（今日の心は紫）
（サイドミラーから見える現実）
ツイターを見ると原発関係のUPが多い。しかし、つなみにしても地震にしても福島にしてもアメリカのテロ行為だとするツイートもあるが、日本人は真実を知っていても見ないふりをして事を済ます傾向にあるのかと思える。時間がすぎれば痛みも和らぐさーではすまない現状が遂行中で、4号機もかなり危ないようで、そこで作業している人のナマの声もネットで表示されている。人材派遣会社の覇権の人間は資材課管轄にあり、人間ではなく物、資材として人間が扱われる現実である。持てる者たちと持てない物、収奪される者たち、消される多くの者達がいる。弱肉強食は大鉈を降って振り下ろされる時代、グローバルという名の妖怪が総浚いしていくようだ。
その中で怪物の内蔵に闘いを挑んだウィクリークスの代表が政治的な罠によってスウェーデン、そしてアメリカへと移送されるかもしれないような時勢？CIAの罠によるSEX TRAPだと弁護士は働きかけるが、個人的なセクシュアリティと政治の罠、そのスパイ映画を見るようなドラマの登場である。どう幕を下ろすのか、興味を持っている。
オーストラリアはなぜアサンジを外交力で助けようとしないのだろうか？アメリカに首根っこを牛耳られているのである。スウェーデンもまたUSのお膝元にある。つまり四海、闇もありえるのである。大きな権力は権力に対峙する組織や個人を封じ込めようとする。
アメリカの人気のあるラジオトークショーradio host： Rush Limbaugh ラッシュ・リンボーがレイプチャージで餌食にするために待ち構えているとの文章も見られる。ところでこの著名なラジオトークショーは沖縄のFEN（AFN)ラジオ（現在は名称が変わったようだ。AFNの任務は海外基地在住の軍人軍属とその家族向へテレビとラジオと通じて情報やエンターテイメントの提供であり、モットーはWe Bring You Home）でも流れている。アメリカの保守の代表で何十万人、いやそれ以上が聞いている番組である。たまに運転中に聞くがオバマの批判ばかりやっている感じである。オバマも含めてアメリカがやっていることは、もう未来志向でないと思えるゆえに、どうでもいいとも思えるが、現在何が起こっているか、を知ることができるというか、アメリカの保守派の意向がわかる番組だといえようか？ブッシュの共和党を大々的に支持している男でもあった。今でもそうなのだろう。宗教大国アメリカ（右派、保守）を代表するラジオホストである。
やれやれ、アメリカの国益に反する行為をするウィキリークスをやり玉に上げているのも想像できる。
この女性クレイアさんの論調は真のヒーローになるには、つまり永遠の名声を得るためにあえて糞にまみれたスウェーデンやアメリカの法廷で自分の主張をしてみたら？とけしかけているように読めなくもない。何を恐れているの？の副タイトルにもそれは感じられる。
それはどうなのだろう？一旦警察国家権力の手に落ちたら殺すも生かすも容易ではないだろうか？
第一国家破壊罪で起訴され監獄に閉じ込められる可能性は大である。
【Julian guilty of sexing up case for martyrdom 】
Claire Harvey
The Sunday Telegraph
June 03, 201212:00AM
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Print
Email
Share
If Assange had not persuaded so many intelligent people to his cause, it would be laughable. Source: Supplied
JULIAN, what are you really afraid of?
There's a strange notion afoot that Julian Assange, the Australian founder of website Wikileaks, is an oppressed freedom fighter and Australia has failed to protect him from his persecutor, the Great Satan America.
If Assange had not persuaded so many intelligent people to his cause, it would be laughable.
Assange is a privileged and spoilt polemicist not a journalist who is ready to fling himself on the flames of sacred martyrdom, as long as it doesn't involve any actual suffering.
For two years he has fought, with all the expense and pomposity a team of English barristers can provide, extradition on Swedish sexual misconduct charges.
But he, and his supporters, don't want you to focus on those charges, which relate to two women with whom Assange had allegedly part-consensual sexual encounters while visiting Sweden in 2010. The women allege sexual encounters with Assange turned nasty when he either refused to wear - or tampered with - condoms.
Assange denies it all, with the most unsophisticated of arguments.
