However, at that time the storm of tremendous bashing was given to me.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

In this ruling, the Sapporo District Court recognized not only the article by Mr. Uemura but also the fact that the Asahi newspaper abandoned the error despite the repeated indications, and the contents of the verification by the third-party committee after 2014 there.

The sentence highlighted the problems of the comfort women's coverage of the Asahi Shimbun spreading false Yoshida fabrication.

The judgment sentence also refers to the fact that the comfort women problem has developed not only to the issue of Japan-ROK relations but also to the international problem which can be taken up by the United Nations, the US Congress, etc.

It is very significant.

The place of fate

Back in the past 22 years, once I said in the lecture ‘Comfort women are not compulsory takeovers’ and was condemned.

Many people now know that it is the truth.

However, at that time the storm of tremendous bashing was given to me.

A large volume of protest letters arrived at the workplace, faxes were sent until the paper was exhausted, and protest phones did not stop.

Among the innumerable protests, one that was conspicuous was originated from Hokkaido.

Mainly from Hokkaido Teachers' Union, many protests with almost the same text arrived. In case

In the area of Hokkaido with such ‘fate’, I think that there is a special meaning in having fought against Mr. Uemura over the problem of comfort women and becoming ‘a complete win’.

I visited Sapporo twice in April 2016 and March 2018 with first oral argument and questioning in person.

At the Sapporo District Court, supporters who asked for a public ticket to watch over Mr. Uemura were in line.

Upon arrival, the auditorium has already been filled with Mr. Uemura's supporters, and in contrast to our defendant's seat where there are only about five lawyers, there are over 30 lawyers in the plaintiff's seat.

Mr. Uemura, who emphasizes the legitimacy of his argument pour to the gestures, reminded political activists.

This draft continues.

also to the international problem which can be taken up by the United Nations, the US Congress

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

In this ruling, the Sapporo District Court recognized not only the article by Mr. Uemura but also the fact that the Asahi newspaper abandoned the error despite the repeated indications, and the contents of the verification by the third-party committee after 2014 there.

The sentence highlighted the problems of the comfort women's coverage of the Asahi Shimbun spreading false Yoshida fabrication.

The judgment sentence also refers to the fact that the comfort women problem has developed not only to the issue of Japan-ROK relations but also to the international problem which can be taken up by the United Nations, the US Congress, etc.

It is very significant.

The place of fate

Back in the past 22 years, once I said in the lecture ‘Comfort women are not compulsory takeovers’ and was condemned.

Many people now know that it is the truth.

However, at that time the storm of tremendous bashing was given to me.

A large volume of protest letters arrived at the workplace, faxes were sent until the paper was exhausted, and protest phones did not stop.

Among the innumerable protests, one that was conspicuous was originated from Hokkaido.

Mainly from Hokkaido Teachers' Union, many protests with almost the same text arrived. In case

In the area of Hokkaido with such ‘fate’, I think that there is a special meaning in having fought against Mr. Uemura over the problem of comfort women and becoming ‘a complete win’.

I visited Sapporo twice in April 2016 and March 2018 with first oral argument and questioning in person.

At the Sapporo District Court, supporters who asked for a public ticket to watch over Mr. Uemura were in line.

Upon arrival, the auditorium has already been filled with Mr. Uemura's supporters, and in contrast to our defendant's seat where there are only about five lawyers, there are over 30 lawyers in the plaintiff's seat.

Mr. Uemura, who emphasizes the legitimacy of his argument pour to the gestures, reminded political activists.

This draft continues.

not only the article by Mr. Uemura but also the fact that the Asahi newspaper abandoned the error

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

In this ruling, the Sapporo District Court recognized not only the article by Mr. Uemura but also the fact that the Asahi newspaper abandoned the error despite the repeated indications, and the contents of the verification by the third-party committee after 2014 there.

The sentence highlighted the problems of the comfort women's coverage of the Asahi Shimbun spreading false Yoshida fabrication.

