第58話. 遅い選挙のレビュー(2) 最高裁判所裁判官国民審査を契機に提案したいアンケート

2017-11-18 23:00:33 | ★改善・変更の要る仕組み 仕来り 風潮 法律
湖畔人です。

56話で先日の衆院選のレビューをしましたが、投票の際、やはり気になったのは、以前18話でも触れた 最高裁判所裁判官国民審査です。
裁判官の名前がずらりと並んでおり、クビにしたい人を選びなさいというものです。私を含め殆どの国民は、それら裁判官の善し悪しを判断する基準になる情報を一切持たず、出来る事としたら、名前の響きが良いとか、字画が良いとか、その位の印象を持つ事しかできません。よって選べないのです。であるにも拘らず、何故国民が選択したような形をとろうとするのか、その意図がわかりません。国民に時間を取らせ、印刷物にお金を掛け、票数を数えるにもコストが掛かるでしょうから、純粋に時間とお金の無駄です。もういい加減止めてほしいです。どうもこの制度も9条と同じくGHQによってもたらされた悪制度のようです。一方、GHQもその実効性に懐疑的だったという話もあり、なぜ続けているか意味不明です。
もし、本当に国民が選んだ形を取りたいというなら、名前の下に実績を列記すべきです。何の裁判に関わりどういった判断を下した、とか、そう言った過去の実績を列記すべきです。でないと何も分りません。出来得るならば、いくつかの社会が抱える課題に対して、一体どう言った見解を持っているのか、考えを知るためにも、アンケートに答えてほしい所です。それで、信用に足る裁判官かどうか判断ができるかと思います。
例えば、
・少年時の犯罪で、社会に衝撃を与え、人間不信の種を植え、被害者の命を奪い、被害者の家族に癒える事のない深い傷を負わせたのにも拘らず、少年法に守られ、のうのうと社会復帰し、全く反省もなく、社会に紛れ今でも一般人に悪影響と危険を及ぼす存在になっている現実をどう思うか、とか、
・性犯罪や薬物犯罪など再犯を繰り返してるにも拘わらず、軽い刑罰で直ぐに社会復帰し、また再犯を繰り返し一般人を危険に晒し続けている現実をどう思うか、とか、
・自衛隊の存在は違憲と思うかどうか?とか、
・9条を含む現憲法を改正すべきかどうか?とか
色々あると思いますが、そうした極端な事例に関し、考えを聞いてみたいものです。そのあたりを聞ければ、ああ、この方には任せられない、等と判断も出来るかもしれません。

実は、こうしたアンケートは、あらゆる公的で影響力の大きな方々には全員受けて貰った方が良いと思っています。

例えば、ジャーナリスト、公平なようで、やはり偏向します。例えば、ニュースキャスター、ニュース番組のプロデューサー、各テレビ局の社長、各新聞の社長、論説主幹、新聞雑誌の記者、全政治家、宗教家、外国人タレント、ワイドショーでコメントする芸能人や有名人、等々に、各人の思想的背景を浮き彫りにするアンケートを受けていただきたい所です。