The girls were up for it. They were groupies. They wanted the undivided sexual attention of this pasty web god and then they cooked up their jealous lies. No, wait. They were CIA plants.
Those are the claims of Assange and his lawyers. "The honeytrap has been sprung ... After what we've seen so far you can reasonably conclude this is part of a greater plan," said lawyer Mark Stephens in 2010.
Barrister Geoffrey Robertson this week called them "these unpleasant charges" before alleging -with no proof - a US grand jury had a sealed indictment to trap Assange. Robertson seems to fear they'll feed him feet-first into the flaming maw of radio host Rush Limbaugh.
That's the tactic: forget the 'rape', this is an evil global conspiracy.
Back in 2010 Swedish police initially decided no case could be made, but the women appealed to Sweden's prosecutor, which reopened the preliminary investigation.
Assange appointed lawyers and fled Sweden, and in November 2010 prosecutors got a domestic detention order in absentia from the Stockholm District Court. Assange's lawyers appealed that order but prosecutor Marianne Ny issued a European Arrest Warrant for his extradition to Sweden.
Assange's lawyers are arguing Ms Ny is not a "judicial authority" - she is just a prosecutor. But, as the UK Supreme Court president Lord Nicholas Phillips pointed out in his judgment this week, the Swedes did go through a judicial process to issue the warrant: the Stockholm District Court's original detention order, which demonstrated a judge's belief there was a case to answer.
Now, Assange's lawyers are appealing again, this time because they say they didn't get a fair chance to make submissions on the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which the Supreme Court judges relied upon in their reasoning. The lawyers have 14 days to make those submissions - and if they lose, Assange and his lawyers will doubtless appeal straight to the European Court of Justice in Strasbourg.
Assange's mother Christine is now accusing the Australian government of abandoning her son. She wants our Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to demand Sweden give Assange bail if he is extradited, or guarantee him "safe passage" home to Australia if the extradition bid fails. "When the plane refuels in Singapore, can someone from the Australian government be there to prevent US marshals from pulling him off the plane and whisking him off to the US? They (DFAT) refused that," Mrs Assange said.
Of course they refused it. Why should Assange get more help than every other Australian who gets in trouble overseas? DFAT provides advice and succour, but not diplomatic pressure to bail out unwary Aussies, whether they allegedly punched a cop in Bali or stole some secret American military files.
Assange's martyr routine, complete with posing and fist-pumping, would cause real political prisoners - like Nelson Mandela and Aung San Suu Kyi - to blush at his shameless carry-on.
His ego is propped by a global fan-club of gullible teenagers and leftover Trots from the Occupy 'movement'.
(It's odd, by the way, to hear the supposed 'left' - the cradle of women's rights - dismissing alleged sexual assault victims as spymasters' sluts.)
The only person so far suffering for the sake of Wikileaks' work is former United States military officer Bradley Manning, who is in prison awaiting court-martial for his part in allegedly stealing US cables for Assange. Both of them knew publishing the cables was prohibited by American law and they did it anyway.
Was Wikileaks a brave act of publishing heroism? Well, only if Assange is prepared to stand up. It's not brave to take bold action if you run away and hide behind your mum while someone else takes the rap.
If Assange really wanted to stand up for his beliefs, wouldn't he go to the United States and ask to be imprisoned in Manning's place? Wouldn't he fly to Stockholm and denounce his accusers from the dock? Wouldn't he dare this US Grand Jury to just try it?
What better triumph - what greater chance at immortality - than to truly be unjustly punished for one's cause, to be sent down by a crooked judge for daring to challenge the corrupt regime?
Assange just doesn't want to face up to what he has done. He is happy to be the avenging hero of Wikileaks, just as long as he doesn't face any actual consequences for his actions.
He wants to conflate an embarrassing sex charge with a global conspiracy.
（彼はグローバルな陰謀とばつの悪いSEXの起訴を融合させたがっている）
And he angrily denies reports that Wikileaks' publication of confidential US cables has endangered America's informants - many of whom are really oppressed - in places such as Iraq and Afghanistan. So far, Assange makes an unconvincing martyr.