The judgment sentence also refers to the fact that the comfort women problem has developed not only to the issue of Japan-ROK relations but also to the international problem which can be taken up by the United Nations, the US Congress, etc.

It is very significant.

The place of fate

Back in the past 22 years, once I said in the lecture ‘Comfort women are not compulsory takeovers’ and was condemned.

Many people now know that it is the truth.

However, at that time the storm of tremendous bashing was given to me.

A large volume of protest letters arrived at the workplace, faxes were sent until the paper was exhausted, and protest phones did not stop.

Among the innumerable protests, one that was conspicuous was originated from Hokkaido.

Mainly from Hokkaido Teachers' Union, many protests with almost the same text arrived. In case

In the area of Hokkaido with such ‘fate’, I think that there is a special meaning in having fought against Mr. Uemura over the problem of comfort women and becoming ‘a complete win’.

I visited Sapporo twice in April 2016 and March 2018 with first oral argument and questioning in person.

At the Sapporo District Court, supporters who asked for a public ticket to watch over Mr. Uemura were in line.

Upon arrival, the auditorium has already been filled with Mr. Uemura's supporters, and in contrast to our defendant's seat where there are only about five lawyers, there are over 30 lawyers in the plaintiff's seat.

Mr. Uemura, who emphasizes the legitimacy of his argument pour to the gestures, reminded political activists.

This draft continues.

しかし、それは朝日新聞が最初に日本軍による強制連行の加害者の証言として吉田氏の紹介記事を紙面に掲載してから、実に32年も後のことだった。

以下は前章の続きである。

この間、吉田氏の証言は、韓国済州島の現地新聞あるいは現代史家の秦郁彦氏によって、事実無根であることが証明されている。

にもかかわらず、朝日新聞は長らく自らの誤りに目を瞑り、訂正もしなかった。

言論機関として許されないことはもちろん、日本と日本国民の名誉を傷つけた点で、非常に重い責任を負っている。　

吉田氏は、虚構の強制連行を具体的に語ってみせ、日本政府及び日本軍を加害者に仕立て上げた。

そして1991年8月11日、植村隆氏が、3日後の記者会見で金学順氏という氏名がわかった女性が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され」だと記事にした。　

吉田作話キャンペーンにより日本軍による強制連行説が定説化しつつあるなか、植村氏が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され、日本軍人相手に売春行為を強いられた朝鮮人従軍慰安婦」の存在を報じたことで、強制連行の加害者・日本軍対被害者・朝鮮人慰安婦という吉田作話の構図が確固たるものとなった。

朝日新聞の慰安婦報道において、植村氏の、この署名記事が果たした役割は大きいと思う。　

2014年8月5日、朝日新聞は吉田証言が虚偽だったことを認め、関連記事を取り消した。

しかし、それは朝日新聞が最初に日本軍による強制連行の加害者の証言として吉田氏の紹介記事を紙面に掲載してから、実に32年も後のことだった。

この稿続く。　

朝日新聞の慰安婦報道において、植村氏の、この署名記事が果たした役割は大きいと思う。

以下は前章の続きである。

この間、吉田氏の証言は、韓国済州島の現地新聞あるいは現代史家の秦郁彦氏によって、事実無根であることが証明されている。

にもかかわらず、朝日新聞は長らく自らの誤りに目を瞑り、訂正もしなかった。

言論機関として許されないことはもちろん、日本と日本国民の名誉を傷つけた点で、非常に重い責任を負っている。　

吉田氏は、虚構の強制連行を具体的に語ってみせ、日本政府及び日本軍を加害者に仕立て上げた。

そして1991年8月11日、植村隆氏が、3日後の記者会見で金学順氏という氏名がわかった女性が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され」だと記事にした。　

吉田作話キャンペーンにより日本軍による強制連行説が定説化しつつあるなか、植村氏が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され、日本軍人相手に売春行為を強いられた朝鮮人従軍慰安婦」の存在を報じたことで、強制連行の加害者・日本軍対被害者・朝鮮人慰安婦という吉田作話の構図が確固たるものとなった。

