Chinese military executives announced in a thesis papers the high military value of

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The birth of a powerful country aiming at supremacy

In addition to merely giving the Chinese government the leeway of the expansion in armaments by the fund from Japan in the military affairs,

Chinese military executives announced in a thesis papers the high military value of airports, railways and expressways made with Japan's assistance.

The military directly used optical fiber construction to Tibet.

The railroad network of Fujian province also completed with Japanese ODA was used for frequent movements of troops that took offense to Taiwan.

It is hard to forget that Taiwanese President Lee Teng-hui directly claimed that ‘Japan's aid for China has stopped only the construction of railroads in Fujian Province’.

It was also obvious that Japan's ODA did not consider China's democratization and respect for human rights.

The ODA Charter did not give aid to countries that oppress democracy and human rights.

The undemocratic constitution of China is also proved simply by looking at Uigur suppression now.

So, ODA to China was measures like extra-legal measures which the Japanese government neglected its foreign aid policy.

The Japanese government gave preferential treatment to China.

Together with China's five - year national development plan, we have given huge money to the project that the Chinese side is seeking with payment in a lump sum for 5 years.

It was a useful fund to China to enrich your country strongly.

That China has now turned away from international norms, spreading hegemony and becoming a huge, powerful nation that threatens Japan's territory.

Japan's ODA to China contributed to the emergence of such hegemony-oriented power.

In addition to merely giving the Chinese government the leeway of the expansion in armaments

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The birth of a powerful country aiming at supremacy

In addition to merely giving the Chinese government the leeway of the expansion in armaments by the fund from Japan in the military affairs,

Chinese military executives announced in a thesis papers the high military value of airports, railways and expressways made with Japan's assistance.

The military directly used optical fiber construction to Tibet.

The railroad network of Fujian province also completed with Japanese ODA was used for frequent movements of troops that took offense to Taiwan.

It is hard to forget that Taiwanese President Lee Teng-hui directly claimed that ‘Japan's aid for China has stopped only the construction of railroads in Fujian Province’.

It was also obvious that Japan's ODA did not consider China's democratization and respect for human rights.

The ODA Charter did not give aid to countries that oppress democracy and human rights.

The undemocratic constitution of China is also proved simply by looking at Uigur suppression now.

So, ODA to China was measures like extra-legal measures which the Japanese government neglected its foreign aid policy.

The Japanese government gave preferential treatment to China.

Together with China's five - year national development plan, we have given huge money to the project that the Chinese side is seeking with payment in a lump sum for 5 years.

It was a useful fund to China to enrich your country strongly.

That China has now turned away from international norms, spreading hegemony and becoming a huge, powerful nation that threatens Japan's territory.

Japan's ODA to China contributed to the emergence of such hegemony-oriented power.

The birth of a powerful country aiming at supremacy

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The birth of a powerful country aiming at supremacy

In addition to merely giving the Chinese government the leeway of the expansion in armaments by the fund from Japan in the military affairs,

Chinese military executives announced in a thesis papers the high military value of airports, railways and expressways made with Japan's assistance.

The military directly used optical fiber construction to Tibet.

The railroad network of Fujian province also completed with Japanese ODA was used for frequent movements of troops that took offense to Taiwan.

It is hard to forget that Taiwanese President Lee Teng-hui directly claimed that ‘Japan's aid for China has stopped only the construction of railroads in Fujian Province’.

It was also obvious that Japan's ODA did not consider China's democratization and respect for human rights.

The ODA Charter did not give aid to countries that oppress democracy and human rights.

The undemocratic constitution of China is also proved simply by looking at Uigur suppression now.

So, ODA to China was measures like extra-legal measures which the Japanese government neglected its foreign aid policy.

The Japanese government gave preferential treatment to China.

Together with China's five - year national development plan, we have given huge money to the project that the Chinese side is seeking with payment in a lump sum for 5 years.

It was a useful fund to China to enrich your country strongly.

That China has now turned away from international norms, spreading hegemony and becoming a huge, powerful nation that threatens Japan's territory.

Japan's ODA to China contributed to the emergence of such hegemony-oriented power.

 

CCP regime that crippled hostility to Japan under the name of ‘anti-Japan’ was intense

The following is from the 3rd page of Sankei Shimbun this morning.

Emphasis in sentences other than headlines is me

ODA to China is the largest failure

Visiting correspondent in Washington Correspondent Yoshihisa Komori

The Japanese government declared the end of Official Development Assistance (ODA) to China.

What did the introduction of public expenditure totaling 3.6 trillion yen in nearly 40 years brought to Japan?

When summarizing its trajectory, the whole picture which can be said to be the largest failure in Japan's post-war foreign policy appears.

The fault between the intention of the Japanese side and the result is too huge.

Not reported at all

In the autumn of 1998 I was shocked when I got to Beijing as the first Director General of China in Sankei Shimbun and learned the actual situation of ODA grant, which was the biggest pillar of Japan's China policy towards China.

This is because the Japanese taxpayers raised public and private prayers for friendship between Japan and China with huge amounts of blood taxes were not acknowledged to Chinese citizens.

As for the financial support from Japan, it does not introduce the state-operated media of the Chinese side absolutely.

