以下は昨日のベスト50である。
The following is the first part of the previous chapter.
Can you believe in a hostile nation?
Here, it will become a story of the Constitution of Japan absolutely.
It seems not to be pointed out so much and I want to point out that all Japanese people should not forget.
First of all, the current Constitution is that it was created by the occupation forces on the premise that Japan will remain occupied.
Try to think about it.
The promulgation of the Constitution of Japan was November 3, 1946 (enforcement is May 3 the following year), and the sovereignty was restored on September 8, 1951 (ratification is November) signed the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
In the meantime, for the whole five years, Japan is the occupied country, it was not in a position to think about defense and security issues.
Before that the Constitution created by the Occupation Forces, there is a terrible complaint.
As is well-known, it is the following complaint.
<...... I trusted the fairness and faith of peoples loving peace and decided to preserve our safety and survival ... (> underline is Watanabe)
Do you declare that the constitution of which country entrusts "safety" and "survival" of people in their country to foreign countries?
It says that it trusts "Peace-loving citizens", but which country is it?
In the GHQ idea around 1946, it would be "Allied".
Can we trust the Soviet Union (now Russia), entrust safety and survival?
The neighboring country of Japan now may be said to be an unconcealed countries of inimical character, although it is not an enemy country.
Does anyone think that we can entrust our safety and survival to North Korea, Korea, and China etc.?
Because there is such "preamble", "Article 9" was also written.
In that respect, the purpose of the Constitution is consistent.
I would like to ask the constitutional scholars who opposed the security related laws here.
I wonder if Japan's security can be the same as when Japan was occupied.
This book is also a book all Japanese citizens have to head to subscribing to the nearest bookstore. It is exactly the same for people all over the world, but somehow, I will tell the part as much as I can.
First edition of June 7, 2017. WAC Inc. 1700 yen. Watanabe Shoichi
"Spring of knowledge" The following is from the cover of this book.
Memorial publication "Knowledge giant" last message, A rare scholar, Essay of a gem
- The consistency of the history memorized in the future Japanese will be the source of patriotism under consciousness and will be the source of pride as a citizen and the prosperity of the country. (From the text)
Constitution under slavery enacted
Young people may not know this, but the occupation of Japan was supposed to continue for fifty years at the time the Constitution was created, and for a short period of twenty-five years.
Japan was an indirect governorate country by GHQ.
Initially it seems that it was a policy to go into direct governance and make currency into martial arts, but it became indirect rule with Shigemitsu Foreign Minister's efforts.
So the currency is also yen, and the official language has also remained in Japanese.
However, the GHQ ignored international treaties.
And it changed the permanent legal system of the occupied countries.
For that purpose, a proper basic method is necessary.
In other words, it was decided that the Japanese made a new constitution - it could not participate in the Japanese making it, and commentary was also strict prohibition - Because GHQ decided to promote their own Occupation Policy Basic Law as the Constitution of Japan is there.
To prepare its appearance, to emperor Showa, "Ratify the amendment of the Imperial Constitution which passed through the advice-seeking of privy councilor and Meiji Council resolution by Article 73 of the Imperial Constitution and promulgate it here", it was made To have an imperial word to be issued.
In this imperial rescript, "We, deeply pleased that the foundation of New Japan Construction has been decided based on the consciousness of the Japanese people ... ..." (Underline is Watanabe) there is also the word of Emperor Showa saying .
However, this Constitution was created by GHQ in around a week and the consensus of Japanese citizens was never questioned, moreover, we did not do any comment on constitutional establishment at all in press code, Emperor Showa should not have known, it could not said That it was absolutely not.
At that time GHQ was an absolute power of Japan, and even by the Potsdam Declaration the Emperor was supposed to "subject to" to GHQ.
What was the mind of the emperor who has no choice but to issue imperial rescript like this, it is contrary to intention.
In the era when the survival of the Imperial Family itself was also in danger, it seemed that they had been cooperated to prepare the form of indirect governance unavoidably.
This draft continues.