例えば、
1)あなたは神を信じますか?信じる場合何という神ですか?
2)あなたは霊の存在を信じますか?人は亡くなったら霊になると信じますか?
3)あなたは民主主義をどう思いますか?良いと思う場合何故ですか?
4)あなたは共産主義をどう思いますか?良いと思う場合何故ですか?
5)あなたは社会主義をどう思いますか?良いと思う場合何故ですか?
6)あなたは天皇をどう見ますか?天照大神のご子孫であるとご存知ですか?
7)今後天皇制はどうあるべきと思いますか?
8)あなたは何故明治維新が起き、侍の国から近代国家に舵を切ったか、その理由をご存知ですか?
9)あなたは、何故日本が朝鮮を併合し、満州国を建てたと思いますか?
10)あなたは、先の大戦をどう思いますか?
11)あなたは、中韓朝が中心に主張する慰安婦問題をどう思いますか?
12)あなたは、慰安婦問題が後から虚偽と認めた日本人が言い始めた話で、朝日新聞が事実のごとく報じた為にまるで事実のように世界に広まり韓朝中に政治利用されていると知っていますか?
13)あなたは、客観情報から誇張や捏造が疑われる南京大虐殺をどう思いますか?
14)あなたは、それらを信じ、日本を批判するユネスコや国連の機関についてどう思いますか?
15)あなたは、国連が、日独伊を仮想敵とした先の大戦の勝者連合により出来ている事をご存知ですか?
16)あなたは、日本国憲法の前文が日本の周辺国が平和的で友好的で非戦闘的な平和を愛する信頼に足る国々である事を前提としており、その前提に則って憲法9条で謳われる戦力の不保持に繋がっていくにも拘わらず、現実には『核で日本を無きものとする』と宣う北朝鮮が隣国におり、その背後には同じく核保有大国で日本と尖閣で揉めるている中国が存在する現実があり、憲法の前文の想定と全くマッチしない現状がそこにあるにも拘わらず、今も日本国は9条の縛りを受け続け、危険に晒され続けている現状をどう思うか?
17)あなたは、9条は破棄されるべきと思うか?保持されるべきか?
18)あなたは、安倍首相の言う9条保持で自衛隊明記で十分と思うか?2項がある限り自衛隊の存在は違憲と思うか?
19)あなたは、自衛隊法で自衛隊が正当防衛(やられないとやり返せない)でないと動けない事、まず死人を出さないと反撃できない現状をどう思うか?自衛隊員がかわいそうと思わないか?
20)あなたは、自衛隊が予算不足から兵器と人数が少なすぎて、まともに戦闘が出来ず、国民を守れない事実をどう思うか?
21)あなたは、国民を守る軍隊を持たない現状の日本が、一人前の主権国家であると思うか?
22)あなたは、仮に、北や中国と戦闘になっても、アメリカに頼らず一定期間戦闘が出来、国民を守れるだけの戦力を保持すべきと思うか?
23)あなたは、中国が米国に代わって明確な覇権国家を狙っており、自国の都合で周辺国に有無を言わさぬ現状をどう思うか?
24)あなたは、その中国に対し、日本はどうあるべきと思うか?
25)あなたは、中韓が、反日プロパガンダとして慰安婦や南京大虐殺等、虚偽の情報を世界中に積極的に広め、残念な事に世界の人々がそれらの虚偽情報を信じ始め、日本にネガティブなイメージを持つ人々が日々増え続けているこの現状をどう思うか?
26)あなたは、そうした中韓の反日プロパガンダに対し、積極的なアクションを起こすべきと思わないか?
27)あなたは、政府が税収を上げる名目で消費税を上げると言うが、消費税を上げる度に、これまで過去3度も税収を減らして来ている事実をどう思うか?
28)あなたは、米英露独仏、オランダ他の国のように、世界の抱える課題に対し、日本も積極的にコミットすべきと思うか?
29)あなたは、アジアの課題、特に中国の覇権に怯える国々とどう連携すべきと思うか?
30)あなたは、日本は今後アジアの中で世界の中で、どういった立ち位置でいるべきと思うか?

等々、他にも色々と確認事項があるかと思いますが、こうしたアンケートに答えていただく事で、その方の思想的背景がより明確になり、それにより、応援すべき人、そうでない人を見分けやすくなるかもしれません。

是非、公人、影響のある方々には、こうしたアンケートに答えていただきたい所です。

湖畔人

第57話. 初タゲリ

2017-11-05 12:39:09 | 花鳥風月
湖畔人です。

今年初のタゲリを確認しました。

20羽くらいで固まっているので、また渡来して間もない感じです。
相変わらず愛らしい姿を見せてくれます。
実をいうと先日欧州の田舎で先に目撃していたのですが、やはり地元で見るのは格別です。
これから4か月、楽しませていただきます。
癒されます。

湖畔人

第56話. 秋も本番 遅い選挙のレビューとトランプ氏の来日

2017-11-05 12:29:02 | ★政治 外交 歴史
湖畔人です。

また気が付けば一ヵ月が矢のように過ぎてしまいました。忙しく休む間もなく体も悲鳴を上げています。

そんな中、衆院選はとっくに終ってしまいましたが、思いの他、小池さんの勢いは抑えられ、自公が圧勝した結果でした。彼女に特に明確なポリシーがある訳では無く、あくまで清潔感、透明感が現存する権力者より多少勝っている、と言うイメージ戦略だけで戦うことを得意としている政局の人だという事が多くの人に気付かれてしまったのかもしれません。北との緊張状態にある中、小池政権等が出現するよりは、自公の方がまだマシかもしれませんが、一方で、憲法9条2項も変えられず、消費税10%を掲げ、親中親半島で日本の強国化に潜在的にブレーキを掛けがちな公明が政権にいるこのチグハグな内閣が続く現在の状況は、日本にとって手放しで喜べる状況ではありません。神々が現政権に対しどう思っているかは、ここ最近続いた台風を見ても想像が付くところです。