That's why the public does not know at all.

Beijing International Airport Building, Beijing Subway Line 2, Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Center, etc. were all built with huge ODA from Japan, but there was no Japanese name in inauguration ceremony and inscription.

ODA was not the only economic assistance from Japan to China.

Public funds were provided to China from the former Ministry of Finance and the Export-Import Bank under the name ‘Resource Loan’.

The total amount was 3.3 trillion yen by 1999, exceeding the total amount of ODA at that time.

So, the total amount of aid to China was 7 trillion yen.

Prime Minister Ohira Masayoshi emphasized ‘Japan-China friendship’ about the purpose of ODA to ODA in the visit in 1979, which was the starting point.

After that, Prime Minister Takeshita Noboru in 1988 when the total amount of ODA increased drastically, declared ‘Primary objective is appeal to Chinese people's mind.’

However, since the people do not know ODA from Japan, it cannot be transmitted to the heart.

There is no evidence that the Chinese government increased friendship to Japan for ODA.

On the other hand, even in the 1990s when the ODA became even bigger, publicity and education of the CCP regime that crippled hostility to Japan under the name of ‘anti-Japan’ was intense.

From the Japanese side, the success or failure of ODA to China will be obvious if it compares with the government's ‘ODA Charter.’

The main idea is that Japan's ODA matches ‘avoidance of military applications’, especially with respect to ‘military expenditure, weapons of mass destruction, missile trends’ of the partner country, ‘promotion of democratization’, ‘guarantee of human rights and freedoms’, was stipulated.

But ODA to China violated all of this.

This draft continues.

On the other hand, even in the 1990s when the ODA became even bigger,

The following is from the 3rd page of Sankei Shimbun this morning.

Emphasis in sentences other than headlines is me

ODA to China is the largest failure

Visiting correspondent in Washington Correspondent Yoshihisa Komori

The Japanese government declared the end of Official Development Assistance (ODA) to China.

What did the introduction of public expenditure totaling 3.6 trillion yen in nearly 40 years brought to Japan?

When summarizing its trajectory, the whole picture which can be said to be the largest failure in Japan's post-war foreign policy appears.

The fault between the intention of the Japanese side and the result is too huge.

Not reported at all

In the autumn of 1998 I was shocked when I got to Beijing as the first Director General of China in Sankei Shimbun and learned the actual situation of ODA grant, which was the biggest pillar of Japan's China policy towards China.

This is because the Japanese taxpayers raised public and private prayers for friendship between Japan and China with huge amounts of blood taxes were not acknowledged to Chinese citizens.

As for the financial support from Japan, it does not introduce the state-operated media of the Chinese side absolutely.

That's why the public does not know at all.

Beijing International Airport Building, Beijing Subway Line 2, Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Center, etc. were all built with huge ODA from Japan, but there was no Japanese name in inauguration ceremony and inscription.

ODA was not the only economic assistance from Japan to China.

Public funds were provided to China from the former Ministry of Finance and the Export-Import Bank under the name ‘Resource Loan’.

The total amount was 3.3 trillion yen by 1999, exceeding the total amount of ODA at that time.

So, the total amount of aid to China was 7 trillion yen.

Prime Minister Ohira Masayoshi emphasized ‘Japan-China friendship’ about the purpose of ODA to ODA in the visit in 1979, which was the starting point.

After that, Prime Minister Takeshita Noboru in 1988 when the total amount of ODA increased drastically, declared ‘Primary objective is appeal to Chinese people's mind.’

However, since the people do not know ODA from Japan, it cannot be transmitted to the heart.

There is no evidence that the Chinese government increased friendship to Japan for ODA.

On the other hand, even in the 1990s when the ODA became even bigger, publicity and education of the Communist Party regime that crippled hostility to Japan under the name of ‘anti-Japan’ was intense.

From the Japanese side, the success or failure of ODA to China will be obvious if it compares with the government's ‘ODA Charter.’

The main idea is that Japan's ODA matches ‘avoidance of military applications’, especially with respect to ‘military expenditure, weapons of mass destruction, missile trends’ of the partner country, ‘promotion of democratization’, ‘guarantee of human rights and freedoms’, was stipulated.

But ODA to China violated all of this.

This draft continues.

There is no evidence that the Chinese government increased friendship to Japan for ODA

The following is from the 3rd page of Sankei Shimbun this morning.

Emphasis in sentences other than headlines is me

ODA to China is the largest failure

Visiting correspondent in Washington Correspondent Yoshihisa Komori

The Japanese government declared the end of Official Development Assistance (ODA) to China.

What did the introduction of public expenditure totaling 3.6 trillion yen in nearly 40 years brought to Japan?

When summarizing its trajectory, the whole picture which can be said to be the largest failure in Japan's post-war foreign policy appears.

The fault between the intention of the Japanese side and the result is too huge.

Not reported at all

In the autumn of 1998 I was shocked when I got to Beijing as the first Director General of China in Sankei Shimbun and learned the actual situation of ODA grant, which was the biggest pillar of Japan's China policy towards China.

This is because the Japanese taxpayers raised public and private prayers for friendship between Japan and China with huge amounts of blood taxes were not acknowledged to Chinese citizens.