朝日新聞の慰安婦報道において、植村氏の、この署名記事が果たした役割は大きいと思う。　

2014年8月5日、朝日新聞は吉田証言が虚偽だったことを認め、関連記事を取り消した。

しかし、それは朝日新聞が最初に日本軍による強制連行の加害者の証言として吉田氏の紹介記事を紙面に掲載してから、実に32年も後のことだった。

この稿続く。　

吉田作話キャンペーンにより日本軍による強制連行説が定説化しつつあるなか、植村氏が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され、日本軍人相手に

以下は前章の続きである。

この間、吉田氏の証言は、韓国済州島の現地新聞あるいは現代史家の秦郁彦氏によって、事実無根であることが証明されている。

にもかかわらず、朝日新聞は長らく自らの誤りに目を瞑り、訂正もしなかった。

言論機関として許されないことはもちろん、日本と日本国民の名誉を傷つけた点で、非常に重い責任を負っている。　

吉田氏は、虚構の強制連行を具体的に語ってみせ、日本政府及び日本軍を加害者に仕立て上げた。

そして1991年8月11日、植村隆氏が、3日後の記者会見で金学順氏という氏名がわかった女性が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され」だと記事にした。　

吉田作話キャンペーンにより日本軍による強制連行説が定説化しつつあるなか、植村氏が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され、日本軍人相手に売春行為を強いられた朝鮮人従軍慰安婦」の存在を報じたことで、強制連行の加害者・日本軍対被害者・朝鮮人慰安婦という吉田作話の構図が確固たるものとなった。

朝日新聞の慰安婦報道において、植村氏の、この署名記事が果たした役割は大きいと思う。　

2014年8月5日、朝日新聞は吉田証言が虚偽だったことを認め、関連記事を取り消した。

しかし、それは朝日新聞が最初に日本軍による強制連行の加害者の証言として吉田氏の紹介記事を紙面に掲載してから、実に32年も後のことだった。

この稿続く。　

そして1991年8月11日、植村隆氏が、3日後の記者会見で金学順氏という氏名がわかった女性が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され」だと記事にした

以下は前章の続きである。

この間、吉田氏の証言は、韓国済州島の現地新聞あるいは現代史家の秦郁彦氏によって、事実無根であることが証明されている。

にもかかわらず、朝日新聞は長らく自らの誤りに目を瞑り、訂正もしなかった。

言論機関として許されないことはもちろん、日本と日本国民の名誉を傷つけた点で、非常に重い責任を負っている。　

吉田氏は、虚構の強制連行を具体的に語ってみせ、日本政府及び日本軍を加害者に仕立て上げた。

そして1991年8月11日、植村隆氏が、3日後の記者会見で金学順氏という氏名がわかった女性が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され」だと記事にした。　

吉田作話キャンペーンにより日本軍による強制連行説が定説化しつつあるなか、植村氏が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され、日本軍人相手に売春行為を強いられた朝鮮人従軍慰安婦」の存在を報じたことで、強制連行の加害者・日本軍対被害者・朝鮮人慰安婦という吉田作話の構図が確固たるものとなった。

朝日新聞の慰安婦報道において、植村氏の、この署名記事が果たした役割は大きいと思う。　

2014年8月5日、朝日新聞は吉田証言が虚偽だったことを認め、関連記事を取り消した。

しかし、それは朝日新聞が最初に日本軍による強制連行の加害者の証言として吉田氏の紹介記事を紙面に掲載してから、実に32年も後のことだった。

この稿続く。　

言論機関として許されないことはもちろん、日本と日本国民の名誉を傷つけた点で、非常に重い責任を負っている。

以下は前章の続きである。

この間、吉田氏の証言は、韓国済州島の現地新聞あるいは現代史家の秦郁彦氏によって、事実無根であることが証明されている。

にもかかわらず、朝日新聞は長らく自らの誤りに目を瞑り、訂正もしなかった。

言論機関として許されないことはもちろん、日本と日本国民の名誉を傷つけた点で、非常に重い責任を負っている。　

吉田氏は、虚構の強制連行を具体的に語ってみせ、日本政府及び日本軍を加害者に仕立て上げた。

そして1991年8月11日、植村隆氏が、3日後の記者会見で金学順氏という氏名がわかった女性が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され」だと記事にした。　

