initiates the reckless friction that loses.
In other words, in the case of the ongoing crisis, the loser is China.
At the time of writing this article, on the 15th, the US Secretaries of State and Defense visited Japan for the Japan-US Security Consultative Committee (2+2).
The document released by the U.S. government on April 14, "Reaffirming the Solid Japan-U.S. Alliance," clearly states that "U.S. involvement in defense of Japan is absolute," "Article 5 of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty applies to the Senkakus," and "Japan and the United States will cooperate in responding to China's challenges.
There were fears that the Biden administration was a second Obama administration of appeasers against China.
However, the document's contents on the right, the realization of the "2+2" agreement, and Prime Minister Yoshihide Kan's arrival in Washington on the first day of the summit all refute such suspicions.
Professor Kennedy said that if Japan's economic relationship with China deteriorates, there will be an alternative, but if Japan's security relationship with the US deteriorates, there will be no alternative.
I think he is right.
The trilogy made me think that Japan must realize major reforms, including the Constitution's revision, to survive as a decent nation in the great flow of history.
1
2
Xi Jinping's Maoist Line is the World's Misfortune
3
That constitution is a mass of malice.
4
TBSが反日的報道をする理由を知っていますか? 元TBS社員の独り言 「うちの局がこんなになってしまった経緯をお話しましょう」
5
日本人こそが、世界で一番中国共産党に警戒心を抱かなければならないと思う。
6
7
We must always be on guard against his rampage to achieve his ambitions.
8
それは前文の国家の自立放棄にも象徴天皇条項にもはっきり窺える。あの憲法は悪意の塊。
9
如何にして日本を打ちのめすかという教えが、中国全土の毛沢東革命の土台となり、現在の習近平体制に引き継がれている
10
20条の立法意図だ。そこには明らかに差別と苛めの勧めがある。何と異様な。
11
Questo saggio dimostra anche che è l'unico giornalista nel mondo del dopoguerra.
12
マスコミは原発事故で日本人が未曽有の原発事故とどう闘ったのかに目を向けず、
13
核のゴミを問題にする人がいますが、太陽光パネルにもその種類によって、鉛、セレン、カドミウムなどの有害物質が含まれている
14
Tout le monde fait des choses superficielles, n'est-ce pas?
15
チャイナプレミアムなんて、いま2%どころじゃないでしょ、プラス8%だからね。それでも外貨がほしい
16
The reactor and its defects were all made by GE, but Asahi kept hiding it.
17
NHK…NTTとの会食当日に高市氏が26500円払ったという部分をカットし、7万円「返金」とのみ報道
18
大気汚染が地球温暖化の原因ならば全ての元凶は中国である事は歴然たる事実だ
19
20
If that crazy President Xi Jinping does something, people all over the world will suffer
21
the top 50 searches for the past week
22
President Xi Jinping desires to spread poison and destroy humanity tomorrow; he can do it
23
They lined up such lies and recommended wind power made in China and
24
Come trattare con la nuova amministrazione statunitense.
25
There is ostensibly no cash flow that can use.
26
27
They don't want people to pay attention to the true source of the problem
28
今は、このYouTubeを視聴していると涙が出てくる。3.11は、母親が津波で死んだ日だからである。
29
they wanted to hide the "source" of the outbreak.
30
In, it is President Xi Jinping Speaking of whether anyone in the Politburo to the instruction.
31
Still, it could not overcome AC electricity's virtues, and Edison met with a crushing defeat.
32
33
34
Let's say that President Xi Jinping suddenly lost his mind one day.
35
That regime can do it beautifully. This is the focus of the issue.