As for the financial support from Japan, it does not introduce the state-operated media of the Chinese side absolutely.

That's why the public does not know at all.

Beijing International Airport Building, Beijing Subway Line 2, Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Center, etc. were all built with huge ODA from Japan, but there was no Japanese name in inauguration ceremony and inscription.

ODA was not the only economic assistance from Japan to China.

Public funds were provided to China from the former Ministry of Finance and the Export-Import Bank under the name ‘Resource Loan’.

The total amount was 3.3 trillion yen by 1999, exceeding the total amount of ODA at that time.

So, the total amount of aid to China was 7 trillion yen.

Prime Minister Ohira Masayoshi emphasized ‘Japan-China friendship’ about the purpose of ODA to ODA in the visit in 1979, which was the starting point.

After that, Prime Minister Takeshita Noboru in 1988 when the total amount of ODA increased drastically, declared ‘Primary objective is appeal to Chinese people's mind.’

However, since the people do not know ODA from Japan, it cannot be transmitted to the heart.

There is no evidence that the Chinese government increased friendship to Japan for ODA.

On the other hand, even in the 1990s when the ODA became even bigger, publicity and education of the Communist Party regime that crippled hostility to Japan under the name of ‘anti-Japan’ was intense.

From the Japanese side, the success or failure of ODA to China will be obvious if it compares with the government's ‘ODA Charter.’

The main idea is that Japan's ODA matches ‘avoidance of military applications’, especially with respect to ‘military expenditure, weapons of mass destruction, missile trends’ of the partner country, ‘promotion of democratization’, ‘guarantee of human rights and freedoms’, was stipulated.

But ODA to China violated all of this.

This draft continues.

since the people do not know ODA from Japan, it cannot be transmitted to the heart

The following is from the 3rd page of Sankei Shimbun this morning.

Emphasis in sentences other than headlines is me

ODA to China is the largest failure

Visiting correspondent in Washington Correspondent Yoshihisa Komori

The Japanese government declared the end of Official Development Assistance (ODA) to China.

What did the introduction of public expenditure totaling 3.6 trillion yen in nearly 40 years brought to Japan?

When summarizing its trajectory, the whole picture which can be said to be the largest failure in Japan's post-war foreign policy appears.

The fault between the intention of the Japanese side and the result is too huge.

Not reported at all

In the autumn of 1998 I was shocked when I got to Beijing as the first Director General of China in Sankei Shimbun and learned the actual situation of ODA grant, which was the biggest pillar of Japan's China policy towards China.

This is because the Japanese taxpayers raised public and private prayers for friendship between Japan and China with huge amounts of blood taxes were not acknowledged to Chinese citizens.

As for the financial support from Japan, it does not introduce the state-operated media of the Chinese side absolutely.

That's why the public does not know at all.

Beijing International Airport Building, Beijing Subway Line 2, Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Center, etc. were all built with huge ODA from Japan, but there was no Japanese name in inauguration ceremony and inscription.

ODA was not the only economic assistance from Japan to China.

Public funds were provided to China from the former Ministry of Finance and the Export-Import Bank under the name ‘Resource Loan’.

The total amount was 3.3 trillion yen by 1999, exceeding the total amount of ODA at that time.

So, the total amount of aid to China was 7 trillion yen.

Prime Minister Ohira Masayoshi emphasized ‘Japan-China friendship’ about the purpose of ODA to ODA in the visit in 1979, which was the starting point.

After that, Prime Minister Takeshita Noboru in 1988 when the total amount of ODA increased drastically, declared ‘Primary objective is appeal to Chinese people's mind.’

However, since the people do not know ODA from Japan, it cannot be transmitted to the heart.

There is no evidence that the Chinese government increased friendship to Japan for ODA.

On the other hand, even in the 1990s when the ODA became even bigger, publicity and education of the Communist Party regime that crippled hostility to Japan under the name of ‘anti-Japan’ was intense.

From the Japanese side, the success or failure of ODA to China will be obvious if it compares with the government's ‘ODA Charter.’

The main idea is that Japan's ODA matches ‘avoidance of military applications’, especially with respect to ‘military expenditure, weapons of mass destruction, missile trends’ of the partner country, ‘promotion of democratization’, ‘guarantee of human rights and freedoms’, was stipulated.

But ODA to China violated all of this.

This draft continues.

So, the total amount of aid to China was 7 trillion yen.

The following is from the 3rd page of Sankei Shimbun this morning.

Emphasis in sentences other than headlines is me

ODA to China is the largest failure

Visiting correspondent in Washington Correspondent Yoshihisa Komori

The Japanese government declared the end of Official Development Assistance (ODA) to China.

What did the introduction of public expenditure totaling 3.6 trillion yen in nearly 40 years brought to Japan?

When summarizing its trajectory, the whole picture which can be said to be the largest failure in Japan's post-war foreign policy appears.

The fault between the intention of the Japanese side and the result is too huge.

Not reported at all

In the autumn of 1998 I was shocked when I got to Beijing as the first Director General of China in Sankei Shimbun and learned the actual situation of ODA grant, which was the biggest pillar of Japan's China policy towards China.

