Late at night lost sleep, just to be interrogated under dim lights will make you fear.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Confessions and torture

In USSR, there was a form, the arrest - the investigation - the trial - the judgment, tentatively.

But their reality was far from the Western judicial system.

According to Yasuo Wakatsuki's ‘Siberian Prison Camp’ etc., a snitch is encouraged, torture is used as a regular means, confessions are emphasized, legal defenses are not made, decent defense is not done in court, and not an act of conduct, but ideas and duties were as tried, the absentee trial was rampant, the shooting deportation and an excessive long-term sentence were imposed. Suspects can be interrogated at the prison or camp but started from the evening and it ran into late night and dawn.

Late at night lost sleep, just to be interrogated under dim lights will make you fear.

It is a kind of torture to push confessions as insomnia and fatigue awakens consciousness.

The interrogator often scared a pistol and threatened it.

Other than that, there were fasting, underfeeding, and torture by water, cold attacks, intimidation, and violence and so on.

There is an investigation of ‘The USSR long time detainee union’ that 85% of sentenced persons were subjected to various torture, and it can be seen as 100% by adding late-night interrogation.

Speaking of why torture was rampant, the interrogation of the Soviet Union was not a proof by physical evidence but the most important thing is to sign the confession letter.

As Anne Applebaum also pointed out in the ‘Gulag ... History of the Soviet Central Concentration’, Stalin believed that confession was the proof of fact, so confession was the queen of evidence.

This produces false charges.

In the cage of the camp state, the Japanese were grasped 'power of life and death', we should not forget that a powerless Japanese who was alone and unaided was forced to confess.

At this time, it is not a waste of time to remember the next words that the Ben Bruce Blakeney defense counsel said in the Tokyo Trial.

"From what we see, it cannot be expected to obtain a favorable testimony against the idea of those who capture that person from the person who is hit by a gun on his back" (from Andrey Illesh 'KGB secret document is talking ')

The defendant and the witness of Khabarovsk trial were as good as having a pistol pushed on his back.

This article continues.

Suspects can be interrogated at the prison or camp but started from the evening and

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Confessions and torture

In USSR, there was a form, the arrest - the investigation - the trial - the judgment, tentatively.

But their reality was far from the Western judicial system.

According to Yasuo Wakatsuki's ‘Siberian Prison Camp’ etc., a snitch is encouraged, torture is used as a regular means, confessions are emphasized, legal defenses are not made, decent defense is not done in court, and not an act of conduct, but ideas and duties were as tried, the absentee trial was rampant, the shooting deportation and an excessive long-term sentence were imposed. Suspects can be interrogated at the prison or camp but started from the evening and it ran into late night and dawn.

Late at night lost sleep, just to be interrogated under dim lights will make you fear.

It is a kind of torture to push confessions as insomnia and fatigue awakens consciousness.

The interrogator often scared a pistol and threatened it.

Other than that, there were fasting, underfeeding, and torture by water, cold attacks, intimidation, and violence and so on.

There is an investigation of ‘The USSR long time detainee union’ that 85% of sentenced persons were subjected to various torture, and it can be seen as 100% by adding late-night interrogation.

Speaking of why torture was rampant, the interrogation of the Soviet Union was not a proof by physical evidence but the most important thing is to sign the confession letter.

As Anne Applebaum also pointed out in the ‘Gulag ... History of the Soviet Central Concentration’, Stalin believed that confession was the proof of fact, so confession was the queen of evidence.

This produces false charges.

In the cage of the camp state, the Japanese were grasped 'power of life and death', we should not forget that a powerless Japanese who was alone and unaided was forced to confess.

At this time, it is not a waste of time to remember the next words that the Ben Bruce Blakeney defense counsel said in the Tokyo Trial.

"From what we see, it cannot be expected to obtain a favorable testimony against the idea of those who capture that person from the person who is hit by a gun on his back" (from Andrey Illesh 'KGB secret document is talking ')

The defendant and the witness of Khabarovsk trial were as good as having a pistol pushed on his back.