朝日新聞は、この件についての本田雅和の捏造報道１件だけでも廃刊が当然だったはずだ。
それにしても加藤千洋の酷さは筆舌に尽くし難いのだが、日本国民は、知らなければならないのである。この男のように紳士然とした風情で物腰柔らかそうに語る人間たち、…加藤の後に登場したのが、私が何度も言及する姜尚中である…を、中国や朝鮮半島の諜報機関はターゲットにするのだと言う事を。
日本国民全員と世界中の人たちは、この新聞会社がどれほど悪質かを知らなければならないのである。
従軍慰安婦報道の捏造、中国共産党のプロパガンダそのものと言っても全く過言ではない「中国の旅」の大特集、渡部昇一氏を攻撃した際の捏造対談記事…朝日新聞が行った信じがたい悪は、枚挙に暇がないのである。
こんな新聞がいまだに大新聞の様な顔をして日本国民に説教を垂れているだけではなく、つい先日は、安倍政権を打倒する、弱体化するために、森友学園、（これが惨憺たる結末を迎えると）、今度は加計学園…これは都議選で自民党に大打撃を与えた。
こんな新聞が堂々と、（平然と）、存続して、発狂したような政権批判を繰り返すことが出来る国である、日本の報道の自由度は世界一、
これほど自国を貶める事に邁進しているメディアが、その国を代表する新聞だなどと思われている国は、世界の何処にもないだろう。
世界に類例のない世界一であることを、
国連の人権委員会等で、日本のお金で給料を得ながら、日本攻撃に励んでいる、人間として最低な連中は、括目して、この章を読まなければならないのである。
そうして、二度と、日本に対して、ふざけた事を言ってはいけないのである。
何度も言うが、そんな暇があったら、中国に調査に行け、韓国に調査に行け。
この唐変木が！
The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
"January 13, 2005 News Station", Mr. Abe interview full text
Abe
"In the first place, this is mock trial, this is in sexual crime, it is a trial to judge the Emperor Showa and Japan, and the beginning of that trial is organized by Ms. Yayori Matsui, as a former Asahi Speaking of newspaper reporter, why it chose Kudan Hall,
A trial was done in a very clear ideological nature that it stated that "It is because it is located right by the Imperial Palace which is the root of evil"
"Emperor Hirohito is responsible for sexual crime and sexual slavery, so they make a judgment of guilt to Emperor"
To say, it is to make a decision,
In the hall, in the crucible of applause wave and excitement very unusual situation of being enveloped by delight,
And without a counsel there is no witness on the defense side.
And what a prosecutor it is, there are two North Korean representatives.
Mr. Huang Huo and Mr. Zhengnan two people are becoming this prosecutor,
These two are, this is already certified as a so-called "agent", after which Japan has not issued a visa
Kato
"I have talked about the simulated court a while ago, but I do not think that it is a story of historical issues today, I think that what is called journalism and political intervention is the issue that is focused Among them, Mr. Abe's remarks earlier, I thought that it was awfully interesting, but Huang Huo who came by prosecutor of North Korea, at Japan and North Korea Summit Meeting which was held twice, he is doing the Main interpreter of North Korea”
Abe
"Yes, that's right."
Kato
"Is it an agent?"
Abe
"That's virtually an agent"
Kato
"Huh ~"
Abe
"I think that it is an unseen world to Mr. Kato probably. Mr. Kato in international politics I think that you are not familiar with it, but I think the country is North Korea,"
Kato
"Oh, Mr. Huang, I have some acquaintance in mind ...”...
Abe
"I think that it is familiar indeed."
Kato
"Huh ..."
Abe
“At that time it is from the media correspondent it takes the information and trying to make it as a sympathizer in North Korea as possible is called what is called "operation", is not it? Because he is involved in that, I wonder if he contacted Mr. Kato, I think so.”
That’s all.
Mr. Kato I was surprised to tell himself, "I am acquainted with North Korean agent"!
Riding on the "operation" of North Korea, North Korean sympathizer providing information to operators explains the news ... What kind of country program is "News Station"?
Partial performance of Kato Chihiro agent
① He burned the Yasukuni issue http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT-Dj8agc4Y
② Japan-China intermediate line is unilateral assertion of Japan ... http://erict.blog5.fc2.com/?mode=m&no=138
In addition, I finally got points on the person I was wondering for a long time (Including resentment that I was watching news station that that guy was appearing without knowing anything).
It is the following article that it found on the net.
Http://blog.goo.ne.jp/taezaki160925/e/cf313f517800f0c67d2489d1cb24b571
Confession that you are an agent on TV, "News Station" Kato commentator
2007-02-04
Well on the net, the expression which said that it is "agent of North Korea" is used.
But this is figuratively used against the sympathizer of North Korea and it is another matter whether it is a true agent.
