Let's proceed with the complaint indifferently.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Let's proceed with the complaint indifferently.

In the face of after the war liability issues in the school days, Mr. Onuma Yasuaki (died in October this year), former Asian Women's Fund Director who has been face to Korea, is looking back at October 2006 roundtable discussion.

"What I really dislike is not changed so much in Korean society, it is a constitution that it only needs to say anti-Japanese. (Omission) Was it such a deep root?" "I knew about Korea as to whether it was no good like this..."

Also, there are books such as ‘Korea's Challenge’, originally a pro-Korea author Toyota Aritsune became critical of South Korea eventually, and ‘How dare you Korean’ published for four years ago so forsook.

"Without considering them as the same Earthling, thinking that it is an alien of somewhere distant planet does not mistake dealing"

So much different from Japanese people such as their way of thinking, behavior style, customs, common sense, moral perspective, values, aesthetic sense, world perception etc. are great.

For Korea, we should take steps lightly appealing to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), do not seek mutual understanding and confidence building in ineptly.

In that case, meaning will be comprehensible to Korean too.

(Editorial Committee and Editorial Board of the Political Division)

In the face of after the war liability issues in the school days, Mr. Onuma Yasuaki (died in October this year), former Asian Women's Fund Director who has been face to Korea, is looking back at October 2006 roundtable discussion.

"What I really dislike is not changed so much in Korean society, it is a constitution that it only needs to say anti-Japanese. (Omission) Was it such a deep root?" "I knew about Korea as to whether it was no good like this..."

Also, there are books such as ‘Korea's Challenge’, originally a pro-Korea author Toyota Aritsune became critical of South Korea eventually, and ‘How dare you Korean’ published for four years ago so forsook.

"Without considering them as the same Earthling, thinking that it is an alien of somewhere distant planet does not mistake dealing"

So much different from Japanese people such as their way of thinking, behavior style, customs, common sense, moral perspective, values, aesthetic sense, world perception etc. are great.

For Korea, we should take steps lightly appealing to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), do not seek mutual understanding and confidence building in ineptly.

In that case, meaning will be comprehensible to Korean too.

(Editorial Committee and Editorial Board of the Political Division)

In that case, it will be comprehensible to Korean too.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Just to do the procedure calmly

In the face of after the war liability issues in the school days, Mr. Onuma Yasuaki (died in October this year), former Asian Women's Fund Director who has been face to Korea, is looking back at October 2006 roundtable discussion.

"What I really dislike is not changed so much in Korean society, it is a constitution that it only needs to say anti-Japanese. (Omission) Was it such a deep root?" "I knew about Korea as to whether it was no good like this..."

Also, there are books such as ‘Korea's Challenge’, originally a pro-Korea author Toyota Aritsune became critical of South Korea eventually, and ‘How dare you Korean’ published for four years ago so forsook.

"Without considering them as the same Earthling, thinking that it is an alien of somewhere distant planet does not mistake dealing"

So much different from Japanese people such as their way of thinking, behavior style, customs, common sense, moral perspective, values, aesthetic sense, world perception etc. are great.

For Korea, we should take steps lightly appealing to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), do not seek mutual understanding and confidence building in ineptly.

In that case, it will be comprehensible to Korean too.

(Editorial Committee and Editorial Board of the Political Division)

Without considering them as the same Earthling, thinking that it is an alien of somewhere distant

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Procedures in a bland way

In the face of after the war liability issues in the school days, Mr. Onuma Yasuaki (died in October this year), former Asian Women's Fund Director who has been face to Korea, is looking back at October 2006 roundtable discussion.

"What I really dislike is not changed so much in Korean society, it is a constitution that it only needs to say anti-Japanese. (Omission) Was it such a deep root?" "I knew about Korea as to whether it was no good like this..."

Also, there are books such as ‘Korea's Challenge’, originally a pro-Korea author Toyota Aritsune became critical of South Korea eventually, and ‘How dare you Korean’ published for four years ago so forsook.

"Without considering them as the same Earthling, thinking that it is an alien of somewhere distant planet does not mistake dealing"

So much different from Japanese people such as their way of thinking, behavior style, customs, common sense, moral perspective, values, aesthetic sense, world perception etc. are great.

For Korea, we should take steps lightly appealing to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), do not seek mutual understanding and confidence building in ineptly.

Because the Korean, too, will understand a meaning if it does it.

(Editorial Committee and Editorial Board of the Political Division)

"I knew about Korea as to whether it was no good like this..."

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Procedures in a bland way

In the face of after the war liability issues in the school days, Mr. Onuma Yasuaki (died in October this year), former Asian Women's Fund Director who has been face to Korea, is looking back at October 2006 roundtable discussion.