This article continues.

not an act of conduct, but ideas and duties were as tried, the absentee trial was rampant

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Confessions and torture

In USSR, there was a form, the arrest - the investigation - the trial - the judgment, tentatively.

But their reality was far from the Western judicial system.

According to Yasuo Wakatsuki's ‘Siberian Prison Camp’ etc., a snitch is encouraged, torture is used as a regular means, confessions are emphasized, legal defenses are not made, decent defense is not done in court, and not an act of conduct, but ideas and duties were as tried, the absentee trial was rampant, the shooting deportation and an excessive long-term sentence were imposed. Suspects can be interrogated at the prison or camp but started from the evening and it ran into late night and dawn.

Late at night lost sleep, just to be interrogated under dim lights will make you fear.

It is a kind of torture to push confessions as insomnia and fatigue awakens consciousness.

The interrogator often scared a pistol and threatened it.

Other than that, there were fasting, underfeeding, and torture by water, cold attacks, intimidation, and violence and so on.

There is an investigation of ‘The USSR long time detainee union’ that 85% of sentenced persons were subjected to various torture, and it can be seen as 100% by adding late-night interrogation.

Speaking of why torture was rampant, the interrogation of the Soviet Union was not a proof by physical evidence but the most important thing is to sign the confession letter.

As Anne Applebaum also pointed out in the ‘Gulag ... History of the Soviet Central Concentration’, Stalin believed that confession was the proof of fact, so confession was the queen of evidence.

This produces false charges.

In the cage of the camp state, the Japanese were grasped 'power of life and death', we should not forget that a powerless Japanese who was alone and unaided was forced to confess.

At this time, it is not a waste of time to remember the next words that the Ben Bruce Blakeney defense counsel said in the Tokyo Trial.

"From what we see, it cannot be expected to obtain a favorable testimony against the idea of those who capture that person from the person who is hit by a gun on his back" (from Andrey Illesh 'KGB secret document is talking ')

The defendant and the witness of Khabarovsk trial were as good as having a pistol pushed on his back.

This article continues.

a snitch is encouraged, torture is used as a regular means, confessions are emphasized

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Confessions and torture

In USSR, there was a form, the arrest - the investigation - the trial - the judgment, tentatively.

But their reality was far from the Western judicial system.

According to Yasuo Wakatsuki's ‘Siberian Prison Camp’ etc., a snitch is encouraged, torture is used as a regular means, confessions are emphasized, legal defenses are not made, decent defense is not done in court, and not an act of conduct, but ideas and duties Was tried, the absentee trial was rampant, the shooting deportation and an excessive long-term sentence were imposed. Suspects can be interrogated at the prison or camp but started from the evening and it ran into late night and dawn.

Late at night lost sleep, just to be interrogated under dim lights will make you fear.

It is a kind of torture to push confessions as insomnia and fatigue awakens consciousness.

The interrogator often scared a pistol and threatened it.

Other than that, there were fasting, underfeeding, and torture by water, cold attacks, intimidation, and violence and so on.

There is an investigation of ‘The USSR long time detainee union’ that 85% of sentenced persons were subjected to various torture, and it can be seen as 100% by adding late-night interrogation.

Speaking of why torture was rampant, the interrogation of the Soviet Union was not a proof by physical evidence but the most important thing is to sign the confession letter.

As Anne Applebaum also pointed out in the ‘Gulag ... History of the Soviet Central Concentration’, Stalin believed that confession was the proof of fact, so confession was the queen of evidence.

This produces false charges.

In the cage of the camp state, the Japanese were grasped 'power of life and death', we should not forget that a powerless Japanese who was alone and unaided was forced to confess.

At this time, it is not a waste of time to remember the next words that the Ben Bruce Blakeney defense counsel said in the Tokyo Trial.