However, a famous journalist familiarized on television was on a television news program that he served as an commentator, and revealed himself as being an agent of North Korea, or at least an information provider of an agent (government approved).
A conversation between Kato commentator and Abe Liberal Party secretary general who was called to guest on January 13 TV Asahi two years ago.
At that time I was watching the same program, but there was a site that accurately translated the contents of the conversation into texts! Http://kaida.xxxxxxxx.jp/shinmachi/kami/yashiro/050113Houdoustation.html
This draft continues.
The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Further problems continue.
After this Asahi newspaper article, Democratic Party member Ishige Eiko used Congress hall, do not allow slander against the blasphemy against, "The Women's International War Crimes Tribunal on Japan's Military Sexual Slavery", she had a meeting with the organization called "Emergency Meeting executive committee of Japan and North Korean women ", it turns out that the sponsorship of this meeting was actually Chongryon.
In addition, the telephone number of this committee "Socialist Women's Union of Korea in Japan", that was the same as the organization, that organization was organized under Chongryon, and the representative of this organization, 金昭子is the vice chairman of Chongryon · Central Committee, in addition, it turned out that she was a member of the Diet of North Korea.
In short, this disturbance was against Mr. Abe and Mr. Nakagawa who were severe in North Korea from the time, the media such as Asahi Shimbun and TBS made the case where trying to set up and entrap with North Korea.
In the case of "political intervention in NHK", originally, this problem means that "North Korea and the supporters of North Korea made political intervention in NHK".
Finally, another important thing turns out at a later date.
Actually, it was a reporter of Asahi Shimbun's Honda Masakazu who did the coverage of this Asahi Shimbun, but this person, in fact it was a participant to the " The Women's International War Crimes Tribunal on Japan's Military Sexual Slavery " which is the people's trial in question.
It would be natural that you would not be trusted if you did this.
The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
A further problem was that the simulation trial called "The Women's International War Crimes Tribunal on Japan's Military Sexual Slavery" conducted in this program was only preliminarily screened participants, with no lawyers or accused, unilaterally Saying "Emperor Showa is guilty", it was so-called people's trial that was neither fair nor neutral.
On top of all, the person named "黄虎男" and "鄭南用" who had been "Appearance" as a prosecutor in this simulation trial was actually an agent of North Korea, and then received a ban from immigration ban from Japan it knew that it was.
In other words, this program is that the producer who produced the program used the thought group to which he belongs, tried the people's trial only with the people without refutation with the North Korean agent and tried to propaganda using public broadcasting it is.
Of course this is a clear broadcasting violation.
That is why it became a problem within NHK, it was a problem before political intervention.
The media, including the Asahi Shimbun that reported this incident as an intervention in political reporting, did not report anything about this, they made it time series back and forth, as if there was political intervention, it was reported.
This draft continues.
更に、以前から疑問に思っていた人物（何も知らずに、この男が出演していた、この番組を観ていたという無念さも含めて）について、やっと合点できた。
それがネットで発見した以下の記事である。
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/taezaki160925/e/cf313f517800f0c67d2489d1cb24b571
テレビで工作員と自白 「報道ステーション」加藤解説員
2007-02-04 08:28:23 | 県知事選
ネット上でよく、誰それは「北の工作員」だといった表現が使われる。
だがこれは北朝鮮のシンパに対して比喩的に使われるもので本当の工作員であるかは別の問題である。