神々の意思を体現していると思える政党は別にいますが、その小さな保守政党は、今回も議席を取れずに終わってしまいましたが、たとえ議席が取れなくても、彼らの主張は見事であって、一切ブレが無く、憲法改正、核兵器の保有、消費税の低減、日本を嘘で名誉棄損する中韓ユネスコへの抗議と、その姿勢は一貫しており、大変潔く、侍のでようあり、美しくもある、ド直球、ドストレートな保守本流の政治姿勢を保っています。当たり前の事を当たり前に言うだけで、何故か危険な意見、過激なことを言っているように聞こえてしまうこのご時世の中、彼らも苦戦を強いられていますが、やはり日本のマスコミが醸し出す、左翼的思想と自虐史観をベースにした思想的土壌が問題であって、彼らのブレークスルーを難しくしている正体ですので、それを啓蒙により変質、打破して行く必要があります。これが遠回りのように見えて、最も近道な王道、勝利への道なのかなと思います。憲法改正、国防強化、核保有、年金システムの改訂、マスコミの規制緩和、未来産業の育成、農業の規制緩和、等、当たり前の事を分かり易く、なぜそれをしないとマズいのか、その理由を単純に明快に繰り返し主張し続けていくしかありません。特に日本に欠けている安全保障面は死活問題であり急ぎ変革が要ると、そういう事を何度も伝えて言く必要がありますね。
段々と彼らの主張に理解を示す人達が増えてきている感触は、肌感覚として感じてはいます。
しかし、票を得るところまでは行かないのは、皆、各自、たった一票しか票を持っていませんので、共感はしても死に票には出来ないという心理が働くのかもしれません。しかし、今の自公では国を守り切れませんので、その点をしっかり国民に理解をさせ、この新たなる保守政党こそが、新たなる保守票の受け皿である、と言う認識を持っていただく必要があります。
注意が要るのは、仮にそれが正しい主張、真実であったとしても、大胆な意見、奇異なる意見に聞こえがちな変革を主張する場合には、それを実施したとしても特に問題が起きない事、全く問題がない事を数値を使って定量的に視覚化して説明する必要があります。減税にせよ年金の停止や改訂にせよ、それを実施しても、世の中はこうなり、全く心配はいらない、長期的には避けて通れない道であって、必ず必要な変革である。最終的には大きく国民を利する政策であると数字を用いて示してあげないといけません。同時に一方では、地方議員の排出を重ね、地方議員に付いた票を足し算するだけで地方の国会議員の当選が想定できる状況を段々と作っていくしかないですね。いずれにせよ、ここからが勝負であって、明確な戦略をもって、地道で押し強い啓蒙活動を続けていただきたい所ですね。また地域で戦う方々は、具体的に地域のイベントや活動に顔を出して、現実的な安心できる勢力として地元の方々、有力者に認知してもらう必要があります。その政党の方々の人柄が良いのは判りきった事ですので、後は彼らの存在を多くの人に知ってもらう事が重要です。
とにかく、諦めればそこで終わりですので、ゾンビのように倒れても何度でも立ち上がって前を向いて進んでいくしかないのです。これからも是非頑張っていただきたいですね。応援しています。

さて、イバンカが昨晩去り、トランプ氏がやってきましたね。一番の関心は北との関係ですが、どう決着するか見物です。あまり長引かせず、今年中に決着いただき、中共という本丸との最終対決に早く移っていただきたいところです。

湖畔人

The article #42. Spiritualism or Atheism, Recommendation to live with clear philosophy (2)

2017-11-05 07:38:59 | Thought Philosophy Spiritual
Hi, this is Kohanbito as Lake man.

This is the 2nd time for this theme. But since this is like a life work type of theme, I would like to continuously write about this theme.