This is because the Japanese taxpayers raised public and private prayers for friendship between Japan and China with huge amounts of blood taxes were not acknowledged to Chinese citizens.

As for the financial support from Japan, it does not introduce the state-operated media of the Chinese side absolutely.

That's why the public does not know at all.

Beijing International Airport Building, Beijing Subway Line 2, Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Center, etc. were all built with huge ODA from Japan, but there was no Japanese name in inauguration ceremony and inscription.

ODA was not the only economic assistance from Japan to China.

Public funds were provided to China from the former Ministry of Finance and the Export-Import Bank under the name ‘Resource Loan’.

The total amount was 3.3 trillion yen by 1999, exceeding the total amount of ODA at that time.

So, the total amount of aid to China was 7 trillion yen.

Prime Minister Ohira Masayoshi emphasized ‘Japan-China friendship’ about the purpose of ODA to ODA in the visit in 1979, which was the starting point.

After that, Prime Minister Takeshita Noboru in 1988 when the total amount of ODA increased drastically, declared ‘Primary objective is appeal to Chinese people's mind.’

However, since the people do not know ODA from Japan, it cannot be transmitted to the heart.

There is no evidence that the Chinese government increased friendship to Japan for ODA.

On the other hand, even in the 1990s when the ODA became even bigger, publicity and education of the Communist Party regime that crippled hostility to Japan under the name of ‘anti-Japan’ was intense.

From the Japanese side, the success or failure of ODA to China will be obvious if it compares with the government's ‘ODA Charter.’

The main idea is that Japan's ODA matches ‘avoidance of military applications’, especially with respect to ‘military expenditure, weapons of mass destruction, missile trends’ of the partner country, ‘promotion of democratization’, ‘guarantee of human rights and freedoms’, was stipulated.

But ODA to China violated all of this.

This draft continues.

but there was no Japanese name in inauguration ceremony and inscription.

The following is from the 3rd page of Sankei Shimbun this morning.

Emphasis in sentences other than headlines is me

ODA to China is the largest failure

Visiting correspondent in Washington Correspondent Yoshihisa Komori

The Japanese government declared the end of Official Development Assistance (ODA) to China.

What did the introduction of public expenditure totaling 3.6 trillion yen in nearly 40 years brought to Japan?

When summarizing its trajectory, the whole picture which can be said to be the largest failure in Japan's post-war foreign policy appears.

The fault between the intention of the Japanese side and the result is too huge.

Not reported at all

In the autumn of 1998 I was shocked when I got to Beijing as the first Director General of China in Sankei Shimbun and learned the actual situation of ODA grant, which was the biggest pillar of Japan's China policy towards China.

This is because the Japanese taxpayers raised public and private prayers for friendship between Japan and China with huge amounts of blood taxes were not acknowledged to Chinese citizens.

As for the financial support from Japan, it does not introduce the state-operated media of the Chinese side absolutely.

That's why the public does not know at all.

Beijing International Airport Building, Beijing Subway Line 2, Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Center, etc. were all built with huge ODA from Japan, but there was no Japanese name in inauguration ceremony and inscription.

ODA was not the only economic assistance from Japan to China. Public funds were provided to China from the former Ministry of Finance and the Export-Import Bank under the name ‘Resource Loan’.

The total amount was 3.3 trillion yen by 1999, exceeding the total amount of ODA at that time.

So, the total amount of aid to China was 7 trillion yen.

Prime Minister Ohira Masayoshi emphasized ‘Japan-China friendship’ about the purpose of ODA to ODA in the visit in 1979, which was the starting point.

After that, Prime Minister Takeshita Noboru in 1988 when the total amount of ODA increased drastically, declared ‘Primary objective is appeal to Chinese people's mind.’

However, since the people do not know ODA from Japan, it cannot be transmitted to the heart.

There is no evidence that the Chinese government increased friendship to Japan for ODA.

On the other hand, even in the 1990s when the ODA became even bigger, publicity and education of the Communist Party regime that crippled hostility to Japan under the name of ‘anti-Japan’ was intense.

From the Japanese side, the success or failure of ODA to China will be obvious if it compares with the government's ‘ODA Charter.’

The main idea is that Japan's ODA matches ‘avoidance of military applications’, especially with respect to ‘military expenditure, weapons of mass destruction, missile trends’ of the partner country, ‘promotion of democratization’, ‘guarantee of human rights and freedoms’, was stipulated.

But ODA to China violated all of this.

This draft continues.

huge amounts of blood taxes were not acknowledged to Chinese citizens.

The following is from the 3rd page of Sankei Shimbun this morning.

Emphasis in sentences other than headlines is me

ODA to China is the largest failure

Visiting correspondent in Washington Correspondent Yoshihisa Komori

The Japanese government declared the end of Official Development Assistance (ODA) to China.

What did the introduction of public expenditure totaling 3.6 trillion yen in nearly 40 years brought to Japan?

When summarizing its trajectory, the whole picture which can be said to be the largest failure in Japan's post-war foreign policy appears.

The fault between the intention of the Japanese side and the result is too huge.

Not reported at all

In the autumn of 1998 I was shocked when I got to Beijing as the first Director General of China in Sankei Shimbun and learned the actual situation of ODA grant, which was the biggest pillar of Japan's China policy towards China.