吉田作話キャンペーンにより日本軍による強制連行説が定説化しつつあるなか、植村氏が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され、日本軍人相手に売春行為を強いられた朝鮮人従軍慰安婦」の存在を報じたことで、強制連行の加害者・日本軍対被害者・朝鮮人慰安婦という吉田作話の構図が確固たるものとなった。

朝日新聞の慰安婦報道において、植村氏の、この署名記事が果たした役割は大きいと思う。　

2014年8月5日、朝日新聞は吉田証言が虚偽だったことを認め、関連記事を取り消した。

しかし、それは朝日新聞が最初に日本軍による強制連行の加害者の証言として吉田氏の紹介記事を紙面に掲載してから、実に32年も後のことだった。

この稿続く。　

この間、吉田氏の証言は、韓国済州島の現地新聞あるいは現代史家の秦郁彦氏によって、事実無根であることが証明されている。

以下は前章の続きである。

この間、吉田氏の証言は、韓国済州島の現地新聞あるいは現代史家の秦郁彦氏によって、事実無根であることが証明されている。

にもかかわらず、朝日新聞は長らく自らの誤りに目を瞑り、訂正もしなかった。

言論機関として許されないことはもちろん、日本と日本国民の名誉を傷つけた点で、非常に重い責任を負っている。　

吉田氏は、虚構の強制連行を具体的に語ってみせ、日本政府及び日本軍を加害者に仕立て上げた。

そして1991年8月11日、植村隆氏が、3日後の記者会見で金学順氏という氏名がわかった女性が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され」だと記事にした。　

吉田作話キャンペーンにより日本軍による強制連行説が定説化しつつあるなか、植村氏が「女子挺身隊の名で戦場に連行され、日本軍人相手に売春行為を強いられた朝鮮人従軍慰安婦」の存在を報じたことで、強制連行の加害者・日本軍対被害者・朝鮮人慰安婦という吉田作話の構図が確固たるものとなった。

朝日新聞の慰安婦報道において、植村氏の、この署名記事が果たした役割は大きいと思う。　

2014年8月5日、朝日新聞は吉田証言が虚偽だったことを認め、関連記事を取り消した。

しかし、それは朝日新聞が最初に日本軍による強制連行の加害者の証言として吉田氏の紹介記事を紙面に掲載してから、実に32年も後のことだった。

この稿続く。　

However, it was 32 years after the Asahi newspaper published the introduction article of

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Meanwhile, Mr. Yoshida's testimony has been proved to be unfounded by the local newspaper of Jeju Island of Korea or by Hata Ikuhiko of modern historian.

Nonetheless, the Asahi newspaper connive their own error and did not correct for a long time.

It has a very heavy responsibility in that it hurts the honor of Japan and the Japanese citizens as well as what is not allowed as a speech organization.

Mr. Yoshida talks concretely about forced entrainment of fiction, to set Japanese Government and Japanese Army up as perpetrators.

And on August 11, 1991, Mr. Takashi Uemura made an article that a woman who knew the name of Ms. Kim Hak-sun at a press conference three days later was taken to the battlefield under the name of a girl’s volunteer team.

With the Yoshida fabrication campaign, the Japanese military's forced tyrant theory is reporting of Mr. Uemura existence of 'brought to the battlefield under the name of a girls volunteer party, to Japanese soldiers, Korean military comfort women forced to prostitute ', forced entrainment perpetrator / Japanese military versus victim / Korean comfort woman, Yoshida fabrication composition has become firm.

In the Asahi newspaper's comfort women's report, Mr. Uemura's role played by this signature article is great.

On 5 August 2014, the Asahi Shimbun admitted that Yoshida's testimony was false and canceled related articles.