As a summary of the previous one,
1) Atheists should not close their minds to the possibility of existence of God or spirits just for the reason that they are invisible because there are many invisible signals or waves around us for communication purpose and there could be other undiscovered and undetected wavelengths of signals which may be omitted from invisible intellectual existences such as gods or sprits. So, they should not deny such invisible existence of God or spirits easily.
2) Atheists should not close their minds to the possibility of existence of God or spirits because the possibility of it is still 50%. They should not pretend like atheism is major.
3) Atheists tends to use the theory of evolution or Darwinism as their theoretical back ground but their theory are not so trustworthy for the gap of logic and for the fact that the theory is based on very unrealistic and unreasonable imagination. We should calm down and we should see it again with rational eyes and with logical way of thinking.
4) If the majority of people on this planet are proper god believers who see that we are all leaves of god tree and we are all brothers and sisters and we are all children of God and we were born and died many times in the process of reincarnations in order to gain our experiences and our understandings about this universe and about ourselves and about God. Then since they see each other as children of God and brothers and sisters each other, they care and respect and be kind to each other and they will be shame on themselves if they think something bad in their minds because they think what they think in their mind can be seen by Gods or spirits, so, those god believers are people we can trust. If the world is full of such nice people, this world will be safer and nicer place to live. And you can trust such world and many parents of kids will prefer to let their kinds to stay in such world.
5) This world seems does not function if we deny the existence of gods and spirits, Especially God believers and spiritualists tend to take Laws or morals more serious because they see God’s will behind moral or laws but atheists see no value in moral and laws. So they do not follow moral or laws if no one watch them. So, there is not much dignity and sense of requirements in laws and moral if majority of people in society are atheists. Our world seems better with god believers.
So, I recommend atheists to recognize and accept that the world with proper god believers make the world nicer and safer and better place to live. So we recommend all atheists to become proper god believers and would like to ask them to start to live with such conscious that we are all children of God so that we all need to love and respect and care each other and we also need to live with conscious that we are existence who live many times in reincarnation in order to gain understanding about this world and get closer to God. I said that in the previous one.

This time also, I would like to add some comments to the funny parts of 3) theory of evolution which tends to be the theoretical back ground of atheists.

■Can the life be born just by themselves while no living being were around?
Even in the previous article #37, I mentioned that how the first organic existence or first living being can be appeared when world was full of rocks which were cooled magma and no mold around. Now, many of us believe that first microbe appeared in the sea, and gradually those were evolved into more complicated beings in time, and finally it became mankind. But, to me, that theory sounds so unreasonable and there should be leap in logic. I still wonder how organic beings or any living creatures can be appeared from rocks or any inorganic substances when there are no molds around. If that is possible, that is a pure magic which God can only realize. I questioned that way. And theory of evolution says new species can be appeared by mutation but mutation is basically rare so that it is hard to make off spring. And basically mutation is minor change so that it is really hard to imagine to break the wall of species by that. So, to me, it is like a bad joke. And hard to accept.
Basically, if this planet earth was full of magma, so heated, and no mold or any organics were there, then how the first one can be appeared?? That is still question to me. If there is no such organics of mold or microbe around, then, there should be no organics of mold or microbe even later. They cannot be born from rocks or inorganics. If the scientists say that is possible to be happened, then scientists who only admit the scientific truth when the truth can be realized in the lab repeatedly should realize the ancient condition of this planet earth in the lab, heat everything first, and block any mold to come in, they should realize the condition of first appearance of organics or amino acids or any living beings in that lab by applying voltage or radioactive or any beams from far ultra violet to infrared. If they cannot do such experiments and if they cannot prove to realize first appearance of organics or amino acids or any living beings in that lab, then they should not say that first organics or amino acids can be appeared in the sea by accidents is true until they realize it in the lab. They should stop saying first microbe appeared in the sea and gradually those were evolved into more complicated beings and it became mankind. That should stop saying so like obvious truth since they cannot prove it in the lab.
If they want to be considered that they are fair people, then they should say, “Regarding the birth of any life in this planet, we know nothing about it and we cannot deny God’s creation is one of the answers at this moment.”

■Two possibilities
If we exclude the God’s creation as one of reasons why and how the first organic or first living being were born in this planet, then I think there are two choices for the reason.
First possibility is, after the environment of this planet becomes appropriate for living creatures like air or proper temperature are provided, if some meteorites from universe consists of some living creatures inside were fallen from universe to this earth, and then those creatures can be proliferated on this planet. That is one possibility. The second possibility is, by the radioactive from universe or by the sun lights or by high voltage from thunder lights or by the magnetic power of this earth, chemical reactions to inorganic substances may happen and change it to organic substances.