This is because the Japanese taxpayers raised public and private prayers for friendship between Japan and China with huge amounts of blood taxes were not acknowledged to Chinese citizens.

As for the financial support from Japan, it does not introduce the state-operated media of the Chinese side absolutely.

That's why the public does not know at all.

Beijing International Airport Building, Beijing Subway Line 2, Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Center, etc. were all built with huge ODA from Japan, but there was no Japanese name in inauguration ceremony and inscription.

ODA was not the only economic assistance from Japan to China. Public funds were provided to China from the former Ministry of Finance and the Export-Import Bank under the name ‘Resource Loan’.

The total amount was 3.3 trillion yen by 1999, exceeding the total amount of ODA at that time.

So, the total amount of aid to China was 7 trillion yen.

Prime Minister Ohira Masayoshi emphasized ‘Japan-China friendship’ about the purpose of ODA to ODA in the visit in 1979, which was the starting point.

After that, Prime Minister Takeshita Noboru in 1988 when the total amount of ODA increased drastically, declared ‘Primary objective is appeal to Chinese people's mind.’

However, since the people do not know ODA from Japan, it cannot be transmitted to the heart.

There is no evidence that the Chinese government increased friendship to Japan for ODA.

On the other hand, even in the 1990s when the ODA became even bigger, publicity and education of the Communist Party regime that crippled hostility to Japan under the name of ‘anti-Japan’ was intense.

From the Japanese side, the success or failure of ODA to China will be obvious if it compares with the government's ‘ODA Charter.’

The main idea is that Japan's ODA matches ‘avoidance of military applications’, especially with respect to ‘military expenditure, weapons of mass destruction, missile trends’ of the partner country, ‘promotion of democratization’, ‘guarantee of human rights and freedoms’, was stipulated.

But ODA to China violated all of this.

This draft continues.

The fault between the intention of the Japanese side and the result is too huge

The following is from the 3rd page of Sankei Shimbun this morning.

Emphasis in sentences other than headlines is me

ODA to China is the largest failure

Visiting correspondent in Washington Correspondent Yoshihisa Komori

The Japanese government declared the end of Official Development Assistance (ODA) to China.

What did the introduction of public expenditure totaling 3.6 trillion yen in nearly 40 years brought to Japan?

When summarizing its trajectory, the whole picture which can be said to be the largest failure in Japan's post-war foreign policy appears.

The fault between the intention of the Japanese side and the result is too huge.

Not reported at all

In the autumn of 1998 I was shocked when I got to Beijing as the first Director General of China in Sankei Shimbun and learned the actual situation of ODA grant, which was the biggest pillar of Japan's China policy towards China.

This is because the Japanese taxpayers raised public and private prayers for friendship between Japan and China with huge amounts of blood taxes were not acknowledged to Chinese citizens.

 

As for the financial support from Japan, it does not introduce the state-operated media of the Chinese side absolutely.

That's why the public does not know at all.

Beijing International Airport Building, Beijing Subway Line 2, Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Center, etc. were all built with huge ODA from Japan, but there was no Japanese name in inauguration ceremony and inscription.

ODA was not the only economic assistance from Japan to China. Public funds were provided to China from the former Ministry of Finance and the Export-Import Bank under the name ‘Resource Loan’.

The total amount was 3.3 trillion yen by 1999, exceeding the total amount of ODA at that time.

So, the total amount of aid to China was 7 trillion yen.

Prime Minister Ohira Masayoshi emphasized ‘Japan-China friendship’ about the purpose of ODA to ODA in the visit in 1979, which was the starting point.

After that, Prime Minister Takeshita Noboru in 1988 when the total amount of ODA increased drastically, declared ‘Primary objective is appeal to Chinese people's mind.’

However, since the people do not know ODA from Japan, it cannot be transmitted to the heart.

There is no evidence that the Chinese government increased friendship to Japan for ODA.

On the other hand, even in the 1990s when the ODA became even bigger, publicity and education of the Communist Party regime that crippled hostility to Japan under the name of ‘anti-Japan’ was intense.

From the Japanese side, the success or failure of ODA to China will be obvious if it compares with the government's ‘ODA Charter.’

The main idea is that Japan's ODA matches ‘avoidance of military applications’, especially with respect to ‘military expenditure, weapons of mass destruction, missile trends’ of the partner country, ‘promotion of democratization’, ‘guarantee of human rights and freedoms’, was stipulated.

 

But ODA to China violated all of this.

This draft continues.