"What I really dislike is not changed so much in Korean society, it is a constitution that it only needs to say anti-Japanese. (Omission) Was it such a deep root?" "I knew about Korea as to whether it was no good like this..."

Also, there are books such as ‘Korea's Challenge’, originally a pro-Korea author Toyota Aritsune became critical of South Korea eventually, and ‘How dare you Korean’ published for four years ago so forsook.

"Without considering them as the same Earthling, thinking that it is an alien of somewhere distant planet does not mistake dealing"

So much different from Japanese people such as their way of thinking, behavior style, customs, common sense, moral perspective, values, aesthetic sense, world perception etc. are great.

For Korea, we should take steps lightly appealing to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), do not seek mutual understanding and confidence building in ineptly.

Because the Korean, too, will understand a meaning if it does it.

(Editorial Committee and Editorial Board of the Political Division)

it is a constitution that it only needs to say anti-Japanese. (Omission) Was it such a deep root?

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Procedures in a bland way

In the face of after the war liability issues in the school days, Mr. Onuma Yasuaki (died in October this year), former Asian Women's Fund Director who has been face to Korea, is looking back at October 2006 roundtable discussion.

"What I really dislike is not changed so much in Korean society, it is a constitution that it only needs to say anti-Japanese. (Omission) Was it such a deep root?" "I knew about Korea as to whether it was good like this ... "

Also, there are books such as ‘Korea's Challenge’, originally a pro-Korea author Toyota Aritsune became critical of South Korea eventually, and ‘How dare you Korean’ published for four years ago so forsook.

"Without considering them as the same Earthling, thinking that it is an alien of somewhere distant planet does not mistake dealing"

So much different from Japanese people such as their way of thinking, behavior style, customs, common sense, moral perspective, values, aesthetic sense, world perception etc. are great.

For Korea, we should take steps lightly appealing to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), do not seek mutual understanding and confidence building in ineptly.

Because the Korean, too, will understand a meaning if it does it.

(Editorial Committee and Editorial Board of the Political Division)

What I really dislike is not changed so much in Korean society, it is a constitution that

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Procedures in a bland way

In the face of after the war liability issues in the school days, Mr. Onuma Yasuaki (died in October this year), former Asian Women's Fund Director who has been face to Korea, is looking back at October 2006 roundtable discussion.

"What I really dislike is not changed so much in Korean society, it is a constitution that it only needs to say anti-Japanese. (Omission) Was it such a deep root?" "I knew about Korea as to whether it was no good like this..."

Also, there are books such as ‘Korea's Challenge’, originally a pro-Korea author Toyota Aritsune became critical of South Korea eventually, and ‘How dare you Korean’ published for four years ago so forsook.

"Without considering them as the same Earthling, thinking that it is an alien of somewhere distant planet does not mistake dealing"

So much different from Japanese people such as their way of thinking, behavior style, customs, common sense, moral perspective, values, aesthetic sense, world perception etc. are great.

For Korea, we should take steps lightly appealing to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), do not seek mutual understanding and confidence building in ineptly.

Because the Korean, too, will understand a meaning if it does it.

(Editorial Committee and Editorial Board of the Political Division)

the Korean government has made no efforts to gain public understanding until now

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It will not make efforts to understand the public

I heard about such an episode from a diplomat who used to be in Korea.

"Even a relatively calm opponent in Korea is discussing Takeshima (Shimane Prefecture Oki no Miyamachi) problem or comfort women's problem, it is definitely not theory at the end that he says ‘You do not have a feeling in Korea’ "

This is also incomprehensible why Japanese must have ‘emotion’ in Korea.

Anyway, it seems Korean style thinking that it cannot be helped even if it bends the facts if there is a feeling.

In retrospect, President Moon Jae-in told the Japanese-ROK agreement that confirmed the ‘final and irreversible solution’ of the comfort women issue in May 2017, taking off the citizen sentiment, as soon as he took office.

"Reality is that the majority of citizens cannot embrace consensus emotionally"

Kang Kyung-wha Foreign Minister likewise said in a meeting with Taro Kono Foreign Minister in December the same year.

"The Korean people are not convinced about the Japan-Korea consensus"

At this time, Mr. Kono contradicted ‘It is your job to convince the Korean people, it is not a Japanese work’, but after all, the Korean government has made no efforts to gain public understanding until now.

This draft continues.

Korean style thinking that it cannot be helped even if it bends the facts if there is a feeling

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It will not make efforts to understand the public

I heard about such an episode from a diplomat who used to be in Korea.