But even if the first one was the truth, it will not explain how organic or first living being were born in universe, so that, to find out how first organics and first living beings were born in this earth, we better think about the 2nd possibility.
Like I said above, if the scientists want to say that organics or living creatures were born from inorganics substances as the results of chemical reactions which were caused by radioactive from universe or by the sun lights or by high voltage from thunder lights or by the magnetic power of this earth, then scientists should realize the condition of ancient planet earth in the laboratory, and they should apply radioactive or high voltage or high magnets or any lights from infrared to super ultra violet to the inorganic substances in order to find out 2nd possibility is true or not. And until scientists realize to create organic substance or living creatures from inorganic materials, scientists should not say like hypothesis of evolution which is like first microbe appeared in the sea and gradually those were evolved into more complicated beings and it became mankind. They should not say that until they prove it in the lab.
Before, Stanley Lloyd Miller of University of Chicago tried to prove in the experimentation in the lab that amino acid can be made by applying high voltage to some gasses such as H2 & CH4 & ammonia because his team thought that ancient Earth were full of those gases. And he succeeded to create Amino acid from those gassed by applying high voltage to those. But after NASA brought stones from the moon, some scientists studied it and concluded that the condition of ancient Earth was full of magma and gasses that ancient Earth had were N2 & CO2 & water vapor which we can find out in Volcanic gas. From that, we found that the experiment result of Stanley Lloyd Miller were not simulation of the condition of ancient planet Earth and it was concluded that his experimentation cannot prove that organic material such as amino acid can be created by accident of nature such as thunder light. So, so far no one has succeeded to prove that organic material can be made in nature by accident such as thunder light in experiments in lab.
Even if scientists could succeed to make simple organic material such as amino acid, that is not enough. Scientist should prove that amino acid become simple microbe which can move by himself as his will. They should prove that such evolution can be done by accidents in nature in the experimentations in lab. That will becomes the evidence of the origin of life and Darwinism. But if they cannot do it, they should not treat the story of the origin of life or evolution or Darwinism as fixed unbreakable truth. They should not say that microbe suddenly appears in the sea and those were evolved to more complex being like human by accidents. Instead, they should say such hypothesis of evolution were not so reliable enough and far from truth. And origin of life is more likely to be done by God’s creation. Scientists should behave fair to the fact. If they cannot prove it in their lab, then they should not claim it is true. They should not talk like microbe were appeared in the sea by accident were proven truth and they should not talk like we humans were result of evolution from simple microbe by accidents. Darwinism and story of evolution could be just a propaganda.

■DNA
In the previous article, I said that one of possible answers to the question why DNA in humans and other animals were similar might be the possibilities that mankind in unrecorded ancient eras could have higher genetic engineering capacity and they could create some new species by using that technologies and they may evolved more complex being from much simpler beings. I said that that could be one of possible scenarios. Or ET who also has higher genetic engineering capacity could do the same. That is another option. But we may also be able to think that God also may create complex beings by using genetic engineering from simpler beings. God may did it in time little by little. That is also possible scenario.
But anyway, DNA, Gene is a program. And such program cannot be written by accident in nature. It should have been designed by someone. If those program were written by accident in nature, then it has to be changed or rewritten so easily by another accidents in nature. But it does not happen. DNA is tough program and it cannot be changed so easily even though we were surrounded by some strong voltages or radio actives or magnetics or different temperatures. I am myself all the time until I die. So as you. The given character lasts till you die. Then we start to wonder who can make such tough and robust program to us. Isn’t he what we call “God”? That is my question. I assume I am not the only one who think that way.

■Changing form to adjust to the environment changes
There is a TV program that shows natures and animals in Japanese national TV channel. But I feel funny when I am watching their program.
According to the narrator of the program, there are some unique animals who succeed to capture unique features or unique functions strategically in order to survive in tough environments. It sounds like those animals has magical power to get those new functions or colors or whatever if they desires those strongly. Changing reality by desiring something in mind strongly sounds same as the popular theory that Spiritualists learns on the 1st page of the text book of self-realization theory. They understand that such an ability is the most powerful power that all mankind were gifted by God. Because we are all children of God, we have such a power. Since animals are also created by God, there is no surprise even if animals have such power of mind to create reality.
Even though the title of this program is about Darwin, the editor of this program may have similar way of thinking as Wallace who is the friend of Darwin but who had a spiritual view point.
Anyway, as a conclusion, there is no doubt that this world does not go well if you deny the existence of God or spiritual world.
Even from now on, I will share with you about the how the life should be with such spiritual way of thinking. Until then, see you next time.

Kohanbito as lake man