日本の対中ＯＤＡはそんな覇権志向強国の出現に奇与したのである。

以下は今朝の産経新聞３ページからである。

見出し以外の文中強調は私

対中ＯＤＡは最大の失敗

ワシントン駐在客員特派員　　古森義久

日本政府が中国への政府開発援助（ＯＤＡ）の終わりを宣言した。

40年近く合計3兆6千億円の公費の投入は日本になにをもたらしたのか。

その軌跡を総括すると、戦後の日本の対外政策でも最大級の失敗といえる全体像が浮かびあがる。

日本側の意図とその結果との断層があまりに巨大なのだ。

一切報道されず

1998年秋に産経新聞初代中国総局長として北京に赴任して、日本の対中政策の最大支柱だったＯＤＡ供与の中国側の実態を知ったときはショックだった。

日本側が官民あげて日中友好への祈りをこめて供した巨額の血税はなんの認知もされていなかったからだ。

日本からの経済援助は中国側の官営メディアは一切、伝えない。

だから一般国民もまったく知らない。

北京国際空港ビル、北京地下鉄２号線、南京母子保健センターなど、みな日本からの巨額のＯＤＡで建設されたのに開設式の祝辞や碑文にも日本の名はなかった。

日本から中国への経済援助は実はＯＤＡだけではなかった。旧大蔵省と輸出入銀行から「資源ローン」などという名称で公的資金が中国に供されていた。

その総額は99年までに3兆3千億円と、その時点でＯＤＡ総額を超えていた。だから中国への援助総額は実際には7兆円だったのだ。

出発点となった79年の訪中で、大平正芳首相は対中ＯＤＡの目的について「日中友好」を強調した。

その後、ＯＤＡ総額が大幅に増えた88年当時の竹下登首相は「中国人民の心へのアピールが主目的」と明言した。

だが人民は日本からのＯＤＡを知らないから心に伝わるはずがない。中国政府がＯＤＡのために対日友好を増した証拠は皆無である。

逆にＯＤＡがさらに巨額になった90年代をみても、「抗日」の名の下に日本への敵意を自国民にあおる共産党政権の宣伝や教育は激しかった。

日本側からみて、対中ＯＤＡの成否は政府の「ＯＤＡ大綱」に照らし合わせれば明白となる。

大綱は日本のＯＤＡが「軍事用途への回避」とくに相手国の「軍事支出、大量破壊兵器、ミサイルの動向に注意」、そして「民主化の促進」「人権や自由の保障」に合致することを規定していた。

だが対中ＯＤＡはこのすべてに違反した。

覇権強国の誕生　

軍事面では単に日本からの資金が中国政府に軍拡の余裕を与えただけでなく、日本の援助でできた空港や鉄道、高速道路の軍事的価値の高さを中国軍幹部は堂々と論文で発表していた。

チベットヘの光ファイバー建設は軍隊が直接利用していた。

同じく日本のＯＤＡで完備した福建省の鉄道網は台湾への攻撃態勢をとる部隊の頻繁な移動に使われた。

かつて台湾の李登輝総統から直接に「日本の対中援助では福建省の鉄道建設だけは止めてほしかった」と訴えられたことは忘れ難い。　

日本のＯＤＡが中国の民主化や人権尊重に配慮しなかったことも明白だった。

ＯＤＡ大綱では民主主義や人権を弾圧する国には援助を与えないはずだったのだ。

中国の非民主的体質はいまのウイグル人弾圧をみるだけでも実証される。

だから対中ＯＤＡとは、日本政府が自ら決めた対外援助政策を無視した超法規のような措置だった。

日本政府は中国を特別に優遇した。

中国の国家開発５ヵ年計画に合わせ、５年一括で、中国側が求めるブロジェクトヘの巨大な金を与えてきた。

中国には自国を強く豊かにするための有益な資金だった。

その中国がいまや国際規範に背を向けて覇権を広げ、日本の領土をも脅かす異形の強大国家となったのだ。

日本の対中ＯＤＡはそんな覇権志向強国の出現に奇与したのである。

その中国がいまや国際規範に背を向けて覇権を広げ、日本の領土をも脅かす異形の強大国家となったのだ。

以下は今朝の産経新聞３ページからである。

見出し以外の文中強調は私

対中ＯＤＡは最大の失敗

ワシントン駐在客員特派員　　古森義久

日本政府が中国への政府開発援助（ＯＤＡ）の終わりを宣言した。

40年近く合計3兆6千億円の公費の投入は日本になにをもたらしたのか。

その軌跡を総括すると、戦後の日本の対外政策でも最大級の失敗といえる全体像が浮かびあがる。

日本側の意図とその結果との断層があまりに巨大なのだ。

一切報道されず

1998年秋に産経新聞初代中国総局長として北京に赴任して、日本の対中政策の最大支柱だったＯＤＡ供与の中国側の実態を知ったときはショックだった。

日本側が官民あげて日中友好への祈りをこめて供した巨額の血税はなんの認知もされていなかったからだ。

日本からの経済援助は中国側の官営メディアは一切、伝えない。

だから一般国民もまったく知らない。

北京国際空港ビル、北京地下鉄２号線、南京母子保健センターなど、みな日本からの巨額のＯＤＡで建設されたのに開設式の祝辞や碑文にも日本の名はなかった。

日本から中国への経済援助は実はＯＤＡだけではなかった。旧大蔵省と輸出入銀行から「資源ローン」などという名称で公的資金が中国に供されていた。

その総額は99年までに3兆3千億円と、その時点でＯＤＡ総額を超えていた。だから中国への援助総額は実際には7兆円だったのだ。

出発点となった79年の訪中で、大平正芳首相は対中ＯＤＡの目的について「日中友好」を強調した。

その後、ＯＤＡ総額が大幅に増えた88年当時の竹下登首相は「中国人民の心へのアピールが主目的」と明言した。

だが人民は日本からのＯＤＡを知らないから心に伝わるはずがない。中国政府がＯＤＡのために対日友好を増した証拠は皆無である。

逆にＯＤＡがさらに巨額になった90年代をみても、「抗日」の名の下に日本への敵意を自国民にあおる共産党政権の宣伝や教育は激しかった。

日本側からみて、対中ＯＤＡの成否は政府の「ＯＤＡ大綱」に照らし合わせれば明白となる。

大綱は日本のＯＤＡが「軍事用途への回避」とくに相手国の「軍事支出、大量破壊兵器、ミサイルの動向に注意」、そして「民主化の促進」「人権や自由の保障」に合致することを規定していた。