36
以下はリアルタイムのベスト10である。am 10:55 on March 14
37
つまり、戦争が目の前に迫っていて、それを防衛しなければならないのに、
38
the top 50 searches for the past week
39
2021年3月16日10時、gooでの人気のページ、ベスト10
40
With the complicity of the WHO, the whole world was deceived,
41
42
医療逼迫演出で数字も滅茶苦茶、緊急事態宣言延長で経済も疲弊…このままでは首都が死ぬ
43
中西宏明・経団連会長は「脱炭素は原発を活用するしかない」と明言していますが、それはそのとおりでしょう
44
ましてやもっともCO2を排出し、プラスチックゴミなど最大の環境汚染国家である中国を規制せずに、実際問題効果としてどれだけあるのか
45
ただ報道を見ていて思うのは、EVを量産するのはいいとしてその電力はどうするのか、という問題です
46
it is a popular page yesterday
47
Jeder macht flache Dinge, nicht wahr?
48
49
So who gives the orders to the Politburo? It is President Xi Jinping.
50
この10年、水力と火力に加え、風力、太陽光パネルに切り替えてなんとか奇跡的に、電力供給を維持してきたわけです
1
The reactor and its defects were all made by GE, but Asahi kept hiding it.
2
They lined up such lies and recommended wind power made in China and
3
4
Still, it could not overcome AC electricity's virtues, and Edison met with a crushing defeat.
5
6
The U.S. Navy chose WH's pressurized water reactor to install on its submarines
7
以下はリアルタイムのベスト10である。2021年3月19日、10時3分。
8
They treated Japan like an undeveloped country.
9
GE's "build it in a low-lying area" design was also at fault in the 3/11 disaster
10
kept Fukushima from turning into Chernobyl was the self-reliant maintenance on the Japanese side
11
TBSが反日的報道をする理由を知っていますか? 元TBS社員の独り言 「うちの局がこんなになってしまった経緯をお話しましょう」
12
ケネディ教授の示した歴史の事例を敷衍すれば、敗れるのは無謀な軋轢を仕掛けた側である。
13
中国共産党の世界支配を止めることが出来るのかという問いは、日本だけでなく全世界の命運を左右する重大事
14
中国が米国の衰退説拡散に努めるのは、彼らの得意とする「三戦」(世論戦、心理戦、法律戦)の一端
15
ベントに欠陥と無知な批難を浴びせ、電源は「地震で落ちたから地震大国に原発は危険」とも主張した。
16
公表しなかったのはGE社への配慮もあるが、もう一つ、馬鹿な朝日新聞が「昨日まで暴走原子炉だったんだ」とか騒ぐからだ
17
以下はリアルタイムのベスト10である。2021年3月19日、21時20分
18
Örtbas etme konusunda hiçbir sorumluluktan kaçış yok.
19
歴史の大きな流れの中で、日本がまともな国家として生き残るために、憲法改正を含めた大改革を実現しなければならない
20
米国は…それでも強い国であり続けるでしょう。その意味では、中国は失望する
21
No hay escapatoria de responsabilidad por el encubrimiento.
22
Neexistuje žádná úniková odpovědnost za utajení.
23
24
だいたい炉も欠陥もみなGE製なのに、朝日はそれを隠し続けた。
25
実際、GEはエジソンと同じだった。ふんぞり返って日本側にノウハウは教えず、格納容器も見せなかった。
26
溜まった使用済み燃料からは「6千発の核爆弾ができる」と繰り返して人々にあらぬ期待を持たせた。
27
28
Es gibt keine entgangene Verantwortung für die Vertuschung.
29
Não há como escapar da responsabilidade pelo encobrimento.
30
放射線漏れや腐食割れもあって、運転効率はたったの16%という有り様だ。石播、東芝がそこで動いた。
31
Non c'è modo di sfuggire alla responsabilità per l'insabbiamento.
32
Daar is geen ontkomende verantwoordelikheid vir die toesmeerdery nie.
33
34
Il n'y a pas d'échappatoire à la responsabilité de la dissimulation.
35
日本の行く道…これからの米国は同盟諸国と協力して中国に対峙しなければならなくなると予測し、
36
it is a popular page yesterday on ameba
37
38
万が一のとき、格納容器から高圧ガスを抜くベントすらなかった。事故が起きれば即チェルノブイリだった。
39
ليس هناك هروب من المسؤولية عن التستر.
