アヴェ・マリア・インマクラータ！
愛する兄弟姉妹の皆様、
聖イグナチオ・デ・ロヨラの祝日、おめでとうございます。
今年は、イエズス会の復興200周年です。イエズス会の復興を天主様に感謝します。
ブルボン家のポルトガル王、フランス王、スペイン王のたちにより追放され、ついには教皇によって41年間の不当な排斥を苦しんだイエズス会は、かえって非カトリックのプロイセン（非カトリックのフリードリヒ二世）とロシア（エカテリーナ二世）によって保護されます。
これらの国々は特別に祝福されたと思います。たとえばロシアはナポレオンに勝つことが出来ましたから。それに引き替え、イエズス会を圧迫し追放したフランス王はギロチンに終わり、同じくイエズス会を追放したスペインとポルトガルとはフランス革命の波に飲み込まれてしまいました。
イエズス会の廃止は、ウォレン・カロルが言うように、ちょうど夜中に鳴る火災警報器のようでした。人間の作った「黙示録」、つまり革命がやってくると言うことを知らせる前兆でした。
クレメンテ十四世は、フランス革命の16年前、すなわち1773年「ドミヌス・アク・レデンプトール」でイエズス会を廃止します。パリの大司教であったクリストフェール・ド・ボモン（Christopher de Beaumont）は、1774年4月24日付けで教皇クレメンテ十四世に抗議の手紙を書いています。
イエズス会はピオ七世によって復興します。1814年8月7日（本当は7月31日の予定でした）、教皇ピオ七世はローマのジェズ教会に行き、聖イグナチオの祭壇でミサを捧げ、その後、横にある「貴族のための小聖堂」(Capella dei Nobili, 今では Cappella della Assunta)に行き、大勅書「ソリチトゥード・オムニウム・エクレジアールム」を読み上げてイエズス会を全世界で復興させることを宣言しました。
すでにピオ七世は、ロシア帝国においてのイエズス会の存在を公認しており（1801年3月7日の「カトリチェ・フィデイ」）、両シチリア王国においても同様に公認していました（1804年7月30日の「ペル・アリアス」）。1814年の大勅令は、これを全世界に拡大させたものです。
ラテン語の原文はここにあります。Sollicitudo omnium Ecclesiarum
これはナポレオンのヨーロッパ征服という大混乱と、ナポレオンに敵対する戦争によってヨーロッパが大変革した後のことでした。
パリの大司教クリストフェール・ド・ボモン（Christopher de Beaumont）の、1774年4月24日付けで出した教皇クレメンテ十四世への手紙は次の通りです。
【出典】
The Jesuits, 1534-1921 A History of the Society of Jesus from Its Foundation to the Present Time
by Thomas J. Campbell
"This Brief is nothing else than a personal and private judgment. Among other things that are remarked in it by our clergy is the extraordinary, odious, and immoderate characterization of the Bull "Pascendi Munus" of the saintly Clement XIII, whose memory will be forever glorious and who had invested the Bull in question with all the due and proper formalities of such documents. It is described by the Brief not only as being inexact but as having been 'extorted' rather than obtained; whereas it has all the authority of a general council; for it was not promulgated until almost the whole clergy of the Church and all the secular princes had been consulted by the Holy Father. The clergy with common accord and with one voice applauded the purpose of the Holy Father, and earnestly begged him to carry it out. It was conceived and published in a manner as general as it was solemn. And is it not precisely that, Holy Father, which really gives the efficacity, the reality and the force to a general council, rather than the material union of some persons who though physically united may be very far from one another in their judgments and their views? As for the secular princes, if there were any who did not unite with the others to give their approbation, their number was inconsiderable. Not one of them protested against it, not one opposed it, and even those who, at that very time, were laying their plans to banish the Jesuits, allowed the Bull to be published in their dominions.