だが対中ＯＤＡはこのすべてに違反した。

覇権強国の誕生　

軍事面では単に日本からの資金が中国政府に軍拡の余裕を与えただけでなく、日本の援助でできた空港や鉄道、高速道路の軍事的価値の高さを中国軍幹部は堂々と論文で発表していた。

チベットヘの光ファイバー建設は軍隊が直接利用していた。

同じく日本のＯＤＡで完備した福建省の鉄道網は台湾への攻撃態勢をとる部隊の頻繁な移動に使われた。

かつて台湾の李登輝総統から直接に「日本の対中援助では福建省の鉄道建設だけは止めてほしかった」と訴えられたことは忘れ難い。　

日本のＯＤＡが中国の民主化や人権尊重に配慮しなかったことも明白だった。

ＯＤＡ大綱では民主主義や人権を弾圧する国には援助を与えないはずだったのだ。

中国の非民主的体質はいまのウイグル人弾圧をみるだけでも実証される。

だから対中ＯＤＡとは、日本政府が自ら決めた対外援助政策を無視した超法規のような措置だった。

日本政府は中国を特別に優遇した。

中国の国家開発５ヵ年計画に合わせ、５年一括で、中国側が求めるブロジェクトヘの巨大な金を与えてきた。

中国には自国を強く豊かにするための有益な資金だった。

その中国がいまや国際規範に背を向けて覇権を広げ、日本の領土をも脅かす異形の強大国家となったのだ。

日本の対中ＯＤＡはそんな覇権志向強国の出現に奇与したのである。

日本政府は中国を特別に優遇した。中国の国家開発５ヵ年計画に合わせ、５年一括で、中国側が求めるブロジェクトヘの巨大な金を与えてきた。

以下は今朝の産経新聞３ページからである。

見出し以外の文中強調は私

対中ＯＤＡは最大の失敗

ワシントン駐在客員特派員　　古森義久

日本政府が中国への政府開発援助（ＯＤＡ）の終わりを宣言した。

40年近く合計3兆6千億円の公費の投入は日本になにをもたらしたのか。

その軌跡を総括すると、戦後の日本の対外政策でも最大級の失敗といえる全体像が浮かびあがる。

日本側の意図とその結果との断層があまりに巨大なのだ。

一切報道されず

1998年秋に産経新聞初代中国総局長として北京に赴任して、日本の対中政策の最大支柱だったＯＤＡ供与の中国側の実態を知ったときはショックだった。

日本側が官民あげて日中友好への祈りをこめて供した巨額の血税はなんの認知もされていなかったからだ。

日本からの経済援助は中国側の官営メディアは一切、伝えない。

だから一般国民もまったく知らない。

北京国際空港ビル、北京地下鉄２号線、南京母子保健センターなど、みな日本からの巨額のＯＤＡで建設されたのに開設式の祝辞や碑文にも日本の名はなかった。

日本から中国への経済援助は実はＯＤＡだけではなかった。旧大蔵省と輸出入銀行から「資源ローン」などという名称で公的資金が中国に供されていた。

その総額は99年までに3兆3千億円と、その時点でＯＤＡ総額を超えていた。だから中国への援助総額は実際には7兆円だったのだ。

出発点となった79年の訪中で、大平正芳首相は対中ＯＤＡの目的について「日中友好」を強調した。

その後、ＯＤＡ総額が大幅に増えた88年当時の竹下登首相は「中国人民の心へのアピールが主目的」と明言した。

だが人民は日本からのＯＤＡを知らないから心に伝わるはずがない。中国政府がＯＤＡのために対日友好を増した証拠は皆無である。

逆にＯＤＡがさらに巨額になった90年代をみても、「抗日」の名の下に日本への敵意を自国民にあおる共産党政権の宣伝や教育は激しかった。

日本側からみて、対中ＯＤＡの成否は政府の「ＯＤＡ大綱」に照らし合わせれば明白となる。

大綱は日本のＯＤＡが「軍事用途への回避」とくに相手国の「軍事支出、大量破壊兵器、ミサイルの動向に注意」、そして「民主化の促進」「人権や自由の保障」に合致することを規定していた。

だが対中ＯＤＡはこのすべてに違反した。

覇権強国の誕生　

軍事面では単に日本からの資金が中国政府に軍拡の余裕を与えただけでなく、日本の援助でできた空港や鉄道、高速道路の軍事的価値の高さを中国軍幹部は堂々と論文で発表していた。