最後の文＝（今までのところ、アサージは納得のいかないマティア（犠牲）になっている）
（サイドミラーから見える現実）
ツイターを見ると原発関係のUPが多い。しかし、つなみにしても地震にしても福島にしてもアメリカのテロ行為だとするツイートもあるが、日本人は真実を知っていても見ないふりをして事を済ます傾向にあるのかと思える。時間がすぎれば痛みも和らぐさーではすまない現状が遂行中で、4号機もかなり危ないようで、そこで作業している人のナマの声もネットで表示されている。人材派遣会社の覇権の人間は資材課管轄にあり、人間ではなく物、資材として人間が扱われる現実である。持てる者たちと持てない物、収奪される者たち、消される多くの者達がいる。弱肉強食は大鉈を降って振り下ろされる時代、グローバルという名の妖怪が総浚いしていくようだ。
その中で怪物の内蔵に闘いを挑んだウィクリークスの代表が政治的な罠によってスウェーデン、そしてアメリカへと移送されるかもしれないような時勢？CIAの罠によるSEX TRAPだと弁護士は働きかけるが、個人的なセクシュアリティと政治の罠、そのスパイ映画を見るようなドラマの登場である。どう幕を下ろすのか、興味を持っている。
オーストラリアはなぜアサンジを外交力で助けようとしないのだろうか？アメリカに首根っこを牛耳られているのである。スウェーデンもまたUSのお膝元にある。つまり四海、闇もありえるのである。大きな権力は権力に対峙する組織や個人を封じ込めようとする。
アメリカの人気のあるラジオトークショーradio host： Rush Limbaugh ラッシュ・リンボーがレイプチャージで餌食にするために待ち構えているとの文章も見られる。ところでこの著名なラジオトークショーは沖縄のFEN（AFN)ラジオ（現在は名称が変わったようだ。AFNの任務は海外基地在住の軍人軍属とその家族向へテレビとラジオと通じて情報やエンターテイメントの提供であり、モットーはWe Bring You Home）でも流れている。アメリカの保守の代表で何十万人、いやそれ以上が聞いている番組である。たまに運転中に聞くがオバマの批判ばかりやっている感じである。オバマも含めてアメリカがやっていることは、もう未来志向でないと思えるゆえに、どうでもいいとも思えるが、現在何が起こっているか、を知ることができるというか、アメリカの保守派の意向がわかる番組だといえようか？ブッシュの共和党を大々的に支持している男でもあった。今でもそうなのだろう。宗教大国アメリカ（右派、保守）を代表するラジオホストである。
やれやれ、アメリカの国益に反する行為をするウィキリークスをやり玉に上げているのも想像できる。
この女性クレイアさんの論調は真のヒーローになるには、つまり永遠の名声を得るためにあえて糞にまみれたスウェーデンやアメリカの法廷で自分の主張をしてみたら？とけしかけているように読めなくもない。何を恐れているの？の副タイトルにもそれは感じられる。
それはどうなのだろう？一旦警察国家権力の手に落ちたら殺すも生かすも容易ではないだろうか？
第一国家破壊罪で起訴され監獄に閉じ込められる可能性は大である。
【Julian guilty of sexing up case for martyrdom 】
Claire Harvey
The Sunday Telegraph
June 03, 201212:00AM
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Share
If Assange had not persuaded so many intelligent people to his cause, it would be laughable. Source: Supplied
JULIAN, what are you really afraid of?
There's a strange notion afoot that Julian Assange, the Australian founder of website Wikileaks, is an oppressed freedom fighter and Australia has failed to protect him from his persecutor, the Great Satan America.
If Assange had not persuaded so many intelligent people to his cause, it would be laughable.
Assange is a privileged and spoilt polemicist not a journalist who is ready to fling himself on the flames of sacred martyrdom, as long as it doesn't involve any actual suffering.
For two years he has fought, with all the expense and pomposity a team of English barristers can provide, extradition on Swedish sexual misconduct charges.
But he, and his supporters, don't want you to focus on those charges, which relate to two women with whom Assange had allegedly part-consensual sexual encounters while visiting Sweden in 2010. The women allege sexual encounters with Assange turned nasty when he either refused to wear - or tampered with - condoms.
Assange denies it all, with the most unsophisticated of arguments.
