Yesterday, weekly Asahi reached.
When reading a reading column last night, it will have read an unnecessary part.
It didn't advance forward.
Today, it read in Starbucks and it re-recognized.
It read from Souichirou Tawara's serialization column but immediately, there was a part which it should read.
It was an article in the streamer to be a constitution 96 article revision theory without the argument of the contents in the thing.
The preamble abbreviation
Of course and it will change Liberal Democratic Party administration above all in the constitution 9 article.
As for most of the conservatism mainstream politicians or the scholars, the present constitution was occupied in 1946, i.e. Japan was occupied by the Allied Powers and in the times which lost a signory completely, the convenience could press a good form for the occupation army.
It weakened Japan if saying more concretely and it made it the country by which it is possible for the combat to defy never Allied Powers.
It says that it is a constitution 9 article.
Moreover, when the present constitution was pressed by the occupation army, of course, Japan didn't have a signory.
There is an opinion to make that the constitution as Japan is supposed to have made only a form in the time when there is not a signory is invalid actually fairly.
For example, Germany (being West Germany then) establishes the constitution by the Deutsches Reich people after it doesn't make a constitution with under occupation and is independent in 1949.
The omission
When saying frankly, there is a problem in the present constitution.
To declare " that it made up one's mind when trusting in the justice of the people who love Peace and the faith and would maintain division's safety and survival " in the constitution preamble doesn't have independence absolutely and not to touch a right of self-defense at all in article 9, too, is a problem.
It is a thing with the bad diplomatic ability of Japan that the influence to insist on the constitution revision by points out strongly.
The diplomatic technology, too, is poor, but it isn't possible to be independent any more as the boiling sovereign and America says that it becomes compliant.
Therefore, to develop the diplomacy which was independent as the sovereign, it says that it should revise a constitution 9 article.
It says that it should make the country which can do military force, i.e. a war as the actuation of the power of the state as the last means of the diplomatic negotiations like the constitution in all the countries except Japan.
It says that it should become the ordinary country like America and the United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, Korea.
Seemed this claim of it, glancing and being logical.
However, as me who experience the Pacific War, it is convinced that it should not change a I clause in the constitution 9 article.
It didn't estimate it to be possible to win one whom of the executive in the army in those days and then the government soul, the Pacific War.
This is a grim fact.
Emperor Showa, too, was opposite to the war.
Nevertheless, what and to be defeated had begun an inevitable war.
The constitution of these Japanese doesn't change at present, too.
Therefore, at least, it should not change a constitution 9 article.
Therefore, I said the thing strongly to Shinzo Abe prime minister who appeared on " the heated discussion! the cross fire " of BS Asahi on March 9th and Abe prime minister sided.
I reconsidered Abe prime minister.