チベットヘの光ファイバー建設は軍隊が直接利用していた。

同じく日本のＯＤＡで完備した福建省の鉄道網は台湾への攻撃態勢をとる部隊の頻繁な移動に使われた。

かつて台湾の李登輝総統から直接に「日本の対中援助では福建省の鉄道建設だけは止めてほしかった」と訴えられたことは忘れ難い。　

日本のＯＤＡが中国の民主化や人権尊重に配慮しなかったことも明白だった。

ＯＤＡ大綱では民主主義や人権を弾圧する国には援助を与えないはずだったのだ。

中国の非民主的体質はいまのウイグル人弾圧をみるだけでも実証される。

だから対中ＯＤＡとは、日本政府が自ら決めた対外援助政策を無視した超法規のような措置だった。

日本政府は中国を特別に優遇した。

中国の国家開発５ヵ年計画に合わせ、５年一括で、中国側が求めるブロジェクトヘの巨大な金を与えてきた。

中国には自国を強く豊かにするための有益な資金だった。

その中国がいまや国際規範に背を向けて覇権を広げ、日本の領土をも脅かす異形の強大国家となったのだ。

日本の対中ＯＤＡはそんな覇権志向強国の出現に奇与したのである。

中国の非民主的体質はいまのウイグル人弾圧をみるだけでも実証される。

以下は今朝の産経新聞３ページからである。

見出し以外の文中強調は私

対中ＯＤＡは最大の失敗

ワシントン駐在客員特派員　　古森義久

日本政府が中国への政府開発援助（ＯＤＡ）の終わりを宣言した。

40年近く合計3兆6千億円の公費の投入は日本になにをもたらしたのか。

その軌跡を総括すると、戦後の日本の対外政策でも最大級の失敗といえる全体像が浮かびあがる。

日本側の意図とその結果との断層があまりに巨大なのだ。

一切報道されず

1998年秋に産経新聞初代中国総局長として北京に赴任して、日本の対中政策の最大支柱だったＯＤＡ供与の中国側の実態を知ったときはショックだった。

日本側が官民あげて日中友好への祈りをこめて供した巨額の血税はなんの認知もされていなかったからだ。

日本からの経済援助は中国側の官営メディアは一切、伝えない。

だから一般国民もまったく知らない。

北京国際空港ビル、北京地下鉄２号線、南京母子保健センターなど、みな日本からの巨額のＯＤＡで建設されたのに開設式の祝辞や碑文にも日本の名はなかった。

日本から中国への経済援助は実はＯＤＡだけではなかった。旧大蔵省と輸出入銀行から「資源ローン」などという名称で公的資金が中国に供されていた。

その総額は99年までに3兆3千億円と、その時点でＯＤＡ総額を超えていた。だから中国への援助総額は実際には7兆円だったのだ。

出発点となった79年の訪中で、大平正芳首相は対中ＯＤＡの目的について「日中友好」を強調した。

その後、ＯＤＡ総額が大幅に増えた88年当時の竹下登首相は「中国人民の心へのアピールが主目的」と明言した。

だが人民は日本からのＯＤＡを知らないから心に伝わるはずがない。中国政府がＯＤＡのために対日友好を増した証拠は皆無である。

逆にＯＤＡがさらに巨額になった90年代をみても、「抗日」の名の下に日本への敵意を自国民にあおる共産党政権の宣伝や教育は激しかった。

日本側からみて、対中ＯＤＡの成否は政府の「ＯＤＡ大綱」に照らし合わせれば明白となる。

大綱は日本のＯＤＡが「軍事用途への回避」とくに相手国の「軍事支出、大量破壊兵器、ミサイルの動向に注意」、そして「民主化の促進」「人権や自由の保障」に合致することを規定していた。

だが対中ＯＤＡはこのすべてに違反した。

覇権強国の誕生　

軍事面では単に日本からの資金が中国政府に軍拡の余裕を与えただけでなく、日本の援助でできた空港や鉄道、高速道路の軍事的価値の高さを中国軍幹部は堂々と論文で発表していた。

チベットヘの光ファイバー建設は軍隊が直接利用していた。

同じく日本のＯＤＡで完備した福建省の鉄道網は台湾への攻撃態勢をとる部隊の頻繁な移動に使われた。

かつて台湾の李登輝総統から直接に「日本の対中援助では福建省の鉄道建設だけは止めてほしかった」と訴えられたことは忘れ難い。　

日本のＯＤＡが中国の民主化や人権尊重に配慮しなかったことも明白だった。

ＯＤＡ大綱では民主主義や人権を弾圧する国には援助を与えないはずだったのだ。

中国の非民主的体質はいまのウイグル人弾圧をみるだけでも実証される。

だから対中ＯＤＡとは、日本政府が自ら決めた対外援助政策を無視した超法規のような措置だった。

日本政府は中国を特別に優遇した。

中国の国家開発５ヵ年計画に合わせ、５年一括で、中国側が求めるブロジェクトヘの巨大な金を与えてきた。

中国には自国を強く豊かにするための有益な資金だった。

その中国がいまや国際規範に背を向けて覇権を広げ、日本の領土をも脅かす異形の強大国家となったのだ。

日本の対中ＯＤＡはそんな覇権志向強国の出現に奇与したのである。