"But as the spirit of the Church is one and indivisible in its teaching of truth, we have to conclude that it cannot teach error when it deals in a solemn manner with a matter of supreme importance. Yet it would have led us into error if it had not only proclaimed the Institute of the Society to be pious and holy, but had solemnly and explicitly said: 'We know of certain knowledge that it diffuses abroad and abundantly the odor of sanctity.' In saying this it put upon that Institute the seal of its approbation, and confirmed anew not only the Society itself, but the members who composed it, the functions it exercised, the doctrines it taught, the glorious works it accomplished, all of which shed lustre upon it, in spite of the calumnies by which it was assailed and the storms of persecution which were let loose against it. Thus the Church would have deceived us most effectively on that occasion if it would now have us accept this Brief which destroys the Society; and also if we are to suppose that this Brief is on the same level in its lawfulness and its universality as the Constitution to which we refer. We abstract, Holy Father, from the individuals whom we might easily name, both secular and ecclesiastical who have meddled with this affair. Their character, condition, doctrine, sentiment, not to say more of them, are so little worthy of respect, as to justify us in expressing the formal and positive judgment that the Brief which destroys the Society of Jesus is nothing else than an isolated, private and pernicious judgment, which does no honor to the tiara and is prejudicial to the glory of the Church and the growth and conservation of the Orthodox Faith.
"In any case, Holy Father, it is impossible for me to ask the clergy to accept the Brief; for in the first place, I would not be listened to, were I unfortunate enough to lend the aid of my ministry to its acceptance. Moreover, I would dishonor my office if I did so, for the memory of the recent general assembly which I had the honor to convoke at the instance of His Majesty, to inquire into the need we have of the Society in France, its usefulness, the purity of its doctrines, etc., is too fresh in my mind to reverse my verdict. To charge myself with the task you wish me to perform would be to inflict a serious injury on religion as well as to cast an aspersion on the learning and integrity of the prelates who laid before the king their approval of the very points which are now condemned by the Brief. Moreover, if it is true that the Order is to be condemned under the specious pretext of the impossibility of peace, as long as the Society exists, why not try it on those bodies which are jealous of the Society? Instead of condemning it you ought to canonize it. That you do not do so compels us to form a judgment of the Brief which, though just, is not in its favor.
"For what is that peace which is incompatible with this Society? The question is startling in the reflection it evokes; for we fail to understand how such a motive had the power to induce Your Holiness to adopt a measure which is so hazardous, so dangerous, and so prejudicial. Most assuredly the peace which is irreconcilable with the existence of the Society is the peace which Jesus Christ calls insidious, false, deceitful. In a word what the Brief designates as peace is not peace; Pax, pax et non erat pax. It is the peace which vice and libertinism adopt; it is the peace which cannot ally itself with virtue, but which on the contrary has always been the principal enemy of virtue.
"It is precisely that peace against which the piety of the Jesuits in the four quarters of the world have declared an active, a vigorous, a bloody warfare; which they have carried to the limit and in which they have achieved the greatest success. To put an end to that peace, they have devoted their talents; have undergone pain and suffering. By their zeal and their eloquence they have striven to block every avenue of approach, by which this false peace might enter and rend the bosom of the Church; they have set the souls of men free from its thralldom, and they have pursued it to its innermost lair, making light of the danger and expecting no other reward for their daring, than the hatred of the licentious and the persecution of the ungodly.
"An infinite number of splendid illustrations of their courage might be adduced in the long succession of memorable achievements which have never been interrupted from the first moment of the Society's existence until the fatal day when the Church saw it die. If that peace cannot co-exist with the Society, and if the re-establishment of this pernicious peace is the motive of the destruction of the Jesuits, then the victims are crowned with glory and they end their career like the Apostles and Martyrs; but honest men are dismayed by this holocaust of piety and virtue.
"A peace which is irreconcilable with the Society is not that peace which unites hearts; which is helpful to others; which each day contributes an increase in virtue, piety and Christian charity; which reflects glory on Christianity and sheds splendor on our holy religion. Nor is there need of proving this, though proof might be given, not by a few examples which this Society could furnish from the day of its birth to the fatal and ever deplorable day of its suppression, but by a countless multitude of facts which attest that the Jesuits were always and in every clime, the supporters, the promoters and the indefatigable defenders of true and solid peace. These facts are so evident that they carry conviction to every mind.
"In this letter I am not constituting myself an apologist of the Jesuits; but I am placing before the eyes of Your Holiness the reasons which, in the present case, excuse us from obeying. I will not mention place or time, as it is an easy thing for Your Holiness to convince yourself of the truth of my utterance. Your Holiness is not ignorant of them.
"Moreover, Holy Father, we have remarked with terror, that this destructive Brief eulogizes in the highest way certain persons whose conduct never merited praise from Clement XIII, of saintly memory. Far from doing so, he regarded it always as his duty to set them aside, and to act in their regard with the most absolute reserve.