"Even a relatively calm opponent in Korea is discussing Takeshima (Shimane Prefecture Oki no Miyamachi) problem or comfort women's problem, it is definitely not theory at the end that he says ‘You do not have a feeling in Korea’ "

This is also incomprehensible why Japanese must have ‘emotion’ in Korea.

Anyway, it seems Korean style thinking that it cannot be helped even if it bends the facts if there is a feeling.

In retrospect, President Moon Jae-in told the Japanese-ROK agreement that confirmed the ‘final and irreversible solution’ of the comfort women issue in May 2017, taking off the citizen sentiment, as soon as he took office.

"Reality is that the majority of citizens cannot embrace consensus emotionally"

Kang Kyung-wha Foreign Minister likewise said in a meeting with Taro Kono Foreign Minister in December the same year.

"The Korean people are not convinced about the Japan-Korea consensus"

At this time, Mr. Kono contradicted ‘It is your job to convince the Korean people, it is not a Japanese work’, but after all, the Korean government has made no efforts to gain public understanding until now.

This draft continues.

This is also incomprehensible why Japanese must have ‘emotion’ in Korea.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It will not make efforts to understand the public

I heard about such an episode from a diplomat who used to be in Korea.

"Even a relatively calm opponent in Korea is discussing Takeshima (Shimane Prefecture Oki no Miyamachi) problem or comfort women's problem, it is definitely not theory at the end that he says ‘You do not have a feeling in Korea’ "

This is also incomprehensible why Japanese must have ‘emotion’ in Korea.

Anyway, it seems Korean style thinking that it cannot be helped even if it bends the facts if there is a feeling.

In retrospect, President Moon Jae-in told the Japanese-ROK agreement that confirmed the ‘final and irreversible solution’ of the comfort women issue in May 2017, taking off the citizen sentiment, as soon as he took office.

"Reality is that the majority of citizens cannot embrace consensus emotionally"

Kang Kyung-wha Foreign Minister likewise said in a meeting with Taro Kono Foreign Minister in December the same year.

"The Korean people are not convinced about the Japan-Korea consensus"

At this time, Mr. Kono contradicted ‘It is your job to convince the Korean people, it is not a Japanese work’, but after all, the Korean government has made no efforts to gain public understanding until now.

This draft continues.

it is definitely not theory at the end that he says ‘You do not have a feeling in Korea’

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It will not make efforts to understand the public

I heard about such an episode from a diplomat who used to be in Korea.

"Even a relatively calm opponent in Korea is discussing Takeshima (Shimane Prefecture Oki no Miyamachi) problem or comfort women's problem, it is definitely not theory at the end that he says ‘You do not have a feeling in Korea’ "

This is also incomprehensible why Japanese must have ‘emotion’ in Korea.

Anyway, it seems Korean style thinking that it cannot be helped even if it bends the facts if there is a feeling.

In retrospect, President Moon Jae-in told the Japanese-ROK agreement that confirmed the ‘final and irreversible solution’ of the comfort women issue in May 2017, taking off the citizen sentiment, as soon as he took office.

"Reality is that the majority of citizens cannot embrace consensus emotionally"

Kang Kyung-wha Foreign Minister likewise said in a meeting with Taro Kono Foreign Minister in December the same year.

"The Korean people are not convinced about the Japan-Korea consensus"

At this time, Mr. Kono contradicted ‘It is your job to convince the Korean people, it is not a Japanese work’, but after all, the Korean government has made no efforts to gain public understanding until now.

This draft continues.

contradicted ‘It is your job to convince the Korean people, it is not a Japanese work’

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

It will not make efforts to understand the public

I heard about such an episode from a diplomat who used to be in Korea.

"Even a relatively calm opponent in Korea is discussing Takeshima (Shimane Prefecture Oki no Miyamachi) problem or comfort women's problem, it is definitely not theory at the end that he says ‘You do not have a feeling in Korea’ "

This is also incomprehensible why Japanese must have ‘emotion’ in Korea.

Anyway, it seems Korean style thinking that it cannot be helped even if it bends the facts if there is a feeling.

In retrospect, President Moon Jae-in told the Japanese-ROK agreement that confirmed the ‘final and irreversible solution’ of the comfort women issue in May 2017, taking off the citizen sentiment, as soon as he took office.

"Reality is that the majority of citizens cannot embrace consensus emotionally"

Kang Kyung-wha Foreign Minister likewise said in a meeting with Taro Kono Foreign Minister in December the same year.

"The Korean people are not convinced about the Japan-Korea consensus"

At this time, Mr. Kono contradicted ‘It is your job to convince the Korean people, it is not a Japanese work’, but after all, the Korean government has made no efforts to gain public understanding until now.