"From what we see, it cannot be expected to obtain a favorable testimony against the idea of those who capture that person from the person who is hit by a gun on his back" (from Andrey Illesh 'KGB secret document is talking ')

The defendant and the witness of Khabarovsk trial were as good as having a pistol pushed on his back.

This article continues.

In USSR, there was a form, the arrest - the investigation - the trial - the judgment, tentatively

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Confessions and torture

In USSR, there was a form, the arrest - the investigation - the trial - the judgment, tentatively.

But their reality was far from the Western judicial system.

According to Yasuo Wakatsuki's ‘Siberian Prison Camp’ etc., a snitch is encouraged, torture is used as a regular means, confessions are emphasized, legal defenses are not made, decent defense is not done in court, and not an act of conduct, but ideas and duties Was tried, the absentee trial was rampant, the shooting deportation and an excessive long-term sentence were imposed. Suspects can be interrogated at the prison or camp but started from the evening and it ran into late night and dawn.

Late at night lost sleep, just to be interrogated under dim lights will make you fear.

It is a kind of torture to push confessions as insomnia and fatigue awakens consciousness.

The interrogator often scared a pistol and threatened it.

Other than that, there were fasting, underfeeding, and torture by water, cold attacks, intimidation, and violence and so on.

There is an investigation of ‘The USSR long time detainee union’ that 85% of sentenced persons were subjected to various torture, and it can be seen as 100% by adding late-night interrogation.

Speaking of why torture was rampant, the interrogation of the Soviet Union was not a proof by physical evidence but the most important thing is to sign the confession letter.

As Anne Applebaum also pointed out in the ‘Gulag ... History of the Soviet Central Concentration’, Stalin believed that confession was the proof of fact, so confession was the queen of evidence.

This produces false charges.

In the cage of the camp state, the Japanese were grasped 'power of life and death', we should not forget that a powerless Japanese who was alone and unaided was forced to confess.

At this time, it is not a waste of time to remember the next words that the Ben Bruce Blakeney defense counsel said in the Tokyo Trial.

"From what we see, it cannot be expected to obtain a favorable testimony against the idea of those who capture that person from the person who is hit by a gun on his back" (from Andrey Illesh 'KGB secret document is talking ')

The defendant and the witness of Khabarovsk trial were as good as having a pistol pushed on his back.

This article continues.

影響力を及ぼす事だけを考えて国を顧みない…国難に対処させず究極的には中国に日本国を売り渡したいような風情の

長瀬了治さんの本当の労作を日本と世界に発信していて、ある事を再認識したのである。

私は今はテレビ朝日やTBSの報道番組は全くみないから報道番組としてはNHKをメインに見ているのだが、最近のNHKのニュースは本当に異常なのである。

現今の日本を取り巻く情勢に対して、どう対応し、どう体制と態勢を作るかという、国家として最も重要な問題から見れば、問題外の見本のような事案…PKO派遣された自衛隊の日報＝日記が外付けのハードディスクから発見された等と言う事が、

日本の尖閣諸島は自国の核心的利益の問題であるなどと公言し沖縄ですら自国の領土であると宣う中国…彼らの核弾頭を搭載したミサイルが日本に照準を当てて配備されている時、

北朝鮮が、あのようである時、

一体、どんな喫緊の課題だと言うのか。

もし米朝首脳会談が決裂した場合、米国が北朝鮮に対して限定的にして決定的な攻撃に打って出る可能性が大である時、

先日来、NHKは執拗に…今回の日報が外付けハードディスクから発見されたなどというだけの問題でも…旧日本軍の古色蒼然としたフィルムを流し続けている。

習近平が究極的には日本征服を狙っていることは、もはや周知の事実である時、

このような報道を繰り返して政権攻撃を行い続けているNHKは、既にして、彼らの走狗であると言っても全く過言ではないだろう。

私は周囲の人たちにも、或いは、このブログでも「私は今を生きる信長である」と言及して来た。

信長が日本が生んだ真に偉大な人物である事を、当のNHKが、先年の「歴史ヒストリア」で、或る全く初見の事で、私に再認識させたのだが…当のNHK職員たちは誰一人として、私が知った偉大さに気づいていないのである。