"This difference of appreciation necessarily excites attention, in view of the fact that your predecessor did not consider worthy of the purple those whom Your Holiness seems to design for the glory of the cardinalate. The firmness on one side and the connivance on the other reveal themselves only too clearly. But perhaps an excuse might be found for the latter, were it not for the fact which has not been successfully disguised that an alien influence guided the pen that wrote the Brief.
"In a word, most Holy Father, the clergy of France, which is the most learned and most illustrious of Holy Church, and which has no other aim than to promote the glory of the Church, does now judge after deep reflection that the reception of the Brief of Your Holiness will cast a shadow on the glory of the clergy of France; and it does not propose to consent to a measure which, in ages to come, will tarnish its glory. By rejecting the Brief and by an active resistance to it our clergy will transmit to posterity a splendid example of integrity and of zeal for the Catholic Faith, for the prosperity of the Church and particularly for the honor of its Visible Head.
"These, Holy Father, are some of the reasons which determine us, myself and all the clergy of this kingdom, never to permit the publication of such a Brief, and to make known to Your Holiness, as I do by this present letter, that such is my attitude and that of all the clergy, who, however, will never cease to unite in prayer with me to our Lord for the sacred person of Your Holiness. We shall address our humble supplications to the Divine Father of Light that He may deign to diffuse it so abundantly that the truth may be discerned whose splendor has been obscure."
●聖伝のミサ（いわゆる「トリエント・ミサ」と呼ばれているローマ式典礼様式のミサ）にようこそ！
●ローマ・カトリックの聖伝のミサ vs エキュメニカルな新しいミサ（第二バチカン公会議のミサ）
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
にほんブログ村のランキングです。クリックで応援して下さい
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
사랑하올 형제 자매 여러분,
한국성비오10세회(SSPX)
임시 웹 사이트를 소개합니다.
SSPX KOREA
毎年恒例の聖ピオ十世会公式秋田巡礼にご参加希望の方々は、聖ピオ十世会日本 秋田巡礼 SSPXJAPAN PILGRIMAGE TO AKITAなどを通してお申し込みください。
愛する兄弟姉妹の皆様、
聖イグナチオ・デ・ロヨラの祝日、おめでとうございます。
今年は、イエズス会の復興200周年です。イエズス会の復興を天主様に感謝します。
ブルボン家のポルトガル王、フランス王、スペイン王のたちにより追放され、ついには教皇によって41年間の不当な排斥を苦しんだイエズス会は、かえって非カトリックのプロイセン（非カトリックのフリードリヒ二世）とロシア（エカテリーナ二世）によって保護されます。
これらの国々は特別に祝福されたと思います。たとえばロシアはナポレオンに勝つことが出来ましたから。それに引き替え、イエズス会を圧迫し追放したフランス王はギロチンに終わり、同じくイエズス会を追放したスペインとポルトガルとはフランス革命の波に飲み込まれてしまいました。
イエズス会の廃止は、ウォレン・カロルが言うように、ちょうど夜中に鳴る火災警報器のようでした。人間の作った「黙示録」、つまり革命がやってくると言うことを知らせる前兆でした。
クレメンテ十四世は、フランス革命の16年前、すなわち1773年「ドミヌス・アク・レデンプトール」でイエズス会を廃止します。パリの大司教であったクリストフェール・ド・ボモン（Christopher de Beaumont）は、1774年4月24日付けで教皇クレメンテ十四世に抗議の手紙を書いています。
イエズス会はピオ七世によって復興します。1814年8月7日（本当は7月31日の予定でした）、教皇ピオ七世はローマのジェズ教会に行き、聖イグナチオの祭壇でミサを捧げ、その後、横にある「貴族のための小聖堂」(Capella dei Nobili, 今では Cappella della Assunta)に行き、大勅書「ソリチトゥード・オムニウム・エクレジアールム」を読み上げてイエズス会を全世界で復興させることを宣言しました。
すでにピオ七世は、ロシア帝国においてのイエズス会の存在を公認しており（1801年3月7日の「カトリチェ・フィデイ」）、両シチリア王国においても同様に公認していました（1804年7月30日の「ペル・アリアス」）。1814年の大勅令は、これを全世界に拡大させたものです。
ラテン語の原文はここにあります。Sollicitudo omnium Ecclesiarum
これはナポレオンのヨーロッパ征服という大混乱と、ナポレオンに敵対する戦争によってヨーロッパが大変革した後のことでした。
パリの大司教クリストフェール・ド・ボモン（Christopher de Beaumont）の、1774年4月24日付けで出した教皇クレメンテ十四世への手紙は次の通りです。
【出典】
The Jesuits, 1534-1921 A History of the Society of Jesus from Its Foundation to the Present Time
by Thomas J. Campbell
"This Brief is nothing else than a personal and private judgment. Among other things that are remarked in it by our clergy is the extraordinary, odious, and immoderate characterization of the Bull "Pascendi Munus" of the saintly Clement XIII, whose memory will be forever glorious and who had invested the Bull in question with all the due and proper formalities of such documents. It is described by the Brief not only as being inexact but as having been 'extorted' rather than obtained; whereas it has all the authority of a general council; for it was not promulgated until almost the whole clergy of the Church and all the secular princes had been consulted by the Holy Father. The clergy with common accord and with one voice applauded the purpose of the Holy Father, and earnestly begged him to carry it out. It was conceived and published in a