The girls were up for it. They were groupies. They wanted the undivided sexual attention of this pasty web god and then they cooked up their jealous lies. No, wait. They were CIA plants.
Those are the claims of Assange and his lawyers. "The honeytrap has been sprung ... After what we've seen so far you can reasonably conclude this is part of a greater plan," said lawyer Mark Stephens in 2010.
Barrister Geoffrey Robertson this week called them "these unpleasant charges" before alleging -with no proof - a US grand jury had a sealed indictment to trap Assange. Robertson seems to fear they'll feed him feet-first into the flaming maw of radio host Rush Limbaugh.
That's the tactic: forget the 'rape', this is an evil global conspiracy.
Back in 2010 Swedish police initially decided no case could be made, but the women appealed to Sweden's prosecutor, which reopened the preliminary investigation.
Assange appointed lawyers and fled Sweden, and in November 2010 prosecutors got a domestic detention order in absentia from the Stockholm District Court. Assange's lawyers appealed that order but prosecutor Marianne Ny issued a European Arrest Warrant for his extradition to Sweden.
Assange's lawyers are arguing Ms Ny is not a "judicial authority" - she is just a prosecutor. But, as the UK Supreme Court president Lord Nicholas Phillips pointed out in his judgment this week, the Swedes did go through a judicial process to issue the warrant: the Stockholm District Court's original detention order, which demonstrated a judge's belief there was a case to answer.
Now, Assange's lawyers are appealing again, this time because they say they didn't get a fair chance to make submissions on the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which the Supreme Court judges relied upon in their reasoning. The lawyers have 14 days to make those submissions - and if they lose, Assange and his lawyers will doubtless appeal straight to the European Court of Justice in Strasbourg.
Assange's mother Christine is now accusing the Australian government of abandoning her son. She wants our Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to demand Sweden give Assange bail if he is extradited, or guarantee him "safe passage" home to Australia if the extradition bid fails. "When the plane refuels in Singapore, can someone from the Australian government be there to prevent US marshals from pulling him off the plane and whisking him off to the US? They (DFAT) refused that," Mrs Assange said.
Of course they refused it. Why should Assange get more help than every other Australian who gets in trouble overseas? DFAT provides advice and succour, but not diplomatic pressure to bail out unwary Aussies, whether they allegedly punched a cop in Bali or stole some secret American military files.
Assange's martyr routine, complete with posing and fist-pumping, would cause real political prisoners - like Nelson Mandela and Aung San Suu Kyi - to blush at his shameless carry-on.
His ego is propped by a global fan-club of gullible teenagers and leftover Trots from the Occupy 'movement'.
(It's odd, by the way, to hear the supposed 'left' - the cradle of women's rights - dismissing alleged sexual assault victims as spymasters' sluts.)
The only person so far suffering for the sake of Wikileaks' work is former United States military officer Bradley Manning, who is in prison awaiting court-martial for his part in allegedly stealing US cables for Assange. Both of them knew publishing the cables was prohibited by American law and they did it anyway.
Was Wikileaks a brave act of publishing heroism? Well, only if Assange is prepared to stand up. It's not brave to take bold action if you run away and hide behind your mum while someone else takes the rap.
If Assange really wanted to stand up for his beliefs, wouldn't he go to the United States and ask to be imprisoned in Manning's place? Wouldn't he fly to Stockholm and denounce his accusers from the dock? Wouldn't he dare this US Grand Jury to just try it?
What better triumph - what greater chance at immortality - than to truly be unjustly punished for one's cause, to be sent down by a crooked judge for daring to challenge the corrupt regime?
Assange just doesn't want to face up to what he has done. He is happy to be the avenging hero of Wikileaks, just as long as he doesn't face any actual consequences for his actions.
He wants to conflate an embarrassing sex charge with a global conspiracy.
（彼はグローバルな陰謀とばつの悪いSEXの起訴を融合させたがっている）
And he angrily denies reports that Wikileaks' publication of confidential US cables has endangered America's informants - many of whom are really oppressed - in places such as Iraq and Afghanistan. So far, Assange makes an unconvincing martyr.
最後の文＝（今までのところ、アサージは納得のいかないマティア（犠牲）になっている）