信長が戦国時代を終焉させ日本国を統一しようとしていた時、

時の権力に対して影響力を保持する事だけを考えていた愚か者の集団であった延暦寺を信長が焼き討ちにした事も、私は、信長の真に偉大な所以の一つであると周囲の人たちに言って来た。

信長が今に生きていたならばNHKという或いは朝日新聞社という時の権力に影響力を及ぼす事だけを考えて国を顧みない…国難に対処させず究極的には中国に日本国を売り渡したいような風情の、

現代の延暦寺であるNHKと朝日新聞社を焼き討ちにすることは間違いがないだろう。

もし米朝首脳会談が決裂した場合、米国が北朝鮮に対して限定的にして決定的な攻撃に打って出る可能性が大である時

長瀬了治さんの本当の労作を日本と世界に発信していて、ある事を再認識したのである。

私は今はテレビ朝日やTBSの報道番組は全くみないから報道番組としてはNHKをメインに見ているのだが、最近のNHKのニュースは本当に異常なのである。

現今の日本を取り巻く情勢に対して、どう対応し、どう体制と態勢を作るかという、国家として最も重要な問題から見れば、問題外の見本のような事案…PKO派遣された自衛隊の日報＝日記が外付けのハードディスクから発見された等と言う事が、

日本の尖閣諸島は自国の核心的利益の問題であるなどと公言し沖縄ですら自国の領土であると宣う中国…彼らの核弾頭を搭載したミサイルが日本に照準を当てて配備されている時、

北朝鮮が、あのようである時、

一体、どんな喫緊の課題だと言うのか。

もし米朝首脳会談が決裂した場合、米国が北朝鮮に対して限定的にして決定的な攻撃に打って出る可能性が大である時、

先日来、NHKは執拗に…今回の日報が外付けハードディスクから発見されたなどというだけの問題でも…旧日本軍の古色蒼然としたフィルムを流し続けている。

習近平が究極的には日本征服を狙っていることは、もはや周知の事実である時、

このような報道を繰り返して政権攻撃を行い続けているNHKは、既にして、彼らの走狗であると言っても全く過言ではないだろう。

私は周囲の人たちにも、或いは、このブログでも「私は今を生きる信長である」と言及して来た。

信長が日本が生んだ真に偉大な人物である事を、当のNHKが、先年の「歴史ヒストリア」で、或る全く初見の事で、私に再認識させたのだが…当のNHK職員たちは誰一人として、私が知った偉大さに気づいていないのである。

信長が戦国時代を終焉させ日本国を統一しようとしていた時、

時の権力に対して影響力を保持する事だけを考えていた愚か者の集団であった延暦寺を信長が焼き討ちにした事も、私は、信長の真に偉大な所以の一つであると周囲の人たちに言って来た。

信長が今に生きていたならば、NHKという、或いは朝日新聞社という、時の権力に影響力を及ぼす事だけを考えて、国を顧みない、国難に対処させず、究極的には中国に、日本国を売り渡したいような風情の、

現代の延暦寺であるNHKと朝日新聞社を焼き討ちにすることは間違いがないだろう。

日本の尖閣諸島は自国の核心的利益の問題であるなどと公言し沖縄ですら自国の領土であると宣う中国…

長瀬了治さんの本当の労作を日本と世界に発信していて、ある事を再認識したのである。

私は今はテレビ朝日やTBSの報道番組は全くみないから報道番組としてはNHKをメインに見ているのだが、最近のNHKのニュースは本当に異常なのである。

現今の日本を取り巻く情勢に対して、どう対応し、どう体制と態勢を作るかという、国家として最も重要な問題から見れば、問題外の見本のような事案…PKO派遣された自衛隊の日報＝日記が外付けのハードディスクから発見された等と言う事が、