40
以下はリアルタイムのベスト10である。2021年3月19日、22時40分
41
エジソンのGE社は以後、テスラのWH社を相手に何件も訴訟を起こすが、テスラの知恵は別格だった
42
the top 50 searches for the past week
43
Det finns inget undantagsfall för täckmantel.
44
Невозможно избежать ответственности за сокрытие.
45
エジソンは…ネガティブ・キャンペーンでテスラを虐めた…犬や馬を交流電気で感電死させるイベントをあちこちで開いた
46
it is a popular page yesterday
47
以下はリアルタイムのベスト10である。2021年3月19日、23時40分
48
土光敏夫もエネルギー資源を持たない日本には原発しかないと思った。視察した結論はWH製だった
49
Salailusta ei ole pakenevaa vastuuta.
50
ただWH製だけではなくGE製も東電が入れた。米国の圧力があったと思われる。
日本テレビが、アイヌは日本の先住民族だった等というナレーションを断定的に流した。
Tutti fanno cose superficiali, non è vero?
2021年3月16日21時35分の検索数ベスト10 on goo
すなわち、在日韓国朝鮮人に各TV局は、乗っ取られていると云う事です。
あの憲法は悪意の塊。やめちまうのも一興と一人くらい傍論して欲しかった。
文春、Yahooに続き、NHKが高市前総務相について悪意の報道。
その電力はどうするのか、という問題です。 電気自動車になると、いまのエネルギーの2倍いる。
Viele Tributfrauen, die 500 Jahre lang als Tribu
戦争を知らない女性を“平和”の名の下に担ぎ出し、 近隣国の立場で日本を非難する輩
ポール・ケネディという名を聞けば、『大国の興亡』の上下2巻がすぐに連想される。
大気汚染が地球温暖化の原因ならば全ての元凶は中国である事は歴然たる事実だ。
電源喪失は津波であって地震は関係なかった。軽水炉の使用済み燃料では核爆弾は作れない。
It is a popular page yesterday
以下はgooにおけるリアルタイムのベスト10である。12時53分
10年、そんな嘘を並べては支那製の風力発電と韓国製の太陽光パネルを勧めた。
表向きはあることになっているけれど、実際に使えるキャッシューフローが存在してないのではないか
正式には「日中両国政府間の記者交換に関する交換公文」と言われるもので、1972年に橋本恕在中国日
2021年3月16日19時45分の検索数ベスト10 on goo
だから、ほんとうにカーボンフリーをやりたいのなら、物理的に原発再起動しかありません。
The Japanese side installed a new vent.
Reina del Cidは本当に素晴らしい。いつも神の御加護がありますように。
防衛する側を「侵略戦争をしたい奴ら」と勝手に規定しているのですから滑稽です
ましてやもっともCO2を排出し、プラスチックゴミなど最大の環境汚染国家である中国を規制せずに、
そんな中国の研究所の実態が、以前から明らかになっていれば、世界の今の悲劇はないんですよ
以下はgooにおけるリアルタイムのベスト10である。pm3:00 on March 13
2021年3月18日6時5分の検索数ベスト10 on goo
つまり、現在進行形の危機でいえば、敗者は中国、ということになる。
なにしろ、福島原発事故によって日本中の原発は止まったままです。
その抑止力をどうするか、ということに普通はなります。しかし、日本は違う。
なぜ日本人が自国の防衛に反対するのかが心底わからないですね。
以下はgooにおけるリアルタイムのベスト10である。am 10:55
これほど包括的かつ深く掘り下げたのは門田さんの本だけです。この一冊があれば十分。
米国の力が弱まっているとの印象を植えつけることで米国への信頼を弱め、多くの国々を中国の方に引きつ
すべての問題は戦争によって解決されると毛沢東は繰り返している。
خطر عهد الإمبراطور شي جين بينغ.
反省文を書いた当日に報道しています。…ということはどういうことか。
「なぜそうなるのか」という簡単な事実を実は外国人は案外知りません。
次々と中国が泣いて喜ぶようなことを言い、日本の防衛力が高まるようなことは阻害する。