manner as general as it was solemn. And is it not precisely that, Holy Father, which really gives the efficacity, the reality and the force to a general council, rather than the material union of some persons who though physically united may be very far from one another in their judgments and their views? As for the secular princes, if there were any who did not unite with the others to give their approbation, their number was inconsiderable. Not one of them protested against it, not one opposed it, and even those who, at that very time, were laying their plans to banish the Jesuits, allowed the Bull to be published in their dominions.
"But as the spirit of the Church is one and indivisible in its teaching of truth, we have to conclude that it cannot teach error when it deals in a solemn manner with a matter of supreme importance. Yet it would have led us into error if it had not only proclaimed the Institute of the Society to be pious and holy, but had solemnly and explicitly said: 'We know of certain knowledge that it diffuses abroad and abundantly the odor of sanctity.' In saying this it put upon that Institute the seal of its approbation, and confirmed anew not only the Society itself, but the members who composed it, the functions it exercised, the doctrines it taught, the glorious works it accomplished, all of which shed lustre upon it, in spite of the calumnies by which it was assailed and the storms of persecution which were let loose against it. Thus the Church would have deceived us most effectively on that occasion if it would now have us accept this Brief which destroys the Society; and also if we are to suppose that this Brief is on the same level in its lawfulness and its universality as the Constitution to which we refer. We abstract, Holy Father, from the individuals whom we might easily name, both secular and ecclesiastical who have meddled with this affair. Their character, condition, doctrine, sentiment, not to say more of them, are so little worthy of respect, as to justify us in expressing the formal and positive judgment that the Brief which destroys the Society of Jesus is nothing else than an isolated, private and pernicious judgment, which does no honor to the tiara and is prejudicial to the glory of the Church and the growth and conservation of the Orthodox Faith.
"In any case, Holy Father, it is impossible for me to ask the clergy to accept the Brief; for in the first place, I would not be listened to, were I unfortunate enough to lend the aid of my ministry to its acceptance. Moreover, I would dishonor my office if I did so, for the memory of the recent general assembly which I had the honor to convoke at the instance of His Majesty, to inquire into the need we have of the Society in France, its usefulness, the purity of its doctrines, etc., is too fresh in my mind to reverse my verdict. To charge myself with the task you wish me to perform would be to inflict a serious injury on religion as well as to cast an aspersion on the learning and integrity of the prelates who laid before the king their approval of the very points which are now condemned by the Brief. Moreover, if it is true that the Order is to be condemned under the specious pretext of the impossibility of peace, as long as the Society exists, why not try it on those bodies which are jealous of the Society? Instead of condemning it you ought to canonize it. That you do not do so compels us to form a judgment of the Brief which, though just, is not in its favor.
"For what is that peace which is incompatible with this Society? The question is startling in the reflection it evokes; for we fail to understand how such a motive had the power to induce Your Holiness to adopt a measure which is so hazardous, so dangerous, and so prejudicial. Most assuredly the peace which is irreconcilable with the existence of the Society is the peace which Jesus Christ calls insidious, false, deceitful. In a word what the Brief designates as peace is not peace; Pax, pax et non erat pax. It is the peace which vice and libertinism adopt; it is the peace which cannot ally itself with virtue, but which on the contrary has always been the principal enemy of virtue.