日本の尖閣諸島は自国の核心的利益の問題であるなどと公言し沖縄ですら自国の領土であると宣う中国…彼らの核弾頭を搭載したミサイルが日本に照準を当てて配備されている時、

北朝鮮が、あのようである時、

一体、どんな喫緊の課題だと言うのか。

もし米朝首脳会談が決裂した場合、米国が北朝鮮に対して限定的にして決定的な攻撃に打って出る可能性が大である時、

先日来、NHKは執拗に…今回の日報が外付けハードディスクから発見されたなどというだけの問題でも…旧日本軍の古色蒼然としたフィルムを流し続けている。

習近平が究極的には日本征服を狙っていることは、もはや周知の事実である時、

このような報道を繰り返して政権攻撃を行い続けているNHKは、既にして、彼らの走狗であると言っても全く過言ではないだろう。

私は周囲の人たちにも、或いは、このブログでも「私は今を生きる信長である」と言及して来た。

信長が日本が生んだ真に偉大な人物である事を、当のNHKが、先年の「歴史ヒストリア」で、或る全く初見の事で、私に再認識させたのだが…当のNHK職員たちは誰一人として、私が知った偉大さに気づいていないのである。

信長が戦国時代を終焉させ日本国を統一しようとしていた時、

時の権力に対して影響力を保持する事だけを考えていた愚か者の集団であった延暦寺を信長が焼き討ちにした事も、私は、信長の真に偉大な所以の一つであると周囲の人たちに言って来た。

信長が今に生きていたならば、NHKという、或いは朝日新聞社という、時の権力に影響力を及ぼす事だけを考えて、国を顧みない、国難に対処させず、究極的には中国に、日本国を売り渡したいような風情の、

現代の延暦寺であるNHKと朝日新聞社を焼き討ちにすることは間違いがないだろう。

先日来、NHKは執拗に…今回の日報が外付けハードディスクから発見されたなどというだけの問題でも…

長瀬了治さんの本当の労作を日本と世界に発信していて、ある事を再認識したのである。

私は今はテレビ朝日やTBSの報道番組は全くみないから報道番組としてはNHKをメインに見ているのだが、最近のNHKのニュースは本当に異常なのである。

現今の日本を取り巻く情勢に対して、どう対応し、どう体制と態勢を作るかという、国家として最も重要な問題から見れば、問題外の見本のような事案…PKO派遣された自衛隊の日報＝日記が外付けのハードディスクから発見された等と言う事が、

日本の尖閣諸島は自国の核心的利益の問題であるなどと公言し沖縄ですら自国の領土であると宣う中国…彼らの核弾頭を搭載したミサイルが日本に照準を当てて配備されている時、

北朝鮮が、あのようである時、

一体、どんな喫緊の課題だと言うのか。

もし米朝首脳会談が決裂した場合、米国が北朝鮮に対して限定的にして決定的な攻撃に打って出る可能性が大である時、

先日来、NHKは執拗に…今回の日報が外付けハードディスクから発見されたなどというだけの問題でも…旧日本軍の古色蒼然としたフィルムを流し続けている。

習近平が究極的には日本征服を狙っていることは、もはや周知の事実である時、

このような報道を繰り返して政権攻撃を行い続けているNHKは、既にして、彼らの走狗であると言っても全く過言ではないだろう。

私は周囲の人たちにも、或いは、このブログでも「私は今を生きる信長である」と言及して来た。

信長が日本が生んだ真に偉大な人物である事を、当のNHKが、先年の「歴史ヒストリア」で、或る全く初見の事で、私に再認識させたのだが…当のNHK職員たちは誰一人として、私が知った偉大さに気づいていないのである。

信長が戦国時代を終焉させ日本国を統一しようとしていた時、

時の権力に対して影響力を保持する事だけを考えていた愚か者の集団であった延暦寺を信長が焼き討ちにした事も、私は、信長の真に偉大な所以の一つであると周囲の人たちに言って来た。

信長が今に生きていたならば、NHKという、或いは朝日新聞社という、時の権力に影響力を及ぼす事だけを考えて、国を顧みない、国難に対処させず、究極的には中国に、日本国を売り渡したいような風情の、

現代の延暦寺であるNHKと朝日新聞社を焼き討ちにすることは間違いがないだろう。

 

by making a statement in the Soviet Union internment / detained for a long time in the Soviet Union

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

But it is quite obvious that there was neither a fair interrogation nor a fair trial in the 'war criminal' trial in the Soviet Union.