ところが、テレビでお馴染みの有名ジャーナリストが自分が解説者を勤めるテレビ報道番組で、自ら北朝鮮の工作員、いや、少なくとも工作員（政府認定）の情報提供者であることを暴露していた。
二年前の１月１３日のテレビ朝日「報道ステーション」でゲストに呼ばれていた安倍自民党幹事長と加藤解説員の会話。
当時たまたま同番組を見ていたが、正確に会話内容をテキスト化したサイトがあった！http://kaida.xxxxxxxx.jp/shinmachi/kami/yashiro/050113
houdoustation.html
「2005年1月13日報道ステーション」、安倍氏インタビュー全文テキスト化
安倍
「そもそもこの模擬裁判なんですが、これは要するに性犯罪においてですね、昭和天皇と日本国を裁くという裁判なんですね。そしてその裁判の冒頭ですね松井やよりさんという方が主催した、元朝日新聞の記者の方なんですが、なぜ九段会館を選んだかといえば『悪の根源である皇居のすぐ傍にあるからだ』という事を明言したという極めて明確な思想性において裁判がなされて、『天皇ヒロヒトは性犯罪と性奴隷強制の責任により有罪という判断を下す』という判決を下すとですね、場内が拍手のウェーブと興奮の坩堝の中で歓喜に包まれるという極めて異常な状況、そして弁護人もいなければ弁護側の証人もいないわけです。
そしてなんと検事にですね北朝鮮の代表者が２人なっているんですね。
この検事は黄虎男氏と鄭南用氏って人がなっているんですが、
この２人はですね、これはもういわゆる"工作員"として認定されていて、その後日本はビザを発給していないんですよ
加藤
「先程、模擬法廷の話が有りましたけれどね、今日は歴史問題の話ではないと思うんですよね。ジャーナ リズムと政治介入って言うものが焦点が当たっている問題だと思うんですけれども、その中でさっき安倍さんの発言でね、ちょっと物凄く面白いと思ったんですけれども、北朝鮮側の検察役で来た黄虎男さん、あれ二度の 日朝首脳会談の向うの主席通訳をやってらっしゃる」
安倍
「ええ、そうですよ」
加藤
「工作員なんですか？」
安倍
「そりゃあ事実上工作員でもあるんですね」
加藤
「はぁ～」
安倍
「恐らく、加藤さんには窺い知れない世界だと思います。それだけ国際政治に加藤さんもしかしたら精通しておられないと思うんですが、北朝鮮という国はですね、」
加藤
「あのぉ、黄さん、は、多少は面識、ていうか、有るんですけど…」
安倍
「やっぱそれは面識有るんだと思います。」
加藤
「はぁ…」
安倍
「その時にマスコミ関係者からですね情報を取る、そしてなるべく北朝鮮のシンパにしようとすると言う事を所謂『オペレーション』と呼ぶんですね。それに関ってるからこそ加藤さんに接触したんじゃないかなぁ、とこう思いますね」
以上。
加藤さん「北朝鮮工作員と面識がある」と自ら語っているのには驚いた！
北の「オペレ－ション」に乗っかって、工作員に情報を提供している北のシンパが解説する、・・・「報道ステーション」って、どこの国の番組なのだろう。
◆加藤千洋工作員の業績の一部
①靖国問題に火をつけた http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT-Dj8agc4Y
②日中中間線は日本の一方的主張・・・http://erict.blog5.fc2.com/?mode=m&no=138
The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Emphasis on writing is me.
Yet,
In fact, before Mr. Abe and Mr. Nakagawa meet up, it has a considerable problem in this program, it became problematic inside NHK, and there was a change in contents so as not to violate the Broadcast Law.
VOWW-NET who played a central role in this program, has been moved to "Before the time that Abe and Nakagawa visited", it also turns out that she knew that it was there.
Http://www1.jca.apc.org/vaww-net-japan/nhk/etv2001.html
Why do you sue NHK - "The Women's International War Crimes Tribunal on Japan's Military Sexual Slavery", Asking the responsibility for program tampering.
NHK complaint symposium July 24, 2001
VAWW-NET Japan representative Matsui Yayori
It became obvious later that on January 19, the department manager who saw the program produced on December 27, ordered the amendment that "the distance to the court is too close", as a result, in the script what further modified the finished delivery made On the 24th, let the one of the 28 performers recapture the comment, on the same day, bother, add an interview of a right-wing scholar quickly, it was made to attack "court", attack "comfort women" remark.
NHK's upper division who saw the program in the preview also ordered the modification, so the program was cut down to the 30th day broadcasting, instead of recording the "court" it turned into a program to be criticized It was.
The program which was altered by direct intervention to the production site of NHK upper part is just broadcasted.
In short, everything was fabrication.
The exact time series of the problem will be like this when you link the VAWW - NET’s original record of 2001 and what I learned later.
2001/01/19
The first preview of manager
· "Distance from the court is too close", "It is different from planning" "Cannot correct button mismatch"
· The director is furious with "I was cheated by you" "It is out as it is" and so on.
2001/01/21
Start editing work.
※ Narration of Emperor's convicted scene & deleted Matsui Yayori's interview
2001/01/24
Editing work end
The second preview of manager
· "It has not changed at all" "This game is fixed game (It seems that the result is already understood")
· "Complete button misplacement" Specific revision proposal comes out from the manager.
2001/01/25 Start additional shooting and editing work
2001/01/28 Including additional interviews (According to Mr. Abe 26 day’s acquisition of appointment. Contents critical to simulated trial)
2001/01/29 Editing work end.