"It is precisely that peace against which the piety of the Jesuits in the four quarters of the world have declared an active, a vigorous, a bloody warfare; which they have carried to the limit and in which they have achieved the greatest success. To put an end to that peace, they have devoted their talents; have undergone pain and suffering. By their zeal and their eloquence they have striven to block every avenue of approach, by which this false peace might enter and rend the bosom of the Church; they have set the souls of men free from its thralldom, and they have pursued it to its innermost lair, making light of the danger and expecting no other reward for their daring, than the hatred of the licentious and the persecution of the ungodly.
"An infinite number of splendid illustrations of their courage might be adduced in the long succession of memorable achievements which have never been interrupted from the first moment of the Society's existence until the fatal day when the Church saw it die. If that peace cannot co-exist with the Society, and if the re-establishment of this pernicious peace is the motive of the destruction of the Jesuits, then the victims are crowned with glory and they end their career like the Apostles and Martyrs; but honest men are dismayed by this holocaust of piety and virtue.
"A peace which is irreconcilable with the Society is not that peace which unites hearts; which is helpful to others; which each day contributes an increase in virtue, piety and Christian charity; which reflects glory on Christianity and sheds splendor on our holy religion. Nor is there need of proving this, though proof might be given, not by a few examples which this Society could furnish from the day of its birth to the fatal and ever deplorable day of its suppression, but by a countless multitude of facts which attest that the Jesuits were always and in every clime, the supporters, the promoters and the indefatigable defenders of true and solid peace. These facts are so evident that they carry conviction to every mind.
"In this letter I am not constituting myself an apologist of the Jesuits; but I am placing before the eyes of Your Holiness the reasons which, in the present case, excuse us from obeying. I will not mention place or time, as it is an easy thing for Your Holiness to convince yourself of the truth of my utterance. Your Holiness is not ignorant of them.
"Moreover, Holy Father, we have remarked with terror, that this destructive Brief eulogizes in the highest way certain persons whose conduct never merited praise from Clement XIII, of saintly memory. Far from doing so, he regarded it always as his duty to set them aside, and to act in their regard with the most absolute reserve.
"This difference of appreciation necessarily excites attention, in view of the fact that your predecessor did not consider worthy of the purple those whom Your Holiness seems to design for the glory of the cardinalate. The firmness on one side and the connivance on the other reveal themselves only too clearly. But perhaps an excuse might be found for the latter, were it not for the fact which has not been successfully disguised that an alien influence guided the pen that wrote the Brief.
"In a word, most Holy Father, the clergy of France, which is the most learned and most illustrious of Holy Church, and which has no other aim than to promote the glory of the Church, does now judge after deep reflection that the reception of the Brief of Your Holiness will cast a shadow on the glory of the clergy of France; and it does not propose to consent to a measure which, in ages to come, will tarnish its glory. By rejecting the Brief and by an active resistance to it our clergy will transmit to posterity a splendid example of integrity and of zeal for the Catholic Faith, for the prosperity of the Church and particularly for the honor of its Visible Head.
"These, Holy Father, are some of the reasons which determine us, myself and all the clergy of this kingdom, never to permit the publication of such a Brief, and to make known to Your Holiness, as I do by this present letter, that such is my attitude and that of all the clergy, who, however, will never cease to unite in prayer with me to our Lord for the sacred person of Your Holiness. We shall address our humble supplications to the Divine Father of Light that He may deign to diffuse it so abundantly that the truth may be discerned whose splendor has been obscure."
●聖伝のミサ（いわゆる「トリエント・ミサ」と呼ばれているローマ式典礼様式のミサ）にようこそ！
●ローマ・カトリックの聖伝のミサ vs エキュメニカルな新しいミサ（第二バチカン公会議のミサ）
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
にほんブログ村のランキングです。クリックで応援して下さい
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
사랑하올 형제 자매 여러분,
한국성비오10세회(SSPX)
임시 웹 사이트를 소개합니다.
SSPX KOREA
毎年恒例の聖ピオ十世会公式秋田巡礼にご参加希望の方々は、聖ピオ十世会日本 秋田巡礼 SSPXJAPAN PILGRIMAGE TO AKITAなどを通してお申し込みください。