This draft continues.

it can not say nothing but that is is 'a country that thinks things traditionally self-centered'

The following is from the series column of Mr. Abiru Rui entitled Unchanged self-centered Korea, on the 5th page of today's Sankei Shimbun.

Korea will not change.

Surely, this way it will not change forever.

I am keenly aware of the South Korean government's dissemination of the issue that the South Korean Supreme Court issued a final decision to order Japanese companies to pay compensation in a lawsuit over former workers from the Korean Peninsula.

"I am extremely concerned that (The Japanese government) continues speaking remarks stimulating the feelings of Korean citizens." (November 6, Korea Foreign Ministry official)

"I am deeply concerned about the extreme remarks of the leaders of the Japanese government, it is not reasonable and not wise" (November 7, Prime Minister Lee Nak-yeon)

Respecting the national sentiment of Korea, it is argued that he is more concerned about Korea.

There is not that the national sentiments exist in Japan, too, at all in their head at all, as usual.

Why do you think that how do Koreans feel anyway is given priority over international order, promises, reasons? -

Why do you believe that Japan should associate with it?

As expected, it can not say nothing but that is is 'a country that thinks things traditionally self-centered' (executive of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs).

This draft continues.　

Why do you believe that Japan should associate with it?

The following is from the series column of Mr. Abiru Rui entitled Unchanged self-centered Korea, on the 5th page of today's Sankei Shimbun.

Korea will not change.

Surely, this way it will not change forever.

I am keenly aware of the South Korean government's dissemination of the issue that the South Korean Supreme Court issued a final decision to order Japanese companies to pay compensation in a lawsuit over former workers from the Korean Peninsula.

"I am extremely concerned that (The Japanese government) continues speaking remarks stimulating the feelings of Korean citizens." (November 6, Korea Foreign Ministry official)

"I am deeply concerned about the extreme remarks of the leaders of the Japanese government, it is not reasonable and not wise" (November 7, Prime Minister Lee Nak-yeon)

Respecting the national sentiment of Korea, it is argued that he is more concerned about Korea.

There is not that the national sentiments exist in Japan, too, at all in their head at all, as usual.

Why do you think that how do Koreans feel anyway is given priority over international order, promises, reasons? -

Why do you believe that Japan should associate with it?

As expected, it is nothing to say that it is "a country that thinks things traditionally self-centered" (executive of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs).

This draft continues.　

Why do you think that how do Koreans feel anyway is given priority over international order

The following is from the series column of Mr. Abiru Rui entitled Unchanged self-centered Korea, on the 5th page of today's Sankei Shimbun.

Korea will not change.

Surely, this way it will not change forever.

I am keenly aware of the South Korean government's dissemination of the issue that the South Korean Supreme Court issued a final decision to order Japanese companies to pay compensation in a lawsuit over former workers from the Korean Peninsula.

"I am extremely concerned that (The Japanese government) continues speaking remarks stimulating the feelings of Korean citizens." (November 6, Korea Foreign Ministry official)

"I am deeply concerned about the extreme remarks of the leaders of the Japanese government, it is not reasonable and not wise" (November 7, Prime Minister Lee Nak-yeon)

Respecting the national sentiment of Korea, it is argued that he is more concerned about Korea.

There is not that the national sentiments exist in Japan, too, at all in their head at all, as usual.

Why do you think that how do Koreans feel anyway is given priority over international order, promises, reasons? -

Why do you believe that Japan should associate with it?

As expected, it is nothing to say that it is "a country that thinks things traditionally self-centered" (executive of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs).

This draft continues.　

There is not that the national sentiments exist in Japan, too, at all in their head at all

The following is from the series column of Mr. Abiru Rui entitled Unchanged self-centered Korea, on the 5th page of today's Sankei Shimbun.

Korea will not change.

Surely, this way it will not change forever.

I am keenly aware of the South Korean government's dissemination of the issue that the South Korean Supreme Court issued a final decision to order Japanese companies to pay compensation in a lawsuit over former workers from the Korean Peninsula.

"I am extremely concerned that (The Japanese government) continues speaking remarks stimulating the feelings of Korean citizens." (November 6, Korea Foreign Ministry official)

"I am deeply concerned about the extreme remarks of the leaders of the Japanese government, it is not reasonable and not wise" (November 7, Prime Minister Lee Nak-yeon)

Respecting the national sentiment of Korea, it is argued that he is more concerned about Korea.

There is not that the national sentiments exist in Japan, too, at all in their head at all, as usual.

Why do you think that how do Koreans feel anyway is given priority over international order, promises, reasons? -

Why do you believe that Japan should associate with it?

As expected, it is nothing to say that it is "a country that thinks things traditionally self-centered" (executive of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs).

This draft continues.