On the same day Mr. Abe will meet with NHK's person on the matter of budget
Preview of the director level at the same day. Further editing work is done by "business instruction" of Chairman Ebisawa and Mr. Matsuo Broadcasting Directorate
2001/01/30 Editing work is over. Broadcast.
And, in the first place, it will also be found one after another that this program itself had considerable problems.
First of all, this program was handled by NHK enterprise, a subsidiary of NHK, but it was discovered that the producer, Eriko Ikeda, who produced the problematic program at this company, was an administrator of VAWW-NET Japan, in short that’s why she was making the programs of thought groups that she belong to, ignoring the neutrality of the report.
This draft continues.
Voici la suite du chapitre précédent.
La reconnaissance fondamentale est étrange
C'est autour d'un programme de "nouvelles filles" sur Tokyo MX TV, il y a eu un différend même avec une action de protestation à Higashimura - Takae, Action Les participants peuvent entrer sous le véhicule, sauter devant le véhicule en course, ils ont garé le Voiture de façon irrégulière, rendant difficile le passage des véhicules généraux, le gouvernement japonais déclare clairement que des actes d'interception dangereux et illégaux se déroulent.
J'ai également visité le site à plusieurs reprises, les perturbations des tâches officielles, qui ont réduit la sous-réglementation sur place pour ajouter des voies de fait aux policiers sont également fréquentes, les «restrictions inutiles sur la démo» de M. Kaya et les «restrictions déraisonnables» signalées ne sont pas applicables à tout.
Nous pensons également à sa recommandation pour la loi sur la radiodiffusion.
Les ondes radio sont des propriétés publiques.
Certaines personnes ont apporté l'idéologie et la doctrine étrange pour diffuser des émissions, il ne sera pas autorisé à jouer les ondes radio.
Nous devons respecter autant que possible la liberté d'indépendance et la liberté d'expression.
Mais cela ne signifie pas que vous pouvez faire n'importe quoi.
Tout ce que vous dites, quelle que soit la couverture ou l'édition arbitraire que vous faites, il n'existe pas de bien être.
Inutile de dire qu'il n'y a pas de sens en disant que vous pouvez faire rapport sur la fabrication.
Je pense que l'article 4 qui impose une diffusion assez neutre aux radiodiffuseurs est une disposition nécessaire du point de vue du bien-être public.
Pour les critiques de l'ancien journal d'Asahi, M. Takashi Uemura, M. Kaya a décidé qu'il s'agissait d'un «harcèlement».
Cependant, M. Kaya écrit un rapport sans regarder directement le fait pourquoi M. Uemura a été critiqué et ce qu'il a fait.
M. Uemura a été accusé de responsabilité, il y a eu une erreur à critiquer.
En ignorant de telles circonstances, tout simplement, l'opinion publique frappe M. Uemura, la manière de penser de M. Kaya est identique à l'affirmation du groupe anti-japonais lui-même.
Ce n'est pas le seul problème que la description du rapport est peu évidente et corroborante.
* La description du rapport rédigé par Kaya manque de preuve ou de corroboration.
Mais le problème du rapport n'est pas seulement cela.
Des contenus qu'il a beaucoup écrit comme la tour de publicité telle qu'elle est normalement détenue par des organisations spécifiques, nous ne pouvons pas dire que la perception de base elle-même est étrange.
Lo que sigue es la continuación del capítulo anterior.
El reconocimiento fundamental es raro
Se trata de un programa de "chicas de noticias" en Tokio MX TV, ha habido una disputa incluso con la acción de protesta en Higashimura - Takae, Acción Participantes pueden entrar en el vehículo, saltar en frente del vehículo en marcha, que aparcó el Coche irregularmente, haciendo el paso de los vehículos generales difícil, El gobierno japonés claramente que los actos peligrosos e ilegales de la interceptación están ocurriendo.
También he visitado el sitio muchas veces, perturbación de los deberes oficiales, que socavar la sub-regulación en el lugar para agregar asalto a los oficiales de policía también son frecuentes, las "restricciones innecesarias demo" y "restricciones injustificadas" señaladas no son aplicables en todas.
También dudamos de su recomendación para la ley de radiodifusión.
Las ondas de radio son propiedad pública.
Algunas personas trajeron la ideología y la extraña doctrina a los programas de difusión, no se permitirá jugar las ondas de radio.