It cannot help saying that this program lacks the understanding of a communism autarchic judiciary completely.

First of all, Japanese Soldiers' Siberian detention was an illegal long-term detention in violation of the provision of the International Law (Geneva Convention) and the Potsdam Declaration, ‘Japanese soldiers shall return home promptly.’

In addition, with the evidence of 'the war criminal' trial being the interrogation in the long time which is accompanied by the forcing, the torture in the sanctum where there is not a fragment in the proper right of the suspect about the granting an audience of the lawyer and so on,

It was the stultified trial to only announce about the judgment which decided direct trial or a defense beforehand as it was not.

I have long argued that a Japanese ‘war criminal’ sentenced person is an innocent prisoner.

The Khabarovsk trial which is one of the 'war criminal' trials is also a fake trial or a dark trial as will be described later.

Therefore, the defendant’s statement and the witness’s testimony in this trial cannot be admitted as evidence to prove the truth, even if the person’s voice tapes.

In other words, this tape has no evidence ability at trial.

Just to be sure, it does not mean that every testimonial on the audio tape is a lie.

Based on the delusional nature of the Khabarovsk trial, it should be strictly and fairly verified whether individual testimonies are true or not true.

Firstly NHK should try meditating on Article 38, paragraph 2 of the favorite Japanese Constitution.

"The compulsion, being confessional by the torture or menace or, it interns long in the unreasonableness, or confess after detained, this cannot be made evidence."

This is a major principle of modern law.

It is NHK who responds sensitively enough to the domestic false charge trial, so the importance of this clause should be known as well.

Even assuming that there was no compulsion, torture or intimidation, the evidence capability in the court would be denied just by making a statement in the Soviet Union internment / detained for a long time in the Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

Even assuming that there was no compulsion, torture or intimidation, the evidence capability

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

But it is quite obvious that there was neither a fair interrogation nor a fair trial in the 'war criminal' trial in the Soviet Union.

It cannot help saying that this program lacks the understanding of a communism autarchic judiciary completely.

First of all, Japanese Soldiers' Siberian detention was an illegal long-term detention in violation of the provision of the International Law (Geneva Convention) and the Potsdam Declaration, ‘Japanese soldiers shall return home promptly.’

In addition, with the evidence of 'the war criminal' trial being the interrogation in the long time which is accompanied by the forcing, the torture in the sanctum where there is not a fragment in the proper right of the suspect about the granting an audience of the lawyer and so on,

It was the stultified trial to only announce about the judgment which decided direct trial or a defense beforehand as it was not.

I have long argued that a Japanese ‘war criminal’ sentenced person is an innocent prisoner.

The Khabarovsk trial which is one of the 'war criminal' trials is also a fake trial or a dark trial as will be described later.

Therefore, the defendant’s statement and the witness’s testimony in this trial cannot be admitted as evidence to prove the truth, even if the person’s voice tapes.

In other words, this tape has no evidence ability at trial.

Just to be sure, it does not mean that every testimonial on the audio tape is a lie.

Based on the delusional nature of the Khabarovsk trial, it should be strictly and fairly verified whether individual testimonies are true or not true.

Firstly NHK should try meditating on Article 38, paragraph 2 of the favorite Japanese Constitution.

"The compulsion, being confessional by the torture or menace or, it interns long in the unreasonableness, or confess after detained, this cannot be made evidence."

This is a major principle of modern law.

It is NHK who responds sensitively enough to the domestic false charge trial, so the importance of this clause should be known as well.