However, it was 32 years after the Asahi newspaper published the introduction article of Mr. Yoshida on paper in the first time as a testimony of perpetrators of forced entrainment by the Japanese army.

This draft continues.

On 5 August 2014, the Asahi Shimbun admitted that Yoshida's testimony was false and canceled

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Meanwhile, Mr. Yoshida's testimony has been proved to be unfounded by the local newspaper of Jeju Island of Korea or by Hata Ikuhiko of modern historian.

Nonetheless, the Asahi newspaper connive their own error and did not correct for a long time.

It has a very heavy responsibility in that it hurts the honor of Japan and the Japanese citizens as well as what is not allowed as a speech organization.

Mr. Yoshida talks concretely about forced entrainment of fiction, to set Japanese Government and Japanese Army up as perpetrators.

And on August 11, 1991, Mr. Takashi Uemura made an article that a woman who knew the name of Ms. Kim Hak-sun at a press conference three days later was taken to the battlefield under the name of a girl’s volunteer team.

With the Yoshida fabrication campaign, the Japanese military's forced tyrant theory is reporting of Mr. Uemura existence of 'brought to the battlefield under the name of a girls volunteer party, to Japanese soldiers, Korean military comfort women forced to prostitute ', forced entrainment perpetrator / Japanese military versus victim / Korean comfort woman, Yoshida fabrication composition has become firm.

In the Asahi newspaper's comfort women's report, Mr. Uemura's role played by this signature article is great.

On 5 August 2014, the Asahi Shimbun admitted that Yoshida's testimony was false and canceled related articles.

However, it was 32 years after the Asahi newspaper published the introduction article of Mr. Yoshida on paper in the first time as a testimony of perpetrators of forced entrainment by the Japanese army.

This draft continues.

In the Asahi newspaper's comfort women's report, Mr. Uemura's role played by this signature article

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Meanwhile, Mr. Yoshida's testimony has been proved to be unfounded by the local newspaper of Jeju Island of Korea or by Hata Ikuhiko of modern historian.

Nonetheless, the Asahi newspaper connive their own error and did not correct for a long time.

It has a very heavy responsibility in that it hurts the honor of Japan and the Japanese citizens as well as what is not allowed as a speech organization.

Mr. Yoshida talks concretely about forced entrainment of fiction, to set Japanese Government and Japanese Army up as perpetrators.

And on August 11, 1991, Mr. Takashi Uemura made an article that a woman who knew the name of Ms. Kim Hak-sun at a press conference three days later was taken to the battlefield under the name of a girl’s volunteer team.

With the Yoshida fabrication campaign, the Japanese military's forced tyrant theory is reporting of Mr. Uemura existence of 'brought to the battlefield under the name of a girls volunteer party, to Japanese soldiers, Korean military comfort women forced to prostitute ', forced entrainment perpetrator / Japanese military versus victim / Korean comfort woman, Yoshida fabrication composition has become firm.

In the Asahi newspaper's comfort women's report, Mr. Uemura's role played by this signature article is great.

On 5 August 2014, the Asahi Shimbun admitted that Yoshida's testimony was false and canceled related articles.

However, it was 32 years after the Asahi newspaper published the introduction article of Mr. Yoshida on paper in the first time as a testimony of perpetrators of forced entrainment by the Japanese army.

This draft continues.

And on August 11, 1991, Mr. Takashi Uemura made an article that a woman who knew

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Meanwhile, Mr. Yoshida's testimony has been proved to be unfounded by the local newspaper of Jeju Island of Korea or by Hata Ikuhiko of modern historian.

Nonetheless, the Asahi newspaper connive their own error and did not correct for a long time.

It has a very heavy responsibility in that it hurts the honor of Japan and the Japanese citizens as well as what is not allowed as a speech organization.

Mr. Yoshida talks concretely about forced entrainment of fiction, to set Japanese Government and Japanese Army up as perpetrators.