Debemos respetar tanto como sea posible la libertad de independencia y la libertad de expresión.
Pero eso no significa que puedas hacer nada.
Lo que usted diga, cualquier cobertura o edición arbitraria usted hace, no hay tal cosa como ser bueno.
Huelga decir que no tiene sentido decir que se puede informar sobre la fabricación.
Creo que el artículo 4 que impone una radiodifusión bastante neutral a los organismos de radiodifusión es una disposición necesaria desde el punto de vista del bienestar público.
Para criticar al ex-periodista Asahi, Sr. Takashi Uemura, el Sr. Kaya ha decidido que es "acoso".
Sin embargo, el Sr. Kaya escribe un informe sin mirar directamente el hecho de por qué el Sr. Uemura fue criticado y lo que hizo.
El Sr. Uemura fue acusado de responsabilidad, hubo un error de ser criticado.
Ignorando tales circunstancias, simplemente, la opinión pública está golpeando al Sr. Uemura, la manera de pensar del Sr. Kaya es lo mismo que la afirmación del grupo antijaponés mismo.
No es el único problema que la descripción del informe es pobre en evidencia y corroboración.
* La descripción del informe escrito por Kaya carece de evidencia o corroboración.
Pero el problema del informe no es sólo eso.
Contenidos que escribió ampliamente como la torre de publicidad, ya que es como normalmente es sostenido por organizaciones específicas, no podemos dejar de decir que la percepción básica en sí es extraño.
Das folgende ist die Fortsetzung des vorherigen Kapitels.
Grundlegende Anerkennung ist komisch
Es handelt sich um ein Programm von "News Girls" auf Tokyo MX TV, es gab auch bei Protestaktionen bei Higashimura - Takae, Action Teilnehmer können unter dem Fahrzeug einsteigen, vor dem laufenden Fahrzeug springen, parkten sie die Auto unregelmäßig, so dass die Passage von allgemeinen Fahrzeugen schwierig, die japanische Regierung klar, dass gefährliche und illegale Abhör-Acts stattfinden.
Ich besuchte auch die Seite viele Male, die Beeinträchtigung der offiziellen Pflichten, die unter der Regulierung vor Ort untergraben, um den Polizeibeamten einen Angriff zuzufügen, sind auch häufig, Herr Kays "unnötige Beschränkungen für Demo" und "unangemessene Einschränkungen" sind nicht anwendbar alle.
Wir freuen uns auch über seine Empfehlung für das Rundfunkgesetz.
Radiowellen sind öffentliches Eigentum.
Einige Leute brachten Ideologie und seltsame Lehre, um Programme zu senden, es wird nicht erlaubt sein, die Radiowellen zu spielen.
Wir müssen die Freiheit der Unabhängigkeit und die Meinungsfreiheit so weit wie möglich respektieren.
Aber das bedeutet nicht, dass du etwas tun kannst.
Was auch immer du sagst, was auch immer Abdeckung oder willkürliche Bearbeitung du machst, es gibt keine Sorge wie gut.
Unnötig zu sagen, es gibt keinen Sinn zu sagen, dass Sie über die Herstellung berichten können.
Ich denke, dass Artikel 4, der eine ziemlich neutrale Ausstrahlung auf Rundfunkanstalten vorsieht, eine notwendige Bestimmung aus der Sicht der öffentlichen Wohlfahrt ist.
Für die Kritik an der ehemaligen Asahi-Zeitung Herr Takashi Uemura hat Herr Kaya beschlossen, dass es "Belästigung" ist.
Allerdings schreibt Herr Kaya einen Bericht, ohne direkt auf die Tatsache zu antworten, warum Herr Uemura kritisiert wurde und was er tat.
Herr Uemura wurde mit Verantwortung beauftragt, da war ein Fehler zu kritisieren.
Ignorieren solche Umstände, einfach, die öffentliche Meinung ist aufrumpfen Herr Uemura, ist Mr. Kaya Art zu denken, ist die gleiche wie die Behauptung der anti-japanischen Gruppe selbst.
Es ist nicht das einzige Problem, dass die Beschreibung des Berichts schlecht in Beweisen und Bestätigung ist.
* Die Beschreibung des Berichts von Kaya geschrieben fehlt jede Beweise oder Bestätigung.
Aber das Problem des Berichts ist nicht nur das.