Even assuming that there was no compulsion, torture or intimidation, the evidence capability in the court would be denied just by making a statement in the Soviet Union internment / detained for a long time in the Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

It is NHK who responds sensitively enough to the domestic false charge trial, so the importance

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

But it is quite obvious that there was neither a fair interrogation nor a fair trial in the 'war criminal' trial in the Soviet Union.

It cannot help saying that this program lacks the understanding of a communism autarchic judiciary completely.

First of all, Japanese Soldiers' Siberian detention was an illegal long-term detention in violation of the provision of the International Law (Geneva Convention) and the Potsdam Declaration, ‘Japanese soldiers shall return home promptly.’

In addition, with the evidence of 'the war criminal' trial being the interrogation in the long time which is accompanied by the forcing, the torture in the sanctum where there is not a fragment in the proper right of the suspect about the granting an audience of the lawyer and so on,

It was the stultified trial to only announce about the judgment which decided direct trial or a defense beforehand as it was not.

I have long argued that a Japanese ‘war criminal’ sentenced person is an innocent prisoner.

The Khabarovsk trial which is one of the 'war criminal' trials is also a fake trial or a dark trial as will be described later.

Therefore, the defendant’s statement and the witness’s testimony in this trial cannot be admitted as evidence to prove the truth, even if the person’s voice tapes.

In other words, this tape has no evidence ability at trial.

Just to be sure, it does not mean that every testimonial on the audio tape is a lie.

Based on the delusional nature of the Khabarovsk trial, it should be strictly and fairly verified whether individual testimonies are true or not true.

Firstly NHK should try meditating on Article 38, paragraph 2 of the favorite Japanese Constitution.

"The compulsion, being confessional by the torture or menace or, it interns long in the unreasonableness, or confess after detained, this cannot be made evidence."

This is a major principle of modern law.

It is NHK who responds sensitively enough to the domestic false charge trial, so the importance of this clause should be known as well.

Even assuming that there was no compulsion, torture or intimidation, the evidence capability in the court would be denied just by making a statement in the Soviet Union internment / detained for a long time in the Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

it interns long in the unreasonableness, or confess after detained, this cannot be made evidence.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

But it is quite obvious that there was neither a fair interrogation nor a fair trial in the 'war criminal' trial in the Soviet Union.

It cannot help saying that this program lacks the understanding of a communism autarchic judiciary completely.

First of all, Japanese Soldiers' Siberian detention was an illegal long-term detention in violation of the provision of the International Law (Geneva Convention) and the Potsdam Declaration, ‘Japanese soldiers shall return home promptly.’

In addition, with the evidence of 'the war criminal' trial being the interrogation in the long time which is accompanied by the forcing, the torture in the sanctum where there is not a fragment in the proper right of the suspect about the granting an audience of the lawyer and so on,

It was the stultified trial to only announce about the judgment which decided direct trial or a defense beforehand as it was not.

I have long argued that a Japanese ‘war criminal’ sentenced person is an innocent prisoner.

The Khabarovsk trial which is one of the 'war criminal' trials is also a fake trial or a dark trial as will be described later.

Therefore, the defendant’s statement and the witness’s testimony in this trial cannot be admitted as evidence to prove the truth, even if the person’s voice tapes.

In other words, this tape has no evidence ability at trial.

Just to be sure, it does not mean that every testimonial on the audio tape is a lie.

Based on the delusional nature of the Khabarovsk trial, it should be strictly and fairly verified whether individual testimonies are true or not true.

Firstly NHK should try meditating on Article 38, paragraph 2 of the favorite Japanese Constitution.

"The compulsion, being confessional by the torture or menace or, it interns long in the unreasonableness, or confess after detained, this cannot be made evidence."

This is a major principle of modern law.

It is NHK who responds sensitively enough to the domestic false charge trial, so the importance of this clause should be known as well.