And on August 11, 1991, Mr. Takashi Uemura made an article that a woman who knew the name of Ms. Kim Hak-sun at a press conference three days later was taken to the battlefield under the name of a girl’s volunteer team.

With the Yoshida fabrication campaign, the Japanese military's forced tyrant theory is reporting of Mr. Uemura existence of 'brought to the battlefield under the name of a girls volunteer party, to Japanese soldiers, Korean military comfort women forced to prostitute ', forced entrainment perpetrator / Japanese military versus victim / Korean comfort woman, Yoshida fabrication composition has become firm.

In the Asahi newspaper's comfort women's report, Mr. Uemura's role played by this signature article is great.

On 5 August 2014, the Asahi Shimbun admitted that Yoshida's testimony was false and canceled related articles.

However, it was 32 years after the Asahi newspaper published the introduction article of Mr. Yoshida on paper in the first time as a testimony of perpetrators of forced entrainment by the Japanese army.

This draft continues.

forced entrainment of fiction, to set Japanese Government and Japanese Army up as perpetrators

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Meanwhile, Mr. Yoshida's testimony has been proved to be unfounded by the local newspaper of Jeju Island of Korea or by Hata Ikuhiko of modern historian.

Nonetheless, the Asahi newspaper connive their own error and did not correct for a long time.

It has a very heavy responsibility in that it hurts the honor of Japan and the Japanese citizens as well as what is not allowed as a speech organization.

Mr. Yoshida talks concretely about forced entrainment of fiction, to set Japanese Government and Japanese Army up as perpetrators.

And on August 11, 1991, Mr. Takashi Uemura made an article that a woman who knew the name of Ms. Kim Hak-sun at a press conference three days later was taken to the battlefield under the name of a girl’s volunteer team.

With the Yoshida fabrication campaign, the Japanese military's forced tyrant theory is reporting of Mr. Uemura existence of 'brought to the battlefield under the name of a girls volunteer party, to Japanese soldiers, Korean military comfort women forced to prostitute ', forced entrainment perpetrator / Japanese military versus victim / Korean comfort woman, Yoshida fabrication composition has become firm.

In the Asahi newspaper's comfort women's report, Mr. Uemura's role played by this signature article is great.

On 5 August 2014, the Asahi Shimbun admitted that Yoshida's testimony was false and canceled related articles.

However, it was 32 years after the Asahi newspaper published the introduction article of Mr. Yoshida on paper in the first time as a testimony of perpetrators of forced entrainment by the Japanese army.

This draft continues.

very heavy responsibility...as well as what is not allowed as a speech organization

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Meanwhile, Mr. Yoshida's testimony has been proved to be unfounded by the local newspaper of Jeju Island of Korea or by Hata Ikuhiko of modern historian.

Nonetheless, the Asahi newspaper connive their own error and did not correct for a long time.

It has a very heavy responsibility in that it hurts the honor of Japan and the Japanese citizens as well as what is not allowed as a speech organization.

Mr. Yoshida talks concretely about forced entrainment of fiction, to set Japanese Government and Japanese Army up as perpetrators.

And on August 11, 1991, Mr. Takashi Uemura made an article that a woman who knew the name of Ms. Kim Hak-sun at a press conference three days later was taken to the battlefield under the name of a girl’s volunteer team.

With the Yoshida fabrication campaign, the Japanese military's forced tyrant theory is reporting of Mr. Uemura existence of 'brought to the battlefield under the name of a girls volunteer party, to Japanese soldiers, Korean military comfort women forced to prostitute ', forced entrainment perpetrator / Japanese military versus victim / Korean comfort woman, Yoshida fabrication composition has become firm.

In the Asahi newspaper's comfort women's report, Mr. Uemura's role played by this signature article is great.

On 5 August 2014, the Asahi Shimbun admitted that Yoshida's testimony was false and canceled related articles.

However, it was 32 years after the Asahi newspaper published the introduction article of Mr. Yoshida on paper in the first time as a testimony of perpetrators of forced entrainment by the Japanese army.

This draft continues.