Inhalte, die er ausführlich wie der Werbeturm geschrieben hat, wie er ist, wie er normalerweise von bestimmten Organisationen gehalten wird, können wir nicht umhin zu sagen, dass die grundlegende Wahrnehmung selbst seltsam ist.
O seguinte é a continuação do capítulo anterior.
O reconhecimento fundamental é estranho
É em torno de um programa de "meninas de notícias" na Tokyo MX TV, houve uma disputa mesmo com ação de protesto em Higashimura - Takae, Ação Os participantes podem entrar sob o veículo, saltar na frente do veículo em circulação, eles estacionaram o Carro de forma irregular, dificultando a passagem de veículos em geral, o governo japonês afirma claramente que estão ocorrendo atos de intercepção perigosos e ilegais.
Eu também visitei o site muitas vezes, o distúrbio dos deveres oficiais, que prejudicam a sub-regulamentação no local para adicionar assaltos aos policiais também são freqüentes, as "restrições desnecessárias do demo" do Sr. Kaya e as "restrições injustificáveis" apontadas não são aplicáveis em todos.
Também nos parece duvidoso sua recomendação para a lei de radiodifusão.
As ondas de rádio são de propriedade pública.
Algumas pessoas trouxeram ideologia e doutrina estranha para transmitir programas, não será permitido tocar as ondas de rádio.
Devemos respeitar tanto quanto possível a liberdade de independência e a liberdade de expressão.
Mas isso não significa que você pode fazer qualquer coisa.
Seja lá o que você disser, qualquer cobertura ou edição arbitrária que você faça, não existe tal coisa como ser bom.
Escusado será dizer que não tem sentido dizer que você pode informar sobre a fabricação.
Penso que o artigo 4 que impõe uma transmissão bastante neutra aos radiodifusores é uma disposição necessária do ponto de vista do bem-estar público.
Para as críticas do ex-jornal Asahi, o Sr. Takashi Uemura, o Sr. Kaya decidiu que é "assédio".
No entanto, o Sr. Kaya escreve um relatório sem olhar diretamente para o fato de o Sr. Uemura ter sido criticado e o que ele fez.
O Sr. Uemura foi acusado de responsabilidade, havia um erro ser criticado.
Ignorando tais circunstâncias, simplesmente, a opinião pública está atacando o Sr. Uemura, o modo de pensar do Sr. Kaya é o mesmo que a afirmação do próprio grupo anti-japonês.
Não é o único problema que a descrição do relatório é pobre em evidência e corroboração.
* A descrição do relatório escrito pela Kaya não possui qualquer evidência ou corroboração.
Mas o problema do relatório não é apenas isso.
Conteúdo que ele escreveu extensivamente como a torre de propaganda, como é normalmente realizada por organizações específicas, não podemos deixar de dizer que a própria percepção básica é estranha.
以下是上一章的延续。
基本认可是奇怪的
在东京MX电视周边的“新闻女孩”节目中，即使在东村 - 高崎举行的抗议活动也出现争议，参与者可能会进入车内，跳出跑车前面，停放汽车不正常，使通用车辆通行困难，日本政府明确指出，危险和非法的截取行为正在发生。
我也多次访问了这个网站，扰乱了公务，这也削弱了对现场的违规行为，对警员进行了殴打也是频繁的，卡亚先生的“不必要的限制演示”和“不合理的限制”指出不适用于所有。
我们也怀疑他对广播法的建议。
无线电波是公共财产。
有些人带来意识形态和奇怪的教义来播放节目，不会播放无线电波。
我们必须尽可能尊重独立自由和言论自由。
但这并不意味着你可以做任何事情。
无论你说什么，无论你做什么覆盖或任意编辑，都没有这样的东西是好的。
不用说，说你可以报告制造没有意义。
我觉得从公共福利的角度来看，对广播机构施加相当中立广播的第4条是必要的条款。
对于前朝日报前藤先生的批评，卡亚先生已经决定这是“骚扰”。
不过，Kaya先生写了一个报告，并没有直接看到Uemura先生被批评的事实和他做了什么。
祖村先生被指控负责，有一个被批评的错误。
忽视这种情况，简单地说，舆论正在呃Uemura先生，Kaya先生的思维方式与反日本集团本身的断言是一样的。
对报告的描述不足以证明和佐证不是唯一的问题。
*由Kaya撰写的报告的描述缺乏证据或佐证。
但报告的问题不仅如此。
他像广告牌一样广泛地像特定组织一样持有的内容，我们不禁要说，基本的感觉本身是奇怪的。