Even assuming that there was no compulsion, torture or intimidation, the evidence capability in the court would be denied just by making a statement in the Soviet Union internment / detained for a long time in the Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

Firstly NHK should try meditating on Article 38, paragraph 2 of the favorite Japanese Constitution

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

But it is quite obvious that there was neither a fair interrogation nor a fair trial in the 'war criminal' trial in the Soviet Union.

It cannot help saying that this program lacks the understanding of a communism autarchic judiciary completely.

First of all, Japanese Soldiers' Siberian detention was an illegal long-term detention in violation of the provision of the International Law (Geneva Convention) and the Potsdam Declaration, ‘Japanese soldiers shall return home promptly.’

In addition, with the evidence of 'the war criminal' trial being the interrogation in the long time which is accompanied by the forcing, the torture in the sanctum where there is not a fragment in the proper right of the suspect about the granting an audience of the lawyer and so on,

It was the stultified trial to only announce about the judgment which decided direct trial or a defense beforehand as it was not.

I have long argued that a Japanese ‘war criminal’ sentenced person is an innocent prisoner.

The Khabarovsk trial which is one of the 'war criminal' trials is also a fake trial or a dark trial as will be described later.

Therefore, the defendant’s statement and the witness’s testimony in this trial cannot be admitted as evidence to prove the truth, even if the person’s voice tapes.

In other words, this tape has no evidence ability at trial.

Just to be sure, it does not mean that every testimonial on the audio tape is a lie.

Based on the delusional nature of the Khabarovsk trial, it should be strictly and fairly verified whether individual testimonies are true or not true.

Firstly NHK should try meditating on Article 38, paragraph 2 of the favorite Japanese Constitution.

"The compulsion, being confessional by the torture or menace or, it interns long in the unreasonableness, or confess after detained, this cannot be made evidence."

This is a major principle of modern law.

It is NHK who responds sensitively enough to the domestic false charge trial, so the importance of this clause should be known as well.

Even assuming that there was no compulsion, torture or intimidation, the evidence capability in the court would be denied just by making a statement in the Soviet Union internment / detained for a long time in the Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

Based on the delusional nature of the Khabarovsk trial, it should be strictly and fairly verified

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

But it is quite obvious that there was neither a fair interrogation nor a fair trial in the 'war criminal' trial in the Soviet Union.

It cannot help saying that this program lacks the understanding of a communism autarchic judiciary completely.

First of all, Japanese Soldiers' Siberian detention was an illegal long-term detention in violation of the provision of the International Law (Geneva Convention) and the Potsdam Declaration, ‘Japanese soldiers shall return home promptly.’

In addition, with the evidence of 'the war criminal' trial being the interrogation in the long time which is accompanied by the forcing, the torture in the sanctum where there is not a fragment in the proper right of the suspect about the granting an audience of the lawyer and so on,

It was the stultified trial to only announce about the judgment which decided direct trial or a defense beforehand as it was not.

I have long argued that a Japanese ‘war criminal’ sentenced person is an innocent prisoner.

The Khabarovsk trial which is one of the 'war criminal' trials is also a fake trial or a dark trial as will be described later.

Therefore, the defendant’s statement and the witness’s testimony in this trial cannot be admitted as evidence to prove the truth, even if the person’s voice tapes.

In other words, this tape has no evidence ability at trial.

Just to be sure, it does not mean that every testimonial on the audio tape is a lie.

Based on the delusional nature of the Khabarovsk trial, it should be strictly and fairly verified whether individual testimonies are true or not true.

First of all NHK should try meditating on Article 38, paragraph 2 of the favorite Japanese Constitution.

"The compulsion, being confessional by the torture or menace or, it interns long in the unreasonableness, or confess after detained, this cannot be made evidence."

This is a major principle of modern law.

It is NHK who responds sensitively enough to the domestic false charge trial, so the importance of this clause should be known as well.

Even assuming that there was no compulsion, torture or intimidation, the evidence capability in the court would be denied just by making a statement in the Soviet Union internment / detained for a long time in the Soviet Union.

This draft continues.